UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2010/December
|
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cycled policy discussions
- UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Update_Promotion_Procedure
- UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Better_Protection_for_User_talk:_Kevan
Scheduled. -- Spiderzed▋ 18:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Next time, protections go under the protections header. >:( --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Suggestion:20101203 New Zombie Tip
Scheduled. —Aichon— 08:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Battle of Krinks
Unprotected as 6 months has passed. See UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Iscariot_vs_Cornholioo --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Lol. I bet you put it in your reminder 6 months ago. Loser :D -- LEMON #1 11:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Rosslessness_vs_Poodle_of_Doom
This case has been withdrawn and should now be protected. Oh, and Ross, next time when you move it (the case) under "Recently Concluded Cases" you should archive it like I just did and just place a link instead of copy/pasting the entire case. --
(Thad)eous Oakley Talk 10:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't copy and paste the case you fool. I cut and pasted the header. Much easier. Plus when I archived the case I would have done this. I didn't archive the case as it had only just ended and wanted to see if anyone else involved wanted to comment so I neither archived or protected it. Any more back seat modding you want to do? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- (I missed reading this part up until now)/ Why do you take so much offense at this, when I merely pointed out some silly mistake, and you immediately lash out at me? --
(Thad)eous Oakley Talk 15:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- (I missed reading this part up until now)/ Why do you take so much offense at this, when I merely pointed out some silly mistake, and you immediately lash out at me? --
- I didn't copy and paste the case you fool. I cut and pasted the header. Much easier. Plus when I archived the case I would have done this. I didn't archive the case as it had only just ended and wanted to see if anyone else involved wanted to comment so I neither archived or protected it. Any more back seat modding you want to do? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oh snap! And done. -- LEMON #1 10:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it is standard procedure to do so and not just on A/A. Looking at the history it also isn't the first time he improperly archived a case. Not that it's that much of a big deal, but eh. --(Thad)eous Oakley Talk 11:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, and "All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:
- Well, it is standard procedure to do so and not just on A/A. Looking at the history it also isn't the first time he improperly archived a case. Not that it's that much of a big deal, but eh. --
- A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility. "
- Its standard procedure. You should probably do it. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Let me set a few things straight right now. 1: It's only mandatory on A/A not A/PM. Once A/PM is cycled, leaving it at the bottom for feedback is fine, been done for years besides the odd insta-archive that's done lately. 2. Yes, Ross, that means you generally insta archive on A/A so I agree with Thad's initial statement at the top. 3. Thad initially did add a link to the page, but no header. In the interests of just keeping the archive clean I changed the internal link brackets into lvlthree header code because since the request had already been filed there wasn't a need for the link to be there (in reality I just didn't really think of putting the header AROUND the link code :|) so that wasn't his fault, more mine. -- LEMON #1 14:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- My god, you're fallible. Thats even better. Besides, I'm going to keep doing it my way, because in my mind, its better. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your joking right? --(Thad)eous Oakley Talk 14:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Whatever floats your boat. not worth arguing over though personally I think Mistergame wasn't wrong in his initial statement. -- LEMON #1 15:19, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your joking right? --
- My god, you're fallible. Thats even better. Besides, I'm going to keep doing it my way, because in my mind, its better. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- I was only pointing out that you misarchived some stuff, sorry if I came off a bit dickish. It's just that after you reverted my earlier edit, and moved it under the "concluded case" header I was like "Well if he does that, he might as well archive it correctly". --(Thad)eous Oakley Talk 14:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Let me set a few things straight right now. 1: It's only mandatory on A/A not A/PM. Once A/PM is cycled, leaving it at the bottom for feedback is fine, been done for years besides the odd insta-archive that's done lately. 2. Yes, Ross, that means you generally insta archive on A/A so I agree with Thad's initial statement at the top. 3. Thad initially did add a link to the page, but no header. In the interests of just keeping the archive clean I changed the internal link brackets into lvlthree header code because since the request had already been filed there wasn't a need for the link to be there (in reality I just didn't really think of putting the header AROUND the link code :|) so that wasn't his fault, more mine. -- LEMON #1 14:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Its standard procedure. You should probably do it. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
User talk:Axe Hack/Sandbox
Needs unprotecting. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:30, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Dezonus
Obvious protection need is obvious. -- Spiderzed▋ 12:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Just moving some things...
I'm moving stuff in 4 to 3 to keep with the yearly fashion so 2008 won't be split in two, while 5 will be moved back by one because I like my archives to be sorted and numbered right. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- unprotected by Ross, make sure come back once you're finished. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 23:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- While we're here, do you want number 3 moved so that there's a space in the title, like the others?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- It doesn't quite matter if there's spaces or not. 2 doesn't have spaces. And while we're here, reprotect 3 and 4, but leave 5 until I archive for December 2010. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 23:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- done. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 23:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- It doesn't quite matter if there's spaces or not. 2 doesn't have spaces. And while we're here, reprotect 3 and 4, but leave 5 until I archive for December 2010. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 23:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- While we're here, do you want number 3 moved so that there's a space in the title, like the others?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Scheduled Stuff
- UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 11
- UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/November-2010
- UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 11
- UDWiki:Administration/Move Requests/Archive/Nov 2010
Someone get to 'em, please. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 08:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 11 too. —Aichon— 09:14, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- As well as UDWiki:Administration/Bureaucrat Promotions/April 2010. Linkthewindow Talk 10:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Done Thanks former and future sops. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
UDWiki:Administration/Bureaucrat Promotions/October 2010
Needs {{CratPromoArchive}} at the top. Linkthewindow Talk 10:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Added --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
