Talk:Malton Uprising

(Archive of Old Discussions)

Group?

So are we really a group now or what? I guess that means the DEM doesn't give a shit about the manifesto...--ScouterTX 23:13, 17 September 2008 (BST)

I rather fail to see how those two comments are related. In either case...no, we're not a group, but if a DEM member wants to list us as a notable presence in a suburb, I'm not going to object. I think the closest thing we could be compared to is an event like the Big Bash. And BB2 was listed as a group in various suburbs (from what I could tell, when I went looking and asked people), so something like ourselves being listed is not without precedent. As to the second part -- maybe you should start following events a bit more closely? --Jen 02:04, 19 September 2008 (BST)

Well excuuuuuuuuuuse me princess for having a real life outside of this little game...durrrr. --ScouterTX 23:25, 19 September 2008 (BST)

Please Stop Talking

Don't most of you guys have to get back to trolling each other on Brainstock? I wished I had as much time and what appears to be either patience, or insulting disregard, for the repetitive arguments that do more to strengthen the points made by the badly worded Manifesto that is apparently being held-hostage. For the love of Sappho, please stop posting. When Secruss and Alphy start sounding reasonable and sober, it should tell you that it's just time to stop arguing and start violence.

Which is why I am suggesting that Secruss, Alphy, and Kikashie all fight Father Tom(?), Labine, and Kristi of the Dead to a Caged Death Match.--Janine 22:09, 5 September 2008 (BST)

Fuck you. I'm important too, you know. Put me in the ring with Garviel. I'll kick his miniature painting ass. --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS MSD pr0n} 01:56, 6 September 2008 (BST)

You important? To who?--Janine 13:06, 6 September 2008 (BST)

I don't wanna be nobody's hero... --WanYao 17:25, 6 September 2008 (BST)

When Secruss and Alphy start sounding reasonable and sober, I'll be the first to let you know. So far all I've seen is a tempest in a teacup about the RG (which has about as much impact on PKers as the Toyota Prius had on global warming), and the DEM (which is so thinly spread it's got a lower population density than Antarctica). Even if DEM and the RG were bad for the game, dicking about with a retarded "Let's encourage butthurt players to PK and pretend that it's not PKing" campaign in green suburbs instead of actually doing something about zombies is worse. Turkmenbashi 13:46, 8 September 2008 (BST)

I see the light Turk! The DEM is not evil! It's just the internet! Morals don't exist on the internet! Holy shit! I've wasted so much time! I quit Urban Dead! I kill myself! I kill my cat! I kill my iguana! I kill my mold spores! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hm4ohAcGJWg --Secruss^|Yak|Brahnz!|CGR|PKA||EMLN|Templates|RRF|RFTM|Crap|WHOZ||MU|GN|C2008||00:12, 11 September 2008 (BST)

Spore? Who has Spore? I'm jealous... --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS MSD pr0n} 00:29, 11 September 2008 (BST)

I so want that game. --Secruss^|Yak|Brahnz!|CGR|PKA||EMLN|Templates|RRF|RFTM|Crap|WHOZ||MU|GN|C2008||22:26, 11 September 2008 (BST)

You and me both. I'd give Labine's left testicle for it. --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS MSD pr0n} 03:45, 12 September 2008 (BST)

PKing is only fun if people complain about it...like Turkmenbashi here. Anyway, Spore has Securom so I'm not going to get it. Toodles! --ScouterTX 20:11, 12 September 2008 (BST)

I did get the new /METALLICA\ CD. It's really good. --Secruss^|Yak|Brahnz!|CGR|PKA||EMLN|Templates|RRF|RFTM|Crap|WHOZ||MU|GN|C2008||18:26, 13 September 2008 (BST)

In the hopes of a more accurate map.

I like using the tool provided on Rogue's Gallery to see where the DEM is absent. If you try to locate PKers with in n-number of blocks of location x and y, then you can see how many days it has been since a spotter went through the area. Example - Sir Fred of Etruria

That can work, but what if there's simply been no reported PKers in the area? --DT^PK 22:02, 6 September 2008 (BST)

Or DEMs who aren't running IMP? -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 22:03, 6 September 2008 (BST)

Couldn't you just use some allies/supporters who are low on ammunition/FAKS go through the area and check the hot spots and declared head quarters? And if you wanted to find out if they were zombie or active you could steal their profiles off of the Brainstock recruitment area to check. --Janine 22:08, 6 September 2008 (BST)

join?

group hitman wuld like to join. did some stuff for the DEM don't like them that much. It was the team zombie hardcore job...one of our best. Right now we are growing and branching out. a pro survivor movment in East gratside also in lockketside protecting St. Alexander's hospital. Some other things going on are mre private.

Haha, I remember you guys: Total retards. --ScouterTX 22:51, 16 September 2008 (BST)

I wish your 'movment' was in a real suburb, Hitman. Or is that your group name? You did things for the DEM but you don't like them? That's got to breed some sort of resentment, eh? I suggest laying down and talking about it with someone close to you, and then decide what would be your best interest. -Dr. Trust M.D.

Didn't the hitmen kill TZH for DORIS? Or is this a DORIS = DEM pancake thing again? --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS MSD pr0n} 00:44, 17 September 2008 (BST)

The DEM has a standing policy against hiring hitmen after Ferrum Leo's little incident back in Dec. '06. If I had to guess I'd say it's either "OMFG DEM PANCAKE" stuff again or Sgt. Steve.

P.S., I've got Spore. <3--Labine50 ^{MEMS | MHG} 02:32, 17 September 2008 (BST)

And if we were gonna hire hitmen, wouldn't we want to, y'know, hire real ones? -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 02:41, 17 September 2008 (BST)

Labine, please tell me Spore is as awesome as I hope it is. If it isn't, I will cry.--William Told 03:19, 19 September 2008 (BST)

It's pretty nifty.--Labine50 ^{MEMS | MHG} 01:40, 20 September 2008 (BST)

Spore is freaking amazing.</end useless comment> LemonHead7t7 *̡͌l̡*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡̡|͡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|]]| ̡̡̡ ̡ ̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡*̡͌l̡* ^{Talk/PDA/Red Rum/MOB} 04:17, 20 September 2008 (BST)

lolindeed. _■^■ 04:38, 20 September 2008 (BST)

MU alt policy... so, uh, where is it, exactly? LOL

do you people have a strict one alt policy for MU members? because there are a large number of groups under this umbrella, and if a player had an alt in more than just one... well... that'd make you... uuuuuh... just like the DEM!

i mean, not that i really give a damn, you're insignificant and irrelevant, anyhow, but... i was just, like, wondering and such about your alt policy, y'know? --WanYao 21:11, 27 September 2008 (BST)

Naw, lol. We're not an umbrella group...we're pretty much an "event." About the closest thing we could be compared to is something like the Big Bash, or some sort of PKer extravaganza. And we stick with the same rules as things like that...one alt involved per person. My babah Philosophe Knight is going to stick with handing out FAKs in centers of learning, for instance, until any Uprising/DEM craziness is done. --Jen 21:25, 27 September 2008 (BST)

So the two alts will be accepted, as long as both aren't fighting DEM members, so they aren't working together. Wow, that sounds a lot like the DEM. Good to know you both aren't breaking the rules! LemonHead7t7 *̡͌l̡*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡̡|͡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|]]| ̡̡̡ ̡ ̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡*̡͌l̡* ^{Talk/PDA/Red Rum/MOB} 05:06, 28 September 2008 (BST)

The Big Bash was, in effect, a group. Which operated in one area at a time, not several simultaneously. And you could have only one alt involved in it. The comparison is totally inaccurate. And, when PKer "events" take place in one location or area, if a one alt per player policy is not followed, that's multi-abuse. Period. This "event" as you call it involves a large number of groups acting across several surbubs. And, these groups are all fighting the exact same enemy. Which would make their stance on multi-abuse a lot less stringent than that of the DEM, technically... But, if it's as Lemonhead explained... then... yeah... it's pretty much the same as the DEM. Fascinating. --WanYao 05:15, 28 September 2008 (BST)

Hmm... First she praises our ability to keep our members off the Ronin Gallery, then she parties with us in Stanbury Village, and now she's following alt policies nearly identical to ours... I predict a DEM alt in your future, Jen. :) --William Told 10:28, 28 September 2008 (BST)

Three simple letters, Jen: MFU. DO EET!! :P -- Atticus Rex ^{mfu pif} Δ 14:56, 28 September 2008 (BST)

If you're going to Recruitment Spam, do it on brainstock. And the entire post seems to be on of those "I don't like those people; they must be zerging" allegations.--Janine 00:29, 29 September 2008 (BST)

Naw, they can try to recruit me here. I don't mind. But...MFU? Blech. No thank you! MCDU or Axes High, maybe...but not the MFU. Or any other part of the DEM core.

And, naw, it's a bit more serious than "I don't like these people; they're zerging" stuff. They're accusing us of hypocrisy, which IS a big deal. I think they're dead wrong, but they've every right to bring it up. --Jen 00:56, 29 September 2008 (BST)

Because apparently it wasn't clear enough the first time:

• This is a temporary thing. We're calling it an "event"/"petition"/"uprising"/"coalition," not a "group"/"alliance," for a reason. In a month or two or three, it's going to be disbanded, and everyone can get back to their normal lives, which tends to involve killing one another. The DEM is a permanent alliance. I'd say that's a rather notable difference.

• We wouldn't have a problem with the DEM alt policy if is its members groups actually acted like groups in an alliance, not like sub-groups. If you want to read and join the debates going on about this, get the password to a certain forum on Brainstock. I'm not going to argue this point here, except to say, we DO think we've got a point here.

• You can only have one alt involved in this. Just like you could have only one alt involved in the Big Bash. Or in a PKer event. Which are the closest parallels I can come up with to this. They may not be perfect comparisons, but they're closer parallels than comparing us to the DEM. Just because the RRF and the MOB were both participating in the big bash didn't mean that you had to officially leave the RRF so that your MOB character could do stuff. It's the same here. I don't see where you're getting the idea that a person can have more than one alt involved, Lemon and Wan, after I specifically said otherwise.

If the one-alt per player policy is not followed, that's multi-abuse, period, and we hammer whoever is doing it over the head. If there's other characters contributing information to the same cause, that's multi-abuse, and we hammer whoever's doing that over the head. I'm sitting out anything DEM-related with my other characters for the duration of the Uprising. Other folks, who could potentially have more than one character involved, either directly (killing) or indirectly (scouting, etc.), are doing exactly the same thing.

• There's a large number of groups, acting across several suburbs, because many of our groups are localized survivor groups. Who aren't just going to up and drop their survivor activities to shoot DEM. And perhaps more importantly...we're spread out because the DEM, who we're attacking, is spread out all across the map. Our spread-out-ness is a direct result of the spread-out-ness of the DEM. If the DEM was in one place, most of us would be in one place. If we wanted to, we could move all our mobile groups into one suburb. Unfortunately, we'd run out of people to shoot pretty darn quickly. --Jen 00:59, 29 September 2008 (BST)

Seconding the above, there were some who posted on the Uprising forum before we got started asking about that and those who had alts in more than one group participating idled out said alts or are putting them to work in something that has NOTHING to do with the Uprising. For those who have multiple alts the ONLY information they are giving us is what that alt in the Uprising-affiliated group is collecting, any information another alt may pick up is ignored no matter how useful it may have been. -- Garviel Loken^{No Pity! No Remorse! No Fear! Talk}02:29, 29 September 2008 (BST)

I agree that this does not constitute alt-abuse in any way. :) --William Told 02:45, 29 September 2008 (BST)

In addition, there's another difference with regards to how the MU and the DEM formed. For someone with an alt in more than one MU group, they were in those groups already when they joined the Uprising, and have now taken steps to ensure they aren't committing alt abuse. The fact that two groups they joined happened to come together for one cause and will then go off again shouldn't force a person to leave a group if they can be in both without both contributing to the Uprising. Now, for those with multiple alts in the DEM, unless every single one of those people had all their alts in the respective groups prior to the DEM coalescing, they've joined the same group knowingly with multiple characters. And even if all of them did meet that criteria, there's still the fact that their policy allows newer people to do the same, as well as those alts who are in the DEM now being contributing, however indirectly, to the same cause. Rather different circumstances. I don't see any way you can call the MU's policy here to be alt abuse unless you're just trying to kick shit up, frankly.--Panthera 02:47, 29 September 2008 (BST)

Comparing the alt-policies of the MU and the DEM is an absolute joke. As has been mentioned, the Malton Uprising is not a group. If any such as Wan do not agree with the term event you could call it a coalition, or maybe, maybe an alliance (although that would actually severely overstate the level of cooperation). To say that groups can't collaborate at all is ridiculous, to say we are organized like the DEM is ignorant, and to say that the MU allows individuals to contribute multiple alts is slander. If someone happened to have had an alts in more than one of the groups that joined the MU (which is very uncommon) they can not use both to contribute to it. Period. If you know of somebody breaking that rule (and I know you don't because you would have cited it) I want to know who they are so they can be thrown out and stuck on my personal KOS list. If you don't, go try to start up trouble somewhere else.--Allan Friedman 03:18, 29 September 2008 (BST)

The wiki is not the place for intelligent discussion on this topic.--William Told 06:42, 29 September 2008 (BST)

Brainstock certainly isn't, so what do you suggest? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:12, 29 September 2008 (BST)

Well, the private discussion that's on the DEM's Public Communication forum on Brainstock is locked to everyone who isn't willing to speak reasonably, including DEM members who haven't been granted access. You just have to PM an admin if you want access, which will be revoked if you prove to be unwilling to debate civilly. Aside from that, I don't know. Perhaps the Philosophe Knights should host a discussion. Given your reputation for enlightenment and your participation in the Uprising, who would be better? --William Told 17:59, 29 September 2008 (BST)

What started off as ironic satire (though, like all real satire, it had a serious point)... has turned to high burlesque... --WanYao 05:43, 30 September 2008 (BST)

Template

yo... i dunno what the f... is wrong wtih this thing, but uh, it ain't working right. check the bottom of the page --Jack ^{S13 T! PC} 16:19, 29 September 2008 (BST)

Support from the Wild Cardz

So, is there any special channel one would have to go through to support the Uprising, or do we just start killing off DEM members? (because I do that...) --Damios 02:20, 30 September 2008 (BST)