Suggestion:20070927 Fuel Can Attack

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Duped.PNG Dupe
This suggestion has been found to be a dupe of this one in peer rejected.
Dupes are easily found by searching for them in the main and suggestion namespaces.

Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20070927 Fuel Can Attack

Bloody Predators 02:16, 28 September 2007 (BST)

Suggestion type
Additional use for Fuel Can.

Suggestion scope
Attack on Humans or Zombies.

Suggestion description
I believe we should be able to use the fuel can as a weapon to attack other humans or zombies, by setting them on fire. The Fuel Can can be in the same drop down list as the other items which are used for attack. (ex. pistol, knife etc...) The fuel can would be able to be used 6 times, like a pistol clip, before the fuel can is empty. It can have the same chance of hit as other melee weapons(Hand-to-Hand Combat) since the human would need to get close enough to dump some fuel and light the fire. Damage can be the same as a shotgun shell (10HP).

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes


Kill Votes

  1. kill - I too want burning zombies but i have seen it done much better and still get rejected. --Honestmistake 10:20, 28 September 2007 (BST) This one is very different from the linked Mr A suggestion tho so its not a dupe of that!--Honestmistake 10:23, 28 September 2007 (BST)
  2. kill Just unrealistic. Stay still while i set you on fire! I have poured 1/6th of a can of petrol on you and none on myself and will now light you. --Rosslessness 17:40, 28 September 2007 (BST)
  3. Kill - Concur with Rosslessness. It would be cute/stylish, but it's not realistic. --Pgunn 18:47, 28 September 2007 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Dupe - can someone provide a link?--'BPTmz 02:52, 28 September 2007 (BST)
  2. Dupe - Dupish of this one in peer rejected... and just no... no incinerating zombies -- boxytalk • 02:55 28 September 2007 (BST)
  3. Spupe - The Spam/Dupe combo! Ridiculously overpowered and suggested many times in many ways before. --Steakfish 03:00, 28 September 2007 (BST)
  4. Spam - And a dupe to boot. --Saluton 03:48, 28 September 2007 (BST)
  5. Spam - I'd only be for this if it carried a high percentage for the survivor to also immolate himself, as well as burn down the building he's in, leaving it ruined forever.--Jiangyingzi 07:45, 28 September 2007 (BST)
  6. Spam/Dupe - enough said --~~~~ [talk] 08:55, 28 September 2007 (BST)
  7. Spam - I think Malton, like most other English cities went smoke-free July 1st.--SeventythreeTalk 15:22, 28 September 2007 (BST)
Personal tools
advertisements