Suggestion:20080827 Tackle: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Voting Section) |
m (Protected "Suggestion:20080827 Tackle": A/G#Scheduled_Protections [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Spam|1|1|9}} | |||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
{{Suggestion Navigation}} | {{Suggestion Navigation}} | ||
| Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
#'''Spam''' - as above. --<span style="font-size:90%">[[User:Funt Solo|Funt Solo]]</span> <sup style="font-size:70%">[[Mod_Conspiracy|QT]]</sup> [[Image:Scotland flag.JPG|18px]] 04:11, 28 August 2008 (BST) | #'''Spam''' - as above. --<span style="font-size:90%">[[User:Funt Solo|Funt Solo]]</span> <sup style="font-size:70%">[[Mod_Conspiracy|QT]]</sup> [[Image:Scotland flag.JPG|18px]] 04:11, 28 August 2008 (BST) | ||
#'''Spam''' Spamtastic!--{{:User:Airborne88/sig}} 05:04, 28 August 2008 (BST) | #'''Spam''' Spamtastic!--{{:User:Airborne88/sig}} 05:04, 28 August 2008 (BST) | ||
#'''Spam''' From 0:30 to 0:34 of [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQlpDiXPZHQ this] for justification. --{{User:Galaxy125}}06:32, 28 August 2008 (BST) | #'''Spam''' From 0:30 to 0:34 of [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQlpDiXPZHQ this] for justification. --{{User:Galaxy125/Sig}}06:32, 28 August 2008 (BST) | ||
#'''Spam''' Because has this been officially spaminated? No template. Nothing. I found it via Recent Changes... Strike this if it's done, NP ... --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:36, 28 August 2008 (BST) Ok, moved out of current day's. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 06:39, 28 August 2008 (BST) | |||
---- | |||
[[ | |||
Latest revision as of 04:32, 30 August 2008
|
Spam! |
| This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 1 keep, 1 kill, and 9 spam votes. |
20080827 Tackle
Igpeno 18:35, 27 August 2008 (BST)
Suggestion type
New Skill
Suggestion scope
Zombies
Suggestion description
Tackle would be a new skill under Vigour Mortis.
With this skill a zombie can tackle it's target and possibly knock it down. The attack would have a 40% chance to hit and would do 1 damage, if this attack is successfully landed then there is a further 30% chance of the target being knocked down. The victim of this attack would get a message reading, "A zombie attacked you for 1 damage. You lost your footing and fell.".
A player on the ground would not be able to make another action until they get up for 2 AP, the only actions not affected by this are speaking and ranged attacks, though the latter suffer from -5% accuracy until the player stands up.
Voting Section
| Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user. |
| The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Keep Votes
- Keep Author Keep Igpeno 18:36, 27 August 2008 (BST)
Kill Votes
- Kill - A single zombie gains a HUGE advantage over humans. Totally unfair to a logged out survivor/one with low AP. It may not kill you instantly, but it immobilizes you unfairly.--SirArgo Talk 19:27, 27 August 2008 (BST)
Spam/Dupe Votes
- No Auto-Kills - Ever. -- Cheese 19:06, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- Kill - If you'd bothered to run this through Talk:Suggestions first, then you'd have found out how broken this idea was before you started gumming up the system with it. I'd spam this so fast my keyboard would glow, but that's not my style. Techercizer (Food) (TSoE) 20:01, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- Krazy nailed it. So I'll AutoSpam this. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 20:25, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- Spam - While Zombies could use something to reply to headshot, this isn't it.--Janine 20:45, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- Spam - So what, then the zombie can't attack? or can attack? does the 2 ap carry over to the 10 ap after death? Did you even think about this? - tylerisfat 20:49, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- Spam - as above. --Funt Solo QT
04:11, 28 August 2008 (BST) - Spam Spamtastic!--Airborne88
T|Z.Quiz|PSS 05:04, 28 August 2008 (BST) - Spam From 0:30 to 0:34 of this for justification. -- Galaxy125 06:32, 28 August 2008 (BST)
- Spam Because has this been officially spaminated? No template. Nothing. I found it via Recent Changes... Strike this if it's done, NP ... --WanYao 06:36, 28 August 2008 (BST) Ok, moved out of current day's. --WanYao 06:39, 28 August 2008 (BST)
