UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2007/December
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
UDWiki:Administration/Guidelines#What_are_System_Operators_on_this_Wiki.3F
Requesting that Special:Listusers/sysop be included in that section, so that it's easier for navigation, I know it's in the Nav template but it should probably be included there too, possibly something like "This is the current Sysop roster, and this is the current Bureaucrat roster." or something to that effect.--Karekmaps?! 14:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
My Sandbox
It needs protection due to it's a backup of my Nav That I created. It needs protection from vandals.--Novascotia 17:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Have people been editing your navbar? Why not just report them to A/VB? --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 17:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- It would seem to be safer to get protected, seeing all the vandals today.--Novascotia 02:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Trust me, this is nothing compared to some days.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 02:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Explain. Also the only reason I want this protected is because of what vandals have been doing these days, more protections are needed.--Novascotia 07:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- It would seem to be safer to get protected, seeing all the vandals today.--Novascotia 02:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- You're not even using it as a navbar? It's not included in any pages. And how about moving it to User:Novascotia/Nav? A sandbox is supposed to be somewhere where you can experiment with wiki code... not real useful if you cant edit your sandbox, eh? -- boxy talk • i 08:46 31 December 2007 (BST)
- For once I have to agree with Boxy I should create it into a nav then protect it.--Novascotia 18:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Suggestion Rule Change Policy
It's been up since mid November, needs archiving, withdrawal, and protection(on the scheduled protections list).--Karekmaps?! 04:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Did this yesterday sometime... must got sidetracked. Anyway, policy and discussion page protected -- boxy talk • i 07:27 1 January 2008 (BST)
Suggestion Rule Change Policy
It's been up since mid November, needs archiving, withdrawal, and protection(on the scheduled protections list).--Karekmaps?! 04:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Red Rum/Martial Law
Needs a Category:Group Subpages put on it. --User:Axe27/Sig 15:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Done - Vantar 06:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Zerg Hunters Unlimited
This page has been protected for a while, and myself and Token Black Man are reinstating the group, and revamping it a little and I would like to be able to edit the page. Thanks :) --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 14:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Nov_2007
Scheduled protection. --User:Axe27/Sig 18:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Done, but please check UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive next time, there were a few that had been temporarily archived there that needed to be transfered over -- boxy talk • i 00:54 17 December 2007 (BST)
Red Rum/Martial Law
To stop the seemingly never-ending edit wars; I think it's obvious and fair enough now. Torec T-CC/CS/CS/CS 02:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Protected. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 02:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Template:NewSug
I suggest moving the <noinclude> tag immediately after the </small> tag. I believe the blank line in the template to be the reason why the list of today's suggestions accumulates a lot of blank lines after it. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 18:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
User_talk:Katthew
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:Katthew
They are using my images without permission; I wish those images permanently removed from that page... That is my likeness and as such is given full protection under the State and Federal Law.
References:
http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Aug/1/126361.html
http://www.ncsl.org/programs/lis/privacy/publicity04.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_rights
I had warned them and removed the images but they insist on causing problems; I don't care about the dialogue but the use of the images I will not tolerate.
--Marty Banks (aka. Mundane) <DHPD> 21:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- This is obviously not a case for protections. Think about it- if I "protect" this page, then the pictures will remain forever. --Karlsbad 21:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, where should I put this? Could you move it? I have to perform a concert in an hour... --Marty Banks (aka. Mundane) <DHPD> 22:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- You should move this case to arbitration, i guess. There you would need to create a case against katthew to prevent her from using your images. This would create a lot of discussion, lots of drama, and katthew will just be a bitch about it more than she already is. I suggest you to simply ignore her, as there is little she can do against it. Another thing you could do is upload another pic over this one. And you can't call real world laws in here (specially US laws), at least not the way you want to. If this image is copyrighted, you can call all these fancy laws you quoted, but then it should'nt have been uploaded to the wiki in the first place and should be removed from the system. If it isn't, anyone in the wiki can use them anyway they like, and all these rules are null and void. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 22:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to remove my images from the wiki and CC them on deviant art... then link them in my profile page... should she put them up again I'll deal with it accordingly... If she continues after I do this please do something, my likeness is something I take seriously... more than UD seriously; her using my images is a real life issue to me, it is not something I will let die... --Marty Banks (aka. Mundane) <DHPD> 22:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Right. Place the images in Speedy Deletion, under author request. If she carry on using your images, then we will be able to do something about this. Sorry about all this. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 01:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Done, feel free to remove this section here then... Thanks for the help on this guys... This is frustrating me; my art and my sisters' is important to me and how it is used is kinda personal... I just realized, how can I have images displayed on the wiki from a remote location? and if it is on my profile, what will prevent them from doing this again? --Marty Banks (aka. Mundane) <DHPD> 16:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- You can't have them displayed from a remote location. They only come up as a link. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 19:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, the suburbs page is incredibly biased, it is supposed to be a map, not a danger map for survivors. This creates a huge impression on new players that they should play survivor, I request that there be a page that shows a map of the suburbs, with no danger ratings. The current suburb page be moved to something like, "Survivor Danger Map". And another page for how hospitible it is for zombies using this map: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Zombie_Map maybe renamed to "Zombie Hospitible Map". --Thekooks 19:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- This doesn't have as much to do with the navigation template as it does with the suburbs article itself. I suggest you post this suggestion to the talk page for the article first, as this is not an edit (and a page move) that will go undisputed. --Daranz.t.
modjanitor.W(M)^∞. 02:21, 1 December 2007 (UTC)- Not really, how could you argue that the current suburb page is NPOV, it beggers belief that nobody has complained before. I'm simply asking for the page to be renamed, and two more pages added. Really not that big a deal. --Thekooks 12:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Eh, because the template page is protected.--Thekooks 15:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Discuss on the template talk page then. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 15:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC)