User talk:Krazy Monkey

Cheese's talk page

Main • Talk • Sandpit (Testage) • Suggestions • Sig • Archives • NavBar • Game The Rules of the Talk Page Welcome to my talk page. Whether you've got a query, complaint or just need some help, please follow these 3 simple rules in order to keep my page nice and tidy so I can find your message easily. I'll usually reply on your talk page unless there are two or more participants upon which I shall reply here to minimise stress and flitting between several talk pages. Thank you for your visit. :) Have a nice day. Stuff not here?? Check my ace Archives. Rule the First Start all new topics with a level 2 heading, i.e ==Your Title here== to keep the format tidy. Rule the Second Place new comments at the bottom of the page so I can find them easily. Rule the Third Please Sign your post or I shall be most unhappy >:( and use lots of angry emotes. DISCLAIMER This is my talk page, and as a result I reserve the right to correct any posts that break any of the above rules as I see fit. Don't like it? Tuff. Do not put anything above this header NEW STUFF RIGHT AT THE BOTTOM! January 10 woah You just blammed A/A good, and I was about to settle. Should I not settle since it was vandalism and got removed or what? --Bob Boberton TF / DW 22:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC) A/A Why did you move a case which was almost done choosing an arbitrator to the talk page? I can understand the others, but the Bob Boberton one practically has a ruling sorted. The second Zombie lord slaps on an acceptance, it'll be pushed through, and off the page.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:50, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Thanks.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC) My bad. I meant to leave that one there. =p Just selected the whole block and chucked it over. I've fixed it now. -- Cheese 22:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC) :D --Bob Boberton TF / DW 22:53, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Mudkip! Heh. Guess who's back? So what have I missed in my long absence? Care to fill me in, Cheese? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs (status:‎Mudkip!) 15:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC) Lolcat With every image you delete, a kitten dies somewhere ;'( --Thadeous Oakley 22:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC) A monster. That's what you are, you dirty kitten-killer! --Thadeous Oakley 22:56, 12 January 2010 (UTC) I have done what I must ='( And now the final traces of Iscariot's taint have been removed too. -- Cheese 22:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC) Sitenotice Just spotted your old old entry on Admin:Discussion about MediaWiki:Sitenotice. I really wanna get this working, what's the go? What repercussion does it have when mixed with CustomTitle template? --         11:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC) I see nowww, and I replied via A/DS although I think the conversation would be better continued on GD. --         11:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC) You Answer mah question!!! --ZsL 22:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC) Oh, you crazy Scots and your weird words. :P --ZsL 22:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC) How rude! You took out your Cait is the best thing :P /me goes to cry moar - Love from Swing XOXOXTalk 19:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC) Fine then. =p Just coz I'm nice I've put it back. -- Cheese 22:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC) And cause it's true ;D - Love from Swing XOXOXTalk 22:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC) February 10 deletion Cmon, you know better than to delete things willy nilly, and the fact that it was in the process of being voted on in deletions made it even more questionable to delete it in the first place. The real reason I am complaining about this is, next time you do something like deleting New user template, could you at leased be responsible and own up to it on A/D or A/SD or wherever you find the request, rather than wait for me to deal with the problem, or for Izzy to throw up a misconduct case. Ironically, with no record or signature of yours attached to the request cycling it, it just makes it easier for me to undelete it and continue with the vote as normal. --         14:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC) I had it marked on my watchlist from a while back and noticed it had been recreated with rubbish on it so I deleted it as a crit 6 on sight. =/ Never realised it was even on deletions. -- Cheese 20:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC) Ah, K. --         00:03, 12 February 2010 (UTC) Oh hello! Some mofo edited the Randoms page twice to add some stupid template about the Sting. I fixed it but you have to go angry emote them for the rest of their life now as stated by the THIS BELONGS TO THE RANDOMS template <3 :3 - Love from Swing XOXOXTalk 01:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC) March 10 Read Now go fix A/VD. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 22:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC) Better? -- Cheese 22:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC) Don't shoot the messenger, I didn't make the policy. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 22:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC) Help? Hey, I'm new here, and I'm not quite sure how to use things. As a result, I really screwed up one of the building descriptions in the Scarletwood Barricade Plan (<http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Scarletwood_Barricade_Plan>). Somebody suggested that I go to you for help... How do I go about fixing my mistake? Maomao200 20:07, 21 March 2010 (UTC) April 10 Settling it once and for all User:Aichon/Other/Iscariot's Vandal Data. The name of the link says it all. I'm not asking for your input, necessarily (though I would welcome it), but I do want to make you aware of the page. I know you're not so active around here these days, but I figured I'd give it a shot anyway. —Aichon— 01:31, 21 April 2010 (BST) Heh, I come and go. =p Usually at the tail end of periods of drama so I can help mop up the mess. In any case, I've chucked in my penny's worth. -- Cheese 18:24, 21 April 2010 (BST) Vouch It's just because I said you were my favourite cheese, right? :) --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:28, 29 April 2010 (BST) a/re you're up dawg. --         02:47, 13 May 2010 (BST) (What i meant was you can make a statement or something). --         02:48, 13 May 2010 (BST) Deletions 21:00, 17 May 2010 Krazy Monkey (Talk | contribs) deleted "The Malton Bandits" (C7 via proxy) 18:04, 17 May 2010 Krazy Monkey (Talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:The Heytown Coalition" (C7 via proxy) 18:04, 17 May 2010 Krazy Monkey (Talk | contribs) deleted "The Heytown Coalition" (C7 via proxy) 18:02, 17 May 2010 Krazy Monkey (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:GoLookAndKill/Journal Archives" (C7 via proxy) I can't find any of these pages at neither the Speedy Deletion archive or the Deletion archive. Your suppose to list all your sysops actions on the relevant archives. Why am I telling you this? --Thadeous Oakley 22:46, 17 May 2010 (BST) New scheduled deletion thingy: As of January 2010, this scheduling now includes pages that the author has blanked or replaced with text indicating a desire to be deleted. However, pages used as inclusions (such as many templates) are excluded from this criterion. All those pages had "Delete meh plz" or something to that effect on it. =p -- Cheese 22:49, 17 May 2010 (BST) I'm not saying you were wrong to delete them, in fact I already assumed they were deleted for something like that. You're suppose to place these actions plus a motivation under Served Speedy Deletions. You didn't. Like I said, all sysops actions must be documented and archived. --Thadeous Oakley 22:55, 17 May 2010 (BST) Not scheduled deletions.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:55, 17 May 2010 (BST) O rly? --Thadeous Oakley 23:00, 17 May 2010 (BST) Ya rly: In some circumstances, scheduled deletions may be required to avoid clogging the Deletions or Speedy Deletions pages. In this case, it is not expected that each deletion be requested through the Administration pages -- Cheese 23:00, 17 May 2010 (BST) Oh...--Thadeous Oakley 23:05, 17 May 2010 (BST) Dammit Cheese, now I feel stoopid >:| --Thadeous Oakley 23:18, 17 May 2010 (BST) You don't have to, silly pie!! ;D --         02:17, 18 May 2010 (BST) A/VD Please remember to put A/VD links in all entries you make as Aichon corrected here. Obviously this isn't a threat, I just do this and mention it when it happens etc. --         05:00, 31 May 2010 (BST) Random Header *Nudge nudge* --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs (status:‎Mudkip!) 00:51, 12 June 2010 (BST) THE JIZZ POLICE Orphaned Page The following page(s) were orphaned, meaning they weren't linked from any other page on UDWiki. For house-keeping's sake, we are adding the link onto the relevant talk page. If you don't want the pages anymore just post them on the Deletions Page. You aren't required to do anything, but we'd appreciate if it you kept the link on any one of your pages. Please note that the link provided below will not remove the page from Orphaned Pages, so you'll still need to manually make a link for us. Thank you. Your page, THE JIZZ POLICE, was not linked to on the wiki. This message is just to provide a link for it and clear it from our orphanage. --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:45, 21 June 2010 (BST) Imposter Sorry about the late response, Cheese. The dipshit who killed your boys wearing our tags is not DRRP. Never even seen the dude before. --Paddy DignamIS DEAD 19:27, 28 June 2010 (BST) Ban Time Surely the ban should be for 30 days, 2 hours, 49 minutes and 48 seconds? He was banned at 22:00 yesterday, meaning he's served nearly a day of his ban time.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 20:11, 6 August 2010 (BST) Whoops, I missed the minutes off when I went to fix a screw up I thought I'd made. Cheers dude. =) -- Cheese 20:14, 6 August 2010 (BST) And you're not Link. I apologise. I meant Yonnua, but I was looking at this at the time. -- Cheese 20:15, 6 August 2010 (BST) Sysop input requested There's a sysop-only vote taking place, and we haven't heard from you yet. Check here. —Aichon— 20:23, 9 August 2010 (BST) Umbrella Disambiguation Page Since there is a new Umbrella, Inc. group, in all fairness it should be listed in the Umbrella disambiguation page which is protected. Can you please list it there or un-protect the page? Thanks. --Kalamord 12:56, 10 August 2010 (BST) Sorted. -- Cheese 13:02, 10 August 2010 (BST) Dear Cheese, I am here to place an arbitration against the listed above Kalamord. You know my wiki skills aren't that sharp so I am not sure as to how to make an official arbitration but I figured you can help me. First I would like to point out that the above poster Kalamord is not who he claims to be. Kalamord was a previous president of Umbrella during the first era and disappeared sometime after that. I tracked him down via myspace and recruited him back to Umbrella Corporation for a short time. Apparently this Kalamord, whose real name currently escapes me, is obsessed with Rated 'R' Superstar the wrestler, as he has a character in game with the name and his own fan page dedicated to said person. Anyway while this might sound like useless info, during the second era after Kalamord's disappearance Rated 'R' Superstar appeared on the Umbrella Corp. scene. He along with Albert Wesker made a successful coup in taking over the forums and banning all previous admin and attempted to take over the group. Members dissatisfied with the lead of a mad man left the group. Now it is hard to tell whether Kalamord had originally made the Albert Wesker and Superstar account or if this Superstar cracked both Albert Wesker and Kalamord, the main suspicion for this is the recorded change in character behavior to be similar to that of the erratic Superstar. Regardless it is obvious that he has some sort of hacking skills as our forums have been victimized before and I requested banning of any of his characters, groups, or the like so they would not be allowed to enjoy the world of UD quite as much. BTW Rated R and Albert--President Jackson 18:10, 10 August 2010 (BST) Moving on to the reasons for arbitration. I designed the Umbrella Corporation wiki and is therefore my intellectual property. This "Umbrella Inc." is not only a blatant copy of the group but also of my wiki page design. All images, fonts, and layouts to be used by the Umbrella Corporation will not be shared with this shady knock-off as it is intellectual property of those who helped build the Umbrella Corp. wiki namely me, MisterGame, and a few others. Thank you.--President Jackson 18:10, 10 August 2010 (BST) First of all, yes, this is really me. But it doesn't really matter if you believe me or not. Second of all, I hate wrestling. Used to like it a bit back in the day (who didn't?), but now it just plain sucks. Anyway, enough of the useless chatter. I would like you to know it would be a waste of your time to dispute Umbrella, Inc. as it is essentially a different group than the one you are/were involved in. From what I've heard, it was abruptly taken over in the absence of Wesker or Rated R (forget which), so them returning should even warrant control of the alternate Umbrella. About copying the wiki, are you even serious? Because of a black background and similar colors? You also claim to have done it as it is your "intellectual property", but admit having poor wiki skills. What's the deal? All an arbitration would result in is a possible change in design, and even that's a long shot. So I ask you to drop it here and now, if you're a wise man. I am actually working on my own group, so I don't even know how long I'll be involved with Umbrella. Oh, and Cheese, sorry for butting in, but I wanted to defend myself and the group. Feel free to move this where you see fit. --Kalamord 20:25, 10 August 2010 (BST) "I hate wrestling. Used to like it a bit back in the day (who didn't?), but now it just plain sucks." -Kalamord I take great offense to that! Just kidding, I know what you mean. --Rated-R Superstar 17:12, 11 August 2010 (BST) If you're looking to start an arbitration, you'd need to go to A/A and set up a case there. 18:16, 10 August 2010 (BST) Do I just copy and paste the usual format and place it in the Arby section?--President Jackson 18:48, 10 August 2010 (BST) Yep. You can pretty much copy this whole message and use it as your statement. You'll also want to consider an arbitrator. 19:12, 10 August 2010 (BST) Wtf, throw that shit on arbitration, Cheese has nothing to do with this. --         01:21, 11 August 2010 (BST) I've dealt with enough Umbrella related drama to know that this case is pretty much dead in the water and nothing will change. =/ All that will happen is a restraining order between you two. I may have more to say in the morning once I've had some decent sleep but this is the extent of my thoughts just now. -- Cheese 22:42, 10 August 2010 (BST) This case is moot, since J has dropped it. Why do you think it was slashed? Also I'm going to slash everything back, you can't edit other people's comments. If you don't this on your page (which I can understand), then just remove it altogether. --Thadeous Oakley 10:18, 11 August 2010 (BST) You do realise that you adding the slashes here was in fact the first changing of somebody else's comment, not cheese's unslashing?--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 10:23, 11 August 2010 (BST) Not Kalamord's; Jackson's.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 10:24, 11 August 2010 (BST) Go 2 revisions back and you'll see why. He removed his own comments which is impersonation vandalism. Slashing/striking is considered the way to go when retracting earlier statements.--Thadeous Oakley 10:27, 11 August 2010 (BST) Well then if striking is discretionary, it's cheese's right as the page owner to disallow that discretion. Or, it isn't discretionary, in which case it should never have been stricken. Either way, Jackson's shouldn't be struck, and Kalamord's should.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 10:28, 11 August 2010 (BST) It should be. You can't prohibit people editing their own comments as long as its legal. If I want to strike this very comment, it's legal. If Cheese's doesn't want it he should remove it all together not edit it back. --Thadeous Oakley 10:37, 11 August 2010 (BST) If cheese removed that comment, it would be vandalism, because it would impersonate people further down.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 10:38, 11 August 2010 (BST) No because when I typed it, you didn't reply yet. As for Jacksons comments, I mean removing this altogether. As for impersonation, that's exactly what Jackson did, and that's why I reverted it and slashed it instead (as both boiled down to retracting an earlier statement, which is perfectly fine!) --Thadeous Oakley 10:45, 11 August 2010 (BST) I didn't mean your comment. He could definitely remove it all if he wanted to, but he doesn't seem to. Jackson did (without knowing) impersonate, but it was most likely lack of knowledge. Personally, I'd disagree about the slashing, but there we go.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 10:48, 11 August 2010 (BST) Are we done arguing? I saw what you did to Misanthropy's page. Spare me a similar fate plz.--Thadeous Oakley 10:50, 11 August 2010 (BST) Yeah, I got a bit over the top there, so I'm stopping now. Also this is Cheese's talk. :P So, can we be fwends again?--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 11:23, 11 August 2010 (BST) Did we stop being on good terms then? We're all BBF's here :D --Thadeous Oakley 12:34, 11 August 2010 (BST) Do not put anything below this header New posts go directly above this bit (unless you are SA)