UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions/Archive/February-2006

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deletions Archive
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020


This is an archive page for Moderation/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in February 2006.

Image:Necronet.jpg

Reason: The image wasn't rendered properly, and it's not what Necronet should look like. It was used as an example in Science skills and I replaced it with some other necronet scan image that was already uploaded to the wiki. --Daranz|talk| 22:08, 23 Jan 2006 (GMT)

  • Delete, definately. No point in keeping it. --Brizth 14:29, 24 Jan 2006 (GMT)
  • Delete no sense cluttering up the server with unneeded images. --RedKnight 06:05, 3 Feb 2006 (GMT)

Moderator: Deleted. -- Odd Starter talk | Mod 12:39, 9 Feb 2006 (GMT)

Category:Cemetery

Reason: Empty category. Not useful. --Nov 01:21, 10 Jan 2006 (GMT)

  • Speedy Delete: Criteria Four. As a note, Pages that meet the Speedy Deletion criteria should probably instead be placed on the Moderation/Speedy Deletions page, as they do not generally require a vote. -- Odd Starter talk | Mod 02:39, 10 Jan 2006 (GMT)
  • Delete Please re-add category when specific cemeteries with strategic importance are discovered. --RedKnight 05:47, 10 Jan 2006 (GMT)

Moderator: Deleted. -- Odd Starter talk | Mod 12:39, 9 Feb 2006 (GMT)

Ludwig Controversy

Reason: Does this really belong here? I'm wondering if it ever did in the first place. There are no official forums; is one lamer having a grievance with a pack of tards really something we want to leave on an NPOV wiki? I can see how the Vimes Controversy might be politically important, but this is pretty worthless. --Slicer 22:07, 11 Jan 2006 (GMT)

  • Keep. Yes, it does. All precedent favors controversy pages being kept on the wiki. --LibrarianBrent 00:56, 12 Jan 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep People need to know why some other people are assholes for no apparent reason. --ALIENwolve 01:00, 12 Jan 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep This was kept to prevent (an escalation of) a flame war between those two parties on the wiki. --Nov 02:37, 12 Jan 2006 (GMT)

Moderator: Kept. -- Odd Starter talk | Mod 12:39, 9 Feb 2006 (GMT)

WCDZ wiki page

  • Reason: Have moved all content to our new and very own URL which we will announce to the Public soon. Current Wiki page is no-longer needed/in use effective immediatley Slavik 11:26, 3 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Delete All member have been informed long ago Slavik 11:24, 4 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Delete Yep, done and done, you guys will love the new page (W00t, own URL, no more peopel changing our page) Slavik 12:36, 4 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep Hi slavic. Your antics grow increasingly pathetic. (All the accounts that voted for this suggestion were cheap imitations of ours, since changed to their real owner.) --Zaruthustra 21:01, 5 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep - WTF ? --hagnat 21:08, 5 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep - Hi there, OCD Noob. --ALIENwolve 21:10, 5 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep - We may be trying to conquer the world, but we're too cheap to pay for our own hosting. --TheTeeHeeMonster 21:17, 5 Feb 2006 (GMT)
    • Can you blame a guy for trying, who would have thought you had so much free time that you search the wiki for my atempts to destroy youSIavik 21:35, 5 Feb 2006 (GMT)
    • We can blame you for trying, and I find it highly amusing that you say we're here all the time, when you spend all day making sock puppets and dodging bans in a community that universally hates you. Enjoy your reban. --Zaruthustra 21:37, 5 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep - The stupidity. The stupidity --Mikm 22:00, 5 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep - Oooooh, clever... just NOT! Have a nice day. ^^ --Omega2 00:43, 6 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep - Enough is Enough. Where the hell are the Mods? This needs to stop, NOW. --Jak Rhee 01:05, 6 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep - Its an entertaining page. --Grim s 02:43, 6 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep, what the hell is this? Slavik is clearly some kind of troll against this group. --LibrarianBrent 03:03, 6 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep, Slavik thinks it's funny to break rules. It's probably one of those childhood phases he's going through. I should have known those phase things would cause problems when I invented them. Oh well--McArrowni 03:05, 6 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep --RAF Lt.G Deathnut 07:15, 6 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep how else can I upsurp zaruth... Slavik who among us would ever use the 'word' W00t? please, if you try to impersonate us try to sound not like a ten year old, even evil has standards--Vista 21:22, 6 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep - Please Slovik, stop. You are not funny. You are not clever. You are not liked. Quit being a jackass. --Blahblahblah 22:06, 8 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep And Slavik? Kane needs you to co-ordinate the attack on GDI's Hammerfest base in Norway. Toddle on back to the Montauk and see to it, would you? There's a good chap . . . --John Taggart 22:26, 8 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep Wow. This was a pathetic attempt. Slavik, just go... eat... cheese... balls... Damnit. The mere futility of his attempts is affecting my ability to create good insults. AllStarZ 23:44, 9 Feb 2006 (GMT)

Moderator: Strong keep, no action taken. -Daranz|talk| 21:28, 19 February 2006 (GMT)

Category:GKer_Groups

Moved from Speedy Deletion page after the debate emerged.

  • Reason: No content. "Generator Killer Groups" only includes one group, the Degenerates - either this article is unexpandable, or it should be expanded to include all zombie and PKer groups. Both are pointless. --Spiro 03:48, 31 Jan 2006 (GMT)
Same could have been said about Zker groups initially. I know several groups that, once finding out about the GKer category, will place themselves in them. These include the Amish Liberation Front and Malton DEA, as both groups smash up generators when they find them. I say it should stay, at least for a while, to see if more groups throw themselves in. --Grim s 06:24, 31 Jan 2006 (GMT)
The Malton DEA has already added themselves. Besides, even with only one group, it's content. - RosutoEnzeru 19:45, 31 Jan 2006 (GMT)
I added the Malton DEA to the list, as a member of the organisation. I just linked the category on the main page We shall see what happens. --Grim s 00:34, 1 Feb 2006 (GMT)
I added Dead Air to this group. They are a Zombie group that is dedicated to taking out mobile phone masts. I vote we keep the catagory. --Erik 21:11, 2 Feb 2006 (GMT)
If i created a group that took out people and zombies named Sam, does that mean I could start a SKer group category? How about one that only attacks buidlings with Mobile Phone towers? An MptKer group? How about a tagging group? I think its getting kind of rediculous (sp?), you gain XP by killing players, not generators. So why do they need their own category? Aren't all the groups in there really organizations? People and/or zombies working towards a common goal?--Theant314 21:24, 2 Feb 2006 (GMT)
By your definition of "organization," every group in the game is one. That's a foolish argument. - RosutoEnzeru 23:50, 2 Feb 2006 (GMT)

The article now contains four groups. As such, the original claim of no content has been invalidated and i move for it to be removed from the deletion queue. --Grim s 06:26, 3 Feb 2006 (GMT)

  • Keep: Unlike other group categories that have previously been deleted, this one has some basis in the game itself and thus merits being kept. --RedKnight 06:43, 8 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep: It is a useful group category. --Nov 03:40, 9 Feb 2006 (GMT)
  • Keep: Whar Nov said. --Grim s 08:11, 9 Feb 2006 (GMT)

Moderator: Kept. --Daranz|talk| 21:28, 19 February 2006 (GMT)

Image:Thumbnail.gif

Reason: File no longer really connects to anything, since I've replaced the file with Image:Handgreen.png (which works with the new message box format). I don't think anything links to it anymore, so it can probably be safely deleted. -- Odd Starter talk | Mod 08:57, 18 Jan 2006 (GMT)

  • Delete, though a number of archive pages link to it. Edit: or apparently not, system just says so. Weird. --Brizth 11:36, 19 Jan 2006 (GMT)
  • Delete. No point in keeping it. --Daranz|talk| 22:08, 23 Jan 2006 (GMT)

Moderator: Deleted. -Daranz|talk| 21:28, 19 February 2006 (GMT)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions/Archive/February-2006&oldid=996122"