User talk:Axe Hack

Main | Talk | Evil Plans! | The Music Quiz | Brawl in a Bar | Sandbox (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) | Signature | Advertisement Requests | Templates | Navigation (2) (3) | Status Read this first! Post new messages at the bottom. You can do this by clicking here. No shouting profanity like Eminem. Keep the profanity to a minimum, unless your stage name is Eminem/Slim Shady and your real name is Marshall Bruce Mathers III. This page is usually archived at the beginning of every month. Certain topics are excluded, that is only if the conversation happens to extend to the next month. And finally, the most important note... First I am popping your new page's animated cherry. 02:20, 1 July 2010 (BST) You want some whip cream with that? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:21, 1 July 2010 (BST) Penalty Good. It's not fun without some some extra challenges. Keep up the good work organizing everything. Oidar 11:25, 2 July 2010 (BST) Malton Manhunt Data Collecting I made the first kill. What are the procedures for reporting it? --Natasha Fatale 18:38, 2 July 2010 (BST) so... how big do our mudkips need to be to win your vote? P.S. THERE IZ 2 OF US... ;) ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 21:59, 2 July 2010 (BST) As the holder of the largest mudkip thus far, I ask that you switch your vote to these guys, just because they stand a higher chance of winning.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:09, 2 July 2010 (BST) So let me get this straight...I've voted for Mis and Rev first, than swapped to Yon. And now you guys want me to switch my vote back again? What is this bizarre ping pong game of votes you guys are trying to pull on me? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:09, 3 July 2010 (BST) MAKE IT SO 01:23, 3 July 2010 (BST) Oh, I'll change my vote...But it won't be for any of you. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:39, 3 July 2010 (BST) GO!! Let's get this party started! -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 23:33, 3 July 2010 (BST) Mayor I'm backing Misanthropy. Change your vote over to his from my campaign, so that we can beat KS.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:39, 4 July 2010 (BST) ...Read that header up there from Rev... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 17:41, 4 July 2010 (BST) But you do not appear to have changed it?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:47, 4 July 2010 (BST) You should check again. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 17:53, 4 July 2010 (BST) Read my response under your vote.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:56, 4 July 2010 (BST) 17:54, 4 July 2010 (BST) Mwuhahaha!!! --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 17:56, 4 July 2010 (BST) Heh. Now no one gets my vote. If you still want my vote, this is what you do. Yon and Mis. Both of you shall fight to the death. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:04, 4 July 2010 (BST) I already killed him. 18:07, 4 July 2010 (BST) WAIT! You never heard who I'll vote for if one or the other wins! If Mis wins, I won't vote for Mis. If Yon wins, I won't vote for Kyle. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:09, 4 July 2010 (BST) I mean I killed him in the figurative sense. 18:11, 4 July 2010 (BST) If Misanthropy loses the election, Yonnua Koponen shall change the links in this template so that they link on the first two names, and not on Axe Hack. --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:20, 4 July 2010 (BST) The Ruling You and Misanthropy shall be forced to link to the Chilean Blob in their signatures and you will both create e-penis templates and present these templates to Giles on his talk page in a timely manner not to exceed 4 (four) days. Additionally they will be banned from commenting on each others talk pages for a period of 1 (one) day, effective immediatly. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 23:55, 4 July 2010 (BST) You can talk to Axe again. The time span has elapsed. Don't forget to get with Giles! ;) -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:21, 6 July 2010 (BST) Arbitration Just a reminder that you have 1 day to create an e-penis template and then present it to me on my talk page as per the recent arbitration ruling. Failure to comply may result in bans or worse. Thank you.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 16:44, 7 July 2010 (BST) Oh shit. I go away for a few days and the ruling was given already? Someone should have told me!!! Oh wait... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 03:02, 8 July 2010 (BST) I'd totally love to see you get a warning for something that should never have been. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 03:10, 8 July 2010 (BST) Heheheh. As funny as it would have been I'd never take anyone to A/VB over such a ridiculous arbitration. I was being tongue in cheek there. But thank you for the epeen template (even though Misanthropy's was much more original).--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 12:18, 8 July 2010 (BST) I thought about it before I posted that, and to be honest, for someone like Axe Hack, getting the warning removed would be no problem,... It's not like he's not active as all get up on the wiki. That aside though, I thought it funnier if I did. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 13:26, 8 July 2010 (BST) When an arbitration ruling is broken the user is taken to A/VB and if ruled vandalism, they are banned outright, breaking an arbitration ruling means the escalation skips the two "warning" phases of the escalation system, so Axe would have been banned for a day : D. However, without being told that the ruling was made I think there would have been leeway in an A/VB case, but otherwise.... :D --         15:55, 8 July 2010 (BST) Yeah,... now that you mentioned it, I did know that, I just didn't think of it. And he was made aware of the ruling in the section above this one. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 20:06, 11 July 2010 (BST) Eh. I was lazy. Forget originality. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 15:50, 8 July 2010 (BST) Updating Buildings, how do I do this? I went to Blesley Malls, and it has two zeds on both the south-east and south-west corners outside, and four zeds in each corner inside. How do I change the status? Defender Of Weak 00:03, 11 July 2010 (BST) Sig Here, or here might be of help. 02:35, 15 July 2010 (BST) I was trying to figure it out myself, but whatever... *COUGH*STALKER*COUGH* --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:37, 15 July 2010 (BST) I psyop. I spies on RCs. 02:39, 15 July 2010 (BST) All I hear is, "I psycho". ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:41, 15 July 2010 (BST) Mother, mother! Blood! Blood! 02:42, 15 July 2010 (BST) I prefer the link to my demo page, but either way works. —Aichon— 03:28, 15 July 2010 (BST) Challenge What are these two undecided suggestions about? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:38, 17 July 2010 (BST) What undecided suggestions? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:52, 17 July 2010 (BST) Your two missing suggestions you made and now cant find. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 15:32, 17 July 2010 (BST) Don't remember. It's been a few years, you know. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 00:34, 18 July 2010 (BST) Blah -1 :( --Thadeous Oakley 17:09, 17 July 2010 (BST) Historical Groups The only problem with the Stats page idea is that it is actually quite easy to fall off the page and then return later. 404 comes to mind in particular, since they were off the page for a good 3-4 months at least and are back now. Issues like that are just in part because they had a number of members disappear for a while, but the group itself never died. The other big problem with using the Stats page is that it is extremely sensitive (it is even case sensitive). For groups that might only have 12-15 members, they might not even show up on the page if they have minor discrepancies in their group tags. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 00:17, 18 July 2010 (BST) Thats true. Most feral members can't even come close to spelling SFHNAS properly. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:40, 18 July 2010 (BST) WelcomeNewbie Stuff Hi, thank you for the welcome message .. I am no good at Wiki editing, so it will be a basic message and sig :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Artagel (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Ok, sorry for all the sig problems. Gonna give up commenting, as I just cannot seem to get the hang of wiki stuff --artagel 19:51, 21 July 2010 (BST)Artagel Copyright is wrong... I just wanted to let you know that you attributed the work done on this image to the wrong people. By this, I mean instead of having the work attributed to Ubisoft,... it should have been attributed to GameWallpapers.com as per the copy right notice in the lower right corner. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 02:01, 21 July 2010 (BST) Aye, but Assassins Creed is Ubisoft, no? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 03:00, 21 July 2010 (BST) It is indeed. All of its characters would, at the very least, fall under intellectual property for Ubisoft. You've got a watermarked image, not a copyright belonging to a wallpaper site. 03:03, 21 July 2010 (BST) See, that's where you're wrong. The characters themselves, and their designs, are copyrighted to Ubisoft. The image is a new generated image, created by the second company. Speaking solely of the image, it is a copyrighted work to the company I mentioned above. The characters are copyrighted to Ubisoft. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 03:20, 21 July 2010 (BST) You know, I got to thinking about it, and how I could explain what I mean differently. I don't know if you're into music or not, but I hope you are for the sake of this example. Go to your musical collection, and grab your favorite album, by your favorite group, so you can see what I'm talking about. Mine is "A Hangover You Don't Deserve" by Bowling for Soup. Now, I'd imagine that, similar to the album I've selected, you have some album artwork in the cover, someplace, like I do. Open the cover, and read it over. Now my music is copyrighted to Bowling for Soup. The album is Copyrighted to Zomba Records. The album art is attributed to Jason Jarik. If I were to use an image from the album, I'd techically attribute the copyrighted album's artwork to Zomba Records, the concept to Bowling for Soup, and say it was courtesy of Jason Jarik in my sourcing of the work. This is what I'm getting at. You'll remember here recently I had a discussion running about citations. This is what I was refering to there as well. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 03:42, 21 July 2010 (BST) Misanthropy said: All of its characters would, at the very least, fall under intellectual property for Ubisoft doot doo doodoo doodoo doot doo doo doo... (Entrance of the Gladiators aside, if I was to market an image of Han Solo, you'd better believe Lucas will be involved in the legality of it somewhere along the line, and given that Ubisoft is the bigger company here I'd find it better to attribute the image to them given that it contains multiple elements they've copyrighted). 04:08, 21 July 2010 (BST) Key word is "Market". Nobody is "Market"-ing anything. That being the difference between copyright infringment, and attributation. Again, my soul request would be to attribute the original work, being the picture in it's entirety to the creator of the work, with the concept going to Ubisoft. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:17, 21 July 2010 (BST)