UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Apr 2008

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deletions Archive
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of April 2008.


This image is now outdated and has a deliberately inflammatory title. --Tormazin 14:29, 14 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete --Tormazin 14:29, 14 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Keep -- but only if it's being used. otherwise delete. but... the title is NOT inflammatory, get real. and, if it has a context, i.e. part of the history of survivor-zombie #s, it's not outdated. --WanYao 23:47, 14 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Delete - As WanYao, but it's not being used. --PdeqTalk* 00:18, 15 April 2008 (BST) Keep - Now it's in use. --PdeqTalk* 00:50, 16 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Speedy Delete - Unused image. --Amanu Jaku 09:09, 15 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Keep - It's in use, and I don't find the title to be horribly inflammatory. --ZsL 21:16, 15 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Keep- Not that inflammatory - Vantar 02:05, 16 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Keep - It's in use. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:23, 16 April 2008 (BST)

Kept --ZsL 01:03, 29 April 2008 (BST)

Category:Great Fire of 1912

This category includes the Great Fire of 1912 article and all location pages for placed effected by the fire. There is no benefit to keeping this category since each location page already mentions the event and a listed added to the article would serve the exact same function with the need to clutter up the category list. - Vantar 01:57, 11 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 01:57, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Keep - "a listed added to the article"? I think this is sort of what categories are intended for. --PdeqTalk* 07:18, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  3. delete - erm why should this category exist, and be tagged onto locations? down with category spam. period. --WanYao 12:56, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Keep - as Pdeq --CyberRead240 15:32, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete - The locations already mention the fire, so I don't see this as being useful. A bulleted list of the locations on the main page would help add to the length of the article. --ZsL 17:51, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Keep Unless we're deleting the Great Fire of 1912 itself (which I'm all for), this category should stay. -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Keep - wtf? Yeah sure a list would pretty much serve the same purpose but i think the category is much more useful and avoids cluttering the page. I don't see how a category with around 20 pages is 'category spam'. If you're looking to clear excess categories try ones like Confirmed Groups which is a total joke as no one keeps the list accurate.--xoxo 06:38, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  8. Delete - Useless category spam. The point of Categories is to ease navigation between related subjects, this does not do that.--Karekmaps?! 07:22, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  9. Delete - as above. And the humourous locations category could do with some cleaning out. It's full of locations that just have the same name as something else... I mean... The Peek Arms, The Podger Hotel, The Question Building, The Shortman Building, The Trick Museum? WTF? Funny as food poisoning. Show some restraint with the categorisation of locations pages please -- boxy talki 12:30 12 April 2008 (BST)
    Actually the stuff in the Amusing Locations category is any page that has the ALiM template on the page and is thus on the list itself. The locations spend at least 7 days on the talk page passing community vote before being added to the list. If you aren't happy with whats passing QC you are more then welcome to come along and have your say!--xoxo 06:14, 13 April 2008 (BST)
  10. Keep - A category is the accepted wiki-way to group related articles together. A list would be possible, but not as convenient. --Toejam 17:36, 12 April 2008 (BST)
    Huh? That makes very little sense considering something like this actually has nothing to do with the articles at all because it is player made side flavor, side flavor that is only mentioned in any noteworthy extent here. Some Articles in the category don't even mention the "event" at all, what's next categories for River Kevan, Big Bash, Miskatonic University, and The Massacre of the 178th? None of these things serve any purpose than to be flavor and until we start categorizing locations by the Lexicon this is in no way connecting related articles, there's no relation between the articles other than one made from third party fiction that has nothing to do with providing information for the game. --Karekmaps?! 18:33, 13 April 2008 (BST)
    And before someone says anything, no, I like the Great Fire thing, I like flavor that is generally well done and expansive but, when we start altering page navigation based on them it ceases being flavor and becomes confusing and easily mistakable for actual game content.--Karekmaps?! 18:33, 13 April 2008 (BST)
    I've no problem with using a category to group together articles related by their flavour text. We may have to agree to disagree on this one. --Toejam 05:29, 14 April 2008 (BST)
    As a side note, every single page in that category (at least the ones i put in the category, which is most of them) directly mention the great fire and link to it. In fact that is how i found the locations to make the category. If you're having trouble finding where they are mentioned on some pages, try control-f.--xoxo 06:37, 14 April 2008 (BST)
  11. Keep --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 17:38, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  12. Keep - Useful. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:49, 13 April 2008 (BST)
  13. Keep - don't mess with the great fiyah!--CorndogheroT-S-Z 01:24, 14 April 2008 (BST)
  14. delete --~~~~ [talk] 21:39, 19 April 2008 (BST)

Kept --ZsL 22:56, 25 April 2008 (BST)

McMurty Crescent zed reports

Yes it is a new page, but that doesn't change the fact that this information should be on the location page, not an uncategorized unlinked page. - Vantar 00:03, 11 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 00:03, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  2. delete - don't delete new pages with potential life. this has no life, it belongs elsewhere, as vantar says. --WanYao 12:55, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Delete - As above. --ZsL 17:51, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Delete -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 17:38, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted --ZsL 22:56, 25 April 2008 (BST)

1 Member Categories Part 2



Category:MOU Member

Category:Malton Reporter, The

Category:Members of TMH

Category:TZH Hostile to Survivors Images

Category:The Daily Spotlight


Category:Wiki God Followers

Category:Wiki Gods

Part two of the 1 man cats.

Decided to make a new header since it might be impersonation to copy and paste your comments...

--Nitro378 T JNL 17:06, 8 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete all but Category:Members of TMH, which should be moved into the TMH group's namespace (and not as a category). --PdeqTalk* 17:28, 8 April 2008 (BST)
    Lol, I just found a category with zero articles in it... Category:TZH Post Arbitration PKs --Nitro378 T JNL 17:34, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Delete Category:The Daily Spotlight, Category:KFTW! DULSTON, Category:TZH Hostile to Survivors Images, Keep the Rest. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 17:37, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Keep the Daily Spotlight - it has more subpages which should be categorized with it - but delete the rest. --ZsL 15:59, 10 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Deleteall -- with the exception of Category:Members of TMH (as per pdeq, move), I don't see any reason for keeping these. --WanYao 16:20, 10 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete except merge Category:Members of TMH as above -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 21:59, 10 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Delete- Vantar 00:03, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Delete- I moved TMH members category into the TMH group space. --Nitro378 T JNL 14:53, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  8. 1 & 7 Keep(group categories), the rest Delete. --Amanu Jaku 09:16, 15 April 2008 (BST)
  9. Keep - Daily Spotlight --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS DORISFlag.jpg LOE ZHU | Яezzens 03:07, 16 April 2008 (BST)
  10. Keep As Animesucks. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 21:33, 22 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted except for the two that were kept. --ZsL 22:40, 23 April 2008 (BST)


Because its rubbish, and appears to have been deleted before as a crit 1. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:42, 21 April 2008 (BST)

Speedily Deleted through criterion 6, as it already was speedily deleted here. --ZsL 22:58, 22 April 2008 (BST)

I don't think you should invoke crit 6 when someone just happens by chance to create a page by the same name as a previously deleted one, but for a totally different purpose and with totally different content. If it was unused, then crit 10... -- boxy talki 04:13 23 April 2008 (BST)

1 Member Categories

There are so many 1 article categories. I just don't see the point in them...

[1] - Category:Army of Dave

[2] - Category: Bilingual_Pages

[3] - Category:Caduceus_Malton_Maintained

[4] - Category:Cornfed_Undead

[5] - Category:Crimson_Vizards

[6] - Category:Extinction_Guardians

[7] - Category:Friend_of_Fat_Momma

[8] - Category:Friend_of_Tylenol_Joe

[9] - Category:General_Hospital

[10] - Category:Historian

And thats not even all of them...

Just wondering if you guys think they should be deleted or not.

--Nitro378 T JNL 14:21, 7 April 2008 (BST)

I've added what the links actually are has been added -- so people know what they're voting on. --WanYao 02:04, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  1. 4, 5, 6 and 9 Keep (group categories), the rest delete. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:28, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Delete all but 7 and 8 - pointless to have a category unless you have multiple pages to put in it. --PdeqTalk* 22:37, 7 April 2008 (BST) Updated my vote to reflect what Fat Momma said. --PdeqTalk* 16:52, 15 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Delete the category tree can always use more pruning- Vantar 22:40, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Delete - none of them are necessary, kill everything. --WanYao 02:05, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  5. 4, 5, 6 and 9 Keep (group categories), the rest delete Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 15:51, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Keep 4-6 & 9, and delete the rest. --ZsL 18:02, 9 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Delete all They can remake the categories if they ever make a second page to put in them. -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 21:59, 10 April 2008 (BST)
  8. 4, 5, 6 and 9 Keep (group categories), the rest delete. --Amanu Jaku 09:11, 15 April 2008 (BST)
  9. 7 and #8 are no longer one member catagories and should not be deleted.--Fat Momma 14:53, 15 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted some, kept some. --ZsL 22:56, 22 April 2008 (BST)


This is obviously nothing but another crass attempt at self-promotion masquerading as information. There is no need for this article to exist -- just as there is no need for a Blytheville or Becktown disambig page. --WanYao 11:48, 7 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - with extreme prejudice. (edit) And since on-topic comments were moved to the talk page... let me add that the orignal page was a redirect to "the Arkham Sisters", and thus the whole thing amount to nothing more than a small clique's attempt at attention-whoring. Again, there is no disambig for the Becktowns or the Boundwoods; there does not need to be one for the Arkhams, either. --WanYao 11:48, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  2. KeepThe page is in the process of being moved and edited by the authors. Give it time.--CyberRead240 11:50, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Keep - per my discussion on J3D's talk page, I believe this page has potential use, and should be given a few days to make the necessary changes for it to be useful. --PdeqTalk* 11:52, 7 April 2008 (BST)
    Comments moved to talk page
  4. Keep - hold up from putting every page on here until this issue is sorted out.--xoxo 11:55, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete - Escalating BBK retardness.--Luke Skywalker 11:57, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Delete - seeing as Read moved the on topic comments above to the talk page, I'll say it again. As of now it's purpose is simply self referencing nickname promotion -- boxy talki 12:08 7 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Keep, but revert to the original redirect that it was until Finis changed it.--Nallan (Talk) 12:12, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  8. Keep - but turn it into a proper disambiguation page. --ZsL 14:56, 7 April 2008 (BST)
    There is no disambig for, say, the Blythetowns or the Becktowns or the Boundwoods. There does not need to be a disambig for the Arkhams, either. Except to serve the purposes of a tiny clique. Delete it. Period. --WanYao 15:20, 7 April 2008 (BST)
    I meant to just have it as a disambig between New and Old Arkham. I also can see your side of the argument, but I disagree. --ZsL 17:39, 7 April 2008 (BST)
    Fine... but for consistency's sake, do you think there should be a disambig page for Blythville, Becktown, Boundwood and Grayside, as well? (Am I forgetting anything?) Because that's the only position consistent with your vote and your argument. --WanYao 17:58, 7 April 2008 (BST)
    Eh, it can't hurt. --ZsL 18:07, 7 April 2008 (BST)
    I think it's kinda pointless, personally... but whatever... --WanYao 19:05, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  9. Delete - Arkham Sisters way of sel promotion. If anyone has real claims to the area its the Old Arkham Republic. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n 17:11, 7 April 2008 (BST)
    Actually, they're ROAR now... And, I was a member for some time... And I still "live" in the Arkhams, myself, and still hang on ROAR's board once in a while... And I talk to Necronauts and Octapopers and Malton Mental Hospitaliers... all the time.... And I can tell you, no one down there calls these suburbs by any of the names these kids are trying to force on us. --WanYao 18:01, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  10. Delete - Vantar 22:41, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  11. Delete - DanceDanceRevolution 23:53, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  12. Delete - Doesn't have much use. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:57, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  13. Delete - Get rid, self-aggrandizing bloat. --Deadtanian 16:29, 10 April 2008 (BST)
  14. Delete -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 21:59, 10 April 2008 (BST)
  15. Keep - I actually think there is some use as a disambig.--Karekmaps?! 07:30, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  16. Keep/Change - Remove the part about the Arkham Sisters and it is a functioning redirect. --Amanu Jaku 09:19, 15 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted --ZsL 22:56, 22 April 2008 (BST)

Arkansas, From A/SD

Crit 2 & 3

Arkansas --Luke Skywalker 11:05, 7 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Keep--xoxo 11:06, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Keep I actually called them the Arkansas back in early 06. Of course, the name started because I had gotten drunk, but it stuck for awhile.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 11:17, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Delete - First of all, should be a redirect rather than a disambiguation (since the state of Arkansas has nothing to do with UD), so the question really is whether this redirect should exist. It is not helpful for the main namespace to be flooded with terms that are only used by a very very small group of people in the game. --PdeqTalk* 11:14, 7 April 2008 (BST) Furthermore, if it is a commonly used term, the pages it link to don't make sense. It should have its own page, or link to a general page for nicknames for the area. --PdeqTalk* 11:23, 7 April 2008 (BST)
    The disambig was so people would understand (if they didn't know the state of Arkansas - not everyone's american) and i changed what it links to while keeping the mention to other nicknames for the area.--xoxo 11:30, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Delete - Crit. 2 & 3.--Luke Skywalker 11:26, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Keep. On another note, Finis is from Romania, and likes to spit roast.--CyberRead240 11:33, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Delete - Self referencing idiocy -- boxy talki 11:46 7 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Keep but should be redirected to The Arkham Sisters where a list of nicknames is included.--Nallan (Talk) 11:49, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  8. Delete - this idiocy is getting to the point of a vandalism report, IMO. --WanYao 11:50, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  9. Delete - Meets crit 1 and possibly 2. --ZsL 15:00, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  10. Delete - Vantar 22:32, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  11. Delete - Spamming up the deletions page when it was rightly put to A/SD for no valid reason should be vandalism. --Karekmaps?! 01:00, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  12. Delete - Deja vu, no reason for it to exist either --Deadtanian 16:31, 10 April 2008 (BST)
  13. Delete -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 21:59, 10 April 2008 (BST)
  14. Delete --Amanu Jaku 09:20, 15 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted --ZsL 22:56, 22 April 2008 (BST)


Doesn't link anywhere, doesn't seem pointful, images are all unused anywhere else. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:36, 4 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Keep - Move to subpage of page's creator, or subpage of Ghetto Cow, to whom these seem to belong. --WanYao 13:16, 5 April 2008 (BST)
    I don't know Wan, that Roland guy has no affiliation with Ghetto Cow, and I don't remember one of us making any of those posters. I'd go ahead and Delete them, as the page has no real value. But Ghetto Cow does not claim the page as ours, so no need to move them under our group page. If any where, put them under Roland's space.-- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 16:22, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Merge - into the guy's userspace. --ZsL 14:56, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Delete- just because we can move it around does stop it from being unused and unlinked - Vantar 22:32, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Delete -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 21:59, 10 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted -- boxy talki 04:31 20 April 2008 (BST)

Yea Drive Police Department, Broadbelt Grove Police Dept, Cotty Street Police Dept, and Dunell_Hills_Police_Department

Perhaps Deletions is not the right place for this... But...

The first three URLs are redirects to the last one, i.e. "Dunell Hills Police Department". The confusion and conflation between these allegedly "neutral" pages and that of the eponymous player group -- the Dunell Hill Police Department -- is IMNSHO quite intentional. But even if it is not wilful, it amounts in any event to sneaky group-promotion-via-wiki-code and should be discontinued. Actually, it's not very surreptitious, is it?? Look at how prominent the DHPD group name is on the destination page... Hmmmn...

And, correct me if I am wrong, but I believe there has been a "movement" to get rid of these clustered-fark multi-block building type pages, and to give each block back its own, individual page. Therefore, each PD in Dunell Hills should have its own seperate wiki page -- and the redirects should be removed and replaced with these NPOV location pages. If the DHPD wishes to note themselves and their activities on these individual locations pages, fine, that's a different issue.

Finally, the deceptive and easily conflated page Dunell_Hills_Police_Department should be deleted or made into a redirect to the player group page.

If I am mistaken in putting this here for deletions, please let me know and I will remove the request or modify it to the appropriate format. --WanYao 16:51, 4 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Keep - Make Dunell Hills Police Department into a disambig, make redirects of the Depts and shift all other content to separate pages, --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:57, 4 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Delete - Forgive me if I don't know the correct terminology... ;) But all these pages need to go. --WanYao 16:59, 4 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Keep - This is one portal page that needs to be kept due to the confusion between the group and the locations page. The location blocks should be moved to the individual pages, but leave the portal page as a list of links to the individual police department pages, and the disambiguation announcement. BTW WanYao, there was no need to go on with all the "deceptiveness" bullshite. You know that portal pages are being deleted. Just fucking move the info to individual pages and put it up for deletion already -- boxy talki 17:11 4 April 2008 (BST)
    BTW, the correct place to put these individual pages is Cotty Street Police Department rather than Dept -- boxy talki 17:14 4 April 2008 (BST)
    No. The page above needs to be put up for deletion. No redirects or disambiguations are necessary. Any Search for "Dunell Hills Police Department", and all its variants, needs must go to the wiki of player group of that name. Period. There is no such building or block called the Dunell Hills PD -- there is only the player group. If each PD has its own page... and if the portal page is deleted, as per the new (old) way of re-organising the location blocks... then there should be no problems, no confusions, nothing but perfect clarity. You are needlessly overcomplicating all of this. And I am raising a stink about it to bring it yours, and everyone else's attention... how pointlessly bureaucratic you being over something VERY simple and straightforward. --WanYao 19:33, 4 April 2008 (BST)
    Ok.... this is all a giant-sized confusing mess... which is inflamed with pathetic drama... which I am taking part in and stoking... for which I apologise... But, the thing is... it is simple, or rather ought to be. Right now, if I type in "Dunell Hills Police Department" I am taken to the portal page -- not to the group page. But the group page is also called "Dunell Hills Police Department". That's all messed up, totally confusing. The portal page needs to be deleted, period, so this confusion all ends. And then each PD location will live its own seperate life, on its own page. Since some of the names are wrong, and since the info isn't very easily fit into the new templates, it's easier IMO to just delete all these and start from scratch. --WanYao 13:13, 5 April 2008 (BST)
    You're right, it is simple. The page has been up for too long now, and there are heaps of links to it, many referring to the group, many to the locations. Unless you are willing to go through all these links, a disambig page is necessary so that people looking for locations don't get directed to the group (that would be unfair promotion of the group) -- boxy talki 13:27 5 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Keep the first one according to the locations guide, delete the second and third one (see boxy's comment), and keep the fourth one, but turn it into a disambig page or redirect or something. --ZsL 17:26, 4 April 2008 (BST)
    I was going to put location blocks into the individual pages... But I don't know how, what with the 3x3 maps, etc., etc... Moreover, none of the information in the orignal pages really fits smoothly into the location block templates, so the content needs IMO to be redone, from scratch. I offered to change or withdraw the deletion request if it was done wrong, or if there was another way to do it more smoothly.... And, finally, I stand by my statements that these pages ended up being a tricky way for the DHPD to promote themselves on an NPOV locationpage, I don't care if you "disapprove" of my comments or think them inappropriate or whatnot... I'm merely calling them as I see them... And I think the DHPD has a proven history of abusing NPOV parts of wiki for self-aggrandisement, so it wasn't totally uncalled-for... ---WanYao 17:39, 4 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete I would way rather have a direct link to our group page rather than the fourth page in question. I never was sure why that page was there in the first place. It just made the whole thing much more confusing. -- Cisisero 20:11, 4 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Delete (Edited to Delete from Change, Vote choice was Invalid...) I for one would like to see you turn this page into a disambiguation; make building info page on Dunell Hills Police Departments. Place both links on the disambiguation; That should have been the way it existed from day one... by the way; WanYou, I like how you imply that the department did all this with malice or abuse in mind... This is just the way it has been since the group's first shoddy wiki edits; no one has really touched these older pages in a long time. --Marty Banks (aka. Mundane) <DHPD> 22:33, 7 April 2008 (BST)
    Is "Change" a valid vote? And, Marty, please read and refer to the comments, above, that portal pages are on the way out. That's the half the POINT of this deletion discussion... Portal pages are on the way out because they are long, often repetitive and typical confusing and hard to read and get info off... And exactly because they can so easily lead to this kind of messy confusion. Doubly so when the portal page you propose (and which is what we already have!) creates ambiguity and seriously blurs the boundaries with a player-group name. So, why didn't you deal with this a looooong time ago, Marty? If you had, no one would feel inclined to see possible malicious-through-conveniently-negligent intent... But as it is... some people wonder... No one to blame for that but yourselves... And it's Wan Yao... Not "You"... --WanYao 02:15, 8 April 2008 (BST)
    Then count my vote as a Delete; WanYao, I felt you conveyed that through the tone with your writing, If I am mistaken then I am sorry; but you must understand, we are on the defensive here... the dead may be pointing out mistakes and missteps, but they are only doing it to be able to further their own goals... please understand, your writing has been giving off that impression to me; I had to challenge that, silence is a sign of weakness or guilt where there is none. --Marty Banks (aka. Mundane) <DHPD> 07:47, 9 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Delete for The Departmensts pages and Move/Change for the individual blocks. For the love of God almighty its about time.... Do you realize the Drama We had to go through when the original Wiki style guide came out? The plan I tried to execute was for every block to have its own page (yes all 10k, regardless of how much information was actually on the pages itself) But certain (now long gone) sysops at the time wanted every page to start out as the cluster pages and then be cut apart as nescessary. THANK YOU WAN! Beleive it or not I never wanted the page to begin with. We created the "Precinct" pages for NPOV stuff and I for one would be happy to see individual pages come about. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 15:47, 8 April 2008 (BST)
    It would have been ridiculous to get rid of grouped locations pages back then. The only reason we can do this now is because Jedaz's location blocking tool made it so easy to create all those thousands of pages. Congratulations, you will now be "the" official Dunell Hills Police Department, and gain a heap of direct links from the location page -- boxy talki 09:49 9 April 2008 (BST)
  8. Delete The only thing I am really concerned about is the link from the stats page for the group Dunell Hills Police Department should lead to the group page and not to a page for a location/building/whatever else. Aside from that, by all means do what it takes to clear things up. FmrPFCBob 22:55, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  9. Delete Pointless page with no content. DH page is good enough to find all PDs in DH. Hey, it even tells where the hospitals are. Bluetigers 06:19, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  10. Delete I went through all 300+ pages that link to Dunell Hills Police Department (yes, really), and there was only one page that links to it as a location page other than to differentiate it from the group page, and that was Dunell Hills Parks, and I fixed it already. -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 07:22, 11 April 2008 (BST)
    Bullshit, there are still a number of location block and co-ordinate redirects with numerous links to them, at the very least -- boxy talki 04:15 13 April 2008 (BST)
  11. Delete --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 08:23, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  12. Delete --ScoobyDooDoobie 21:32, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  13. Delete --Cythrelo 22:30, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  14. Delete -- dǝǝɥs ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 05:02, 13 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted - content moved to individual location pages -- boxy talki 04:31 20 April 2008 (BST)


Ok I put this up for deletion in February and it was kept because people thought it could either be expanded or moved somewhere useful. It it has been untouched since then so I'm going to renominated for deletion because, 1) the discussion using the page has long ended, 2) The page is not expandable because no one has shown interest in expanding it. There was a lot of interest in moving the page but there wasn't a clear consensus on where to put it, so if you think it should be moved please say where you want it moved too. - Vantar 12:20, 4 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - - Vantar 12:20, 4 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Merge - Place it in the sandbox/user subpage of User:RocketYam -- its apparent creator --WanYao 17:08, 4 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Keep - and add the glossary category to it. --ZsL 17:26, 4 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Keep - Same as Zombie -Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 02:23, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete - Serves no purpose and moving it to a users subpage would just be spamming up the users namespace for no reason.--Karekmaps?! 12:12, 9 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Delete It was a one-off test of the then current Mobile Phone Mast map colors, and should have been done in the user's namespace. Besides, the map's legend has been sufficiently changed in the interim that the page would have to be practically recreated from scratch to be updated anyhow. -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 03:22, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Keep --Amanu Jaku 09:17, 15 April 2008 (BST)

Kept - -- boxy talki 04:31 20 April 2008 (BST)


copy of Template:VC--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:19, 19 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - and change the links that point to it. --Toejam 18:27, 19 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Speedydelete - duplicated to no purpose, and I've fixed the single link -- boxy talki 18:52 19 April 2008 (BST)
  3. SD --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:52, 19 April 2008 (BST)
  4. sd' --~~~~ [talk] 21:37, 19 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Speedy Delete --PdeqTalk* 22:42, 19 April 2008 (BST)

Speedydeleted - Karek got it -- boxy talki 04:00 20 April 2008 (BST)


This page needs a rewrite to be use able but since the project appears to be dead, I seen no reason to document something that never got far off the ground - Vantar 07:32, 2 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 07:32, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Delete - "Just so you're informed, this script no longer works. Also, the use of my code for the purpose of breaking my database violates my Terms of Use" says it all. Can't be developed or expanded, and it is a malicious hack. Get rid of it. --WanYao 13:22, 5 April 2008 (BST)
    Merge - Once again... it's new... it has content... sorta... no, it does. Move it to the user page. --WanYao 07:39, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Delete - It's a malicious script created simply as a tool to harass the horrible monsters from SA with no care as to how it affects the general UDBrain user base. It has been denounced by the UDBrain crew who have rendered it unusable with their tool. --Laughing Man 14:21, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Delete - It a talk page in the main namespace -- boxy talki 08:28 3 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 08:54, 5 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Delete -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted --ZsL 15:32, 17 April 2008 (BST)

The Arkham Sisters

When coining a nickname, get people to use it before making a page for it. - Vantar 07:06, 2 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 07:14, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Keep --CyberRead240 07:17, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Keep -- Will you people STOP putting up for deletion pages that are for all intents and purposes BRAND NEW... And give people a FUCKING CHANCE to add content?? Seriously... stop it. --WanYao 07:27, 2 April 2008 (BST)
    Just to comment... No one I know uses this term... And I live in the Arkhams, since I first started playing. That being said, I still stand by my comments that you are deleting brand new pages willy nilly and that is wrong. And ironically all the deletion attempt has done is given the page's advocates fuel to make what I think is a blatantly POV edit to the Arkhams wikis inserting this term there. Good job! You who oppose this just shot your raison d'etre in the foot. --WanYao 13:26, 5 April 2008 (BST)
    I know we don't see eye to eye, but I am glad you are standing so strong on this subject. The term "Arkham Sisters" has charisma, and we all know that Jed and Nick are wonderful creators when it comes to writing descriptions (check ALiM). I think we should let this page hang around for a little while, and see if the term lifts off. No time for removing it now, before it gets any chance to roll along. I have never been to Arkham though, so I don't really care..haha. But, WanYao, I admire you standing up for good morals over your usual POV stance.--CyberRead240 15:34, 5 April 2008 (BST)
    Hummmnn, hotay... But seriously folks... let 'em keep this page... But get rid of the POV reference that they stuck on the NPOV part of the Arkhams pages... 'Cuz, fer REELZ, no locals really use that term. I ain't gonna delete it myelf... but... There other more important and irksome things to clean up on the wiki than these guys making an Arkham Sisters page, leave them alone. --WanYao 23:27, 5 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Delete-- inserting all sorts of nicknames used solely by certain groups into main space is just wrong. Given the lack of community support for it (how many players actually use this nick?), this is bordering group propaganda.--Luke Skywalker 07:56, 2 April 2008 (BST)
    Hardly. I am not voting cause I think the page is pretty stupid, but 'group propaganda' is ridiculous. Something tells me you are just voting against for the fun of it. Finis? Do that? No Wai!!!! DanceDanceRevolution 09:10, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Keep More like YOU shut up. Everyone uses it.--Nallan (Talk) 07:59, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Delete - It's unexpandable(crit 1) and is not a term used widely. If you wish to roleplay something about it though we do have the Lexicon which is attempting to start up another run and it needs writers.--Karekmaps?! 08:03, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Keep. Impersonation of others is just wrong Finis but that hasn't stopped you on at least two occasions. Oh expandable, in that case yes it is, Nick and I fully intend to add an ALiM style amusing history for the name. Unfortunately the term 'Arkham' isn't referred to on the wiki frequently enough for their to be ample opportunities to link to this page however i intend on adding links on both suburbs pages in the near future.--xoxo 08:07, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  8. KeepHow do you expect terms to gain popularity if you just continuously delete them?--Scurley7 08:31, 2 April 2008 (BST)
    Barhah did it, so did Mrh?, and even Yahoomas(which is a term I personally coined). We aren't a source for creation of content we are a source for citing what already exists as content, there is a significant metagame community through forums and ingame groups with which you can get the term popular and commonplace first before making an article on it, if everyone just made the articles of what they wanted to catch The Glossary would be completely unreadable.--Karekmaps?! 18:47, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  9. KeepGuys, give it a chance, oh and btw, Finis,i dont like you--Shakey60 08:57, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  10. Delete - as Karek --~~~~ [talk] 09:13, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  11. Keep - This is just ridiculous, give the guy a chance to make something of the idea. It could grow to be a page we love such as the ALiM or Finis' discussion page.--GomerPyle41 09:25, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  12. Keep - i agree with gomerpyle, you need to give pages time to grow Sirpom 11:27, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  13. Delete - As Karek. --ZsL 17:39, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  14. Delete - Let the term have widespread ingame or metagame use before making a page for it. Doesn't seem worthy of anything more than perhaps a mention on their group page or at most a subpage. --PdeqTalk* 05:48, 3 April 2008 (BST)
  15. Delete - nothing to see there -- boxy talki 08:23 3 April 2008 (BST)
    Re: Nothing to see?? I beg to differ! ;)--xoxo 11:55, 3 April 2008 (BST)
    Re: PWNED!!--Nallan (Talk) 12:04, 3 April 2008 (BST)
    Oh man, you really got me there... with blather... wow, I know when I'm beat -- boxy talki 15:03 4 April 2008 (BST)
    Ah, you're alright. *ruffles boxy's hair*--Nallan (Talk) 04:33, 5 April 2008 (BST)
  16. Keep -meh.--Airborne88Zzz1.JPGT|Z.Quiz|PSS 14:20, 4 April 2008 (BST)
  17. Keep - as Airbourne --DanceDanceRevolution 01:59, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  18. Keep - Maybe it needs to be moved somewhere at the very most, but it is still a recently created page. I see no reason to delete it. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:58, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  19. Keep - It's not really doing anyone any harm is it? Just leave it be. --Nitro378 T JNL 11:05, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  20. Delete Anyone who needs to refer to the Arkhams will call them "the Arkhams", as this discussion shows. -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Kept --ZsL 15:32, 17 April 2008 (BST)

Tarumigan Gistarai vs 155 zombies

Too much on the page for me to call no content, too little to make me want it to stay - Vantar 01:58, 2 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 01:58, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Merge - Into his userspace. Or delete it, as it seems to be ignored. --PdeqTalk* 07:11, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Merge - Hard drive space is cheap. Merge with user page. --WanYao 07:31, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Delete - This belongs to userspace.--Luke Skywalker 07:58, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete --~~~~ [talk] 09:15, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Merge - as above. --ZsL 17:39, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Merge per Pdeq -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Merged --ZsL 15:32, 17 April 2008 (BST)

Shrink soda

Again Not sure what is going on here but my guess is it should not be - Vantar 01:43, 2 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 01:43, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Keep - Why delete this? It's someone's template. Just give it the right category. --WanYao 07:36, 2 April 2008 (BST) Delete - as boxy. --WanYao 13:01, 11 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Keep - As WanYao. --PdeqTalk* 08:17, 2 April 2008 (BST) Delete - as Boxy. Content duplicated. --PdeqTalk* 10:41, 5 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Keep. - as Boxy. --Toejam 16:19, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Keep Doesn't anyone read EGS??? Sure the grammars messy, but... --Nitro378 16:23, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Delete - Meets Criteria 2 and 10 of SD. --ZsL 17:39, 2 April 2008 (BST)
    There, i fixed up the grammar on template and page. Just move it and it will be a productive member of society. --{{User:Nitro378/Sig}} 05:30, 3 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Delete - and replace any uses of it with {{Shrink soda}} -- boxy talki 08:11 3 April 2008 (BST)
  8. Delete per boxy -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  9. Delete - The template works. --Amanu Jaku 09:12, 15 April 2008 (BST)
  10. Speedy Delete - Crit 1.--Karekmaps?! 18:01, 16 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted --ZsL 15:32, 17 April 2008 (BST)

Newtown Emergency Response Department

After a month this group only has a name. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vantar (talkcontribs) at 23:47, 1 April 2008.

Delete Unsigned. --ZsL 01:14, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  1. Keep - Has potential. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n 00:58, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Keep - vote changed. As per Sonny. If it's not updated in a month, delete it. --WanYao 01:02, 2 April 2008 (BST)
    WTF? I was just trolling. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n 01:16, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --ZsL 01:14, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Speedy - No content -- boxy talki 08:17 3 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Speedy Delete -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted --ZsL 15:32, 17 April 2008 (BST)

NMP warnex

This page is in the wrong place but since no pages link here the right place is a mystery

  1. Delete - Vantar 00:39, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Delete - As it stands, this is essentially spam, in my opinion. --WanYao 00:56, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Delete - Content duplicated at NMP warning example. --PdeqTalk* 01:09, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Merge - into New Malton Privateers' groupspace. --ZsL 01:14, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete - as Pdeq. also move NMP warning example to New Malton Privateers' groupspace --~~~~ [talk] 09:20, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Move - to New Malton Privateers/warnex. There is a link to this page on New Malton Privateers, but as it's in the wrong format it doesn't show up in the "what links here" log -- boxy talki 08:16 3 April 2008 (BST)
  7. Delete per Pdeq, also move NMP warning example to group's pages -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Deleted --ZsL 15:32, 17 April 2008 (BST)


No incoming links, minimal content, I can see no reason for keeping. - Vantar 23:55, 1 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete- Vantar 23:55, 1 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Merge - Only a week old, man. Move it to a sandbox or something. --WanYao 00:59, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Keep - for now, but after another week speedy delete it. --ZsL 01:14, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Keep per Zombie Slay3r -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Kept --ZsL 15:32, 17 April 2008 (BST)

Lockettside United Suburb Theory

Near dupe of Lockettside Unified Suburb Theory with no incoming links - Vantar 00:22, 2 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 00:22, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Delete - duplicated page, etc. --WanYao 00:57, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --ZsL 01:14, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Speedy -- boxy talki 08:12 3 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Speedy delete -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Speedily Deleted --ZsL 17:47, 14 April 2008 (BST)


If he doesn't want to make banners for his one man group, why bother making a page to announce it? This seems awfully like the "Dr" Sinclair farce to me...--TerminalFailure 16:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep - Give it time. Being that the page is brand new, they probably intend to actually put some banners there, with a humorous statement filling the page in the meantime. If they eventually decide they aren't going to make banners, they'll remove it from their navigation template. Not even close to the Sinclair subpage mess. --PdeqTalk* 07:13, 31 March 2008 (BST)
  2. Merge - into Armageddon space knights' groupspace. --ZsL 17:40, 31 March 2008 (BST)
  3. Merge - into a subpage of the group. --WanYao 12:31, 1 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Merge - Above. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:17, 1 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Merge - As above. -- Cheese 00:24, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Merge per Zombie Slay3r -Ornithopter (Talk | contribs) 04:06, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Merged --ZsL 17:47, 14 April 2008 (BST)

Crit 1

The last charge - Should probably be moved or deleted. --User:Axe27/Sig 20:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete --User:Axe27/Sig 20:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Keep Its less than 3 days old... Give it two weeks and then we'll nuke it if it isn't significantly improved. Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 21:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
    I don't see how you can improve that page. Maybe if by a miracle the primary editors learned to spell...--User:Axe27/Sig 22:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Give it time.--Karekmaps?! 04:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep. --Toejam 11:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. keep, give it at least 2 weeks of time --~~~~ [talk] 12:46, 30 March 2008 (BST)
  6. Keep - for now, but after a couple weeks speedy delete it. --ZsL 17:40, 31 March 2008 (BST)
  7. keep - it's only a week old, give 'em a chance. if it's junk in a couple weeks, then kill it. --WanYao 12:30, 1 April 2008 (BST)
Kept, for now, if the page is in the same state a month or so from now if may be put up for deletion again - Vantar 19:17, 12 April 2008 (BST)


Heavily off-topic. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 05:31, 12 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 05:31, 12 April 2008 (BST) Speedy Delete - As per Karek. I didn't look too much into the page's history. --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 07:39, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Speedy delete - Because the author crit 1ed it until another user decided to come along and revert the author's own request for deletion. That's Crits 1, 2, and 7 that it should/would meet. as of this revision. It is also duplicated here.--Karekmaps?! 07:19, 12 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Speedy delete - as Karek, it was author requested. --PdeqTalk* 07:28, 12 April 2008 (BST)

Speedydeleted -- boxy talki 12:24 12 April 2008 (BST)

Trimble Lane(Molebank)

Because its not called trimble lane. Its a copy of the location block, but wrong. Kill please!--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 12:49, 8 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete --PdeqTalk* 17:30, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Delete - It's not even linked to from anything -DanceDanceRevolution 05:28, 9 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Speedydelete - Crit 1, duplicated at Tarzwell Road -- boxy talki 10:02 9 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --ZsL 15:59, 10 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --WanYao 16:23, 10 April 2008 (BST)

Speedily Deleted --ZsL 16:28, 10 April 2008 (BST)

Nuke Malton!

Historical this type of on topic but unlikely to happen event page has been dumped in --- or Crit 1ed in the middle of the night. This one is shorter then most, and has no real incoming links (only link in is from creator's user page). If you are going to vote keep could you at least say how you would expand the page (or better yet expand the page yourself). - Vantar 23:15, 7 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 23:15, 7 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Move - seems like it belongs at Template:Nuke Malton!. --PdeqTalk* 01:03, 8 April 2008 (BST) Speedy Delete - now that it's been merged, no point in keeping the old page. --PdeqTalk* 17:25, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Merge/Move - the text content should go on the Template:Nuke Malton! page. --WanYao 01:58, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Speedydelete - Crit 1 (has been duplicated here).--  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:41, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Speedydelete - self-edited and merged - now Nuke the joint awwready! (Furreakin' lirbrarians...!) Fred Flange 04:03, 8 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Speedydelete - As everyone... --Nitro378 T JNL 17:36, 8 April 2008 (BST)

Speedily Deleted --ZsL 16:28, 10 April 2008 (BST)

Crit 2

Out of Character In Character

--User:Axe27/Sig 23:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

  1. Keep - This is a guide for a roleplaying game, so something that describes roleplaying and what is not should be included. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 03:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Keep - It fits, it's a roleplaying term, it may not be unique to UD but it is(has been in the past) commonly used, no point in not making it accessible through OOC and IC redirects.--Karekmaps?! 04:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Keep - As Karek. --PdeqTalk* 07:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Keep - I know I've used this before. Very helpful for those who don't know the difference between OCC and ICC.--MikhailA 00:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Keep - Useful for newbies or something. --ZsL 03:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Keep IC: Mah zambah az hangrah. Zam ganna harm Gamgan --~~~~ [talk] 07:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. keep - why would you even consider deleting these?? definitions of commonly used gamer jargon are exactly one of the things the wiki is here for. --WanYao 12:34, 1 April 2008 (BST)

Kept --ZsL 17:51, 7 April 2008 (BST)

Template:Zzz/Template talk:Zzz

Crit 7 redirect on original image accomplishes intent of this template. Template is now useless.--Airborne88Zzz1.JPGT|Z.Quiz|PSS 04:31, 6 April 2008 (BST)

  1. This belongs in speedy delete, no? --WanYao 09:48, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Speedy - yeah, put it on the speedy delete page next time. And I don't think you need to list the talk page along with the page. They'll both get deleted together. --PdeqTalk* 09:58, 6 April 2008 (BST)
    Ok, will do. thanks--Airborne88Zzz1.JPGT|Z.Quiz|PSS 10:29, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 10. --ZsL 14:56, 7 April 2008 (BST)

Speedily Deleted --ZsL 14:56, 7 April 2008 (BST)

Radio Freq 27.59

Under construction since its one and only edit in december. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:38, 4 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Speedy Delete - no content. --PdeqTalk* 22:35, 4 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Speedy delete - there is a Radio page for this... --WanYao 13:15, 5 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --ZsL 14:56, 7 April 2008 (BST)

Speedily Deleted --ZsL 14:56, 7 April 2008 (BST)

Operation/Take The Younghusband Arms

Not sure what is going on here but my guess is it should not be - Vantar 01:00, 2 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 01:00, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Merge - It's a valid... thing... But it has no context. Move to user subpage. --WanYao 01:03, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --ZsL 01:14, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Merge - haha don't deystroy this hilarious page.--xoxo 08:37, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Speedy - no content -- boxy talki 08:19 3 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Speedy - no content. --PdeqTalk* 22:38, 4 April 2008 (BST)

Speedily Deleted --ZsL 14:56, 7 April 2008 (BST)


Flamebaitery. --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n 00:52, 6 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Speedy Delete --Sonny Corleone RRF DORIS MSD MOB pr0n 00:52, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Speedy Delete --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 00:53, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Delete--Gus Thomas 00:54, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Speedy Delete --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 01:01, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Delete --Airborne88Zzz1.JPGT|Z.Quiz|PSS 01:02, 6 April 2008 (BST)

What criterion of speedydelete was that again? Best you could argue is a scheduled deletion, if Karek is going to go rule vandalism on both Nitro and Sonny... and then he'll have to go and take out Template:HaloFans and Template:Gaylo as well -- boxy talki 01:20 6 April 2008 (BST)

It was deleted under the "There's a significant difference between wishing a user dead and commenting on a game in a round about way that insults a user. I don't think it was vandalism because the user simply didn't now better, that still does not justify the existence of template calling for a user's death. And yes, I am kinda tempted to rule vandalism anyway because it's common sense that that crosses a line" Criteria.--Karekmaps?! 04:13, 6 April 2008 (BST)
  • Template:HaloFans has been deleted under the similar criteria of Too damn far and now that I've had a chance to see these templates I'm going to go and look over Hagnat's rulings.--Karekmaps?! 04:20, 6 April 2008 (BST)

The Human Revitalization Project

I don't believe it is coming - Vantar 07:14, 2 April 2008 (BST)

  1. Delete - Vantar 07:14, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  2. Delete - Ok, this has been around for almost a month. NOT like a week. AND has no content. This, unlike some others, is valid for deletion. --WanYao 07:30, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  3. Delete - The author's first contribution was on the 9th of March, and his most recent on the 11th March. I doubt he's coming back. --Toejam 16:11, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  4. Speedy Delete - Crit 1. --ZsL 17:39, 2 April 2008 (BST)
  5. Speedy - -- boxy talki 08:24 3 April 2008 (BST)
  6. Speedy Delete - no content. --PdeqTalk* 11:33, 3 April 2008 (BST)

Speedily Deleted --ZsL 17:26, 4 April 2008 (BST)


Orphaned, Uncategorized and Unupdated. There is no reason to keep this page - Vantar 01:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete - Vantar 00:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete - This is why I miss crit 12. --ZsL 15:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Delete Conndrakamod TDHPD CFT 22:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. delete - --~~~~ [talk] 11:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. delete yep. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. merge - into the groupspace. --WanYao 12:36, 1 April 2008 (BST)
Deleted - Vantar 11:18, 4 April 2008 (BST)


Not sure what it is but whatever it is it should not be here- Vantar 01:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

  1. Delete - Vantar 00:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Merge - into Brendan's userspace. --ZsL 15:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Merge - As Zombie Slayer. --User:Axe27/Sig 18:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Merge - As Zombie Slayer. --Toejam 11:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. merge - As per teh Slayage o' Zambahz. --WanYao 12:38, 1 April 2008 (BST)
Moved to user name space - Vantar 11:18, 4 April 2008 (BST)