UDWiki:Administration/Demotions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(707 intermediate revisions by 46 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{shortcut|[[A/DM]]}}
{{shortcut|[[A/DM]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{{TOCright}}
{{TOCright}}


Line 8: Line 8:
===Request===
===Request===
System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.
System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.
*'''Reason for demotion''' - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through promotions page again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
*'''Reason for demotion''' - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through the promotion process again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
*'''Effects of demotion''' - Demotions may necessitate additional action, such as in the case of a Bureaucrat being demoted, which triggers an immediate by-election to fill their seat for the remainder of [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Re-Evaluating Re-Evaluations and Other Sysopness|their term]].


After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Demotions/Archive|archive]].
After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator or deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives|archive]].


===Inactivity===
===Inactivity===
Line 22: Line 23:
*If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.
*If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.


==Requests for demotion still needing to be processed==
==Demotions in process==
 
<!--
===[[User:Linkthewindow]]===
''There are no active demotions.''
I've become less interested in this place lately and have gone pretty much inactive over the past couple of weeks. In the interests of not having a 'crat who isn't active enough in the community to really make appropriate judgments on A/RE and A/PM, I would like to step down from 'crat now. I'll stay on as a sysop for now (as I want to get the guides namespace fixed in my time,) and it's also obvious that inactive sysops aren't as bad as inactive crats.
-->
 
''There are no active demotions.''
I also apologize to the community for making them have two 'crat bids in (roughly) a month. I thought about leaving this a month for this reason, but talked myself out of it due to the torrent of A/RE bids that's soon to arrive ;). {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 13:49, 10 September 2009 (BST)
:Damn. =( Least you're staying on as a sysop though. I'll stick the new 'crat election up now so just feel free to demote yourself when you're next on. Either than or Boxy'll get it when he sees it. He was floating about a little while ago. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 22:48, 10 September 2009 (BST)
::Thanks Cheese. Since we usually don't touch our own bids, I'll leave this for Boxy. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 01:13, 11 September 2009 (BST)
:::Yeah, I was super relieved when I saw that you're staying on as sysop. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 02:01, 11 September 2009 (BST)
::::"yummm dick tastes sooooo goood!!!! " - bob {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 03:23, 11 September 2009 (BST)


==Recent Actions==
==Recent Actions==
''Older actions can be found in the [[UDWiki:Administration/Demotions/Archive|archive]]''.
<!--
''There are no recent actions''
-->
===[[User:Rosslessness]]===
{{bid|Rosslessness}}


==[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Sysop Activity Check]]==
4+ month inactivity, have made a note on his talk page. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 22:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
:Ross has responded, I'm not interested in demoting him and I doubt AHLG is either, but will leave here just in case Gnome has grown into Goblin. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 22:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
::I mean by this point I'm not sure that Ross is even really Ross. Like the [[Wikipedia:Ship of Theseus|Ship of Theseus]], a little bit of him changes each day, and we don't see any of it because he's not around. So he's not Ross. Call him by a new name. I'll call him, how about, Jross. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 23:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
:::I am the sugarbabes [[User:Rosslessness|<span style="color: MidnightBlue ">R</span><span style="color: Navy">o</span><span style="color: DarkBlue">s</span><span style="color: MediumBlue">s</span><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness|<span style="color: RoyalBlue">l</span><span style="color: CornflowerBlue">e</span><span style="color: SkyBlue">s</span><span style="color: LightskyBlue">s</span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness/Quiz|<span style="color: LightBlue">n</span><span style="color: PowderBlue">e</span>]][[Monroeville Many|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]][[The Great Suburb Group Massacre|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]]<sup>[[Location Page Building Toolkit|<span style="color: DarkRed">Want a Location Image?]] </span> </sup>  20:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)


{{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check}}
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS MESSAGE -->
''Older actions can be found in the [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives|Sysop Archives]] and the [[:Category:Demotions_Archives|relevant category]].''
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Sysop Activity Check}}

Latest revision as of 20:19, 29 June 2024

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for system operators to request a demotion of status, or for enaction of demotion due to long-term inactivity. The act of demotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such system operators will need to request their demotion here.

Guidelines for Demotion Requests

Request

System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.

  • Reason for demotion - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through the promotion process again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
  • Effects of demotion - Demotions may necessitate additional action, such as in the case of a Bureaucrat being demoted, which triggers an immediate by-election to fill their seat for the remainder of their term.

After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator or deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the archive.

Inactivity

Crystal Clear app xmag.png main article: Policy Text

  • A sysop that hasn't made any edit in four months will be warned, on their talk page, by a Bureaucrat, that they face demotion of their sysop powers in one week, if they remain inactive.
  • One week after the warning has been placed, dependant on the actions of the sysop, the Bureaucrat will decide whether or not to carry out the demotion.
  • This is to avoid, for example, the unlikely case of a sysop simply making a single edit with the aim of avoiding the demotion.
  • The Bureaucrat is trusted and bound to make a fair decision, and not to demote a sysop who clearly demonstrates a return to activity on the wiki.
  • Any demonstrable abuse of this power by a Bureaucrat, however unlikely, could (as with any other abuse of specific powers) be grounds for a Misconduct case.
  • If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.

Demotions in process

There are no active demotions.

Recent Actions

User:Rosslessness

4+ month inactivity, have made a note on his talk page. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 22:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Ross has responded, I'm not interested in demoting him and I doubt AHLG is either, but will leave here just in case Gnome has grown into Goblin. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 22:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
I mean by this point I'm not sure that Ross is even really Ross. Like the Ship of Theseus, a little bit of him changes each day, and we don't see any of it because he's not around. So he's not Ross. Call him by a new name. I'll call him, how about, Jross. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
I am the sugarbabes RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Older actions can be found in the Sysop Archives and the relevant category.

Sysop Activity Check

User Position Last Contribution Seat Available
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-29 2021-12-01
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-28 2021-12-01
Rosslessness (Contribs) Sysop 2024-06-10 N/A
Stelar (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-29 N/A

Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)

Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)