UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2007/July

e Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Every Page of Axe Hack's

User:Axe Hack/Nav

Yes. You heard me right. I want all my pages, except for the talk page, protected by the 31st. I'm leaving for Taiwan for vacation and won't be back for a month, and would really hate it if someone messes around with my pages without anyone noticing. The link to them, are in the above Nav bar of mine. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:19, 27 July 2007 (BST)

I think I got them all The preceding signed comment was added by boxy (talk • contribs) at 01:50 31 July 2007 (BST)

Ketchelbank suburb page

Ketchelbank is there anyway we could just ban me and donathin from posting? that would have the same effect. edit war is starting again...i really dont like the drama....--'BP^Tmz 17:07, 19 July 2007 (BST)

A/A -- boxy ^{T Nuts block it! DA} 00:40, 21 July 2007 (BST)

UDWiki:Moderation/Policy_Discussion/idledemotions

I'd like this to be unprotected, as I'd like to reword it to submit it as an active policy. It does seem that there is still some interest in this policy and previous discussions showed that many sysops were interested in enacting this in some form. --Akule ^{School's in session.} 19:16, 21 July 2007 (BST)

If you want to, start another policy discussion, that one is archived. There's no need for you to use the same page, just copy the text you need/point towards the old version/something else. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 23:40, 21 July 2007 (BST)

Welcomenewbie

I think we can unprotect Template:Welcomenewbie now that the header is gone from the page (which is what caused newbies to edit it when trying to remove the template) -- boxy ^{T Nuts2U DA} 04:07, 15 July 2007 (BST)

I've got some worries about the fact that it's on about 1000 user talk pages. It's a high visibility target, and one that would give a lot of effect for little work. But as long as the protection isn't needed.-- Vista  +1  12:06, 15 July 2007 (BST)

Ketchelbank

Donathin and Blood Panther are at it again, this time with the suburb news page. It looks like another little edit war between them is breaking out, User:DangerReport/Ketchelbank might also need temporary protection to and someone needs to do something to force those two to resolve this. It's the same argument they went to Arbies for last time.--karek 14:23, 3 July 2007 (BST)

please do. this is getting sad. yes i was proven wrong last time but the suburb has changed, with most of the resource buildings now caded with survivors inside.--'BP^Tmz 22:56, 3 July 2007 (BST)

If anything it should be left at the danger level it was set at in the arbitration case until proof is provided by either side. Which I'm thinking may require another arbitration case or something.--karek 01:12, 4 July 2007 (BST)

Those two had better start pulling their heads in a bit. The suburb is dangerous, and about half the buildings have cades. The dangerreport page has been protected, I'll watch the suburb page -- boxy ^{T Nuts2U DA} 03:19, 5 July 2007 (BST)

if i may ask...how could a suburb be dangerous and have about half the buildings caded?--'BP^Tmz 03:30, 5 July 2007 (BST)

Barricades don't matter to danger level, only their absence matters. And in your images you posted it is obviously a case of a few people strafing the suburb for the sake of trying to change the danger report, not of the suburb being safer.--karek 03:36, 5 July 2007 (BST)

Strafing. I wouldn't like to be without free running, and trying to survive there -- boxy ^{T Nuts2U DA} 03:37, 5 July 2007 (BST)

But I will monitor the situation for a bit longer, have another walk around later. If the situation hasn't changed, I may change my mind. This conversation should be continued on User talk:DangerReport/Ketchelbank -- boxy ^{T Nuts2U DA} 03:51, 5 July 2007 (BST)