UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2008 10
|
Vandal Banning Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 2008
User:Obsdark
Soft warning given to Obsdark for deleting comments (poorly) off Talk:Suggestions. Remember kids, just because you don't agree with a poster that doesn't mean you can delete their comments off public pages. (The T:S page history is a nightmare, but he deleted a DCC post and placed ranting nonsense over it.) Just posting for informational reasons. --– Nubis NWO 01:05, 5 October 2008 (BST)
- Since when did deleting comments merit a mere soft warning? --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 01:07, 5 October 2008 (BST)
User:Happykook
Happykook (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
This edit. Removing a signed comment from a talk page without reason. Given Happykook's history with me, this is clearly targeted and therefore a bad faith edit to remove my comment from a community talk page. -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 11:55, 3 October 2008 (BST)
- Not Vandalism - Take it up with him instead of bringing it here. -- Cheese 13:26, 4 October 2008 (BST)
- I point all readers to the above case and this one to compare and contrast. Both regarding removals from community talk pages, however one results in a soft warning (in which the sysop in question clearly states it would be a full warning if the case was brought here) and the other where it's ruled not vandalism and the ruling sysop recommends further contact with the vandal in order to promote more wiki drama. A/VB, when you absolutely positively have to flip a coin for any decision, accept no substitutes. --
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 12:17, 5 October 2008 (BST)
- I point all readers to the above case and this one to compare and contrast. Both regarding removals from community talk pages, however one results in a soft warning (in which the sysop in question clearly states it would be a full warning if the case was brought here) and the other where it's ruled not vandalism and the ruling sysop recommends further contact with the vandal in order to promote more wiki drama. A/VB, when you absolutely positively have to flip a coin for any decision, accept no substitutes. --
- Not Vandalism - very petty reporting from Iscariot, yet again. It was a purely coincidental comment about wiki maintenance that any decent wiki contributor should be fine with it being removed once it had served it's purpose (keeping the section from being re-inserted on the main Mall page). However I see no reason why the comment was reinserted by Cheese if there was already a ruling of not vandalism, as it did nothing but up the drama level on the page -- boxy talk • i 13:54 5 October 2008 (BST)
User:Schizoidgull
Schizoidgull (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
Blocked for a day. More vandalism -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:21, 1 October 2008 (BST)
