Suggestion:20090216 Ring the Bell

20090216 Ring the Bell

Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 08:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion type
Improvement

Suggestion scope
Survivors

Suggestion description
Allows survivors to use the bells in churches and cathedrals as flares.

The bell doesn't require any additional skills to use. However, you do need to repair the belltower seperately from the church, should it be ruined. The bell tower will always need 5 AP (10 AP for a cathedral) to repair, regardless of how long the church has been ruined. You cannot repair the bell tower/bellfry until the church/cathedral is repaired first.

Ringing the bell takes 5 AP.

Ringing the bell has the same effect as a flare, though the distance it can be heard from is shorter, with the area of effect being only 5 blocks in radius.

Flavour text is:

• You ring the church bell
• You climb the bellfry and ring the cathedral bells
• The bell tower is ruined, you cannot ring the bell until the tower is repaired
• The bellfry is ruined, you cannot ring the bells until the building is repaired
• You hear a church bell rining [Number] blocks [Direction] and [Number] blocks [Direction]
• You hear cathedral bells ringing [Number] blocks [Direction] and [Number] blocks [Direction]

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Keep - The fact that I wrote this is reason enough. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 08:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Keep/Change - I don't see the harm; it's expensive enough that it is unlikely to be abused by spammers. However, I did have a question that I don't remember being answered from the discussion: when a cathedral bell is functioning (as opposed to a church), does it ring from all 4 squares of the cathedral, and therefore is actually heard in a 6x6 area? If not, why is a cathedral bell more expensive to repair? ~ extropymine ^{Talk | NW | 4Corners} 08:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

   Because cathedrals tend to have more than one bell. Oh, and for clarification in larger buildings when you ring the bell, the area is calculated from the square you are standing in. Any square can be used to ring the bells from. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 22:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

   Aha, okay. So fixing the bells in one square of a cathedral fixes them in all four squares, but when someone uses Ring the Bell inside a cathedral, its point of origin is that single square. ~ extropymine ^{Talk | NW | 4Corners} 00:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

3. Keep- It would realy help if you dont have a flare and alot of AP--Dudeperson13 16:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
4. Keep Yes, but multiple rings from one location should be condensed like so "A church bell was rung nine times..." to eliminate spam. --A Big F'ing Dog 18:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

   How about messages for 'once', 'twice', 'three times' and 'several times'? --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 00:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

   Why wouldn't the "...and again" mechanic work? ~ extropymine ^{Talk | NW | 4Corners} 06:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

   Too many messages. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 08:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

   Anything would work, as long as it condenses the efforts of one person who rings it multiple times. --A Big F'ing Dog 18:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

5. Keep - As everyone above, especially Big F'ing Dog. --Private Mark 19:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
6. Change - See HM and Maverick below. Linkthewindow  Talk  20:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
7. Keep - Good as is, but I'd also like it if the bell rang/clanged when it gets ruined. --Kamikazie-Bunny 14:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

   I agree with the several people who have mentioned this. Something like you hear a tremendous, discordant crash X blocks to the Y and Z blocks to the A as church bells fall from their belltower or something. ~ extropymine ^{Talk | NW | 4Corners} 18:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

8. Keep - I agree with Extropymine about the AP on the repairs, but other than that I like it. --Rohndogg1 20:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
9. Keep - Adds to the value of Churches and Cathedrals, and would work wonderfully from a roleplaying standpoint. ChainReaction01 03:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
10. Keep - Sounds good to me. Nemesis645 12:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
11. Keep - As long as I wouldn't end up with a thousand messages every time someone decided to blow a full AP cycle on bell ringing, I'm all for this. Mmm, flavoursome --Sage|Carr ^Cobra 00:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
12. keep--Sgt Gonnella 02:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
13. keep sounds like a good addition KdaAnimefan 1:08 am EST 24 february 2009
14. keep It seems like a good and intresting idea. --^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 16:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
15. keep Sounds good. --D.E.ATalk 16:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
16. keep It makes sense, realistic too. --User:KingsBlendRizla 02:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
17. keep Another way to signal survivors, and makes Churches and Cathedrals more useful. Same thing as above. --reverselift 06:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Kill Votes

1. Change - I like the concept, but I think the actual mechanics need some revision. Specifically, the AP to repair a belltower. Why would this be constant? If a church has been out of comission for a long enough time that the building requires 45 AP to repair, why would the bell tower be a mere 5 AP? --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 15:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

   I suppose that could work. But, there definately should be a cap on how much AP it takes to repair the tower, say around the 20 - 25 AP mark for churches, and 40 - 50 AP for cathedrals? --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 11:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

2. Change - I still like this but would want zombies to be able to get some glory for the ruining of bell towers. Basically a single AP should ruin the tower and should ring the bell with the zombie in question geting a triuphant roar in (and displaying his/her profile tag) This would actually make it a potentially useful update for zeds rather than more survivor biased fluff! --Honestmistake 20:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

   A zombie ruined the belltower/bellfry good enough for you? It would be displayed to all people in the church/cathedral, as well as the message You see [church name]'s belltower/bellfry collapse to those in neighbouring blocks/outside. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 11:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

3. Changes - You make the changes Maverick and Honest suggest and you've got my vote. -- Cheese 20:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
4. Kill - I concur that the tower's repair should be dependent on the time the church/cathedral has been ruined. --ZsL 02:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

   I don't agree; I don't think a stationary, reduced-range flare deserves making a building a potential AP sink of that magnitude. Plus, what happens if someone repairs the church but *doesn't* repair the belltower? Does it continue to "degrade?" I'd rather just add +5AP to the repair cost and call it done. ~ extropymine ^{Talk | NW | 4Corners} 18:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Non-author reply struck. --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 23:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Incomplete Please explain how it would work in large buildings --Explodey 20:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Incomplete - As Explodey. -- T^HEL^ORDG^UNS^LINGER 02:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

---

Voting Rules

Current Suggestions Advice to Suggesters Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes. Advice to Voters You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam). It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.

Rules for Discussions Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20090216 Ring the Bell). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit. Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page. Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions. Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks. Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion. Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied. Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}} Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.

Invalid Votes Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide. X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others. Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.

Comments Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting. Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.

All Caps Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES Keep Votes Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill Votes Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Spam/Dupe Votes Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)