Suggestion:20081019 Crucifixes, read first, do not dupe

	Closed
	This suggestion has finished voting and has been moved to Peer Rejected.

20081019 Crucifixes, read first, do not dupe

Yonnua Koponen 11:09, 19 October 2008 (BST)

Suggestion type
Flavour.

Suggestion scope
Survivors in church.

Suggestion description
Before you say that this suggestion is spam because it has crucifix in the title, read it.

I merely mean to suggest an alternative to the godly power of crucifixes which is normally suggested, yet to give a slight purpose to them that people who carry them seem to want so much.

In a Church/Cathedral, one carrying a crucifix can spend an action point praying, and recieves the flavor text 'You get down on a knee and pray for salvation' or something along those lines.

That's it. Nothing happens, you just get the flavor text. This means that crucifixes now have a minor use, but are still very much flavor items. So, what do you think? Constructive criticism is advised. Yonnua Koponen 11:09, 19 October 2008 (BST)

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Keep - Author Vote Yonnua Koponen 11:27, 19 October 2008 (BST)
2. Keep - Meh, it's flavour and whilst I won't say that I particularly want it, I don't find it objectionable. I also don't see why it can't stand alongside the other suggestion as a second 'use' for a crucifix. --Papa Moloch 12:03, 19 October 2008 (BST)
3. Keep - The other suggestion for crucifixes was better, imo, but what the hell. We could always merge this one with the other. --Private Mark 21:34, 19 October 2008 (BST)
4. Keep - Meh, why not. It doesn't show text to anyone but the person clicking on it, so, in that sense, it might be even LESS potentially objectionable than the other one. I still prefer the "wave" suggestion, though. --Jen 21:48, 19 October 2008 (BST)
5. Keep - Ain't nothing wrong with a little flavor text, it wont do no harm, why not,I say keep--Brian eetar 21:51, 19 October 2008 (BST)
6. Mmm,Flavour! - Give a usless item some intrest. --Angusburger 09:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Kill Votes

1. Kill - I like the other one better. This one's too over the top for my liking. -- Cheese 11:18, 19 October 2008 (BST)

   There's another one?Yonnua Koponen 11:27, 19 October 2008 (BST)

2. Kill - give a useless use to a useless item? no thanks --Irounds 13:46, 19 October 2008 (BST)
3. kill while the other crucifix suggestion gets past my "no religion in game" filter nthis one does not... Why? Because this one involves actually invoking a particular religion thus favouring it over others and that will just generate another wave of "change some churches to Mosques/Hindu temples/Druidic Circles etc" --Honestmistake 15:15, 19 October 2008 (BST)

   It's a crucifix. That makes it Christian. Are you stupid or something? Yonnua Koponen 07:40, 21 October 2008 (BST)

4. Weak Kill as Honest. The other crucifix suggestion does this better without making it overly religious. Linkthewindow ^Talk 22:50, 19 October 2008 (BST)

   Oh, and be sure to use Talk:Suggestions next time. Linkthewindow ^Talk 02:18, 20 October 2008 (BST)

5. Kill I like the other one better and as said above it will make the game more religous which is not really the point --Michaleson ^CAPD 23:52, 19 October 2008 (BST)
6. Kill/Change Remove 'for salvation," and you have my vote. And I hope Midianian will be voting against the "talk to yourself" item on Talk:Suggestions. -- Galaxy125 04:45, 20 October 2008 (BST)
7. Kill Sorry, but this just doesn't sound appealing to me, especially since its for a pointless item.--Omega360 04:55, 20 October 2008 (BST)
8. Kill - But why would you need a crucifix to pray? A church has pews and kneelers. You can just pray anytime you're in a church.--Kolechovski 19:19, 20 October 2008 (BST)
9. Kill - As Kolechovski, plus you don't even have to be in a church. Just use the magical talk function and you can grovel before Jeebus all the live-long day.--Jiangyingzi 07:57, 23 October 2008 (BST)
10. Kill Because there's already a better suggestion up for voting, and because of what Midianian, Kolechovski said --Silisquish 02:42, 24 October 2008 (BST)
11. Kill - Because for this to be worthwhile, your crouching would have to be visible to other players. And if you changed it to that, it would be killed more than now. Sorry. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 07:57, 24 October 2008 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - There's already a silly suggestion under voting, giving crucifixes a non-purpose. The place to get constructive criticism is Talk:Suggestions -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 11:16 19 October 2008 (BST)
2. Spam - le sigh. I had big hopes for this one what with the title and all...--xoxo 12:08, 19 October 2008 (BST)
3. Spam - An action that doesn't do anything, and isn't even visible to others. That's a waste of code. --Midianian^{|T|T:S|C:RCS|} 23:29, 19 October 2008 (BST)
4. Spam - I agree with Midianian, i see stuff that auctuly have a function wasting ap when you use it inpropely, but for an update to make somethings sole function to be a complete waste of aps is just ridiculous --Tjayh913 01:37, 20 October 2008 (BST)
5. Spadoink-a-spam-o-dupe - as boxy, there's a half decent suggestion getting voted on... and... if you wanna pray, just RP it... --WanYao 09:52, 20 October 2008 (BST)
6. WTFCentaurs Spam this fucking shit into outerspace. --Sonny Corleone ^{DORIS MSD pr0n} 20:20, 20 October 2008 (BST)
7. Spam - Cause it had Crucifixes in the title--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 20:34, 20 October 2008 (BST)

   This vote is spam. It doesn't count unless you give a reason. Yonnua Koponen 19:48, 22 October 2008 (BST)

   That is a justification. Please see Talk:Developing Suggestions for the discussion on this. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 10:05, 23 October 2008 (BST) Non-author reply struck. --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 10:36, 23 October 2008 (BST)

   GTFO my internets --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 02:50, 24 October 2008 (BST) Unjustified vote struck. --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 13:16, 24 October 2008 (BST)

8. Spam - Do we need anymore? Can someone cycle this? - tylerisfat 03:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

---