Suggestion talk:20090530 New Barricade Rules
Developing Suggestions Discussion
No. Survivors should never be more efficient at tearing down barricades than zombies. -- Cheese 20:55, 28 May 2009 (BST)
BALLS. --Midianian¦T¦DS¦SP¦ 21:45, 28 May 2009 (BST)
Hey look, the trolly troll is back! Did you find your balls yet? --Bob Boberton TF / DW 23:21, 28 May 2009 (BST)
Is this just for survivors, or does it change zombie rates for bashing 'cades as well? If it's both, it might be worth a try.--Necrofeelinya 00:40, 29 May 2009 (BST)
- Yep, this would effect ALL attacks against cades. Cept for Knives, Guns, and Teeth which still would not work at all.--Zombie Lord 05:21, 29 May 2009 (BST)
- Sure, why not? It's worth a try as far as I'm concerned.--Necrofeelinya 00:53, 30 May 2009 (BST)
Do not feed the zerging troll. -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 06:48, 29 May 2009 (BST)
- Hurmh. I just don't think you can mess with 'cades without seriously f'ing up the balance. Also, it seems like the hit % would be higher when the cades are higher and there's more stuff to bash. By this system it's more logical that you would miss at light barricades a bunch and how obnoxious is that? --GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 07:11, 29 May 2009 (BST)
- Or you could just assume that the cades are weaker at lower levels and easier to knock down.--Zombie Lord 07:33, 29 May 2009 (BST)
What's this have to do with a zombie apocalypse? I don't even see ZOMBIES in the suggestion? Just a guy with a nard fetish.--Pesatyel 01:47, 30 May 2009 (BST)
- Don't be a fool, Pest. ZOMBIES get to tear down cades with this table too. Why are people so afraid of a real ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE? UD isn't even a game right now. Like a glorified social network for BALL-LESS survivors and some zombie groups that can't do anything unless they get 200 SHEEP together and their leaders can play "little fascist" of the intardwebz. COME ON, LETS HAVE A REAL GAME FOR ONCE!--Zombie Lord 03:21, 30 May 2009 (BST)
NOTE:
Zombie Lord illustrates that it is his opinion that anyone who doesn't vote "yes" is a "pussy". This shows that if he did not vote "yes", he acknowledges that he is a "pussy". Whereas no-one else agrees with this, their votes do not constitute them being "pussy"s. Now, to look at his vote. Hmm, he appears to have voted "Keep" not "yes". So, according to Zombie Lord, he's a "pussy".--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 12:00, 31 May 2009 (BST)
