UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Nov 2007

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deletions Archive
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of November 2007.

Mall Locations

All information covered by Category:Malls- Vantar 23:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Keep, Merge, and Redirect to Category:Malls - This doesn't need to be handled here, just merge the info into the category page (only the paragraph or two at the top), and turn the page into a redirect -- boxytalk • 02:09 23 November 2007 (BST)
  2. Merge - What boxy said, except also merge the map at the bottom. Koli T 07:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. Merge - I go to this page all the time, it is very useful -- which is why I actually added a link from the better known and better referenced MIC... Merge this the Mall Information Centre. --WanYao 09:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
    No, the MIC is specifically about danger levels, this would dilute that page. It should be merged with Category:Malls, so there is only one page listing all the Mall locations. Both the maps are already on the category page -- boxytalk • 12:59 25 November 2007 (BST)
    Also, if the maps are placed on the MIC page, I suspect it will overload the page with templates (and templates withing templates, within templates), as it did with Mall/Lowdown -- boxytalk • 03:08 30 November 2007 (BST)
  4. Merge - Please don't loose this info. Adding it to the MIC would be a very smart thing. ZEDU medic T MEMS 04:28, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
  5. Merge - enough said --~~~~ [talk] 12:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. Merge with Category:Malls. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 16:15, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
  7. Merge - Can we do something with the graphics for that page? Perhaps make it more like the Suburb map but with mini icons of the mall logos in the appropriate suburb blocks? --Akule School's in session. 20:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  8. Keep - Cause this page is better than what you want it merged into and probably older too.--Karekmaps?! 22:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
    What don't you understand about merging? It means that the info (which may or may not be better) will go onto the page... it will all be there, only easier to access because there is a link to Category:Malls on every single mall page already -- boxytalk • 03:08 30 November 2007 (BST)
    I understand about merging but don't think it should be done in this case, if anything Category:Malls should have most of it's content removed so it's just a list of links to the malls in the category. The page is better where it is, Mall Locations, because it is more friendly to new users, easier to find in searches(it's in the main namespace which is always easier to search), it contains more information than the page you want it to merge into(meaning the other page should be crit 1 speedy deleted, not this one merged into it). It's better the way it is now, this page has been around longer, contains more content, is in a better location, and is easier to use in almost any way, including linking as the category links are not newbie friendly. It's better left alone.--Karekmaps?! 20:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
    So leave this page as a redirect, that way the links still work, and linking remains possible via [[Mall Locations]] -- boxytalk • 23:59 30 November 2007 (BST)
    Needless redirects are needless.--Karekmaps?! 07:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
    Duplication of information is exactly what redirects are for -- boxytalk • 13:46 3 December 2007 (BST)
    Sometimes Duplication of information is not only allowable but pertinent, look at Forts and Fort Creedy/Fort Perryn they have duplicated information on them based on which pages will get more traffic. If you don't like the two pages being the same add some content to one instead of the other, Mall Locations would be a great place to, say, discuss the tactical buildings around each mall, or the important of an outlying Necrotech building, both of which would have no place at Category:Malls--Karekmaps?! 16:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  9. Keep - I have been using this info a lot as I tend to wander Mall to Mall. At the very least merge it into the Mall information center.--Walterohdim 14:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  10. Keep - I use this page all the time. Please keep it. --Lrhyme 02:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
    What does it have on it that Category:Malls doesn't? Why do we need 4 pages to cover malls? 1, 2, 3 and 4 -- boxytalk • 03:04 30 November 2007 (BST)
    This location makes more sense than on the category page.--Karekmaps?! 16:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
  11. Keep/Merge - What boxy wrote. --Z. slay3r Talk  15:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
  12. Merge I particularly like the "Mall Location Map" section. Very handy for quickly locating the nearest mall. But the rest is redundant.      Ekashp wuz here (aht harman bra!nz!)        00:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  13. Merge - Npov duping is bad. --Tumu 05:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Merged into Category:Malls, but kept as a redirect. --Z. slay3r Talk  16:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


Seemingly created as an experiment in stealing wiki code. Whilst it doesn't state how it intends to 'minaturise' (sic) the wiki, the userpage of one of those involved with the 'project', Austin, would suggest that 'minaturisation' involves placing a page's text inside a small scrollbox. --Pavluk A! E! 13:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Delete - It's helpless spam. There is no potential for expansion. --User:Axe27/Sig 14:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Delete - Whoops. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 15:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. Delete - doesn't make any sense --~~~~ [talk] 16:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  4. Delete - farking huge template, for someone who wants to make things smaller. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 18:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  5. Delete - Kill it with fire --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 05:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. Delete - Die. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 07:01, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  7. Delete - And smack the guy up the head.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 14:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  8. Delete - EXTERMINATE --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 14:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  9. Delete - I vaugely remember this being created. I thought it looked like it might become vaugely interesting, but it doesn't seem to be even partly grounded in reality.--SeventythreeTalk 09:34, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
  10. Keep - Isn't it a wiki group? I don't see how that is much different than Project Evil or other wiki groups. It's just some people who want to make the wiki's content smaller. --Akule School's in session. 20:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  11. Keep - It's on topic, it has a purpose, it's made by a user that people seem not too like. All of that means keep and feel ashamed for having voted delete on this, cause you all should.--Karekmaps?! 22:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
    I didn't put this up to vote because of any dislike for Austin. I put it up because it's a rambling exercise in code theft, nothing more. Even if this "wikigroup" carried out their objective, it'd be vandalism. The wiki is fine as it is, it doesn't need to be 'minaturised' into scrollboxes. --Pavluk A! E! 23:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
    Not really, you're just assuming that's it's purpose and how it would go about it.--Karekmaps?! 02:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  12. Delete -Various reasons, one of which that the creator is a permabanned sockpuppet. Doesn't look like it's going anywhere either.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  13. keep i am one of the memebrs i believe that it is as if not more usefull then profect evil and anyway we are only planing on duing it on partcipating group pages and user pages.--zinker M! 23:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  14. Delete - As Suicidalangel. --Barbecue Barbecue 09:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  15. Keep - What a curious oddity. It makes the wiki more interesting to have oddball groups/pages like this around. --Toejam 00:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  16. keep I have no idea what zinker is upto but it sounds like he is plotting to make everything tidy and tinyy and well unreadable but still there. As long as he doesn't actually do it i really don't see what the fuss is about? --Honestmistake 16:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  17. keep It seems to be kind of weird, but since when is oddness a critera for deletion? Lets wait and see how this turns out. --Chelsea Dagger 08:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  18. Delete potential Table-breaking spam with no purpose. --Karlsbad 02:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Deleted --Z. slay3r Talk  16:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Malton Meta Tactical Map

The link should be added to the external links section of the navigation template. --User:Axe27/Sig 17:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Keep - There is precedent for pages describing an outside resource that relates to UD.--Karekmaps?! 17:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Keep - Can be expanded. Must be expanded to be kept. Must be linked to External Links. Must be categorized --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
    Must? How 'bout should? --User:Axe27/Sig 18:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. Keep - This is good info; yeah, it needs to be expanded, linked up, and categorized, but none of those are a problem. See? -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 18:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
  4. Keep - Expandable and possibly useful.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 02:08, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  5. Keep - Has potential. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 10:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. Keep - And, uhm, I'm the mystery author. There's a link on my page. Link it elswhere if you find it useful. It's got maybe one mistake in it, I think, and was created before modern forts. And, uhm, well - I find it useful for cross-city travel plans. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 18:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  7. Keep - It looks like it can be useful. --Z. slay3r Talk  19:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  8. Keep - i don't see any reason to delete it... --~~~~ [talk] 20:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  9. Keep - Chiming in on the unamimity... it's the stray app's been claimed by its owner and the page expanded since this was put up for deletion. Keeperoonee.--WanYao 03:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  10. Keep - Not that it matters at this point. Also, its a neat app. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 19:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Kept -- boxytalk • 13:45 3 December 2007 (BST)

Santlerville Saints

No longer needed as the intended group never got to be.--Edward Grengle 20:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Speedy Delete - Crit 1, No content. --Karekmaps?! 20:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - Ay, Crit 1 --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 21:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. Speedy Delete - does that mean I can nuke it now? (I'll hold off and template it). SIM Core Map.png Swiers 23:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedydeleted (yep, you could have nuked it Swiers) -- boxytalk • 00:03 1 December 2007 (BST)

Chromegirl hates small children & puppies!

I feel the title speaks for it all, but after looking at the page it is also quite clear that it has no potential for expansion.--Labine50 MEMS | MHG 23:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Keep Move to User:BobtheBuilder/Chromegirl hates small children & puppies!  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  23:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Delete - Kind of dumb. Make it a vendetta against zombies, and then we can move it as "Hidden crit 2.5:trenchie stuff".-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. I'll vote after someone takes the time to actually try to figure out the purpose of a page made, at least according to the history, as an example page. Maybe talk to BobtheBuilder, instead of putting a page that isn't even 2 days old up for deletion.--Karekmaps?! 00:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  4. speedy Delete chrome girl is a bounty hunter, this guy is making this page to try and impersonate her. this page is complete rubbish and spam. The man 07:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  5. Delete - Written as if by me in first person (i.e. someone else purporting to be me)in protest at a moderator decision on the Brainstock PK/Bounty Moderating forum. Yes, please delete. ChromeGirl 08:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. Speedydelete Crit 1. rambling and incoherent, no real content, cannot be expanded beyond adding more random incoherent crap. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 08:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  7. Speedydelete - Crit 1 --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 09:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  8. Speedydelete - Crit 1. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 16:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  9. Delete - Disk space is cheep... so go get yourself some and knock yerself out -- boxytalk • 16:53 16 November 2007 (BST)
  10. Speedydelete Crit 1. - Whitehouse 19:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  11. Speddydelete Crit 1. --Ryiis 19:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  12. Speedydelete Can we fix it? No, we can't. --Pavluk A! E! 20:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  13. Speedydelete --Jorm 21:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  14. Keep - And move. As per Nali and Karek -- move to subpage of user page. --WanYao 22:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  15. Keep - As above. --The Hierophant 23:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  16. Speedydelete - Serves no purpose except to insult someone.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  17. SpeedyDelete - Reasons as above.--SeventythreeTalk 23:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  18. delete why is this even still here? --Honestmistake 00:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  19. Keep - As above -- CrystalEyes 01:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  20. Keep - As above -- Canker Sore 06:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  21. Delete - No content, nothing to expand. --Ashate 09:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  22. Keep - As above -- yodadog 11:46, 17 November 2007 (GMT)
  23. Delete - No content. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
  24. Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Z. slay3r Talk  19:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  25. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 20:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  26. Speedydelete - Crit 1 --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 19:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Deleted - 19 Delete, 6 keep, 1 invalid. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 00:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


Inactive for some time now, last edit was June 16. I also propose that, if this deletion is carried out, "x" be made an example page, because that is MUCH easier to type and remember than whatever the current example page is. If deleted and then the group ever wants a page again later on, they can use the page "Group: X" or some such. SIM Core Map.png Swiers 05:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Keep - Isn't crit 12 no longer a valid criteria?--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 05:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Withdrawn by author. P works just as well for my purpose. I do think an old group page can still be nominated for deletion- its just not eliegable for a "speedy delete", and requires the full voting process to pass and be deleted. X is surely out of date, but so are many, many others, none worth voting on. SIM Core Map.png Swiers 05:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The example page is, surprisingly enough, example page. I'd redirect your P page to it (as blank and examples are) -- boxytalk • 06:13 23 November 2007 (BST)
Awe, where's the fun in that? I wrote a cute poem and everything! SIM Core Map.png Swiers 06:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Urban Dead conspiracy theory

linkless ranting- Vantar 15:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Merge nonsense rant but it should just be moved to his user page rather than deleted! --Honestmistake 17:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Merge As Honest, made me chuckle though. Is it actualy true?--SeventythreeTalk 17:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. Delete - Not every rant needs saving. --Karekmaps?! 17:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
  4. Keep or Move - but don't delete it. I'm sure it took time and energy to write and so is likely of value to (at least) the author. --Toejam 18:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
  5. Move It's not nonsense; whatever facts are in there are true; conspiracy? Possibly, I dunno. Just needs to be moved and/or rewritten.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  21:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC) Keep As per Boxy's instruction.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  00:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. Merge - It's kind of funny, so it should probably be moved merged into to his user space. --Z. slay3r Talk  00:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  7. Delete - As it's stupid as hell. Not even worth moving really.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 03:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  8. Delete - wtflol --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 03:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  9. move - meh --~~~~ [talk] 14:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  10. moveKeep or Move. Same rationale. It's rambling and paranoiac... Needs to be turned into a mini-game! :) --WanYao 22:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  11. move - My page was moved, why shouldn't his page be moved? The man 17:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  12. Delete - Not funny. Sockem 03:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  13. Move --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 17:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  14. Delete - Really should be deleted. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 17:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  15. Delete - One hell of an unsubstantiated rant. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 12:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
  16. Move Keep, and move. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 02:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  17. Keep - and move... anyone voting move should be aware that it isn't a valid vote -- boxytalk • 12:05 11 November 2007 (BST)
    Then why not strike it as such?--Karekmaps?! 18:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
    Because its implicit that they are all keep? Perhaps Merge would have been the correct vote, move just seems/sounds better :) --Honestmistake 10:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
    Because I don't need the drama or workload. I've informed you guys, now, go change your own move votes, or change the rules so they do count, or don't do either... see if I care. But don't whinge if they don't count when the votes are tallied -- boxytalk • 11:13 12 November 2007 (BST)
    Well no, the issue is that sysops have been counting them when tallied instead of ignoring them. --Karekmaps?! 00:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  18. Keep- Keep it, or move it. But do not delete it.--  Savant  Chit-Chat  18:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  19. Keep, but Move - Don't we have a place for wiki rants? --Akule School's in session. 23:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
    That's just a category tag to put on articles.--Karekmaps?! 00:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
    Then add the tag? --Akule School's in session. 00:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
    Category:WikiRantings is for wiki related rants about problems or complaints people have this really doesn't t fit there - Vantar 23:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
    What about a journal? --Akule School's in session. 02:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
    Doesn't really read like a journal plus it doesn't look like it will be a running log so journal won't really fit. I would say it belongs in Category:Fiction - Vantar 11:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  20. What the hell? - What the hell? I wrote this, how the hell did it wind up here?--Doggie W! 01:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Kepted - Vantar 22:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Rodman PD Plan

For the complete text of my anti-"this page" rant see the Pegton Evacuation Plan two items below this - Vantar 01:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Delete-As above.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  01:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Move Makes more sense than deleting it.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  18:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Delete-I don't see any reason really for it, it probly has a reason i missed when i read through it, but, meh, so i say delete.--Darkmagic 01:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. Keep - and move to his useer space -- boxytalk • 02:35 4 November 2007 (BST)
  4. Keep - as boxy --~~~~ [talk] 14:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  5. Move - It looks like he put a good amount of work into it, so it should probably be moved to his user space. --Z. slay3r Talk  17:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. Move - While I'm all for stuff like this being purified in fire I'm also reasonable, user page sounds reasonable. --Karekmaps?! 18:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  7. Move - As Karek.--SeventythreeTalk 18:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  8. Keep - Lets all copy off boxy, 'cause it's the cool thing to do.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 19:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  9. Keep - As boxy.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  10. Move - to his user space. --Pavluk A! E! 23:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  11. Move Keep, and move. - As Gage. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 01:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    Eh? -- boxytalk • 12:24 5 November 2007 (BST)
    Nothing sinister, just a joke. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 18:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  12. Keep - Just wondering what all the fuss was about. If you think this should be moved to my user page I'm happy to do it, but I'd rather it not be deleted completely. Regarding the OP's rant against my page, I cannot follow it. --evilbob 17:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    I have a few issues with the page the primary one being that it was on Special:Uncategorizedpages with only one link leading to it. To put this in non wiki terms, you wrote your plan then balled it up and threw it into an unmarked folder and shoved it into a filing cabinet. No one else can easily find it and no one has any real reason to look for it. If you have a plan tell people about it, get input make it awesomer and put it somewhere were other people can easily find it. Since this page is unknown and uncategorized I put it up for deletion, then everyone else said that it should be moved to your userspace so you can keep a copy of it. I hope that explained what my issue with this page was, if not stop by my talk page and I can try and make it clearer for you.- Vantar 12:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
    No problem, I'll do that. --evilbob 19:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  13. Keep - Move to subpage of user space. Creator wants to keep it. --WanYao 22:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Moved --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


Meh. Self-explanatory. And Nali (or 73, I don't know who did it) mauled the page with ugly coloring, so it sucks now.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Keep Transferring to A/D, and yes that was me, and I'll remove it if you want me to.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  01:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Delete I didn't do the colouring (I thought that was you, SA?), but I have to agree, It's an old joke that's past it's best.--SeventythreeTalk 01:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    I did the coloring. Now I've undone it. I personally consider it a legitimate wiki group.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  01:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. Keep - Technically, we're/Assylum is a group. I think if the page was unbroken, it should stay. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    Thing is, it's pretty much inactive. Maybe we should create a group page for us lot so we can share ideas and stuff instead?--SeventythreeTalk 01:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    Well, we pretty much do everything on eachother's talk pages.--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    I like the idea of having one communal page; how about we tell about the Assylum as the antecedent for that community and have a small sample of the 'discourse' on the page?  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  01:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    Possibly. If there was a central group page for us lot, and one of us thought of something shiney they could stick it up on there and we could all have a nice chat about it.--SeventythreeTalk 01:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    Okay, we've got to think of a name, and we'll have subpages, like Our Group/Spam Room, Our Group/Template Creation Room, Our Group/Random Chat, and then on our main page, have the member list and what it's all about. I invision it as for the casual wiki-chat-stuff that there isn't a place for communally, and for template makers and wiki-code-innovators. I'm decent at design, but obviously SA is the best at designs; I'm terrible with using colors in designs, as it involves a lot of meticulous coordination. If anyone can think of a name, I'd be willing to do the grunt-work of creating the pages and sections and whatnot.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  02:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  4. Delete - Well, I was the one who requested it, so my vote is self-explanatory, but I figured I'd also say that it's pretty inactive for the most part, and the coloring wasn't what killed it.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  5. Speedydelete Crits 1 and 2. Whole lot of spam, no content whatsover. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 01:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. Keep - It's a group, right? -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 01:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    About 50/50 a group. Mostly it was a collection of our spam. Our personal trash can really.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    I dunno, tehre was a vauge plan for it all, but it got lost--SeventythreeTalk 01:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    Keyword being was. I was gonna clean it up and stuff, but it deteriorated much too fast to do anything. Hell, just partially organising the talk page was a miracle!-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 01:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  7. Keep - Group page, of sorts, and not all members want it gone -- boxytalk • 12:21 5 November 2007 (BST)
  8. Delete - Never was a group, still isn't. Ask Lachryma who created the page of Vista who is the reason it was created. It was simply a page to put the crap that 73, gnome, SA, and Lach were spamming other pages with that wasn't one of their talk pages(cause Vista started moving the mass blocks of comments to their talk pages.) --Karekmaps?! 18:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    Their talk pages! Always my talkpage! Sometimes when I had nothing ot do with it! It was quite funny actualy.... --SeventythreeTalk 21:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
    You always had something to do with it, damn puppetmasters.--Karekmaps?! 20:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
    Not always. well, mostly not always.... Sometimes I may have offered a little encouragement. Is that so wrong? :) NAh, seriously, we used to mess around with that kinda thing, but we've kinda grown out of it now.--SeventythreeTalk 20:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  9. Keep - sounds like a wikigroup to me... or became one if it wasn't the original intent.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 20:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  10. Delete - We have enough inactive groups. Sockem 21:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  11. Keep - as Mr Gnome. --Pavluk A! E! 21:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  12. 'keep looks like a bunch o' crap to me but until the page creators ALL decide they are done with it then it should stay! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Honestmistake (talkcontribs) at an unknown time.
  13. Keep - It's a group. Antipathy 4:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  14. Delete - Taking a look over it, all I see is a lot of spam.--Ryiis 19:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  15. Keep - Taking a look at it, I see the war I had with Gnome ages ago. And it looks like I won that battle, too. Delete it...and I'm gonna be pissed. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
  16. Delete - I read this... sort of... and is not even a real wiki group, just an pantry full of freeze-dried spiced ham. If the "contributors" want to preserve this stuff they should cut and paste to their livejournals or something. Or perform it and put it on YouTube, then it would be Performace Art. But as it is... plese delete, I am a vegetarian. --WanYao 14:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  17. Delete - I normally don't care about this kind of thing - in the vein of "If a bear shits in the woods and no one is there to smell it, does it still stink?" - but since Nali's squirting his garish signature everywhere these days, I vote for anything that reigns that in, however slightly.--Squid Boy 17:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
    Oh really? Thanks for giving me another opportunity to spread my garish sig. Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  22:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
    Nelly, you changed it. The one I hated was that red and black abomination that I'm sure is the thing that inspired the sig policy discussion. You really do like to make the folks here dance for nonsense, don't you! If only all that energy were put toward something more useful...--Squid Boy 18:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  18. Delete - When it comes to wiki questions, I have adopted a new policy called "What would Nalikill do?" Then I do the opposite. Strong Delete!! --Stephen Colbert DFA 17:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
    So you're trying to say something?  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  22:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  19. 'Delete' - I'm with my fellow Late Night TV Crue Member. Nalikill's crappy formatting makes my eyes burn, so if he wants it to stay, I want it gone! --Jimmy Kimmel 17:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
    Heh, you're welcome.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  22:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
    havent anyone ever told you that replying every vote that doesnt agree with you is considered poor form ? --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  20. Delete - pile o' pish. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 19:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
    It might be spam, but that page was originally created to hold spam from me, 73, Gnome, and a bunch of other people. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
    That makes it quite blatantly crit 2 for speedy delete. --Karekmaps?! 03:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
    What you saying, Axey? It's a page of nonsense that has nothing to do with UD or the UD-wiki? What the fuck's it here for then? You guys could just messenger each other this bullshit and store the logs, then lovingly print them and frame them and put them on your walls ... or something. But what's it doing here? It's not even funny, unless you're in the gang. Pile o' pish. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 09:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
    It's suppose to be a wiki group. Like the Signature Race. And the Sig Race doesn't seem to relate to the wiki much...as it is mostly sigs... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 20:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
    That was never it's purpose, it wasn't a group until it got put up for deletions and some few people suddenly decided it now is one.--Karekmaps?! 21:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  21. Delete - Kill it with fire. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 12:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  22. Delete - Current content is the same as nalikill's infamous spam gun. If this is actually a group, they can easily create a new page with valid content--People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 17:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  23. Delete - Junk that should have been deleted originally. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 12:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
  24. Keep - This page is amusing...very amusing...I believe it is one of the greatest stories ever told and should be archived!--goose 01:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  25. Keep Why delete something when so many people want it kept? Is the wiki lagging? Does this half a megabyte of text take up to much disk space? Keep it.--Wooty 15:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
  26. Keep - If some of the members still want it around, then we should keep it. It's not hurting anyone. --Toejam 22:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  27. Delete - it's spam--Kashara 07:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Deleted 12 Keep, 15 Delete --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Discussion moved to talk page -- boxytalk • 01:15 20 November 2007 (BST)


It's another account of mine, I used to use it for editing and creating my group page, as I thought it would make sense to have a seperate account for that. It's a pain in the arse to be honest, (a couple of times forgot to sign out of it before I voted on things, then I had to delete the vote, sign out and sign back in and vote) and I just don't use it.--SeventythreeTalk 09:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Delete--SeventythreeTalk 09:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

We can't delete user accounts, only pages, and there is no userpage there to delete -- boxytalk • 16:55 16 November 2007 (BST)

Removed - Invalid deletion request. Accounts cannot be deleted. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 17:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Team Recon

Was deleted, and not undeleted, recreated with "vastly different content". Probably should be redeleted, or moved to a subpage of the user as it isn't a group in that term. --User:Axe27/Sig 04:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Delete - Redundant justification. --User:Axe27/Sig 04:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Move - To User:Sgt Wyant/Team Recon --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. Move - As Grim. --Karekmaps?! 05:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  4. Keep - It's a group page (of sorts), it was crit 1 deleted when this guy's teammate wiped the page (must have left the wiki back in april). As long as it has content on it, I'd leave it alone -- boxytalk • 07:53 1 November 2007 (BST)
  5. Move- As Grim. The guy who recreated this probably just doesn't know about subpages or something like that.  Nalikill  TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI  03:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. Keep it was deleted for having no content, they have content now so it's not a problem. Its a group page so it belongs in the main namespace. - Vantar 00:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  7. Move - It's somewhat like a story, so it should go to where Grim suggested. --Z. slay3r Talk  17:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  8. Keep - It's a group, right? -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 01:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Moved - Sent to User:Sgt Wyant/Team Recon. --Z. slay3r Talk  15:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Redundant Image

We've since uploaded a newer image with more a more appropriate link title, making this one redundant.--S. Pain, Chairman of Detulux Inc 19:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. Speedy Delete - unused image and crit 7?--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 19:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Speedy Delete - Crit 7, also possibly crit 1 if you can provide the dupe.--Karekmaps?! 19:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Deleted - Per this policy. --Z. slay3r Talk  21:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)