Talk:Suggestions/20th-Nov-2006

Malton Airport

1. Spam - SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 00:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
   • RE - You see, That's what I like about you Sonny. You always give such well thought out reasons behind your votes.--Labine50 ^MH|^ME|^P 01:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

     So many times new building ideas are shot down. Why? Because they suck. We don't need new buildings. No new items. No new places to find items. We need to deal with barricades. Barricades were good when malls had at most 50 people defending them. Now you have on average 400-600. No need for that amount of barricade levels. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 01:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

     Wait, What? One building has no doors, and another can't be above VS, and I'm not sure if your aware, but this over-laps a PD with a next to useless building.--Labine50 ^MH|^ME|^P 01:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

     We don't need it though. We don't need to add anything. We need to fix what is broken. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 01:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

     You are like the king of clarity. What do you mean by that?--Labine50 ^MH|^ME|^P 01:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

     I mean is the game fucking broken without a shitty Airport? Is it? Huh? No it isn't. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 01:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

     That isn't a really good reason to vote spam. It's not like Kevan is going to make one more update then stop updating the game.--Labine50 ^MH|^ME|^P 01:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

   Yes it is. This suggestion doesn't need to exist. It's a waste. The game isn't broken and adding anymore survivor based updates will throw this game into Survivor Apocalypse + 1 or 2 zombies. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 01:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

   Are you listening to yuorself? Your saying that a 3x4 area of buildings, most useless, one there purely for flavor, will break the game off in Nixbank and Roywood. You might as well start saying that the zoo is breaking the game. I'm done talking to you. Your obviously voting spam for the sake of voting spam.--Labine50 ^MH|^ME|^P 01:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

   I'm not saying this will break the game. I'm saying it's worthless. I'm also saying that because everyone is making pro-survivor suggestions that the game will be even more broken. --Sonny Corleone ^{RRF CRF DORIS Hunt!} 02:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

   It's not needed. My GOD! Is that the best you can come up with? As said many times below, by your logic, that means that almost every single suggestion on that page should get a spam vote.--Labine50 ^MH|^ME|^P 01:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

That's the arsiest reason for a spam vote I think I've ever seen. If you want to change the barricade rules, make a barricade-changing suggestion. By your "logic", you should vote Spam on every single suggestion that doesn't change barricades in exactly the way you want it to. Arsholus Maximus. --Funt Solo 10:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Seconded. Just because a suggestion isn't needed (which can be said of at least half the stuff already in the game) or doesn't affect the issue you believe to be broken (and for the record, I agree that barricades are far too powerful), doesn't make the suggestion worthless. --Reaper with no name ^TJ! 16:08, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Thirded, as per Funt and Reaper. What do you want, Sonny - a game that's as boring as possible? If so, why don't you go ask Kevan to make the one-day fog a permanent thing? (In all seriousness, though, I'd rather see more flavor and location alterations in the game than I'd like to see more skills and items. I think that having an airport, expanding the area of play, added game flavor, or - preferably - all three would be better than Yet Another Zombie/Survivor/Cross-Class Skill right now. Not that I won't vote Keep on good skill/item suggestions - I'd just rather see some strategic/flavor changes made before implementing more skills.) --Sgt. John Taggart^{UNIT 11/5 WCDZ} 18:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Fourthed, as per funt, reaper, and taggart. Many suggestions that would have been shot down by your constricted approach to suggestions have been implemented into the game without breaking it, eg binoculars. Many binocular suggestions were shot down "ZOMG X-RAY ZOMG WUAAAAAAAAH?", and then they were implemented without a hitch. --BBM 18:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

---