Category talk:Historical Groups

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game. A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups. Voting will last for exactly two weeks following nomination. To be successful, a group must be approved by 2/3 of eligible voters to pass. A minimum of 15 votes must be cast for the vote to be valid. The only allowable votes are Yes and No. Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below. Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations. Groups must allow 4 months in between when the group disbands and when they can be nominated for Historical Status. (Note: Only for Malton-based groups)

Nominations for Historical Status

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{HistoricalVotingRules}} under the group's application for historical status.

New Nominations

East Becktown Defenders

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms: # comments ~~~~ or # ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a moderator.

The only valid voting sections are Yes and No. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

The East Becktown Defenders officially disbanded on May 1st, 2020, which makes them eligible for Historical Group status. The EBD had been active since 2016, and included dozens of members, including both veterans and entire newbies. They maintained good relationships with survivor groups (including, but not limited to the DHPD, SoC, Knights Templar and the DEM) and zombie groups (specifically the Daubeney Resident Zombies next door, and of course our favourite frenemies in the RRF). Aside from regular survivor-style operations, they also brought a fun, no-pressure approach to the game, along with wiki-tools (like the automatic SitRep on their group page) and weird events (like the EBD StatParty). The group decided not to fade away like many others, but officially disbanded after exactly 4 years of activity.

Yes

1. Yes - PB&J 13:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
2. Yes - Clayton Carmine (talk) 13:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
3. Yes - MicoolTNT 13:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
4. Yes - stelar ^{Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge} 14:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
5. Yes - Roddy Winters (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
6. Yes - Matt Langley (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
7. Yes - Tarkenton (talk) 20:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
8. Yes - Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 23:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
9. Yes - Simcoe 07:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
10. Yes - Yo Ris (talk) 07:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
11. Yes - RaiNo 10:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
12. Yes - Frank Burn (talk) 13:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

No

1. I was going to go with “Who?” but apparently we’ve spoken. As they did not fix their page in the entire 4 years they spent as a group, I cannot in good conscience vote for this group to be historical. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 16:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Malton College of Medicine

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms: # comments ~~~~ or # ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a moderator.

The only valid voting sections are Yes and No. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

MCM has been inactive since November 2018, making them eligible to voted for historical group now. -- Spiderzed▋ 21:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Yes

1. Yes - MCM had a great concept as a learning institution for new players that hasn't been there before, and never been copied after. A very widely respected group across the entire spectrum of play-styles, from survivors to zombies to PKers. Definitively one of the most remarkable groups in UD history, and definitively worthy of historical status. -- Spiderzed▋ 21:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
2. Yes Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 02:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
3. Yes -- 14:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
4. Yes --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 19:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
5. Yes ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
6. Yes - Even though they revoked my ZhD degree. Bastards. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
7. Yes --Grimeynick (talk) 16:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
8. Yes --KingJabbaDaButt (talk) 15:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
9. Yip What killed them off? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 22:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
10. Of course Hate Crime 🎭 (talk) 20:42, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
11. yES hajen (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
12. OuiI'm all riggered up (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
13. Yes (Ross, if you want to know, DM me on discord) stelar ^{Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge} 21:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
14. Yes Richardskull16 (talk) 22:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
15. Yes, seeing as the Trotters dunked so hard that MCM died. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ ☉ |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 03:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
16. Yes, obviously PB&J 05:46, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
17. Yes--Akbar (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
18. Yes - I consider them a far better version of Quartly Study Group and have fond memories of murdering Violet Begonia. Worthy candidates. --LordMoloch (talk) 17:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

No

1. I'm just here for my +1. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 02:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

With 18 votes for and 1 against, Malton College of Medicine is now officially a historical group. Congratulations. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 21:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Previous Discussions

There are 3 archives for this page.

General Discussion

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Succeeded

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Failed

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.