UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2010/September
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Umbrella
Clean up time. Remove
- U.B.C.S. Merc-for-hire Inactive, members joined UC
- Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Service Inactive, I actually co-own the page.
- Umbrella, Inc. Inactive, no content, on deletions.
- Umbrella Special Operations Unit Inactive, co-owned by me.
--
Thadeous Oakley 11:47, 30 September 2010 (BST)
Why is this being ignored?--Thadeous Oakley 07:58, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- Perhaps it's because none of those pages seem to be protected, so you can edit them yourself. It's also unclear what edits you actually want made -- boxy talk • teh rulz 09:40 1 October 2010 (BST)
- He wants them removed from the disambig SILLY -- LEMON #1 09:53, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- As DDR. I'm linking to a protected disambig page, and I'm asking for removal of pages linked on that disambig. I'm missing the rocket-science part of this Boxy. Sorry if it was unclear. --
Thadeous Oakley 09:59, 1 October 2010 (BST)
Alright. I didn't address this cause I've been super super lazy lately cause I'm on holidays and have only been checking UDWiki like 5 minutes a day before I find another excuse to forget about it and drink myself stupid. Basically, I'm pretty indifferent but TBH I think removal isn't the best option, as the guy who formatted EVIL the way I did, I'd suggest a NPOV active/inactive roster? -- LEMON #1 10:18, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- I'm leaning on disagreeing with you, but I'll think it over first. Except for number 3, Umbrella Inc; it's going down anyway. Thanks for the suggestion though. --Thadeous Oakley 11:48, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- Alternatively, Regaining the redirect but having a fairly clear disclaimer at the top of the only active umbrella group page directing to Umbrella (Disambiguous) --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:52, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- I'm with DDR, just re-arranging the page is better, since the other pages still clearly exist.
15:13, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- Why is it even still protected? It's been protected for almost two years, and the conflict died down AGES ago. Thads intentions and frustration here at least demonstrate a point of why he has to ask our permission to fuck about with a page that we, 5 umbrellas and a wiki don't give a shit about. -- LEMON #1 15:36, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- I'm already starting to regret bringing this up. Even though the disambig is in desperate need of updating; Most groups are inactive, one's getting deleted which means a red link, and the 2 joke ones really don't belong there. However, if we have to go through another hissy fit to get anything done then consider this request withdrawn. --Thadeous Oakley 15:57, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- oh come on we could use some entertainment around here.----sexualharrison
¯\(
)/¯ 16:00, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- Red links can be removed. Anything else should be treated properly, not in some special case just because you ask (and not even nicely might I add). Pages that still exist on the wiki should not be removed from relevant disambiguation pages, otherwise those pages serve no purpose at all. 16:16, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- Unless anyone objects I'm going to remove the protection on this page. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:19, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- Dude, three of those pages are mine. I added 1, 2 and #3 myself. I could legitimately ask for their deletion if I wanted too. This was suppose to be just a formality. --Thadeous Oakley 16:24, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- I'd still rather see them on the page, perhaps de-emphasised under the heading of your main group. But plain old removing listings is counter-productive. 16:30, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- I'd still rather see them on the page, perhaps de-emphasised under the heading of your main group. But plain old removing listings is counter-productive.
- Red links can be removed. Anything else should be treated properly, not in some special case just because you ask (and not even nicely might I add). Pages that still exist on the wiki should not be removed from relevant disambiguation pages, otherwise those pages serve no purpose at all.
- oh come on we could use some entertainment around here.----sexualharrison
- I'm already starting to regret bringing this up. Even though the disambig is in desperate need of updating; Most groups are inactive, one's getting deleted which means a red link, and the 2 joke ones really don't belong there. However, if we have to go through another hissy fit to get anything done then consider this request withdrawn. --
- Why is it even still protected? It's been protected for almost two years, and the conflict died down AGES ago. Thads intentions and frustration here at least demonstrate a point of why he has to ask our permission to fuck about with a page that we, 5 umbrellas and a wiki don't give a shit about. -- LEMON #1 15:36, 1 October 2010 (BST)
- I'm with DDR, just re-arranging the page is better, since the other pages still clearly exist.
- Alternatively, Regaining the redirect but having a fairly clear disclaimer at the top of the only active umbrella group page directing to Umbrella (Disambiguous) --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:52, 1 October 2010 (BST)
The Page is Unprotected sort it out between yourselves. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:38, 1 October 2010 (BST)
Suggestion:20100916 Airstrike
Early cycling eligibility has been reached. This is now a scheduled protection. Someone get to it. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 20:09, 18 September 2010 (BST)
- Protected. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 21:30, 18 September 2010 (BST)
