Category talk:Historical Groups

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game. A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups. Within two weeks of a nomination, the group must be approved by 2/3 of the voters, with a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass. The only allowable votes are Yes and No. Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below. Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations.

Nominations for Historical Status

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page.

New Nominations

Detulux_Inc

Detulux_Inc has disbanded (per news banner on their forum) but was a longtime presence in the Kempsterbank area, contributing much to the general fun level for survivor and zombie alike.

1. Yes - Nominator vote. - M arcusF ilby ^T 21:14, 17 October 2009 (BST)
2. No - Who? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:16, 17 October 2009 (BST)
3. Um Marcus you need to convince me. Although having eaten them for a few years, Im more than aware of their existence, what have they done that is historical? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:23, 17 October 2009 (BST)
4. No - Never heard of them. Oddly enough, never been to Kemsterbank either. Historical groups need to ahve exuded their fame beyond their suburb.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:09, 17 October 2009 (BST)

   Which is a bit weird, since they (histr. groups) usually only get specifically mentioned in suburbs they were active in.--Thadeous Oakley 23:53, 17 October 2009 (BST)

   General historical (namely this page and the associated category) have traditionally been separate from suburb historical. Some groups that have never passed here have been placed in the historical section of suburb pages due to the consensus of their input there rather than the game as a whole to gain the nod through this process. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 23:58, 17 October 2009 (BST)

5. No - Who?-- Adward  22:27, 17 October 2009 (BST)
6. No - Calling these guys nobodies would be a massive overestimation of their significance. --Papa Moloch 22:53, 17 October 2009 (BST)
7. No - I'll second Yonnua, Drawde, Iscariot and the Hierophant. --Goa'uld 0:04, 18 October 2009 (MET)
8. No - I have been playing this game for years and i just head about you all. -- 
   •   Timmah!  
   •   Talk  
   23:18, 17 October 2009 (BST)
9. No - as moloch. --Papa Johnny 01:02, 18 October 2009 (BST)
10. Yes I originally Led the KT, and they came to K-Bank just after I quit the group, and just before I took a hiatus from the game. All these years later,... I still know who they are by the mere mention of their name. If I'm not mistaken, they were active in a couple suburbs prior to going to Kempster. -Poodle of doom 01:17, 18 October 2009 (BST)
11. Yes - If poodle of doom vouches for them they must be worthy of historical status, surely? It increases the validity of the bid greatly, so yes from me.--CyberRead240 01:51, 18 October 2009 (BST)

    wait no, I'm totally lying, he makes it so much more no worthy, SORRY LOL--CyberRead240 01:52, 18 October 2009 (BST)

12. No - A group, yes; with a presence, yes; of historical significance, not quite. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 02:00, 18 October 2009 (BST)
13. No - As the Papas. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:17, 18 October 2009 (BST)
14. LOLWUT??? - --WanYao 06:33, 18 October 2009 (BST)
15. ...No. Cyberbob  Talk  09:40, 18 October 2009 (BST)
16. No - Not historically significant. --Rahrah^{Come join the #party!}09:43, 18 October 2009 (BST)

Recent Nominations

There have been no recent nominations

Previous Discussions

There are 3 archives for this page.

General Discussion

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Succeeded

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Failed

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Historical Groups Use Discussion

The Dead

Currently has 131 active members and is ranked 4th on the stats page. While it definately is historic, it also is by all means active and at the least should be added to Category:Confirmed Groups.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 00:22, 7 September 2009 (BST)