UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2010/October
|
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Combat 18
The threat of Corn's alt accounts is no longer apparent, so I guess it's fine to unprotect this now. Obviously if it happens again, I'll lodge another request to have it re-protected (in fact by that point I'll just do it myself). -- LEMON #1 14:05, 19 October 2010 (BST)
- Main and Talk? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:28, 19 October 2010 (BST)
the dead of Dunell Hills
Can this be unprotected please? The DHPD would like to archive it. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 19:44, 17 October 2010 (BST)
- Done.
19:55, 17 October 2010 (BST)
Template:SugVoteRules
thoughts on removing the justification requirements under the "Invalid Votes" section? Either way, the rules contradict each other on this template and it's idiotic that even after discussions like this it was never changed. Either we have to remove the clause under "invalid votes" or we have to remove the part under "suggestions for voters" which says they should justify their votes. thoughts? -- LEMON #1 06:24, 7 October 2010 (BST)
- Maybe make it so a justification isn't needed for a keep vote, and keep votes only? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 06:26, 7 October 2010 (BST)
- I never understood why justification was needed anyway. --VVV RPMBG 06:43, 7 October 2010 (BST)
- Because it used to act as a forum for Kevan to read the feedback given for a suggestion, incase he wanted to adopt it but needed feedback on tweaking the suggestion and suggested numbers, etc. Nowadays, most of the suggestions go through DS so they are usually refined with everyone's opinions weighed in already. Long story short, unless we force people to use DS before they post a suggestion up, we shouldn't be changing the feedback rule, just eliminating the double standard that exists on this template. -- LEMON #1 08:20, 7 October 2010 (BST)
- Yeah, it should say "should", not "must", and they should not be a requirement. Justifications help people understand the problems/benefits to the suggestion, but they should not be a necessity for a vote to count. —Aichon— 20:16, 7 October 2010 (BST)
- As above, unless there is a mandatory source of feedback either on the suggestions' talk page as a result of DS, or on the main page in the form of votes, we shouldn't be changing the rule. -- LEMON #1 11:20, 13 October 2010 (BST)
- Motion to make Aichon's change as above?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 08:09, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- No! Don't you guys read anything I say above? :( We've had discussion after discussion even a vote or two in the past, and it ain't gonna happen unless that mode of discussion can be kept in the suggestion system as a compromise somewhat, forcing people to use DS would be a good start, but unless we find a way to do that I'm probably going to continue arguing against the rules removal. -- LEMON #1 08:16, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- Oh, I read "As Above" as meaning, "As Aichon who is posting above me". :P My bad. --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 08:38, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- Sorry, not your bad cause that's how I meant it, maybe we're getting crossed lines atm ;) I thought you meant that and I'm still arguing against it, we should not change the rules unless we have proper community consensus, until then the only purpose of this request I think (since not many people have shown interest here as I would have hoped) is to just get rid of the double message displayed on the template, until an actual rule change is made. -- LEMON #1 08:49, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- Frankly it works well as it is, we all want justification, but if people don't offer one, we don't go mad. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:22, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- I seem to be having a hard time arguing my way, and I'm fine with that assessment Ross so I'm happy to just cycle this. Seriously though, when wiki tensions heat again this will become a problem, remember the Iscariot :( I'm just saying that so I can say "I called it" when it happens. -- LEMON #1 10:55, 16 October 2010 (BST)
- Frankly it works well as it is, we all want justification, but if people don't offer one, we don't go mad. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:22, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- Sorry, not your bad cause that's how I meant it, maybe we're getting crossed lines atm ;) I thought you meant that and I'm still arguing against it, we should not change the rules unless we have proper community consensus, until then the only purpose of this request I think (since not many people have shown interest here as I would have hoped) is to just get rid of the double message displayed on the template, until an actual rule change is made. -- LEMON #1 08:49, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- Oh, I read "As Above" as meaning, "As Aichon who is posting above me". :P My bad. --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 08:38, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- No! Don't you guys read anything I say above? :( We've had discussion after discussion even a vote or two in the past, and it ain't gonna happen unless that mode of discussion can be kept in the suggestion system as a compromise somewhat, forcing people to use DS would be a good start, but unless we find a way to do that I'm probably going to continue arguing against the rules removal. -- LEMON #1 08:16, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- Motion to make Aichon's change as above?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 08:09, 14 October 2010 (BST)
- As above, unless there is a mandatory source of feedback either on the suggestions' talk page as a result of DS, or on the main page in the form of votes, we shouldn't be changing the rule. -- LEMON #1 11:20, 13 October 2010 (BST)
LUE
Hey guys, can we get the LUE page unlocked to add on to our recent exploits, or if that is undesired, just to add a link to a new page separately from the old LUE page? In the past month or so us folks at LUE have made a comeback with about 20 or so members, with me leading them. We helped Big Bash 3 in Wyke Hills and Scarletwood, then spearheaded the effort to take down Stickling Mall last week and are spearheading an effort to take down Caiger Mall right now. Vito Mortis (our original leader) can corroborate this, he's been back in the action with us off and on. Thanks.--VinnyMendoza 04:56, 12 October 2010 (BST)
- Dones. Let me know if you need it done again after you've edited it. 04:59, 12 October 2010 (BST)
- Thanks! Will do!--VinnyMendoza 05:59, 12 October 2010 (BST)
