Suggestions/14th-Feb-2007
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Closed Suggestions
- These suggestions are now closed. No more voting or editing is to be done to them.
- Suggestions with a rational Vote tally of 2/3 Keeps over total of Keeps, Kills, and Spams will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page by a moderator, unless the original author has re-suggested the Suggestion.
- Suggestions under the 2/3 proportion but with more or equal Keeps to Kills ration will be moved to the Undecided Suggestions page.
- All other Suggestions will be moved to either the Peer Rejected Suggestions page or the Humorous Suggestions page.
- Some suggestions may not be moved in a timely manner; moving Suggestions to Peer Reviewed Suggestions page will take higest priority.
- Again, DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM. It will be used as a historical record and will eventually be locked.
Contacts Top Of Healing Menu
Timestamp: | Cap'n Silly T/W/P/C 06:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC) |
Type: | Interface change |
Scope: | People who don't want to scroll down 1000 names to heal someone. |
Description: | Today at Whippey, I saw a contact on low health. I tried to heal them, but had to dig through 200 trenchcoater names first. What I'm suggesting is that contacts are put at the top of the "use medkit on" drop down menu, saving people an annoying search for one name. |
Keep Votes
- Keep This is probably a dupe of something, :P --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/C 06:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep well, since I'm that contact, i cant say no to this--♠ Che ♠-T GC X 08:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Although you can search the list by typing in the first few letters of the name you're after (at least on my browser) -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 11:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Yes, it may be a dupe, but meh... --Abi79 AB 11:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I like this. :D -- TheDavibob LLL 11:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes! Put them in alphabet order as well. You might not know how many of your contacts are in the same place. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 12:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I like the idea... but probably better off in Alphbetical order but with contacts highlighted in the colour you chose from your contact list so they stand out.. but still nice idea. --Matt 15:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Sure, sounds fine. -- 16:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I don't see why not. -Nibiletz 18:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep athough useing the keyboard if just as easy like funt said i guess this is a good change if your in a smaller highly coordinated group and have the wwhole group on your conttacts. --Mazu 00:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Would help a bit... -Certified=Insane☭ 04:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - This would be nice to have, especially like you said when you have to dig through about 200 names to find them. --Darkvengance 19:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - This is a lazy survivors dream, and I am a lazy survivor. --Doc Garden 05:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Kill Votes
- Kill - alphabetical makes more sense (and should be easy to code). By the way, when you've activated the drop-down list, you can just type in the first letter of the name of the person you're looking for - it'll take you straight to the first match it finds - repeatedly hitting the letter you're after will cycle through them in the list. Dead easy. --Funt Solo 14:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - As per Funt Solo. --Saluton 17:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - I rather prefer the whole "who got here last?" system. Why not just colour contacts instead? --Jay Clarke 17:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - I like the way it is now. I do agree with Jay Clarke though, contacts should be color coded, but I'm not sure how to set the text color in a drop down list without creating a custom control. --Gm0n3y 18:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Re - Interesting thing: There's a suggestion right now about colour-coding contacts in the drop-downs, including an example of a site using it. --Jay Clarke 11:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - I was gonna vote keep but I would rather have Funt's and Jay's changes. --Deras 21:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - I ain't always gona heal my buddies now, am I?--Ducis DuxSlothTalk 22:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - I like the way it is now so you can kind of tell who has not moved in a long time and who just walked in. --genie in a bottle ♥ - zone 06:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Spam/Dupe Votes
Spam/Dupe Votes here
Crucifix Flavor! (Please..Don't kill me..)
Removed by author because he was too stupid to check for dupiness. -Nibiletz 21:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC) }}
Look Outside
Timestamp: | Preasure 20:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC) |
Type: | New feature |
Scope: | Survivors in tall buildings |
Description: | With the use of binoculars, survivors can look out from tall buildings to see who is outside adjacent ones. However, they can't look out directly ont the building they're standing on, even though it is clearly tall enough to see in other direction.
'Look outside' would be a 1AP action avaliable to all survivors in tall buildings (those that binoculars can be used from). when used, the player would see a brief overview of who is outside, as with binoculars. (X zombies, X survivors) By looking outside, survivors would better be able to make descisions about barricading of the building, and what they could do with their AP. |
Keep Votes
- Why not... -Certified=Insane☭ 04:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Kill Votes
- Kill- No x-ray vision.--Grigori 20:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Re - So what are binoculars then? --Preasure 20:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - I think you've missed the point - binoculars can't see outside the building you're in precisely so that they wouldn't be guilty of X-Ray Vision. Tis a game balancing device. Do not fuck with it. It would be rude. --Funt Solo 21:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - As Funt, but less fucky :P --Deras 21:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - As Funt. I could get into the logical reasons as to why this wouldn't work, but that would require me to get into my explanation for why survivors can't shoot zombies from the rooftop and how free running can logically make sense (most of the theories out there have huge holes in them). You don't want to hear all that, do you? --Reaper with no name TJ! 22:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - Yeah, don't screw with the current game mechanics unless you have a very good reason. This, my friend, is one that is not. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 22:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - It is almost just as easy to leave the building and look outside for yourself. -- 00:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - Study the background purpose of something before you propose to change it. Because you didn't you got lectured by Funt. --Matthew Fahrenheit YRC☺T☺+1 02:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Funt said it all. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 12:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Spam/Dupe Votes
Spam/Dupe Votes here