UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2006 10

2006	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2007	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2008	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2009	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2010	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2011	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2012	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Q3			Q4
2013	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
Years	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019
	2020

Vandalism Report Space

Master B8

I will speak to him, yet again.--Gage 22:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Master B8 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Diff comparision. He's a newbie, probably didn't intend to impersonate. I'd suggest making a note of it (but not warning him) and having a quick word as to why doing that sort of thing isn't a wise idea. Not my call though. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 15:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I will speak to him.--Gage 17:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Grau Fox

His last 150 edits or so (I didn't go any farther back) have been concerned with the placing of that template. Warned.--Gage 19:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Lmao.--Lol 10:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Mrmooge88

Mrmooge88 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) I don't think this was bad faith - it seems more like ignorance - but he altered the vote counts on several Peer Undecided suggestions, some of which are now archived and so I can't fix them. --Funt Solo 23:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I think he may have been thinking this was how he voted. I will just roll back the page.--Gage 00:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Well someone else has edited the page since, and I am busy right now so forget I said anything about fixing it.--Gage 00:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Lots of vandals

Owned

Again Again

Again Again (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permaban.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Once more

Once more (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Ban-Perma.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Sharp

Sharp (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permanent banhammered.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Why? He has nothing in his contribs!--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 18:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

You'll have to ask Conndraka on his talk page, he's the one who banned sharp. However currently Conndrakas talk page is locked so I can't ask him myself. - Jedaz^{ΣT ΞD GIS S!} 21:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Same person as Again Again, Once More, Bathtime, et al... Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 01:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Ouroboros

Ouroboros (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Blocked.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Bath Time

Bath Time (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Crushed.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Dinglewar

Dinglewar (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permaslaughtered.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 17:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks - I banned the top two and started on rolling back edits, but I lost internet access midway through. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 17:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

DarkStar2374383

DarkStar2374383 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Violation of this arbitration ruling, diff comparison, Farewell UDWiki. --DarkStar2374383 ^{Talk | LDY | LOE} 08:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

sigh, banned for 48 hours. (One warning + "as if two warnings were already issued" = 48 hours). Also, you do realise that your record isn't long enough to get you permabanned, right? (I assume you're trying for that, for some unfathomable reason.) Who wants to bet this happens again on the 31st? What a waste of time. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 08:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

If you want to leave the wiki DarkStar, do me a favor and don't waste our time again. Just leave.--Gage 08:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Elias Taylor

Elias Taylor (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Elias Taylor has edited the [Crabapple] page several times, which is contentious enough already, adding a rather incorrect history of this 'non-group'. That my personal page has been edited with references to neo-nazism is particularly galling -- Harald von Holzapfel

Warned Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 02:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

IndyGoat

Actually, I banned every IP that Duce or alts used to post on the wiki for a year, so nobody could share an IP with him by definition.--Gage 19:02, 28 October 2006 (BST)

Interesting then... Well, If he that account later gives sufficient evidence to say it's a proxy, I'll report it again then... Untill then, well... I'll just move along... -Certified=Insane^☭

21:37, 28 October 2006 (BST)

Reptileus

Reptileus (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) This. Editing someone else's userpage. Or is there more to this (hi)story? -- Atticus Rex ^{AMP ' T} 00:49, 28 October 2006 (BST)

Reptileus seems to be a member of the Confederacy of Malton that he is saying Katthew is leader of. Hmmm... I just don't see bad faith here. I will leave a message on each of their talk pages and see what is said. Until then, probably not vandalism.--Gage 00:58, 28 October 2006 (BST)

Fair enough. Thanks, Gage. -- Atticus Rex ^{AMP ' T} 01:05, 28 October 2006 (BST)

Mistress Katthew No longer uses the wiki due to poeple dislikeing her, she also no longer uses her real e-mail in anything. I am her messager, anything you wish to ask her you come directly to me. I'm sorry for any inconvenance. --Reptileus 19:15, 28 October 2006 (BST)

On second thought, Katthew hasn't been on the wiki for 6 months, and has never even touched the Confederacy of Malton page. What kind of group leader never touches the page? As such, I am having a hard time believing the validity of this statement. I am warning Reptileus and the warning will be overturned only if Katthew decides to show up and verify the edit.--Gage 07:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

On third thought, that "warning" was actually a 48 hour ban.--Gage 07:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Maxwell Hammer

Um, so? Are you not allowed to have alts? Did he do voting fraud or something? Policymakerman 22:55, 27 October 2006 (BST)

He Used Said alt to circimvent an arbitration ruling against him, and in the process not only committed vandalism but issues against the TOS as well. Alts are still legal as of this point but not if used to go around rulings or policies. Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 22:58, 27 October 2006 (BST)

Hello sockpuppet of Agradera. Wait, he is probably a sockpuppet too.--Gage 22:59, 27 October 2006 (BST)

my bad, it jsut was not explained previously what he actually did wrong. carry on. Policymakerman 23:01, 27 October 2006 (BST)

Tiger Striped Dog

This. Removing pages from the speedy delete queue made by him in order to keep them from being deleted.--Gage 15:37, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Warned.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 19:56, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Alan Watson

Impersonation--Gage 07:30, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Frankly, I'm a little stumped by that edit. I know I didn't write the "umm... alex" vote, but I really have no explanation for how else it could have gotten there. -- Alan Watson ^T·RPM 08:04, 26 October 2006 (BST)

This is voting fraud of the most flagrant kind. Did you think you would get away with this? How stupid do you think we are?--Gage 08:29, 26 October 2006 (BST)

If I was intent on committing voting fraud, why would I in effect cancel out my own vote? It doesn't make any sense. Nonetheless, there's absolutely no evidence in my favor so I'll just swallow the warning, though this leaves me frankly disturbed about my account's security. -- Alan Watson ^T·RPM 08:35, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Not impersonation. Alan didn't do that part of the edit, it merely looks like that because there was some revisions deleted from history. For mods: Check here. --Brizth ^{M T} 09:59, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Ah, yes. I thought it would be a good idea to remove the vandl edits while we had the opprtunity. Sorry that i caused this trouble.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 10:12, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Well, it was my mistake with the deletion template that caused this undeletion mess to begin with so it's no big deal. -- Alan Watson ^T·RPM 10:15, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Sorry for the trouble guys.--Gage 17:26, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Rueful, Mia Kristos

Created this and this policy respectively. Don't you dare use the "Not vandalism. Not bad faith .: not vandalism" quote from the previous one Mia, because we all know that this edit shows that this is all just a pathetic attempt to make a point.--Gage 03:51, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Mia's policy is spiteful, yet Rueful's brings up a good point, although in a reactionary way to comment on Alan Watson's policy, just as Alan was countering The General and Mia. Mia's is iffy and condescending, Rueful's seems OK once you get past the frivolous name. --Zod Rhombus 04:33, 26 October 2006 (BST)

What is that? Three warning for me now, if this goes through? God, I hope so. --Sirens^{T RR} 04:35, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Why was mia's policy deleted? Theres nothing on either of the deletions pages!--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 10:14, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Check the Served Speedy Deletions. Mia Crit 7'd it herself. -- Alan Watson ^T·RPM 10:17, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Hurr. Cyberbob Talk 10:20, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Oops *Blushes bright red*.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 12:41, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Wow, it's been a while since I've been here. Hey everyone! -- Rueful 14:14, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Make a report for everyone who types something you disagree with. Though Mia is actually pushing it. Basil 20:40, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Mia's bad faith in this instance is evidenced by the report below this one, where she alluded to creating this policy out of spite. --Zod Rhombus 23:04, 26 October 2006 (BST)

The_General

Haha, very cute. Created a policy to bring back Amazing, presumably when it became clear that the first one was failing. I don't see this as good faith. --Sirens^{T RR} 02:21, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Buzz off. Not vandalism. Not bad faith .: not vandalism.--Gage 02:24, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Fine. My turn then. --Sirens^{T RR} 02:26, 26 October 2006 (BST)

709394

Permabanned--Gage 00:35, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Wow, it doesn't go to warning first? Rheingold 01:45, 26 October 2006 (BST)

Silkentresses

After seeing her recent edits then I think just a polite note about editing other users pages. Pillsy ^FT 20:45, 25 October 2006 (BST)

Polite cautionary note left, edit reverted.--Gage 00:39, 26 October 2006 (BST)

KingStoph

warned--Gage 14:53, 25 October 2006 (BST)

W00tw00tw00t

Um... alex

This user does not share an IP with any other user? --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 03:05, 25 October 2006 (BST)

It does not share an IP address, no, but it certainly shares an internet provider with the user below. Both of their only edits are on the policy. Coincidence? I think not.--Gage 03:09, 25 October 2006 (BST)

Pro-tec

Mr vandal

Mr vandal (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) This guy was embedding a large number of template calls in pages, stopping the page from being displayed due to overload of the server. example Permabanned him. --Daranz^{. talk . mod .} 01:24, 24 October 2006 (BST)

Ouch, that must have hurt the server. He linked the templates together as well!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by The General (talk • contribs) .

Many Vandals

Someone else can list them. I am too busy blocking them. Rest assured, all will be blocked (IP too).--Gage 01:16, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Gage is a wanker

Gage is a wanker (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

I masturbute to a picture of gage

I masturbute to a picture of gage (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Hello

Hello (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

I was going to distract you with moving pages but you fucking cunts have disabled it

I was going to distract you with moving pages but you fucking cunts have disabled it (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Egag

Egag (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Permabanned vandal.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 01:47, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Gauge

Gaged

Evil Thud

Alevins

did it again--The Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Talk | CC CPFOAS DOЯIS Judge LOE ZHU} 00:38, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Warned.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 00:42, 23 October 2006 (BST)

...and again--Gage 00:44, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Gage is a wanker

Blocked by Gage. --Axe Hack 00:13, 23 October 2006 (BST)

202.155.73.142, misconduct starter

Bug me not2, Fukmanditoryregristration

Perma ban? It's a site to avoid registration, basically inviting vandalism. --CaptainM 06:48, 22 October 2006 (BST)

I will go with that, and am considering banning the IP as well.--Gage 06:50, 22 October 2006 (BST)

An ip ban is ridiculous, that guy's done nothing wrong!--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 07:17, 22 October 2006 (BST)

IP bans are standard for permabanned users. Laying one on. Cyberbob Talk 07:21, 22 October 2006 (BST)

It's a site that bypasses mandatory registration. Thing is? He's breaking their own rules about it, not just ours. This is the third time he's done this, and there is another account called "fuck you gage!" ready to be used. In other words? Bad faith sockpuppeteering. Permaban and IP ban remain. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 07:28, 22 October 2006 (BST)

You can report any site to be blacklisted in the bugmenot system so that the login data is removed and new logins can't be created: http://www.bugmenot.com/report.php . I reported wiki.urbandead.com already.--Bonefiver 17:49, 22 October 2006 (BST)

12 year old AOLer

NB Admin

He inserted a space in the page. And removed something that he himself had just added. For future reference guys, Inserting spaces into a page is totally legal--Gage 15:34, 20 October 2006 (BST)

Y'know, a reasonable response goes down a lot better with other people than being abusively "humourous". Cyberbob Talk 15:50, 20 October 2006 (BST)

Another OAR multi

DJSMITH

Diff. Editing a comment in such a fashion as to negate the meaning/wording/etc. of another's reply. Petty? Yes, but I doubt anyone wants to see this sort of shit become common place. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 19:31, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Warned--Gage 19:37, 19 October 2006 (BST)

You are warning me for an edit made nearly four weeks ago? --DJSMITH^CDF 20:45, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Aparently so, thats the way things work around here I guess. --Agradera 20:48, 19 October 2006 (BST)

If you have nothing useful to add, do not add it at all. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 21:10, 19 October 2006 (BST)

That was four weeks ago? I know I'm operating damn near blind at this hour, but I wouldn't have bothered over something this trivial and old if you had not done it (surreptiously? maliciously? damnit... what's that word I'm looking for...). But... this edit proves you did not. I'm gonna stop editing the wiki at 6 in the mornin'. Warning retracted. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 21:10, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Thank you --DJSMITH^CDF 21:14, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Ken irons

Ken irons (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Vadalising the DHP Front Office and editing with a proxy --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 20:00, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Account banned for a week, proxy permabanned.--Gage 22:12, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Not Duce

so let it be written, so let it be done...Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 15:38, 17 October 2006 (BST)

This is pathetic. Almost hillareously so... -Certified=Insane^☭

01:10, 18 October 2006 (BST)

Honestly? I hope he does it again.--Gage 02:51, 18 October 2006 (BST)

Meh, If you ban his IP for a year I'm not even sure he'll ever come back... If he does, well, I don't think his group will exist anymore, so he probably won't have anything to vandalise for (though he'd do it anyways). -Certified=Insane^☭

04:11, 18 October 2006 (BST)

Jon_Pyre

The ambiguity of day vs. 24-hours is coming into play here again. Nearly everyone else (including MrA, our most prolific suggester) interprets it as 24-hours, but Jon is interpreting it as a day of the week. Even there, though, he's posted both suggestions in the same day. If he's allowed to get away with doing this, then the other 1-a-day suggesters are going to want to play to - which makes a mockery of the intention of the rules, and increases the workload for those people who edit the suggestion system pages, by allowing people to post ill-thought out suggestions at an increased rate.--Funt Solo 08:34, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Actually, it doesn't come into play here at all. Either way of looking at it he broke rule twelve. Warned. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 08:48, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Pinkfloyd224

I have permabanned the sockpuppet.--Gage 22:18, 16 October 2006 (BST)

Is there anyone here? Oh god, I am talking to myself!--Gage 00:18, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Yes you are. ;) I'm not gonna state my opinion on this, as I hardly have a neutral position on him, but you can pretty well guess it. -Certified=Insane^☭

00:22, 17 October 2006 (BST)

I will warn Duce Nauks another time (bringing him up to a month ban) and possibly ban his IP until such time as the ban is over in a few hours if no mod has anything to say about this. What say everyone else?--Gage 00:31, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Yes, the Alt is Permabanned and Duce should be banned for the next level. This should include his IP as well. Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 00:46, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Evading a ban is a bannable offence. Amusing when worded that way, but it is true. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:36, 17 October 2006 (BST)

Scrapped, Captain Rickety

Looks to be an SBC Dial up provider rather than an actual proxy service. Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 18:52, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Although I doubt you'd believe me, that's my brother. There'd be no reason why I'd create another account. --| scrapped | 00:17, 16 October 2006 (BST)

Does your brother vote? If not, there's no problems here. If he does, then… then I'm not sure. An experienced and constructive editor is a helluva lot more trustworthy than some fresh account that showed up out of nowhere, or some drama whore. I know I'd be willing to give you the benefit of the doubt in this regard. Unless anyone objects, I'd say you're good to go. Just be aware that if any vandalism comes from an IP you two share you may get inadvertantly banned. (Or vice-versa.) I don't see vandalism from either of you two as being a likely occurance though. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 20:25, 16 October 2006 (BST)

Shamus Oakshod, Martin Flamenco

Looks to be an Asian Pacific Dial up provider rather than an actual proxy service. Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 18:57, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Oh hey there. Yep, "we're" both faces of one truely charismatic guy. I only use Shamus as my front-man on the wiki, except if Martin has something to say in a group/context he's in. Also, Martin had a brush with the Malton Bounty Emo Hunters, and just case they are vindictive by nature I had hoped to keep Shamus and Martin seperate (Still admire your work EMOH btw, from afar aka out of pistol range!). Shamus Oakshod 21:00, 18 October 2006 (BST)

Wait. You're the same person? Cyberbob Talk 22:16, 18 October 2006 (BST)

Yes. Had Scotland Yard fooled for ages. Shamus Oakshod 05:25, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Love sentence fragments. Just don't use them for voting twice, or I promise we will get midevil on your ass.--Gage 05:30, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Much as I love old-fasioned buttock whipping methods, you can be sure I won't double-vote. If I ever do that, I'd deserve to get booted. Shamus Oakshod 08:42, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Theseveredband & Harald von Holzapfel

I say we ask him to stick to one account. He doesn't seem to be being deceptive or anything, but if one is to be banned it should be Theseveredband as that account has fewer edits.--Gage 07:04, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Might be a coincidence, but Harald von Holzapfel started editing once TheLibrarian stopped, and they posted very similar topics. Just thought you should check out if they are related. -Certified=Insane^☭ 17:08, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Duce Nauks, Taco Death, and Hendrix224

Are you sure they're not using AOL? Cyberbob Talk 04:10, 15 October 2006 (BST)

I googled the IP address, and nothing came up about it being from AOL, but it did come up as a proxy on several lists.--Gage 04:15, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Hrm. I'm not 100% sure on how to proceed. Cyberbob Talk 04:20, 15 October 2006 (BST)

Hahahaha!!! No wonder Taco Death talks in the name of the IWM but Duce Nauks denied his affiliation!!! Even got himself a spot in the arbitrator list! Ah common, permaban his ass, he never was up yo any good anyhow. And how many rules did he break in the last few days, considering he was using those accounts... -Certified=Insane^☭ 04:21, 15 October 2006 (BST)

The IP address is from Boston MA, and it is on Comcast, which IIRC is one of the non proxy using ones. I say we ban the sockpuppet accounts.--Gage 04:24, 15 October 2006 (BST)

That's a plan. The main will be warned as well - bringing him to a weeklong ban. Cyberbob Talk 04:34, 15 October 2006 (BST)

User:Dzme14

Dzme14 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Filed a report on suburb danger levels for Judgewood which was completly wrong and would be seen as misleading to people near the area. Here it is. Judgewood is practilly empty from zombies and anyway there is only one PD there. Users only two edits. --Marie^{The Grove} 16:33, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Can you prove bad faith, or is this guy just a n00b?--Gage 19:05, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Whats good faith in telling people a resource building in a completely safe suburb is being seiged by 250 zombies? Not even the balckmore building had that for most of the seige. Judgewood is struggling slightly with a lack of survivors from the invasion of the supposed Feral Undead and scaring people away again isn't going to help. --Marie^{The Grove} 20:08, 14 October 2006 (BST)

It is possible that he's reporting his own experiences as being a fact for the whole suburb and exagerrating them. I suggest we give him a polite warning to be more careful next time.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 20:16, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Well OK but I don't know how he could have found that. I've just walked round. Theres less than 10 zeds there who aren't waiting for a revive. --Marie^{The Grove} 20:17, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Maxwell Hammer

has recreated Rabbit Hole serveral times, a violation of this policy.--Gage 03:41, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Please see UDWiki:Moderation/Speedy Deletions for an explanation of this and to see how the mods are screwing me over because Conndraka doesn't like me in game. --Maxwell Hammer 03:48, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Not Vandalisim - Although it occured repeatedly before winding itself over to M/U I noticed that they never seemed to recieve a polite warning. I have left them one now. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 06:59, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Incorrect Max. A nice little timeline:

What Happened	When it happened	Proof
Initial Deletion	11:49, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk \| contribs) deleted "Rabbit Hole" (criterion 1)	Log
Deletion of Recreation	12:13, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk \| contribs) deleted "Rabbit hole" (deletion workaround)	Log
Polite warning	Revision as of 12:14, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk \| contribs)	Diff
Recreation	12:20, October 14, 2006 . . Maxwell Hammer (Talk \| contribs)	Undelete Link
Third Deletion	12:38, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk \| contribs) deleted "Rabbit Hole" (deletion workaround)	Log
Getting told to stop doing it... Again.	Revision as of 12:31, October 14, 2006 (edit) Gage (Talk \| contribs), Revision as of 12:46, October 14, 2006 (edit) Gage (Talk \| contribs)	Diff, Diff
Restored by Gage	14:35, October 14, 2006 Gage (Talk \| contribs) restored "Rabbit Hole" (2 revisions restored)	Log
Edit	14:44, October 14, 2006 . . Maxwell Hammer (Talk \| contribs)	Undelete Link

The rule explicitly states that the person needs to be told to not do it again. He was told not to do it again. It was a polite warning. All criteria were met ∴ Maxwell gets warned. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 12:37, 14 October 2006 (BST)

I saw and walked myself through the timeline. Placing a warning for someone on a page they have never edited is in neither polite or fair. IF he was meant to be comunnicated with it should have taken place on his talk page. Never happened. It is reasonable to assume that gage, bob and condrakka all knew where maxwell's user page was. It is not reasonable to assume that the noob knew where the speedy deletions page was. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 16:48, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Why should we coddle him if he couldn't be bothered to take the time to acquaint himself with the wiki? Cyberbob Talk 16:51, 14 October 2006 (BST)

To demonstarte that the rules as they are laid out are adequate and effective. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 17:31, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Ah Ha! I see what I missed I did not pay attention to the time at which max editied M/U. Xoid is absoulutely right thanks for fixing my mistake. --Max Grivas ^{JG / M.F.T.} 17:56, 14 October 2006 (BST)

You guys might want to check out this as well. -- Alan Watson ^T·RPM 18:49, 14 October 2006 (BST)

Codename V

Codename V (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Insane amounts of unnecesary spam on Group talk pages and user talk pages . --Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 05:28, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Okay, he has posted on about 60 or so group pages. The difference from before? This time, all those he edited on had signed up on the 5th of November page. By signing up, they asked to be kept abreast of news and recent happenings. As such, I find no wrong doing here. He hasn't hurt anyone, and he is just trying to make the game fun (a badly needed change).--Gage 05:36, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Scrapped

Scrapped (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Apparently, editing another persons posts are not allowed, this guy edited mine taking away the impact of the statement "And I find it unacceptable". So, go ahead, do your thing.--Duce Nauks 01:53, 13 October 2006 (BST) http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Dakerstown&diff=423806&oldid=423804 Heres the proof.--Duce Nauks 01:55, 13 October 2006 (BST)

If you'll also see, the reason that happened, was another damned edit conflict. I've gotten so many of those today, it totally ticked me off. I was being just a little blunt, so I simply copied the lower box and pasted it on the upper. But if Duce wants to call me a retard, go ahead and put it back. My bad. Also, if that wasn't enough, I just got an edit conflict right now. --| scrapped | 01:58, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Good for you--Duce Nauks 02:03, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Ummm, Duce... You change others' wordings. He simply removed a picture that (along with the rest), had no place in the news section of a suburb page. -Certified=Insane^☭ 02:39, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Aww, do you need a tissue? Or maybe this will help you stop Crying Image:For Hayduke.jpg--Duce Nauks 03:00, 13 October 2006 (BST)

Scrapped was removing an image that was spammming up a suburb page. It had absolutely no place there. He is pretty new, so I will assume that he didn't know that you could replace [[Image:R-tard.jpg]] with [[:Image:R-tard.jpg]] in order to link to the image (as I have done here). I see this as a good faith edit, and as such Scrapped will only receive an unofficial warning. I am sick and tired of the drama between these two groups, and I strongly recommend an arbitration case. You guys do NOT own the Dakerstown page, and this is getting out of hand. If you want to argue with me about this case, do it on my talk page because you have thoroughly pissed me off between the spamming of this page and Dakerstown. --Gage 05:19, 13 October 2006 (BST)

MrAushvitz

MrAushvitz (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss) Suggestions. Continually ignores the Rules for Discussions, which state "Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters." I think he should be warned to tone it down a little. --Funt Solo 16:23, 11 October 2006 (BST)

Give me a fucking break, Don't you have ANYTHING better to do? Not. Vandalism.. --Gage 17:22, 11 October 2006 (BST)

Crap moved to talk page.--Gage 19:44, 11 October 2006 (BST)

Welcome to our world, Gage. Cyberbob Talk 01:22, 12 October 2006 (BST)

Andrew McM

Not Vandalism - We will endeavor to assume good faith in this community. This user has less than 500 edits so I think that is a safe assumption. In the future don't bother us with this kind of stuff, just tell the user what we typically do here. It is that simple.--Gage 22:05, 10 October 2006 (BST)

Re Thanks for your good faith. I had actually been discussing my vote on the suggestion in question with the author, and he understood why I voted, and I assume he didn't mind me changing the reason for my vote. By the way, I've been here since roughly October last year. I understand all the rules in the wiki, it was just a minor slip. The reason I have less than 500 edits is merely because I don't edit much. -- Andrew McM ^W! 22:17, 10 October 2006 (BST)

Regardless of how long you have been here, I can't imagine punishing a contributive user for something so trivial. I will make this wiki a nice place if I have to do it myself. The days of witch hunts and banning users for no reason are things of the past.--Gage 22:28, 10 October 2006 (BST)

Then I salute you good sir. -- Andrew McM ^W! 22:30, 10 October 2006 (BST)

As the supposedly injured party, I'd like to say there was clearly no bad faith involved here from Andrew - just sensible editing and avoidance of drama. (Be a different matter if he'd spammed me, though ... *mutter* *mumble*) --Funt Solo 22:47, 10 October 2006 (BST)

Let me know how that works out, Gage. --Kiki Lottaboobs 08:38, 16 October 2006 (BST)

I never assumed bad faith; that's why I asked that a mod only tell him that it is not appropriate to edit a comment after it's been replied to, which is exactly what Gage did. I could have done it myself but I couldn't find the rule written down anywhere. Also a comment from a mod has more weight. Thanks, Gage. Rheingold 23:52, 10 October 2006 (BST)

Duce Nauks

I hit him with my banhammer. He should be out for the next 48 hours.--Gage 23:12, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Jeda

I would like to request this account to be kept unbanned for the length of the voting process in the poll to unban Jedaz. I believe its utter nonsense to ban all this alt accounts that jedaz have to create to reply in this poll, since accounts are easily created and to ban them will do nothing but fill available user names. Once the poll is over, Jeda (and any other alt account owned by Jedaz) can be banned and his main account unbanned (if doing so the poll results). This account, of course, will be limited only to reply in the poll, and i believe Jedaz will follow this. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 17:26, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Yes, because he will break the rules anyway let us ignore the rules in response to him. Why should we even ban a 3pwv account for that reason?
Okay, I'll be less flippant: The issue is that we have a banned user appropriating comments to a page which innately concerns him, which is not the problem- however it does not belong on the Wiki page itself but rather in the talk page, for one- he is TALKING about the case, not opening or changing the case (as that would result in a new vote). Secondly, if the vote looks like it is heading directly towards him remaining to be banned, what is to stop him from using said account to vandalize as he has nothing to lose? I would say that even if Jedaz was alotted an account for just the talk page (where he can discuss to his heart's content without getting into conflict with the poll itself) he should be re-banned for the 24 hrs leading up to the vote itself.
Reply to Obvious arguement; yes, Jedaz might be a good person. However if he is a good person than taking a 24hr break of editing before he is rightfully unbanned because of how good a person he is should not be such a sacrifice. --Karlsbad 18:08, 9 October 2006 (BST)

If he is the vandal everyone claims he is, what is keeping him from creating other accounts and vandalizing the wiki ? All i ask is to give the guy a chance to defend himself. How harmfull can be one account when you can create a thousand of them ? --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 18:28, 9 October 2006 (BST)

The thing that is keeping him, at the moment, is the fact that he is attempting to prove himself a good person at this very moment. He could create a thousand accounts and proxy-slam the wiki and not be charged if he called himself the 3pwv. If he really wanted to defend himself he could attempt to get the "club" over at Scroll Wars to stop using "wiki-terror vandalism" as a valid political tool, proving that he is actually for the preservation of a wiki. But since he is proven to be more apt to give a proxy-switching account to his Buddy-Pal-for-Life 3pwv, I won't hold my breath. --Karlsbad 18:33, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Master Cheif

And tonight's entrée, a Covenant Elite a l'oignon gratinée in a duck sauce... Rheingold 01:24, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Do not insult the vandals. It validates their activities.--Gage 01:28, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Nobodya

Lip

Another Proxy IP, banned as per policy; would it be out of place to request that people not vote using proxy accounts because they only strive to embarrass the cause they vote for? --Karlsbad 06:42, 8 October 2006 (BST)

Wanker

Kinda handy that he reported himself, don't you think?--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 23:34, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Banned. --Brizth ^{M T} 23:34, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Mayor Fitting

wow, is that really vandalism? i responded to him just not on his talk page...wow--Mayor Fitting 03:05, 7 October 2006 (BST)

I can't see any vandalism here. He was only telling him that he did something wrong. --Solamnic Knight 03:30, 7 October 2006 (BST)

The Issue is he Edited the Page itself and not on the Talk/Discussion page. If he had said the same on the "Talk Page" it wouldn't be considered Vandalism, but since it was on the User page itself it is. However I do think it wasn't in Bad faith necessarily... Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 03:39, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Not vandalism - in the future, only use the talk pages, not the main user page. --Darth Sensitive

^W! 04:03, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Cisisero

Vandalized the predators talk page. Put up un-provoked harrassment comments. --Mayor Fitting 02:12, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Unfortunately, talk pages aren't protected from harassment. If you really want him to stay off the page, start up an Arby's case. Cyberbob Talk 02:29, 7 October 2006 (BST)

Bah

"Gold Blade" etc etc

The account and character of GoldBlade should be warned again for a work-around of a ban. Therefore he is to be banned for 4 days (the time he had left on the current ban) infinity (the time alotted to him from the permaban) and a month (the punishment of a 5th warning). Why? Basically: Being a shithead when you get disciplined gets you in more trouble. --Karlsbad 07:54, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Thank you for that edit, Gold Blade. You just proved everything. Fuckwit. Is that the sweet sound of vindication I hear? Yes it is. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 21:52, 6 October 2006 (BST)

*does a little jig*--Gage 22:30, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Seriously folks, this is pure Gold (Blade):
A) That doesn\'t even make sense, B) How can you get your account into more trouble when its permabanned, C) This place i\'nt worth my attention anymore. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Because he was mocking you, idiot. Stab at ye2 admitting he was Gold Blade (x1) –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST) Then why do I have an email from the place saying that they were paid to shut it down? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Because you are blowing smoke out of your arse. You seriously think I would pay money for that? I'm a fucking pensioner. I need money for food, not to foil the eeeeeevil plot of a pack of retards who can be easily countered anyway. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST) Correction: Alt of New 3 page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Correction: Gold Blade. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST) Correction: Alt of New 3 page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Correction: Gold Blade. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST) No, keep your nose clean until you get it chopped off for no reason. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Correction: You vandalise repeatedly and get caught. Then you get punished. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST) Why should I care if I can\'t fix my sig? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Stab at ye2 admitting he is Gold Blade (x2) You might also like to note that Gold Blade was having problems properly using his template style signature on the SW Wiki recently. This seems familiar. I wonder why. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST) This idiot cant count. It says 3 vandals, when I count 5. GB, 3P, N3P, Meow, and Stallone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Admitting Gold Blade is a vandal? Lets see, how many is that now? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST) Xoid, don\'t make accounts that have my name on that vandal forum and I won\'t do the \"I was impersonated\" thing. Don\'t play stupid, I acessed the IP check on both This page and the Forum\'s. Its the exact same thing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. LMFAO. Oh, sure. I have absolutely no fear of it confirming that I impersonated you. That would be because I didn't. I'll email Clickdev and ask for the records if you wish. Hell, why not get Kevan to do it? I'm sure he'll really bend over backwards for your "resetting the wiki" bullshit after he finds out you're lying through your teeth. Oh yeah? Admitting he was Gold Blade (x3) Oh yeah, would anyone like the email he sent me where he claims the exact same shit? He also claims that this account was his? This is a comedy of errors, folks. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST) Sure as hell I can use proxies. No this is Stallone. Axe hack, have you recieved those emails or are you ignoring/blocking me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Most likely. Undoubtedly, he sees you for the scum you are. Stallone? The same Stallone who vigorously denied vandalism? The same Stallone that despite being the biggest zerger in the history of the game, seems to have some standards? I think not. You story seemed consistent so far, why change it? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST) Yes there is IP checking there. No it was not a proxy. Yes it was Xoid. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stab at ye2 (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Hilarious. Really, this is too rich. First it was Cyberbob, then it was me. Can't quite make up your mind, can you? Allow me to get my popcorn. Hey! Anyone got some butter? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 22:57, 6 October 2006 (BST)

GоІd ΒІаdе

Double permaban by Gage and Conndraka.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 00:26, 16 October 2006 (BST)

No comments please. --GоІd ΒІadе 00:47, 16 October 2006 (BST)

Not quite sure where you get off ordering people around. Stay on the SW wiki, please. Cyberbob Talk 07:01, 16 October 2006 (BST)

GoldBlade

Gold Blade would vandalize if the mood struck him. He enjoys being talked about, and so therefore I hope that this sentance calling him pathetic gives him a girlish titter. PermaBanned --Karlsbad 07:53, 9 October 2006 (BST)

Stab_at_ye3

GOLD BLADE

I'm pretty sure he's already banned, but banned again. I also find it laughable that he thinks I paid to have it shut down. I merely asked nicely. Didn't require much, they were violating the terms of service they signed up for. Idiots. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 03:46, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Gold Blade

Tch tch tch......good friend goes vandal.... --Axe Hack 03:37, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Sadly, I don't see him getting permabaned for that, we can't prove that's GB. That's why he posted that there instead of posting it on SW.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 03:41, 3 October 2006 (BST)

I bet that since The Devil made a comment on there about seeing that it was a proxy IP, that it's not GB and someone trying to fuck him over yet more. --CaptainM 05:09, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Gee, I wonder whether it's because he's trying to cover for his friend. Cyberbob Talk 07:14, 3 October 2006 (BST)

I don't know that he could have Gold Blade's IP for reference. That comment is sketchy to me.--Gage 07:18, 3 October 2006 (BST)

That's a good point, but if the wiki can use evidence off the wiki against people, when's it stop? I'm positive that if you knew what to google, you could find alot of dirt on ME, outside sites shouldn't be used as condeming evidence against Wikizens. --CaptainM 07:26, 3 October 2006 (BST)

He *could* have looked it up and proven it to be a proxy, but I'll bet that it really was GB, and 3page is trying to cover up his fairly major fuckup. Cyberbob Talk 07:23, 3 October 2006 (BST)

...when's it stop? A damn sight further than a forum specifically created to discuss how to vandalise this particular wiki, I'd say. Cyberbob Talk 07:34, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Can we contact the host of that forum and get it shut down?--Gage 07:36, 3 October 2006 (BST)

NFI. Would be worth looking into, though. Cyberbob Talk 07:41, 3 October 2006 (BST)

We can bitch here, I can't find the exact spot, though.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 07:58, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Here ya go. --Lucero ^{Talk U!} 18:44, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Considering that the person who owns it is paying to have it hosted, I doubt it. --Steel Laser 22:23, 3 October 2006 (BST)

I already know what to do for the supposed Halloween Vandal Attack, we have someone save the important pages of the Wiki unto they're computer, so then when the dust clears they can just Cut and Paste.--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 22:33, 3 October 2006 (BST)

You dont even have to cut and paste, there is a little thing called export pages.... --DarkStar2374383 ^{Talk | LDY | LOE} 00:30, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Don't worry guys, it's being taken care of. Cyberbob Talk 11:05, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Problem being that the import pages feature is only available to moderators. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 11:53, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Gold Blade

Advertising a vandalism forum.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 00:17, 3 October 2006 (BST)

He asked for a link. I gave him one, seeing as the vandal got banned. --Gold Blade^{Vote Abstain!} 00:18, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Thanks for doing a vandal's job.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 00:20, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Well, he wanted a link. I gave it to him. It was neutral. --Gold Blade^{Vote Abstain!} 00:21, 3 October 2006 (BST)

And I am the Queen of England. Come on, that is advertising. Advertising a vandalism board is as bad as doing the vandalism yourself.--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 00:23, 3 October 2006 (BST)

No you arent, and I would know, seeing as I am the queen's advisor. But when someone asks for something, isnt it a good thing to help them? HURRR. --Gold Blade^{Vote Abstain!} 00:25, 3 October 2006 (BST)

hath legalized it. --Gold Blade^{Vote Abstain!} 00:26, 3 October 2006 (BST)

That logic would be great if it applied here. This is vandalism. That is the wiki equivalent of helping someone kill someone and then saying "I was only being helpful LAWL."--Gage 00:28, 3 October 2006 (BST)

No, if someone asked me for poisoned food, I would give it to them. I have no idea what they plan to do with it. --Gold Blade^{Vote Abstain!} 00:29, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Ok, that was wrong of me. But nowhere in the rules does it say anything bout this being bannable. --Gold Blade^{Vote Abstain!} 00:31, 3 October 2006 (BST)

You quoted Odd Starter in saying that there is no Accidental Vandalism. This means that there is no "incorrect Good Faith". Warned. --Karlsbad 00:33, 3 October 2006 (BST)

You can get warned for advertising a site where vandals are talking? Really? Oookay. --Kiki Lottaboobs 10:43, 3 October 2006 (BST)

No, the entire site is about vandalism of this wiki - not just a place where they happen to hang out. Cyberbob Talk 10:59, 3 October 2006 (BST)

I HAVE NO IDAE WAHT TEHY PLANS 2 DO WIT IT!!!! Rheingold 15:38, 3 October 2006 (BST)

This entire page is about vandalism of this wiki. Can linking to M/VB be a bannable offense? I thought precedent was clear, you are innocent until you do something wrong. When did that change? --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:34, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Actually Kiki, this entire Page is about the PEOPLE who vandalize the wiki. Gold Blade already admits that he was guilty of attributing to this wiki in Bad Faith: the rule was minted as soon as he admitted that he was a vandal- are you actually going to argue that advertising a forum CREATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF VANDALISM is in Good Faith? Really? --Karlsbad 01:21, 5 October 2006 (BST)

No, I was just considering that since Gage and Baddass also linked to the site, it might be a good idea to clarify what he's being banned for. Was it that he linked to the site (and therefore we should file vandalism cases on both of them, too), or was it the language tht he used to invite people to the forum, or was it for some thoughtcrime that hasn't quite happened yet, but he should still be punished for. What is he guilty of? Planning to do vandalism? Participating in a discussion about vandalism? Encouraging others to talk about vandalism? --Kiki Lottaboobs 00:17, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Oh for the love of god, will you fuck off? Encouraging someone to commit vandalism is quite different from giving evidence. Bad faith editing is vandalism. Giving evidence is not bad faith, encouraging vandalism and then enticing someone to go participate on a site that is specifically about organised vandalising of this wiki? That's vandalism. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 02:53, 6 October 2006 (BST)

Okay, so telling someone to vandalize not bed faith. But, telling someone to go to a web page where they're told to vandalise the wiki is bad faith. At least that's consistant. --Kiki Lottaboobs 04:59, 6 October 2006 (BST)

You dropped something, oh look, it was the word between web-page-told and vandalize wiki bad faith- its the HOW. Advertising HOW to vandalize and linking to a place where the entire PURPOSE is to vandalize is Bad Faith. I don't see why you are stupid about this. --Karlsbad 07:50, 6 October 2006 (BST)

He did do something wrong, hurr.--Gage 02:03, 4 October 2006 (BST)

Impersonators

CyberΒοb240

Dаranz

Devils Night Vandal:Banned Conndraka^{mod T CFT} 02:06, 3 October 2006 (BST)

Xoіd