UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/June-2009

e Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of June 2009.

---

The Darkness.jpg

Criteria 7. I am the original author. I have intended to use this for my group and have not. I see no reason for it to be here, taking up space anymore. -Poodle of doom 21:33, 26 June 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 00:26, 27 June 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy - Linkthewindow  Talk  00:56, 27 June 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy - We need a bigger sign that links to A/SD for crit 7's. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:05, 27 June 2009 (BST)

(Speedy) Deleted. --Cyberbob 04:16, 27 June 2009 (BST)

Hungry Man Clan

A group page with almost zero content. --  RoosterDragon  22:34, 7 June 2009 (BST)

1. Delete Junk.--Thadeous Oakley 22:37, 7 June 2009 (BST)
2. Delete - Dead since May '07, the user that created it has absolutely no other contribs other than the one edit creating that page. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 22:38, 7 June 2009 (BST)

   That's probably because of the history purge.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 22:45, 7 June 2009 (BST)

3. Om Nom it. We don't needs it anyway.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 22:45, 7 June 2009 (BST)
4. Delete - D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:14, 8 June 2009 (BST)
5. Crit One (Speedy) - little content, not edited post-purge. Linkthewindow  Talk  03:00, 8 June 2009 (BST)
6. Delete --Cyberbob 13:59, 9 June 2009 (BST)
7. Deleter --WanYao 22:08, 9 June 2009 (BST)
8. Delete -- Asheets 20:37, 19 June 2009 (BST)
9. Speedy - Let it die. --ZsL 21:24, 19 June 2009 (BST)
10. Keep - i know it sounds kinda stupid but you wont regret it! --xoxo 21:25, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Deleted --Cyberbob 07:55, 21 June 2009 (BST)

Take Back

Abandoned testing on cade level reports. Not edits other than link fixes since early 2007. Doesn't seem useful, and isn't linked to from anywhere in the proper sense. --  RoosterDragon  00:36, 7 June 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete - would have deleted it here, but I was seeing if anyone objected, as it is a large page and someone might still need it. But meh. Linkthewindow  Talk  02:11, 7 June 2009 (BST)

   You said it didn't match any SD criteria, do it meet one now? --  RoosterDragon  12:45, 7 June 2009 (BST)

   Point taken. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:48, 7 June 2009 (BST)

2. Delete --Cyberbob 14:00, 9 June 2009 (BST)
3. delete --WanYao 22:08, 9 June 2009 (BST)
4. Delete --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 22:10, 9 June 2009 (BST)
5. abstain -- The creator and main editors are pretty well known folk -- why doesn't somebody ask them? Asheets 20:40, 19 June 2009 (BST)

Deleted --Cyberbob 07:55, 21 June 2009 (BST)

Suggestion:20090530_New_Barricade_Rules

This Suggestion was moved in less that 24 hours, before I had a chance to remove it from Voting, which I would have done in order to rework it. I know 6 hours is the current minimum, but I'm asking a break on this one. Thanks for your time.--Zombie Lord 21:21, 6 June 2009 (BST)

1. Keep - We don't delete suggestions from the system, even hilariously bad suggestions. I'll change my vote if you can get the 6 hour policy changed (and you did well going to the other page and starting a discussion), but for now the policy is king. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 22:13, 6 June 2009 (BST)

   Found something relevant on the Welcomenewbie template: "You can't modify a suggestion that you've written once it has been posted on the Suggestions page. You can withdraw and resubmit it with changes later, but only do that if people liked your original suggestion while requesting changes, not if it was Spaminated." Withdrawing of suggestions was intended for Kill voting, not Spaminating, it would seem. --Bob Boberton ^{TF / DW} 00:06, 7 June 2009 (BST)

2. Keep - As bob.-- Adward  23:00, 6 June 2009 (BST)
3. Keep - Linkthewindow  Talk  00:27, 7 June 2009 (BST)
4. This right here is why I hate the suggestions system. It was spammed before he could remove it. He's learning his lesson and using DS. Good. But now, he's probably not going to be able to salvage the original idea, because as it was all numbers from the start, someone could easily throw this up as a dupe link, and we all know how sheep-like this community can be. Especially when Izzy throws up a dupe link, which he could at any time. Seriously everyone. Just let it go. Is it really that important for you all? Is being able to say "ZOMG ANUDDER SPAM TO ADD TO MAH TALLY" so important? Fuck the rules. Sometimes they're stupid. Like that sysops spam thing. We can honestly allow a break every once in awhile without the system breaking, so I say just slap the removed tag on it and call it done.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 02:59, 7 June 2009 (BST)

   If you don't agree with a suggestion being a dupe, take it to A/A. If you think someone is actively abusing the dupe system, take them to A/VB. Don't try to retroactively unspaminate this just because a suggestion you haven't even seen (or have you?) might be duped by a suggestion which was pretty unanimously spaminated. Seriously, this is a bad suggestion. If Zombie Lord's new idea is good, then there quite obviously is a viable difference (or several) and it isn't a dupe. --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 15:03, 9 June 2009 (BST)

5. Keep - As above. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 07:20, 7 June 2009 (BST)
6. keep - as SA --WanYao 19:00, 7 June 2009 (BST)
7. Keep --Cyberbob 14:00, 9 June 2009 (BST)
8. lose in the system Pretty much as SA, SPAM should not be removed for at least 24 hours --Honestmistake 14:58, 9 June 2009 (BST)
9. Keep - Just make your new suggestion different enough. --Midianian^{¦T¦DS¦SP¦} 15:03, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Kept --Cyberbob 07:55, 21 June 2009 (BST)

User:DangerReport/St. Luke's Hospital

Since there are four St. Luke's, this ambiguous one was made in error. It had been assigned to Ridleybank, but that 'burb now has a separate DangerReport. Lariat2301 11:58, 9 June 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete - as below. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:00, 9 June 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy - Linkthewindow  Talk  12:08, 9 June 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Cyberbob 13:59, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Deedy Speleted --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:23, 9 June 2009 (BST)

User:DangerReport/Patriarch General Hospital(Eastonwood)

The lack of space before the suburb name is a mistake. Another page exists that includes the space. Lariat2301 10:38, 9 June 2009 (BST)

1. Speedy Delete - Check Speedy Deletion candidates next time, we could have these done in a jiffy. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:00, 9 June 2009 (BST)
2. Speedy - Linkthewindow  Talk  12:08, 9 June 2009 (BST)
3. Speedy Delete --Cyberbob 13:59, 9 June 2009 (BST)

Deleted. Speedily --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:24, 9 June 2009 (BST)