UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2009/December

e Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

A/G#Scheduled_Deletions

Shouldn't new stuff go at the bottom? --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 20:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Oops, it's actually located here. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 20:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Re-ordered. Everything should be in chronological order, top to bottom, now. 20:28, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Cult of Cockfucktus

I'm somewhat confused. The talk page mentions this group as historical, although there is no corresponding template on its main page, nor did i find its name in the historical groups list.--Axel27 10:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Well, anyways, if it's a historical group the proper template should be placed on Cult of Cockfucktus page so that it's included in historical groups category.--Axel27 10:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

If I had to guess I'd say someone just threw the template up there for kicks. If there's no mention of it anywhere in the Historical Groups list then I'd say the template should be removed. Cyberbob  Talk  11:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

The archives are your friend. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Cheers. Template removed. Cyberbob  Talk  00:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Linkthewindow/Archive

Forgot to have this uprotected when I got demoted - it's an archive disambig. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:28, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Done.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 03:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Image:Dead-Transparent.png

Was thinking of a hypothetical fun main-page christmas prank (omg a/m) and I realised this isn't protected. Thoughts? --

 

 

 

 

22:23, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Better safe than sorry.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 23:30, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

A Couple of my Subpages

Could you please protect User talk:Zombie slay3r/old and User:Zombie slay3r/the zombie genocider? I don't see myself editing those pages in the future. --ZsL 18:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

No Prob. Merry Christmas. --

 

 

 

 

20:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. --ZsL 21:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

fuck off with your header

My user and talk pages. Do your job and fix it. --Thadeous Oakley 09:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back, I guess. Done. --

 

 

 

 

09:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Gee DDR, how very nice of you!--Thadeous Oakley 10:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

User Talk Page

Mine. Protect. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:26, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Done. Cyberbob  Talk  07:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Poodle of Doom's crap which apparently doesn't need a header...

Never really gave it much thought to have this and this protected. It's the main redirect we use on the wiki.... -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 05:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Done. Cyberbob  Talk  07:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

The Following Pages

I would appreciate the protection of the following talk pages. There is no reason what so ever that these pages should need to be edited. I've taken the liberty of provided direct links, and hope they won't redirect....

One | Two | Three | Four | Five | Six | Seven | Eight | Nine | Ten | Eleven | Twelve

Thanks.... -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 03:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Protected.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 04:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Again, thank you very much. It's greatly appreciated. -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 04:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

More archives....

Yep, I archived some more EVIL news. Basically, the pages are here for nothing but archive purposes, and should never need to be edited for any reason at all, by anyone, in the future. The pages are located here, and here. -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 03:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Protected.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 03:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you kindly,... it is much appreciated. -Poodle of Doom^{M! T} 03:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

winman

User talk:Winman1 reason:I am constantly being insulted and flamed on my talk page. --Winman1 18:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Personally, I'd recommend it being blanked before the protect, so that you don't have trolling on there permanently.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I've wiped all the text not made by Winman and protected it. I would suggest, Winman, asking for an unprotection soon, it isn't a particularly efficient thing to do on a wiki and I'd only want, myself, this protection to stay up for a week or so. --

 

 

 

 

23:11, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Trolling or not, it's an arbitration issue, always has been. Unless he's inactive, his page should not be protected. Although I don't plan to edit his talk ever again, I could be considered an involved party, and will not outright dispute the ruling. Only voice my opinion, as shown.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 14:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

DHPD

Template:DHPDnav

I've unprotected it so Sanpedro could edit it.-- SA 13:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks SA Sanpedro 23:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Imagery

Given there's likely to be some targeted vandalism aimed at me shortly, best protect this, this and this to prevent potential disruption. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Sure, why not?-- SA 23:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Oohh!! Targeted by whom?! --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

The guy making death threats I assume.-- SA 23:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I see now. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

A/VB request

[1]

I'd like to comment on my own A/VB case (tops).--Thadeous Oakley 10:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

And what comment would you like to add? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

A few of my thoughts on the matter. If it weren't on the end of the month, I would already be finished.--Thadeous Oakley 13:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

If you want to post them below, I'll add them. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I was planning on writing a whole lot of nasty words, but since you're the one adding them, I'll preserve your innocence and drop this issue. --Thadeous Oakley 13:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

No, how about you learn your lesson and use the talk page? The case was open and shut and it doesn't necessarily need any more input from you, especially of which, in a more violate form, got you into trouble in the first place. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

It's my case, it's my right as a involved party. I never had a chance to give input, seeing as I was banned almost instantly. --Thadeous Oakley 13:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

By what you said above, it looks like my call was exactly right. Sorry buddy. The talk page is the place for idiotic, butthurt profanities. Learn your lesson already! --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

And exactly. Talking on the main page was your right, not you privilege. We don't keel over and let banned vandals come back and complain about their rightful bans on their cases. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Err... shouldnt this page be left unprotected for a week at least ? Its the first day of the december, and there is still a case waiting to be ruled on, and users (like mistargayme) might want to make comment there. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[talk] [wcdz]} 21:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

lol-- SA 23:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Red Hawk One/Archive 1

Personal talk archieve.--~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 04:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Dun --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 08:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)