UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 01

Giles

Hope I'm not conflicting Spider now. This, obviously --Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:15, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Once you've edited the category page. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 14:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Done --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 14:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Krinks Power Station

Short term anti vandal measure. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:09, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Now Unprotected --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

User page and stuffs

Unprotect plz.

• User:Krazy Monkey
• User:Krazy_Monkey/Archive
• User:Krazy_Monkey/sig
• User:Krazy_Monkey/NavBar

I'll leave the rest of them as I'm not sure I'll be needing to edit them in the near future. -- Cheese 12:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Done --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

A/PM

These two archived promotion bids were never properly categorized. Both need this and this one slapped on. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 23:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Done. 23:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Er noooo you use PromRej you two duffas -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 01:30, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Fanglord2/sig

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Fanglord2/sig

Please change "President" to "Chairman".

Regards,

--Chairman Fanglord, 17:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Requested edit served, Mr. Chariman. ~ 17:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion:20110110 Recon Training

Voting? Done. Cycled? Check. Protection? It's scheduled. Who wants it? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 01:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Dun. -- Cheese 01:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

General Discussion Archives

See this. Basically Archive 1 to 6 all need protection. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Really? They never have been before, and older cases can always be revisited and discussed with new information. But hey, throw me some precedence and its yours. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 16:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Precedence? How about that every monthly A/VB page gets protected including the talk page? It's always been this way, don't see why these pages need to be an exception. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure the discussion pages of monthly archives are protected because they are for sicussion of case for those months only. The archives you requested for protection are General A/VB discussion. ~ 17:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Not really so applicable, since A/VB falls under the scheculed protection of admin archives, and GD is a general use area. Lots of behind-the-scenes work often needs to happen on archives like link fixing and the like, IMO the less archives we have protected on the wiki the better (with the exception of the admin archives). But I don't really care too much either way, would just prefer unprotected. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 20:19, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah. I'm with DDR on this. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

They're not GD archives; they just happen to share the same label of "General DIscussion". They're the archives from A/VB itself, as opposed to the monthly A/VB archives. Follow Thad's initial link and you'll see what he meant. I'm not saying I do or don't agree, but I wanted to make sure everyone was deciding based on the right ideas. —Aichon— 20:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean with link fixing? Anyway, I thought this was pretty standard. An archive is for preserving old information, it shouldn't be edited. Even if something related to the subjects came up, you should bring this somewhere else, not reply to discussion of years old. If you don't want it, then okay, beats me why but not worth the care.(editconflic) --Thadeous Oakley Talk 21:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

I say protect them. They're VB archives anyway, and none of them have ever been editted after archival. I see no reason not to protect them.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm with Yon. They're archives for a reason. Protected. -- Cheese 21:52, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:ApprovedPolicies

I think this should be protected, no? ~ 15:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

No because it will be edited from time to time? Since I just added the new policy there as a regular user? Unless you want to make that a sysops only action. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

It just seemed like something that would be Sysop only edits, its not because of your edit personally. But in checking, UDWiki:Administration/Policies is not protected so there may be a good reason why. ~ 15:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, it's unprotected so that normal users can archive policies.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 15:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Policy

UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/No minimum vote on APD

Policy passed and added to the relevant section. Only needs protection now. Don't forget the talk page. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Done. ~ 14:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

You're forgetting the protection template good sir! --Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Wait. More --Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:55, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Got it. ~ 14:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Suburb/Archive_3

Because Talk:Suburb/archive and Talk:Suburb/Archive are protected. ~ 19:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Done.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:48, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

it can haz {{protect}}? ~ 19:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion:20101227 Move restriction based on encumberance

Scheduled. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 00:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Done -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:01 11 January 2011 (BST)

Suggestion:20110110 Suburb name on the map should link to its wiki page

Early cycling criteria has been reached. This is now a scheduled protection. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

done.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:36, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Lockettside Valkyries

After being the reason for years of vandalism, I'm protecting this page. Would only suggest unprotecting once said vandal is most definitely finished with harassing the wiki, which, going by her past, could be another half a decade. -- LEMON #1 07:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Anyone opposed to sticking {{InactiveGroup}} on the page? Forums are all but dead, not on stats, and excluding vandal edits, hasn't been edited in a long time. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:53, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

+1 --VVV ^RPMBG 20:38, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

I've added the template.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

The talk page needs to be protected, along with {{InactiveGrouptalk}}. Linkthewindow  Talk  21:24, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Both done.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Bunch of policies

For some reason these didn't have {{Policy Document}} put on them when they were passed:

• UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Historical Voting Time Limit
• UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Better Vandal Data (not sure how this one would work, given that only two of the three policies on the page passed.)
• UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection
• UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Update the Wiki Software (2)

The latter wasn't added to any of the pages for passed policies either, I'll check that the others were added, too. Linkthewindow  Talk  00:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

done. The notice on Better Vandal Data that was already there should cover the fact that only two are policy.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 15:30, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Axe Hack/Archive 5

...Do I really need to provide a reason for my own page? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes -- LEMON #1 00:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2010_12

+ talk page - Scheduled. Only case that might still require discussion is the Izumi one, but I think the January cases about her sock puppets would suffice for that purpose. -- Spiderzed▋ 21:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I think don't protecting ongoing discussions or vandal cases immediately is right here. Just wait a day or 2 until the heat dies down, but not like in this, in the middle of something. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 22:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

While we're at this, also protect:

• UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 12‎
• UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/December-2010‎
• UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2010/December‎

--•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Done all, left Talk:A/VB archive, make sure we don't forget about it in a few days :( -- LEMON #1 00:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, there's been no talk in about 5 days, and a lot of the Izumi discussion is now in the 01/2011 archive, so I think it's good to protect. -- LEMON #1 14:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Protections Scheduling Queue

Protection Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like deletion scheduling requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Valid votes are:

• Yea - Approval of Schedule Request
• Nay - Disapproval of Schedule Request