UDWiki:Administration/Move Requests/Archive/Oct 2010: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
:Meh, just add a note to the top of the group page, ''did you mean the event?'' etc. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:12, 11 October 2010 (BST)
:Meh, just add a note to the top of the group page, ''did you mean the event?'' etc. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:12, 11 October 2010 (BST)
::I could get behind that. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:16, 11 October 2010 (BST)
::I could get behind that. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:16, 11 October 2010 (BST)
:::Added a tiny sentence to the top of the page. Look good? Would also appreciate people on other browsers checking it hasn't gone weird.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 19:20, 11 October 2010 (BST)
:Personally, I'd leave it the way it is. Groups have control of their namespace, and while the group may be inactive, I'm not inclined to bump them from their namespace without there being another group trying to make a claim to the name (and even then, I'd be a bit hesitant). Plus, as far as I know, it's a one-time event, and not something that would need a long-term presence such as a disambiguation page. In a month, it'd make very little sense to have that disambiguation page, since both of the items it'd link to would be inactive/done and the need for disambiguation would be gone. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:16, 11 October 2010 (BST)
:Personally, I'd leave it the way it is. Groups have control of their namespace, and while the group may be inactive, I'm not inclined to bump them from their namespace without there being another group trying to make a claim to the name (and even then, I'd be a bit hesitant). Plus, as far as I know, it's a one-time event, and not something that would need a long-term presence such as a disambiguation page. In a month, it'd make very little sense to have that disambiguation page, since both of the items it'd link to would be inactive/done and the need for disambiguation would be gone. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:16, 11 October 2010 (BST)



Revision as of 18:20, 11 October 2010

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for the requesting of page moves by normal users. The average user's ability to move pages has been rescinded due to frequent abuse by vandals; as such, users will need to submit requests (similar in nature to those on Speedy Deletions and Protections) for pages to be moved by a sysop.

Guidelines for requesting a Page Move

Copy the template below (Or just type it), replace the text in red with the relevant details, and paste the template under the Move Request Queue heading. A day after a sysop has taken action on the request, move requests should be moved to the Archive.

===[[PAGENAME]]===
*[[MOVE TO HERE]]
*~~~~

Move Request Queue

Red October

More of a "should we move this" than "do move this" - I'm thinking the group should be moved to Red October (Group), and the original page made a disambiguation for the group and the event, given that the group's marked inactive and the event's more pressing at the moment (and has various connected pages which could do with listing too, I guess). Opinions? We're coming to get you, Barbara 19:10, 11 October 2010 (BST)

Meh, just add a note to the top of the group page, did you mean the event? etc. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:12, 11 October 2010 (BST)
I could get behind that. Aichon 19:16, 11 October 2010 (BST)
Added a tiny sentence to the top of the page. Look good? Would also appreciate people on other browsers checking it hasn't gone weird.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:20, 11 October 2010 (BST)
Personally, I'd leave it the way it is. Groups have control of their namespace, and while the group may be inactive, I'm not inclined to bump them from their namespace without there being another group trying to make a claim to the name (and even then, I'd be a bit hesitant). Plus, as far as I know, it's a one-time event, and not something that would need a long-term presence such as a disambiguation page. In a month, it'd make very little sense to have that disambiguation page, since both of the items it'd link to would be inactive/done and the need for disambiguation would be gone. Aichon 19:16, 11 October 2010 (BST)

Recent Actions

User:Axe Hack/Game

To User:Axe Hack/Game/RN 0. But leave the talk page where it is, please. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 06:10, 7 October 2010 (BST)

Done.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:13, 9 October 2010 (BST)

User:Axe_Hack/User:Axe_Hack/Game/RN_0_Look

To User:Axe_Hack/Game/RN_0_Look. The mistake is blatantly obvious... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 05:46, 7 October 2010 (BST)

Done. Aichon 05:55, 7 October 2010 (BST)

Talismen

Misplaced user page created by User:Talismen. Probably move it to the User:Talismen page, as it is currently empty. Red Eyes-Dezonus-Red Eyes (talk) 23:50, 1 October 2010 (BST)

Moved by DDR hours ago. Aichon 07:51, 2 October 2010 (BST)