UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/December-2010

e Deletions Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

501st U.S. Army Battalion

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/Blood_Red_Cross http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/The_Shadow http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/Operation_Safehouse http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/Trinity_Directorate_of_Sergeants http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/501st_U.S._Army_Battalion/The_Mass these sites i request deleted since im not gonna use them anymore--—The preceding unsigned comment was added by MBjarno (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.

1. Keep - Why should these pages be deleted? Do you have any evidence that you're the page creator?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

   Sorry to sound like Iscariot, but I'm staying as a keep. Frankly, if you can just take over an inactive group and start deleting their subpages, all sorts of mayhem will ensue. We don't have a crit 12, and the policy discussion to allow group leaders to delete their pages failed, iirc.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

2. Keep - These pages served to showcase an old group prior to your editing them; Trying to revive the group doesn't make the pages yours. If you'd like, we can (easily) revert them to how you first found them. --VVV ^RPMBG 16:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Changing my vote to Delete since MBjarno explained his position on the pages and the page explicitly said that anyone could take over the page. This should be like a Crit 7 workaround or something. ~ 16:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

   Keep - Unless MBjarno can explain his reasons for requesting deletion. ~ 17:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

4. Delete - As explained below, he's the only relative controlling interest in the page and (this may exhibit some bad bias but) any page with content like this that has "military", "corp", "battalion" or "strike" in it is more or less a crit 1 and can go to hell IMO. Plus the fact he came back to explain himself shows some conviction in his actions. Although, if all he wants to is revive it he can easily just take over the pages manually, mostly without fuss. -- LEMON #1 16:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete - As DDR. Besides, even in the highly unlikely case the original creator returns and makes a fuss, it's quickly undeleted. -- Spiderzed▋ 00:37, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete. G F J 17:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

If you guys wanna keep it as museum pages, it's fine, but seriously nobody watches them, two of the original three who made it don't play and the last one is rarely in, the group is clearly dead and i want to revive it, what is the reason to keep it? it was free to take an i was a former member so i thought i could revive the group without opposition, there is no need for the mentioned pages and nobody watches them, but it's your decision--MBjarno 10:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Kept - With 3 votes to keep and 3 to delete.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 18:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

But it was 4 to 2 to delete. ~ 18:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Fuck, I thought it was the other way around. Doing it now.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 18:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Cool. For the record, I agree with your keep comments mostly except for that one line in the main page stating that anyone was free to take over the page. Otherwise, I probably would have kept my vote as keep. ~ 19:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Men of action

One-man group from 2008, never took off. --VVV ^RPMBG 23:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete (don't forget the talk page) - --VVV ^RPMBG 23:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete -- LEMON #1 00:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -Estacado^Talk 00:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete ~ 17:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

UD Project

This is a really cool idea to record the history of urban dead. Unfortunately no one ever contributed to it, and the website it links to is nonexistent. Kind of a shame really.

1. Delete - Nothing going on here.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 15:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete - could've been good, but alas it was not to be. ~~ Chief Seagull ~~ ^talk 15:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:48, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete - bummer -- LEMON #1 05:01, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Move Move it to a section under my namespace would you? -Estacado^Talk 00:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

   No. Do it yourself. -- LEMON #1 01:23, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

   Wasn't it you who once told me that it was easier for the Mods to do it, because they could do it with a click of a button? -Estacado^Talk 22:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

   You seem to be failing to realise there is absolutely no reason why we should be moving it into your userspace when it's a community page deletion candidate. Copy it there. Also, the way you said it seemed to indicate that you felt we had some sort of obligation to follow your request/order, of which we have absolutely none, since your request here to have it moved is actually just a vote and it's being outnumbered by deletes 5:1. -- LEMON #1 00:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

   I've always wondered this. If you copy a page that is up for deletion to your userspace, and the page eventually gets deleted, will your copied page be subject to on-site speedy-delete as a deletion work-around (Crit. 6)? -MHSstaff 22:23, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

   Nope, arking in userspaces is fine, I think the main concern is that we don't want these incomplete or redundant pages in the mainspace. -- LEMON #1 00:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

   I think if the original is a crit 7, then it's still elligible for Crit 6, but I'm not certain.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 00:05, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

   It implies that they would be deleted, but both precedent and the 'a userspace belongs to the user rule' say otherwise. Perhaps we should have a vote, and amend it to clarify? --VVV ^RPMBG 01:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

   I seem to recall that the Iscariot precedent says it would be deleted. A vote isn't necessary, it can just be dealt with at the time if it ever happens.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:35, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

   This workaround was ignored. --VVV ^RPMBG 23:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

   I always thought that Crit 6 is for recreating deleted pages in the same space to directly circumvent deletions, rather than for archiving a page that has no place in mainspace in userspace. See the Second Battle of Krinks precedent, which was archived in Cornys userspace. Else, I'll throw in a funny smiley, move it to User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/PistolNinjaGuide and claim it's a completely different text for a new guide. -- Spiderzed▋ 00:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

   Is that a crit 7 suddenly?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

   I currently have several old crit 1s and 7s arked somewhere (in the sandboxes, couldn't be fucked finding them), and was always of the belief that userspace pages can be used to archive anything. Didn't Iz have an image ark saved from deletion through this same idea? 23:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

   An image ark once again not being a crit 7.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:53, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

   Never said it was, as you can clearly read. I mentioned it as it was a perfect example of userspace pages having a large degree of protection. 14:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

   Can anyone specify which of Izzy's arks you're talking about? -- LEMON #1 23:59, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

   Sorry, just cause the only ark I remember him making was the one he was escalated for as per Bob's A/D/S vote. -- LEMON #1 16:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

7. Delete - I don't see this going anywhere anytime soon. MHSstaff 22:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Dunell_Hills_Police_Department/Department_of_Internal_Affairs/UDTRoster

Out of date UDTool list, now supplanted by an automatically generated list stored elsewhere. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - As Above. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete -- LEMON #1 01:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Dunell_Hills_Police_Department/Department_of_Internal_Affairs/UDTRoster2

Out of date UDTool list, now supplanted by an automatically generated list stored elsewhere. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - As Above. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete -- LEMON #1 01:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Dunell_Hills_Police_Department/Most_Wanted/UDTList

Out of date UDTool list, now supplanted by an automatically generated list stored elsewhere. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - As Above. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 12:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete -- LEMON #1 01:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:31, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Two Zombies Ultimate Attack Force

Another relic that probably never took off. Just news for three weeks, and that was it. Also, never categorized until right now, and the only link to it comes from Yon's orphanage clearing efforts. -- Spiderzed▋ 11:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - as above. -- Spiderzed▋ 11:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete Keep - but weak. It's got a bit of content, still orphaned and a nonexistent. Too much content for a crit 1, which is really it's only saving grace. -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Keep - whaaaat? I really like this, I like the header and the style. The only two reasons I see this should be deleted is cause it's orphaned and crit 12. crit 12 no longer exists etc, and while orphaned can sometimes be a reason... I just dig this page, even though its not really useful (what group page is?) It lasted 3 years before, I wouldn't mind keeping it around now :'( -- LEMON #1 01:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Keep - The concept is hilarious plus the banner and style has this cute, retro, old-skool feel. Worth keeping around IMO. -MHSstaff 03:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Keep - Lengthy page on a group of more than one person. --VVV ^RPMBG 05:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Keep Like the page. --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Keep - Nice find. I'd love to stumble on to something like this with the random page button.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 14:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Keep --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
10. Keep ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Kept --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:31, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Roftwood_Retake_Campain

Looks like a leftover campaign from the days of yore that never got off the ground. Only linked to the creator's talk page.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 03:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete - As above.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 03:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Marinade overnight, coat lightly in durum wheat flour and shallow fry. 03:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete -- LEMON #1 11:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete (don't forget the talk page) - For the record, the days of yore are August 2007 and before. But yeah, this is still pretty old, and was set up for an non-notable event. --VVV ^RPMBG 08:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete -- Linkthewindow  Talk  14:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
10. Delete ~ 21:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 00:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Bill stokes was here

And associated talk page. This has been moved from A/SD, and was a graffiti campaign that never took off, or had any noticeable impact on the game or community. It is not linked to from anywhere -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:07 28 November 2010 (BST)

1. Delete -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:07 28 November 2010 (BST)
2. Delete ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 01:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete Pointless page about a non-event. -- Spiderzed▋ 01:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete -- LEMON #1 01:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
5. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 10:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete - Linkthewindow  Talk  11:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
7. Delete. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 04:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete ~ 06:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete - Bill Stokes was here, but not for much longer. ~~ Chief Seagull ~~ ^talk 14:14, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
10. Delete - I don't think I've ever seen it sprayed, so its some sort of obscure. --VVV ^RPMBG 23:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

    Then again, we could merge it with Streets, Blades, etc. into Common Graffiti. --VVV ^RPMBG 23:44, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

    I would fight to keep Blades, it's exactly the same as Blanemcc is a PKer and surprisingly, as prominent, and I don't mind them having their own pages. -- LEMON #1 00:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

11. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
12. Delete Bandwagon --Thadeous Oakley 10:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 00:01, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

More cats

Don't let the title of "groups" fool you. These cats are basically a list of templates that have nothing to do with each other whatsoever except for the fact, you guessed it, they all start with the same letter. Originally created by Nubis, these cats are incomplete, wrong (some templates don't start with the corresponding letter), generally useless, and most importantly an inferior dupe of this page--Thadeous Oakley 09:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

1. Delete All of them. --Thadeous Oakley 09:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete - nubis/dcc did some good shit, but this wasn't one of em. This has also been succeeded by Rooster's better template categorising efforts too. -- LEMON #1 09:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 15:04, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
4. Delete -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:07 28 November 2010 (BST)
5. Delete Linkthewindow  Talk  11:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
6. Delete - Just makes it harder to find shit.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 12:51, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

   But surely shit is in Category:S Groups?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

7. delete ~ 03:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
8. Delete -- Spiderzed▋ 12:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
9. Delete. G F J 15:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted, and all pages decategorised.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 23:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Malton Manhunt/Player Hunt 2008

This Malton Manhunt event has never really kicked off. It's one of those Malton Manhunt events that just faded from existence.

1. Delete --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Delete ~ 20:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Keep - Ahahah. I like the history of this manhunt that everyone got involved in and that petered out. Also, now I know when Axe Hack graduated highschool. Mwahahaha. Stalker XP+1.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 03:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Keep - This is my page. In a namespace I made. It came as humanly close to starting (we all got together in the starting zone, everything was ready and the day before it was supposed to start, zombies rolled in and fucked everyone over and the contestants scattered making it hard to re-co-ordinate the thing again) without having actually got off the starting mark, but that doesn't make it a useless page. It's mine and I don't want it gone. -- LEMON #1 04:52, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

   Well, since you did start the Malton Manhunt, I can't argue with you there. What's the procedures for retracting this deletion request? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 05:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

   Just cycle it early, shouldn't be much of a problem. -- LEMON #1 05:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Kept early -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:24 11 December 2010 (BST)

Yeah. Sorry for being butthurt over this. I'm just very protective of my UD history, specially when it records the exploits of my IRL friends. -- LEMON #1 16:35, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Clearing Short Pages

Crit 1's

• Night Ravers/Icehawg.
• Bad Habit/Enshrinement (And it's a crit 13 to boot).
• Socialist Survivor Network/ Military.
• The Rebellion/Recruitment (The page creator said he's not going to finish work on it).

That's all I got time for now. ~ 02:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Bad Habit still exists, so it's not a crit 13. If there's no objection I'll nerf these in a bit. 02:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm willing to haggle on this, but for now,... I'd be willing to vote keep... I didn't think we deleted group pages,... plus disk space=cheap. -Estacado^Talk 02:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

We're not deleting them as group pages, but as short pages. (That is, under C.1). Also, I'm going to pretend I didn't hear that piece of trash you just said. That said, are you sure you want to vote keep (in which case they'll just go to A/D and be deleted in a few weeks), or would you like to change your mind so we can skip the red tape and get rid of them here? ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 23:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

My group.. Keep--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 01:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Which one? ~ 01:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, now, it never worked when I tried it Red... convience me more. And I haven't necessarily voted keep yet. -Estacado^Talk 04:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Because 1) you're overreacting, the majority of the time your requests have been deleted; 2) the ones that were denied had valid justification; and 3) voting keep is just delaying the inevitable. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 05:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

But I have valid uses for each of these pages. Keep -Estacado^Talk 23:49, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Just realized I neglected to put the speedydelete template on these pages. As Hawk said, these are all speedy delete worthy. No need to move to A/D. ~ 23:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Speedy Delete as crit 1. Shame Poodle is a faggot. -- LEMON #1 00:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
2. Crit One Speedy 00:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
3. Delete Bad Habit/Enshrinement, Speedy Delete the rest. --VVV ^RPMBG 00:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
4. Speedy As we have no bolded keeps, and 3 speedies, I'm tempted to cycle this right now. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 01:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
5. Technically, my vote up above constatuted a keep, otherwise it didn't need to be moved here. Speedy Delete it now... -Estacado^Talk 01:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
6. Speedy ~ 02:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted as per the speedy deletions clause. I would like to remind poodle as per his vote above, that moving a/sd entries to a/d is the only purpose of voting keep on a/sd so the fact that you were surprised that this would happen just bewilders me. You might want to heed a well learned lesson regarding keeping A/SD entries just to make a point or piss people off; you may think you're achieving something or annoying your enemies but it won't last long. You keep our shit for shits and giggles, we'll put it straight on A/D and people will come to vote on an entry which essentially has become an irreversible record of how much of an idiot you were for keeping it in the first place. Iscariot did this too and even he stopped once I started putting his fails on a pedestal at a/d, so here's some food for thought; you throw the red tape in our face, we throw the community into yours. -- LEMON #1 03:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Chekken and related pages

Specifically, User:Chekken/Penehzmcgee, Department_of_Emotional_Man-love, User:Chekken/nav, User:Chekken/Sandbox, User:Chekken/sig, Naked_Twister_party/History, Naked_Twister_Party/Strike_Teams, Naked_Twister_Party/09, Malton_roadtrip_'09/map, Malton_roadtrip_'09, Wind_and_Fire_Tour.

I know it's a lot of stuff, but it all has to go. I'm done with the game, and it's time to move on. --Chex 09:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

1. Scheduled --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Except for Malton roadtrip '09, to which I only say Delete.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:16, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

2. Speedy - None of those pages are remotely worth keeping. --Thadeous Oakley 11:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
3. Scheduled - awww man, I've been holiday-post-uni drinking and am too ruined to comprehend the request, lest fulfil it. What I'd do is delete everything (bar his signature),fix the links from the pages being deleted (bar the subpages), redirect dem to DEM as per common sense, and.... uyeah... And I'd do it as soon as I'm sober. So unless soemoen votes keep inbetween here and then, I'd do it by tomorow. And if someone voted keep I'd probably do it anyway. -- LEMON #1 13:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Instead of not deleting his sig, just replace it with [[User:Chekken|Chekken]], so it's like deleting it only without the mess of broken template calls. 18:55, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   The map is really nice. :( -MHSstaff 19:13, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   I've Deleted everything except for the signature and Malton roadtrip '09, which has multiple contibutors, so I'm only voting delete on that, and hence it only has 2 Speedy votes. The sig needs sorting and I'll leave it to someone else to decide how.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

4. Delete for the Roadtrip '09 page You have already blown the supporting map page and with that gone, I don't see much point in keeping this one. Shame because both were nice pages. -MHSstaff 19:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   *Cough*--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:26, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Yeah but that image is basically on a death row now so it is more or less deleted. -MHSstaff 19:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   There we go, arked for keeping. 19:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

5. Keep Naked_Twister_Party/09. I don't know why Yonn deleted it already, considering it has about two-and-a-half dozen edits from other authors. Heck, I even had it linked from one of my character's bios on the wiki, since it was an actual event page that several dozen or hundred zombies and survivors were present for. Now all I have is a red-link. —Aichon— 21:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Because it had three speedy deletion votes and hence the rules above say it should be deleted?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   Fair enough, though considering you didn't offer your own Speedy for the Malton roadtrip page on the basis of having multiple contributors, I'd have hoped for the same here as well. —Aichon— 21:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

   From the tone of roadtrip, I felt the other contributor was more important in the creation of the event, and since half the edits to that page were made by the other contributor, I feel there was a substantial difference. :P --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

6. Delete. G F J 16:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

This was done a while ago. -- LEMON #1 03:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)