UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Template:Moderationnav

This page will be used for users to request that pages falling into certain categories be deleted as appropriate by a sysop without having to go through all the red tape of Speedy Deletions and Deletions. A list of pages in the Scheduled Deletions list is located here.

Deletion Scheduling

Deletion Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as normal Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like normal deletion requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Votes in this case shall be as follows:

  • Yea - For approval of the deletion scheduling request
  • Nay - For disapproval of the deletion scheduling request

Remember that votes must be signed and datestamped (use ~~~~)

After the two weeks are up, if the page has reached at least a 50% majority in favour it is added to the Scheduled list. If the request fails to get the required number of votes, it doesn't get added. In either case, the closed request can then get shifted to the Archive.

Scheduling requests under consideration

Amending "Crit 7 by Proxy" scheduled deletion

If a page's author blanks it or replaces it with text indicating their desire to have it deleted, the page is to be deleted on sight. However, templates and other pages used as inclusions are exempted from Crit 7 by proxy.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 22:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

  1. Yes I beleive this meets the template concerns.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 22:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
  2. Yes Might as well remove/retract the vote further down then. -- 22:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
    :O:O:O You'd better not be planning to remove a vote before it's scheduled closing time!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
    Actually, that's exactly the reason the last one's still up here.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 22:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
  3. はい 箱の人は馬鹿であるが、これはよい考えである。 Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 22:45, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
    (Yes)--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 22:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
  4. Yes - Congratulations, Red Hawk, you have secured my vote.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
  5. Sea - Is polasaí maith é. For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 00:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
  6. Yes - --Michalesonbadge.pngTCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 00:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Corollary to "Crit 7 by Proxy" scheduled deletion

If a page's author blanks it or replaces it with text indicating their desire to have it deleted, the page is to be deleted on sight. Current rules for deleting by proxy still apply as applicable.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

  1. Yes --~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  2. Yay -- 04:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  3. Yea Seems obvious enough. Nay - I had not thought about the template issue. Make an exception for that and I'm back on board. --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 06:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  4. Yea --Bob Boberton TF / DW Littlemudkipsig.gif 07:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  5. No - this would allow users to get templates, that may be in use on other people's pages, deleted with no record as to what happened. Stuff in their user space, stuff ups, or low content group pages maybe, but not everything -- boxy talk • teh rulz 07:37 15 December 2009 (BST)
    I'm not quite sure what you mean with the template thing; the user would still have to have been the creator to have the page deleted. Care to elaborate?--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 14:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
    User A create a template. B includes it on their page. User A later blanks it and requests that it be deleted on it. B is out of luck when it gets deleted, despite the fact that B is using it. —Aichon— 15:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
    What people aren't getting is that it would be deleted anyway, either through A/SD or the already existing Crit 7 Proxy clause. The argument is redundant and complaining for the sake of complaining. -- 00:00, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
    I wouldn't delete a template that was used elsewhere just because the author requested it. I'd roll back the pagewipe. Just because something meets a speedydelete criterion, doesn't mean it should automatically be deleted -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:41 16 December 2009 (BST)
    Are you saying you wouldn't do the same rollback in the same situation had this scheduled passed? -- 06:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
    Yes, I would. But there is no way for others to double check the deletion, like we do on a/sd, because there is no record. Sysops make mistakes -- boxy talk • teh rulz 06:33 16 December 2009 (BST)
  6. No - Boxy knows what he's on about. Not templates and such.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  7. No - YUM BOXYS DICK TASTES GUDjust make an exception for templates and resubmit Cyberbob  Talk  07:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  8. No - re boxy and I dont like the idea of deletion on sight as mentioned by red even if author signifys --C Whitty 15:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  9. No - It's not a lot of hassle to request deletion, and avoids any hassle this might cause. For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 15:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  10. No - As boxy. Just change it so you can't delete included pages (as per Cyberbob's suggestion) and it'd be fine. —Aichon— 15:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  11. Nay! Nay I say!-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 23:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
    Ik kan me hier niet in vinden ben ik bang, zoals anderen al hierboven sommeerde, ik ben het met hun eens. Nee . Dit kan ik trouwens niet laten, SA <3 --Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 07:14, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
    *sigh*. You idiot -- boxy talk • teh rulz 08:53 16 December 2009 (BST)
    English, or GTFO -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:47 17 December 2009 (BST)
  12. NOPE. As boxster. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  13. No - What those other people said. --ZsL 10:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  14. Nay - You'll have to resubmit this one accounting for templates, as others have stated.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 14:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
  15. No - Boxy ha ragione, bisogna modificare questa proposta in modo da includere il suo suggerimento. E Heaven è favolosa. --Janus talk 15:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
    <3--Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 20:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
    私は皆涼しいために私のズボンのトロンボーンを付けることにしたが完全に退屈であることおよび皆をコピーするために、恐ろしい翻訳と後で解決した。いいえ悪臭がするコアラの腎臓 Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 21:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
    Epic. You need to have a clear yes/no though before someone strikes it, preferably in the Latin alphabet. --Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 22:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
    私は。 どれも大胆である部品ではない。 3つの盲目のフランスのソーセージが唾液の川で最初に浸る沈降の船から叫ぶことを動かせば、か。 ウエーター。 Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 22:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
    いいえ = No. --ZsL 21:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
    English, or GTFO -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:47 17 December 2009 (BST)
    あなたのろばの上のそれを、無学な至上主義者の愚か者置きなさい。 Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 00:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
  16. No - Tidak bagus sekali, karena template masalah. See, I can speak another language too! I only needed to use Google Translate for one word! Seriously, as someone said, proposal is fine for low-key group pages and user pages, but there's a problem with it being applied to templates. Linkthewindow  Talk  15:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
    I didn't have to use a translator at all! \o/ -- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 21:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Recent Requests

Unused Images

Passed with 12 for and 10 against. Cyberbob  Talk  00:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Grouped Location Pages

Passed with 10 Yeas to 7 Nays.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 05:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Unnecessary Banned User Pages

Passed with 14 for and 2 against. Cyberbob  Talk  11:02, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Image revision removal
Image revisions that are older than 7 days are to be removed.
Approved 16 May 2006
Monumental Screw Ups
Pages in this form: with//////lots//////of//////slashes, and this one: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Example_monumental_screwup are unable to be moved or edited via normal means. Their content is to be manually moved to a sensible pagename without extraneous //s in its title and the original page is to be deleted on sight.
Note to sysops: A method for deleting these pages can be found here.
Approved 23 August 2006
Unused redirects resulting from page moves
redirects resulting from moves, that only show admin pages in their "what links here" list.
Approved 3 Mar 2007
Copyrighted images
Images that are requested to be deleted by the copyright holder
Approved 10 Nov 2007
Broken redirects
redirects that lead to nonexistent pages
Approved 12 Dec 2007
Personal Information
If a user wants personal information about themselves deleted from the wiki, they should be able to get it speedy deleted. Things like your name, your phone number, your email or home address, your workplace, pictures of your family etc. Link
Approved 11 July 2008
Porn is to be deleted on sight.
I like porn, you like porn, but this isnt the place for it.
Approved 22 July 2008
Revoked 2 August 2009
User page redirects
in the main space should be delete on sight as crit 3 or 9 (excluding those redirecting to Kevan).
Approved 26 November 2008
Swearing in page titles
Pages that have swearing in the title that is directed at a user or group (or their actions).
Approved 22 July 2008
Crit 7 by Proxy
If a user leaves a sysop a note on their (i.e the sysop's) talk page requesting deletion of a page that falls under Crit 7, the Sysop may delete the page on sight, making clear in the edit summary that the user requested it via talk page.
Approved 26 March 2009
As of January 2010, this scheduling now includes pages that the author has blanked or replaced with text indicating a desire to be deleted. However, pages used as inclusions (such as many templates) are excluded from this criterion.
Approved 3 January 2010
Crit 11
Userpages/Journals that are in the User: namespace but are non-existent users, and are already duplicated in the appropriate User: or Journal: subspace may be deleted on sight.
Approved 30 June 2009
Adbot-created pages
Pages created by Adbots and Spambots are to be deleted on sight.
Approved 30 July 2009
Unnecessary banned user pages
The User: pages of permabanned spambots and vandal alts (that have no contributions showing) are to be deleted on sight.
Approved 27 November 2009
Grouped location pages
Grouped location pages are to be deleted once each individual location has its own page and all incoming links (excluding those refrencing deletion) are diverted.
Approved 1 December 2009
Unused Image Removal
Images on the Unused Image list that are two weeks old are to be deleted. Images that are linked by text only will appear on the unused image list also.
Approved 10 December 2009
Associated talk pages
Talk pages associated with pages that are deleted under other policies, including talk pages missed in previous deletions.
Approved 19th May 2010
Amended 14th August 2011
Crit 9
Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.
Approved 29th August 2011
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling&oldid=1628783"