UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Vantar/2007-03-07 Promotion

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Administration » Sysop Archives » Vantar » 2007-03-07 Promotion


Browse the Sysop Archives
Bureaucrat Promotions | Demotions | Misconduct (TBD) | Promotions | Re-Evaluations
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019

This page is an archive of Vantar's Promotions candidacy. If you wish to speak with this candidate, please use their Talk page. If you believe that the candidate has abused the abilities and privileges granted them by this promotion, please report them for misconduct.

Vantar

Over 4 months on the wiki, with 2500 edits. He's almost singlehandedly reduced the uncategorised pages from 1500 to under 10, has been active in the admin area of the wiki and has created a number of locations pages (including grouped pages). Shows good judgment, and an even temper. A good candidate for wiki maintenance -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 02:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the nomination I am honored and I will gladly accept it. Vantar 14:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - He moves scary fast. This vouch is dependent, of course, on Vantar's acceptance of the nomination. --Barbecue Barbecue 02:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - I have some issues havin such a good contributor being promoted to mod. Since most of the times a user simply stop doing whatever positive he was doing before becomming a mod and just get into the utter madness of wikidrama. Anyway, if this user wishes to become a mod, i'll give him my vouch, but my advice to him is to refuse this and keep the good work. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    You have a good point, and it's sort of why I decided to nominate Vantar (and Zombie Slay3er below). I've found that I've almost slowed to a stop on the locations pages I used to be doing, because whenever I get the time/motivation to do something productive around here, there's always an admin queue somewhere that I know is waiting for attention. I figure that a few more sysops who arn't put off by long "to do lists" would lighten the load, allowing all to get on with their own projects -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 02:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    Hagnat, what drama? The wiki's been pretty quiet lately, wouldn't you say? The drama's over, so you can put that gun back in the holster. --Hubrid Nox Sys WTF U! B! 07:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    i am pleased to say that yes, things are pretty quiet lately... but that doesnt change the fact that this wiki attracts a lot of drama, and when they hit, they hit hard. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 12:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    I really don't think that's a good argument against promoting people who deserve it. We've got plenty of sysops who manage to stay out of all of that (I'm attempting to make a bit of a reform in that direction, actually). It's a question of personality, not position. --Hubrid Nox Sys WTF U! B! 12:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    well, i did said that if he wants to run for admin, that i'll vouch him... --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 13:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    I know, but there's no reason to go and try to dissuade him. --Hubrid Nox Sys WTF U! B! 13:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Abstain - Both him and Zombie Slay3r, along with some other background wiki contributors, are a kinda weird decission for me to make. While Boxy was a clear choice to me, as I had an idea of how he was, I don't have a good idea of how these guys are apart from that they're hard working wiki users. I would like Vantar to introduce himself, and unless it's a really negative introduction, I would vouch for him. --Matthew Fahrenheit YRCT+1 06:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    In that case I'll try my best to keep my introduction positive, I started playing Urban Dead at some point around September 2005 and started working on the wiki in October 2006. Most of my early work was done on my group's page but after I noticed the number of pages on Special:Uncategorizedpages, I started a small war with this page. Working on categorizing all the pages on the wiki gave me a chance to learn more about templates and tables. I'm still working on categorizing pages but I've also been working on maintaining Wiki Questions and and I've started to mess around with locations pages, I have yet to figure out what my next big project will be but I'm thinking about either going through the existing categories and making sure everything is in the right place or making pages for every location listed on Special:Wantedpages. Vantar 15:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    Vouch then =D. --Matthew Fahrenheit YRCT+1 21:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - Excellent worker, and has always been a nice guy. Two thumbs up! --Hubrid Nox Sys WTF U! B! 07:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - with wheels ;D--Gage 09:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Third Vouch Received at 09:09, 7 March 2007. --Hubrid Nox Sys WTF U! B! 09:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Abstain - Not to be mean, ridding this wiki of uncategorized pages is all well and good but what other contributions have you made to the wiki apart from special pages. Is there a specifi reason you want to become a sysop? Just need to know before I give a thumbs up or down. Pillsy FT 15:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Vouch - Thumbs up, sounds good enough for me. Pillsy FT 22:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
In addition to mass categorization I have made a few templates {although they were mostly for use in categorization), I've made pages for nearly ever square in Peppardville and I've have helped out on the Wiki Questions page. I would like to become a sysop so that I could help out on the wiki in ways that a normal user can't, such as helping clear the Move Request or Speedy Delete queues but a majority of my work has been and will continue to be with the special pages, mostly Uncategorized, Broken/Double Redirect, and Wanted pages. Vantar 21:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - Never heard of this guy, and had to look into his record on the nom and vouches to really see what's up. He does good work and doesn't make issues into explosive wars. We need more like him.--The Envoy 22:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - Vantar has done an immense amount of work around the wiki and is quite calm and level-headed. --ZombieSlay3rSig.png 22:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - The work he has done would make me puke, but Vantar steps up to the challenge and keeps his breakfast in. --Cap'n Silly T/W/P/CAussieflag.JPG 23:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - Alright... your edit history and almost non-existence in the public areas has a vouch from me. Just continue with what you are doing, and stay out of any issues that may arise between users. Palm it off to someone else to keep your hands clean. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 12:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - Everyone above me said it all. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 15:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - Yeah, I have to agree with Axe Hack. --Kamden 16:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 22:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - You really deserve this. Your categorizations are great. I can see you going far. and thanks for {{vandaldatanav}} too. --Darth Sensitive Talk W! 23:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch As Envoy. --Karloth Vois RR 11:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch-Don't really know this user very well, but his lack of public or political dealings combined with his long list of maintenance make him a seemingly ideal candidate. --Reaper with no name TJ! 16:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - Categorically a superhero! --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 18:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - I was a bit skeptical of Vantar when I first saw his in-game work, his safehouse proposals were original though. I've reviewed some of his Wiki work, and he seems fairly solid.--Headless gunner W! 15:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - aye. --Funt Solo Scotland flag.JPG 18:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Vouch - I logged on a few days ago, and looked at my watchlist. Every edit on there was Vantar categorizing. Nice to see that instead of drama. --CaptainM 03:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Diligent and without drama. He would make a good sysop.--Vista 09:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)