UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/November-2009
Deletions Archive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of November 2009.
User:Iscariot/Noah's Boat
Blatant attempt to poison the well for the scheduled deletion proposal I put up. He pretty obviously has zero interest in preserving these images for their own merits; this is yet another one of his childish attempts to "win" an argument simply for the sake of it. Cyberbob Talk 16:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion moved to talk page
- Delete Cyberbob Talk 16:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete As Bob. --Haliman - Talk 16:23, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - only made to make a chickenshit point on A/D/S -- boxy talk • teh rulz 16:26 28 November 2009 (BST)
- Delete - As the Box. -- Cheese 16:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Allowing an in-use user subpage to be deleted by meat puppetry is going to cause all sorts of problems come the next forum invasion. Should we allow AT to try and force through a deletion of TZH's Most Suck page? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 16:34, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Given I'm being censored (shocked yet?): Why is this not being early kept? Attempting to bad faith the pages of others into deletion, such as meat puppeting the group pages of active or high profile groups has always been overridden before. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 16:21, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't worry. If it's deemed vandalism, it'll be deleted automatically anyway ;) -- boxy talk • teh rulz 16:38 28 November 2009 (BST)
- Just so we're clear, you are happy that a in-use user page is being meat puppeted? That's going to set a wonderful precedent when the Goons return and try and mass delete DHPD. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 16:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't worry. If it's deemed vandalism, it'll be deleted automatically anyway ;) -- boxy talk • teh rulz 16:38 28 November 2009 (BST)
- Given I'm being censored (shocked yet?): Why is this not being early kept? Attempting to bad faith the pages of others into deletion, such as meat puppeting the group pages of active or high profile groups has always been overridden before. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 16:21, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- speedy - page creation result of vandalism --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 17:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 17:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Bad Faith Fail. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 18:06, 28 November 2009 (BST)
- Deletion Esuaceb--Thadeous Oakley 20:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - I made him one of those pictures! :( 21:00, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - as Boxy. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 21:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Shadow Guide
Guide:Shadow guide Promotes Zerging and since zerging is against the rules. I do not believe a guide on how to zerge should be on the wiki. --Technerd CFT U! 03:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Zerging Guide against game rules and not needed --Technerd CFT U! 03:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Soooo. How is this guide zerging exactly? I'm reading it at face value and it's looking like just another terrible guide. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:22, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Weeelllll the original guide which they link to says "4. Get another account to revive your self People don't waste Syringes on Pkers. If your on KOS (Kill on sight) then your sort of screwed. it's best to get a Doctor/scientist account to revive you if your killed your self. You can get easy XP with Doctor accounts by DNA extracting from Zombies." --Technerd CFT U! 03:27, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Soooo. How is this guide zerging exactly? I'm reading it at face value and it's looking like just another terrible guide. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:22, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Better guides exist already anyway. Torec T-CC/CS/CS/CS 03:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete & refer to Kevan for BANHAMMAR? I wish. :D - M arcusF ilby T 03:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Fair play is good play -- Papa Jadkor (RRF) (MotA) (MT11) 03:22, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete A poor guide (and rather ironic to boot) which reads more like an advertisement.--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 03:28, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - This is being put up for deletion for something that was on the page months ago. There is no mention of zerging tactics on the page -- boxy talk • teh rulz 03:31 26 November 2009 (BST)
- Keep - Wait, what? Am I reading a different guide? If this is in actual fact the guide you meant to put up, then there should be a vandalism ruling for shit like this. For those who are too dumb to actually click the link this guide in no way promotes zerging, Technerd is out and out lying. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:32, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'd like to point out if this is deleted based on you fuckers not actually reading the guide in question, I'm putting a link to the original guide in my sig, which is going to give it massive exposure on this wiki. That and I'll write an actual guide to zerging. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- You mean this guide? Zerger Guide --Technerd CFT U! 03:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is that the guide up for deletion? No. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:43, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Great(!) More people answering for me. Yes, Technerd, that guide is the one I'll link to using my sig which will give it a few thousand extra links for the search engines to eat up. That guide may seem to encourage zerging but the one on this wiki that you're lying to people to remove isn't. Your call. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- The page links to the zerging guide. So you support a group that supports zerging? Shame on you... --Technerd CFT U! 04:02, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- See, doesn't work on me, not given I have a reputation for militant enforcement of fairplay in this game. A page links to something that can be used for cheating in the game so we delete it? It's odd you haven't put DEM up given it eventually links to DEMon. You're the one that's going to cause it to get a whole load of extra exposure. I wonder what keywords I should use? "A Fair Urban Dead Guide"? "Zerg Liste Approved Guide"? What do you think? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 04:06, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- So remove the link, as suggested before, numbnuts. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 12:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- The link's accompanying text has be altered accordingly. End of discussion. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is that the guide up for deletion? No. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:43, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- You mean this guide? Zerger Guide --Technerd CFT U! 03:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'd like to point out if this is deleted based on you fuckers not actually reading the guide in question, I'm putting a link to the original guide in my sig, which is going to give it massive exposure on this wiki. That and I'll write an actual guide to zerging. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - As above. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:34, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - I've missed you Technerd. Cyberbob Talk 03:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Thanks --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Early kept, as the reasoning behind the deletion intro is that the guide advocates zerging, which it does not, and the guide they are referring to exists off site. Put it up for a different criteria, and let it run through, but do not lie in the original report. The guide hosted here does not in anyway advocate zerging.-- SA 04:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Category:Confirmed Groups
Category:Confirmed Groups has become redundant now that Crit 12 (outdated group pages) has been removed from the speedydelete criteria. Groups, as long as they have suitable content (enough to avoid crit 1), are no longer subject to automatic deletion. This category has, historically, been woefully out of date, and to keep it updated, a constant effort is required to go through the stats page to confirm that groups are in fact confirmed, despite anyone being able to add the category regardless of actual group numbers. Even when it was cleaned out, there were still groups disputing it because they claim that their members don't show their group name in their profile. I've discussed this with others in the community, and it has been open for discussion on the talk page here for quite some time, and I've yet to hear any opposition to it's removal, let alone convincing argument against it. It is a category that has no purpose any more, apart from boosting the egos of 'borderline group' leaders -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:15 5 November 2009 (BST)
- Delete - no longer needed -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:15 5 November 2009 (BST)
- Delete - No purpose, no need to be on the wiki.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Seems fair. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- yo dawg. shit be wack yo-- SA 16:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- delete this and remove the indent when you make a valid vote -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:12 6 November 2009 (BST)
- Oh what the fuck. I said that the category sucks. That's close enough to a fucking delete vote boxy. Are you going to go strike cheese's vote because nukimilation isn't a valid vote either? Sure, he explained it, but I explained mine too. >:| -- SA 13:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hell, I see quite a few examples in october alone where you used invalid votes to speedy delete shit. Or left them and didn't bother them. So, what, bolding "pow pow pow" is a valid vote, yet me saying what amounts to "shit sux delete it" isn't?-- SA 13:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nuke is close enough to delete, it was bolded. Yours had no such qualifier, and the shit that could have been wack (yo), could well have been the deletion request. I'm not a mind reader. Just make it clear, please... because cool is overrated -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:25 6 November 2009 (BST)
- Only if you just let my votes sit there next time instead of making your self look bad. I mean seriously mate, you even voted after Yonnua's invalid vote. VV -- SA 13:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nuke is close enough to delete, it was bolded. Yours had no such qualifier, and the shit that could have been wack (yo), could well have been the deletion request. I'm not a mind reader. Just make it clear, please... because cool is overrated -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:25 6 November 2009 (BST)
- Hell, I see quite a few examples in october alone where you used invalid votes to speedy delete shit. Or left them and didn't bother them. So, what, bolding "pow pow pow" is a valid vote, yet me saying what amounts to "shit sux delete it" isn't?-- SA 13:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oh what the fuck. I said that the category sucks. That's close enough to a fucking delete vote boxy. Are you going to go strike cheese's vote because nukimilation isn't a valid vote either? Sure, he explained it, but I explained mine too. >:| -- SA 13:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- delete this and remove the indent when you make a valid vote -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:12 6 November 2009 (BST)
- Delete Not needed --Thadeous Oakley 16:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nukumilation - Not needed. -- Cheese 19:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - It also rewards multi-abuse. Ix-nay it. --WanYao 03:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - It was never a good category. Cyberbob Talk 03:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - I tried cleaning it up over the summer (blame boredom), and it was out of date the next week. A waste of time in retrospect,--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 03:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Just change the criteria required for a group to be considered confirmed. -Poodle of DoomM! 04:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Linkthewindow Talk 07:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Useless category is useless. --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 14:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Doesn't the great suburb massacre fulfil this role now? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - I never really cared for this category. --ZsL 23:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Disc space = cheap! --Sonny Corleone DORIS I jizzed in my pants pr0n 19:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Votes closed, Delete time. I'm very busy today, but if this isn't fixed within the day I'll have it done myself on high priority. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- See this is why thewiki needs no more ops. xoxo 06:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Are you spasmic today? You don't need ops to remove [[Category:Confirmed Groups]] from 200 pages. We need more regular users and not just drama-magnet tards like you. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 06:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Or less lazy ones. DDR is a blight upon our reputation.-- SA 06:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Less chat, more deleting. I'll start in on removing the tags, but I'm afraid someone else will have to finish up (getting late).--~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 06:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Good riddance to it! Have done ten or so... -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 07:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted - thanks for the help with the tags everyone -- boxy talk • teh rulz 07:41 23 November 2009 (BST)
- Wow. It was so great to see everyone helping out to fix this... I should ask for help more often =D --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Categories: The Malton Insane Asylum/Main Page
Made Categories: The Malton Insane Asylum/Main Page a wrong page title for creation of page. Looking for a speedy deletion to correct this error. Thanks in advance. Matt Aries 14:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy -crit 7. --Janus talk 14:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy - As Janus. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:54, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 16:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted-- SA 16:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
D.o.W.
Dogs of War was a horrid attempt I tried at making a survivor group. I think it lasted all of three days. No point in keeping it around as no one heard of it and has no real meaning for historical purposes.Matt Aries 17:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Keep - Not a stub, not an orphan, not pure coded vomit. Not a pow, pow, pow.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Why do I want to say he's only doing it to steal the name? :/ -- SA 17:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)- No bolded keyword as per the above guidelines -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Nope, sorry --Thadeous Oakley 19:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)- No bolded keyword as per the above guidelines -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - and fuck you two above... bold a keep or delete vote, ffs, so that the serving sysop doesn't have to read through your vote in the fucking edit box to work out which way you're voting. Slack pricks -- boxy talk • teh rulz 06:48 8 November 2009 (BST)
- Speedy Delete
Keep - Fuck off with trying to crit 12 things. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC)- Vote changed due to deletion being filed by owner. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 17:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC) - Keep - As boxy 100%. As Iscariot 100%. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Somehow, I don't think someone would have went through all that effort for something lasting three days. -Poodle of DoomM! 17:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - That's a bad ass page. Also, I think SA probably nailed it.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 12:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to delete that page. --Papa Moloch 14:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Guess I should have signed in with the right name to try and delete this page huh. I just see no point it keeping the page up. Their is no historic value, no actual group, the only known members in the group are in their own groups themselves. XxCannon FodderxX 08:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - criterion 7, as requested by author. --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 16:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Change vote to Speedy - Author request. --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- DELETIN' THIS PAGEEEE Because teh "author" asked for it.-- SA 22:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted as a Crit 7. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Discussion on speedydeletion of pages with keeps moved to talk page -- boxy talk • teh rulz 06:30 11 November 2009 (BST)
Trenchcoater Liberation Front
Useless page that has been orphaned since I-don't-know-when. As the author, I would like to kindly ask for the page's deletion. --Chekken 17:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy per author's request.--Thadeous Oakley 17:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- SPEEDY per above..... Chekken,... your vote would get it deleted right away. -Poodle of DoomM! 17:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - Pow, pow, pow!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy - Page creator and group leader. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 20:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, along with talk page -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:36 9 November 2009 (BST)
La Révolution
Done trying stuff now Ross? -Poodle of doom 23:14, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - unless the ghost issue is cleared up, it should be kept, so that it doesn't end up on the uncategorised list -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:27 22 October 2009 (BST)
- What's the ghost issue? -Poodle of doom 00:37, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - Because of the Ghost issue, they'll always show up on every Special Page you can see them on now (except shortpages I think, but thats the only one)- the only difference being now you can see what the problem is and be informed about it. I don't mind if these do get deleted, but I think it's a little more helpful this way. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:21, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - Don't ask people if they're finished with a page by putting up for deletion. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 02:23, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --WanYao 02:36, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - I don't think Wan quite gets what ghost pages and images are. Cyberbob Talk 06:29, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- I don't think you quite get how stupid you look with your pettiness, bob. You think that because a bug tells me I can't delete a page, that should influence my vote that it should be deleted? I voted correctly, according the content of the page. Unlike everyone else.
- Seriously... is your life really that empty that you need to fill it with lame attempts to insult me? Or are you just out of your meds? --WanYao 14:25, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- I don't like Bob whatsoever but srsly Wan, you just lamely insulted him in a more lame way than he first lamely insulted you in the first place. Lame. Also you're a cunt.--CyberRead240 15:29, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Whoa, the Meds Insult... I haven't seen one of those in minutes Cyberbob Talk 15:34, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- You get those comments a lot, I take it. --WanYao 15:55, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Nooo....maan seriously, that isn't even remotely witty come on--CyberRead240 18:26, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- You get those comments a lot, I take it. --WanYao 15:55, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Your second line is especially ironic. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 15:38, 24 October 2009 (BST)
WHOA!!! I made drama!!!! -Poodle of Doom M! 16:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)- Multi-vote struck. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 16:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)- Multi vote? -Poodle of Doom M! 16:39, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - You can't kill a ghost.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:54, 22 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep Because its a ghost image. Good try though poodle. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:24, 22 October 2009 (BST)
Keep - Although, I wouldn't care if it was deleted.Remove the strike and this comment when you sign your vote. I also recommend that you take the time to read up on what ghost images and pages are. Cyberbob Talk 03:51, 23 October 2009 (BST)- Keep - --KNITKNITINSTITUTION 12:09, 23 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - eep! Nice article on ghosts, bummer.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 11:56, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep Let's see how many of you notice my vote,... and find humor in it. -Poodle of Doom M! 16:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keepzorz - As above. -- Cheese 19:16, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Linkthewindow Talk 07:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
keeped.-- SA 11:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
A Quick Zombie Guide
A "guide" of horrid quality that hasn't been added to since 2007.--Teln 20:36, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete As Teln said above. -Poodle of doom 02:25, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - We don't delete guides that are bad, that's what Guides/Review is for, of which this has already been put through. Most guides haven't been touched since 2007. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 05:16, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete - It's not a guide, it's pure coded vomit. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:56, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - It doesn't matter if the guide sucks or if you disagree with it, there's no reason to go deleting articles all willy nilly.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 16:01, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete -- RoosterDragon 16:19, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - As DDR. -- Cheese 20:34, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep though more folk should point out how bad the advice is! --Honestmistake 23:23, 20 October 2009 (BST)
- Merge - into subpage of user who wrote it. Otherwise delete it. --WanYao 01:51, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - As DDR --Haliman - Talk 01:54, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete - no signal, just noise -- boxy talk • teh rulz 02:30 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - As DDR. I'm loving the role reversal though.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:38, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - It's not a group page, it's pure coded vomit. Cyberbob Talk 07:44, 21 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete - As Iscariot. That guide is pure shit. It tells you not to get Ankle Grab until later? AG is almost a REQUIREMENT to be a zombie.-- SA 12:01, 23 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete--Winman1 15:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --Zaphord 06:44, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:11, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
The Southern Cross Club
Just J3D making yet another wiki "group" to annoy people who have no interest in being in it -- boxy talk • teh rulz 07:07 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete -- boxy talk • teh rulz 07:07 17 October 2009 (BST)
Speedy Delete Cyberbob Talk 07:09, 17 October 2009 (BST)- Keep - eh, fuckit Cyberbob Talk 09:56, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- As long as it means you will let your name on the list though, tbh making fun of hating each other really isn't that bad.--CyberRead240 15:08, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - eh, fuckit Cyberbob Talk 09:56, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 09:27, 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 09:33, 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete--Teln 17:14, 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete --Bob Boberton TF / DW 17:53, 17 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep - you guys are no fun.--xoxo 06:20, 18 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete .... and you're not funny --WanYao 06:47, 18 October 2009 (BST)
DelKeep!--Nallan (Talk) 10:49, 18 October 2009 (BST)- Keep - Okay, so... it's a list of users from australia. Not very interesting. But the reaction to the list is entertaining and worth preserving. Also, what sexylegsread said.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 11:22, 18 October 2009 (BST)
Delete - If and only if DDR's stance on it is actually the majority stance in Australia. Though in my time there I never once heard of anyone considering a symbol of hatred, and it's pretty much the only symbol of Australia (other than kangaroos and those silly corks-on-strings hats) that the majority of the world would recognise at a glance.- Keep who cares if your name is on a mainspace list of people from down under that is obviously not serious. Have a bit of humour instead of blindly saying OMG NO WAI to everything your "enemy" says OMG YES WAI to. Idiots, the lot of you.--CyberRead240 09:52, 19 October 2009 (BST)
- Keep --Shakey BBK 11:21, 24 October 2009 (BST)
- Delete - The hideous urge to nullify Shakey's vote has overcome me. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - The Southern Cross is not isolated to just Australia so I believe this club is a misrepresentation of Australia and needs to be culled. Also, Shakey is always wrong so... --Guy.The.Firefighter 09:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wow should've read the page first... still delete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Guy.The.Firefighter (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
- discussion moved to talk page --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 16:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wow should've read the page first... still delete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Guy.The.Firefighter (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
- Keep i lieks it --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 16:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep -J3D's douchery amuses me.--GomerPyle41 08:33, 1 November 2009 (UTC)voting ended. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 08:50, 1 November 2009 (UTC)