UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/Apr 2007
Deletions Archive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in the month of April 2007.
Big River
A call to retreat for Ackland Mall before the Mall tour sieged it. It went unheard by most and the mall has already fallen and rebuilt so it's need is questionable Vantar 21:00, 15 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete --T 16:27, 16 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete --Vista 19:30, 16 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 11:56, 17 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete--Ducis DuxSlothTalk 09:34, 18 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete --Soccerfan667 11:53, 18 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete --User:Axe27/Sig 00:38, 28 April 2007 (BST)
Deleted --T 01:05, 30 April 2007 (BST)
Old BAR Members List
I should have just reused this wikipage when I redesigned The Burchell Arms Regulars group wikipage, but for some reason the idea did not occur to me. You know what they say about hindsight. As is, this page's contents, along with other information, are now stored here (scroll down to B.A.R Member List). Please delete the original as it is no longer needed. --Mobius187 April 20 2007, 9:32 AM (EST)
- Speedydelete - Crit 1., duplicated elsewhere for no purpose -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 15:19, 20 April 2007 (BST)
- Speedy Delete - As boxy. --T 22:38, 20 April 2007 (BST)
- Speedy Delete -As Zombie. --User:Axe27/Sig 00:39, 28 April 2007 (BST)
Speedily deleted --Daranz.t.mod janitor.W(M)^∞. 23:03, 28 April 2007 (BST)
User:Lt Pliskin22
Created for a non-existent user by a new editor. Content moved to User:Joker22's user page. -- Cheeseman W!ASBTalk 23:31, 13 April 2007 (BST)
- Speedy Delete - Criterion 9. --T 23:33, 13 April 2007 (BST)
- Speedy Delete - Criterion 9. Just realised I could put it there. -- Cheeseman W!ASBTalk 23:36, 13 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Seeing as the author didn't move it over, he won't know where to find it if we just delete it straight away (and possibly recreate it). So I've put {{movedelete}} on it, it will be listed in Category:Speedy Delete Candidates, and will get speedydeleted in a week or two. These types of pages are better going through the move request page rather than doing it manually -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 00:38, 14 April 2007 (BST)
Deleted --T 04:36, 27 April 2007 (BST)
Independent
Well, seeing as it hasn't been touched since July 2006, and no one really knows its there, I see all the more reason to delete it. No templates were created, so deleting it should be a fairly simple task. --User:Axe27/Sig 17:34, 13 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete - the joke is no longer works, and wasn't that funny to begin with.--Vista 18:16, 14 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete - Seeing as I'm the one who put it up there. --User:Axe27/Sig 18:18, 14 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete - Not really even that funny. --T 21:22, 14 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - mildly amusing piece of history (looks like UD is attracting better speelers these days, eh). But remove the group category tags. It is not a group, even though 43 players do list 'Independent' as their group, they are obviously claiming to be part of no group -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 11:40, 17 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - I agree with what Boxy is saying with removing it from the group category. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 09:34, 18 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Although only slightly amusing, it's amusing enough to keep. --Soccerfan667 11:52, 18 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Mildly amusing bit of trivia. Is there a humor catagory? --Dread Lime 16:18, 20 April 2007 (BST)
- keep - I just joined and want to promote this agenda. 'Death to the Independants!' --Honestmistake 17:01, 20 April 2007 (BST)
- 'Keep - I like it. And it's been viewed fifteen thousand times. -Mark D. Stroyer SoH 01:33, 22 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Not an actual group page so much as a "spoof." Even if it's not funny, it's still humour to someone. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 06:11, 22 April 2007 (BST)
Kept --T 04:36, 27 April 2007 (BST)
The James Earl Jones Awards
Created by the now banned Apex basically just to award people he likes best with random awards. Even though I won some, I think this was just part of his nefarious plot to take over the wiki, or somefin' like 'dat. He may just be crazy too. There are also some associated templates too, and I'd like those deleted as well.
- Delete - Gage 22:20, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete - I want a prize.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 22:53, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete - I'm very bitter about losing.--Lachryma☭ 23:02, 1 April 2007 (BST)
Delete- but keep the templates.--Blood Panther 23:13, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - - changed my vote, dont see the harm in keeping the page.Blood Panther 01:35, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - **Shrugs**, mildly interesting. Perhaps it could be moved to a sub-page of his user page -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 02:30, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - If only for the whimsical irony of Reptileus awarding himself the Biggest Douche award. -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 03:11, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete - I didn't even get nominated. :( --T 04:16, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - **Shrugs**, mildly interesting. Perhaps it could be moved to a sub-page of his user page -- Vi "yes my vote is indeed a direct cut&paste from Boxy's" sta 12:23, 5 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Mainly for the templates since this vote lumps them all in together. If templates are being used elsewhere on the wiki and aren't offensive then they shouldn't be deleted in my opinion. There are far more ridiculous templates out there with little or no reason to exist. With regard to the page and the competition itself, one can hardly claim that they are important in themselves but they serve to give context to the templates (which I say again, should not be deleted) and make an interesting bit of history for the people who took an interest at the time or who want to know more later. If the objection to their existence is that the awards were not voted for by members of the academy, then the correct response is to go ahead and make a new page with fair and impartial rules. --Belmondzoo 04:23, 9 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - As above. --Reaper with no name TJ! 21:21, 9 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep --Toejam 00:15, 11 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep --Kamden 00:30, 11 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - I like it --Mcpldave 03:57, 13 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Moo--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 05:40, 13 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete - Stupid --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 06:40, 15 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Why not? Makes interesting reading... --saxsuxMalTel 13:42, 15 April 2007 (BST)
Kept -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 12:16, 16 April 2007 (BST)
Category:Escendo Numerus
This Page attempts to rename a suburb for a group. Misleading and could be used inappropriately to misinform. Yaznov 09:25, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - No, sorry. Above mentioned page is no different than New Baghdad or Twilight Edgecombe. The only category it is listed under is that of Escendo Numerus, not suburbs. Adrian Jeshua 17:37, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete Wrong. It doesn't link to your group page as said page has already been deleted, for lack of members. A page cannot belong to a category that does not exist. Mark Williams 10:24, 1 April, 2007 (PDT)
- Keep - Let him have his page. If you go by your rules, every sub-page for ever PKer group would be gone. -- Vigeous RHA 18:40, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete -- Bufla 18:02, 1 April 2007 (GMT)
- Delete -- If I'm allowed to vote Yaznov 18:33, 1 April 2007 (GMT)
- Keep -Leave this group be they are under the Pk Alliance. The PKA allies stick together and I think with that in place the group should stay Johnny Reb
- Keep - There's no possible way creating a fake suburb map which links ONLY from the EN pages (which were merely replaced with a facelift, not placed back onto the wiki because of outside group deletion), as it's only accessible as Escendo_Numerus/Numerus_Regnum and it makes no attempts to replace the Huntley Heights page.Josh Reveka 22:08, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - There's no reason to delete this. It's not replacing a suburb page and the group page exists.Spicy A
- Delete They've turned one page of harassment into multiple pages of spam. Also, Spicy A = Adrian Jeshua. PROXIES ARE AWESOME! Mods, have fun. I'm gone. -- Aiden H
- Keep - I fail to see how this is any different from New Baghdad, which, incidentally, has not been deleted. Precedant are precedants, after all. - DT
- Keep - It seems to me like some people with a grudge against Escendo Numerus trying to get the page deleted. Yaznov is part of the 4H a group that is in war with EN.It’s a hostile and childish act to get revenge. Revenge and ingame fights shouldn’t be a reason to delete a page. IMHO trying to get a enemies page deleted is a form of griefing. Pathetic Bill 00:05, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete And I don't think the statue of limitations has expired for New Baghdad either... TheBerts 01:10, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - This page will not be mistaken for a legitimate suburb page for more than a few seconds, added to which this strikes me as an issue between groups -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 02:19, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Also... Please sign your edits on the wiki. You can do this either by typing ~~~~ (four tildes), or by pressing the button in the editing toolbar. Signing your edits in the standard format makes it much easier to identify who has made changes and when, and creates less work for moderators and other wiki users -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 02:26, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- There....corrected.It was a mistype. Thanks. Hope you don't mind the alteration. Yaznov 18:33, 1 April 2007 (GMT)
- Keep - This is permissible. --T 04:15, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - SkarzxEN 04:49, 2 April 2007 (BST) In a make believe game, with make believe rivalries and uprisings, i see this as a fun way of roleplaying. I believe most if not all other urban dead players are witty enough to enjoy it and also not be misled by it.
- Keep - This page isn't misinforming anyone. If it was linked to on the main suburbs page, I'd say it is, but it's not. It's just one group trying to have a little fun on one of their own pages, so where's the harm? D4rkness 06:02, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete -- Dweeezul 06:28, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep --This obviously reeks of a personal vendetta. You got to come up with something better than "misleading". There's no attempt to link to a Wiki map, and no suburbs called Numerus Regnum in Malton. Keep your nose out of ENs page and use your brain if you're going to fight them. This is a retarded attempt to grief.--Headless gunner W! 07:11, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - It's time for school... you're going to be late! --Hubrid Nox Sys WTF U! B! 16:26, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- "Abstain" - much as it pains me, and much as I despise the actions of certain EN members they haven't actually broken any rules here. For the record I do find Jeshua lacking as a human being, and generally unfit to lick the filth from the sole of my shoes, but that is no reason to move against them unless they break the rules here. --GoatFoam Abstain is not a valid vote. --T 22:44, 4 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - The discussion should be limited to the deletion of the page. To bring in other factors to prejudice voting is not only irrelevant but also childish to the extreme. --Karloth Vois RR 15:00, 4 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Doesn't hurt anything and not "misleading" at all, IMO. --DirskoSM 18:45, 5 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - I've never even heard of this page. How can it mislead someone if they can't find it without specifically looking for it? And when it comes to humor/satire based pages, I say "leave 'em alone!". --Reaper with no name TJ! 21:30, 12 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Durrr --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 21:43, 15 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep -- This is transparently a problem for a single group who can't separate IC and OOC. Black Mask 22:39, 15 April 2007 (GMT)
- Keep - Ohh yeah... soooo misleading. I have a scientology meeting to go to now.--Jake4d1 22:54, 15 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - If only because of the precedent set by this page. --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 09:34, 16 April 2007 (BST)
Kept -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 12:16, 16 April 2007 (BST)
Category:NecroTech Countermeasure Squad
Not needed. The category was not created by a member of the NTCS, it is not used. G F J 18:08, 26 March 2007 (BST)
- Delete - G F J 18:08, 26 March 2007 (BST) (NTCS)
- Keep I created this Category for pages like NecroTech Countermeasure Squad/Operation Blackwatch there are 3 operation already in this category and this is the most logical place for them Vantar 22:53, 31 March 2007 (BST)
- Are you trying to force the NTCS to use your category? I do not think there is a rule saying that we MUST use a category for only 3 pages. I repeat, the category was not created by a member of the NTCS, and the NTCS does not want to use it. Thank you for your effort to organize the 3 pages, but we don't want it. Stop putting the pages in it. Thanks, G F J 16:35, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - I'm all for Vantar's campaign to categorize the wiki. It's simple, descriptive, and doesn't detract from the page, so let's keep it. --Darth Sensitive W! 16:50, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Why delete a valid category?--Gage 18:14, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Because the group that the category obviously refers to does not want to use it. I had removed the category from the 3 pages, making it a crit. 4 speedy delete (see above votes). Vantar has reverted my edits - which was I must say against the groups will. Is there a rule/guideline forcing us to categorize our 3 pages? If not, please delete the category as we will not use it. If there is such a rule, please give me a link. G F J 18:42, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- All wiki pages should (ideally) be categorized. It helps people find stuff. Think of it as a table of contents. What is the problem here? Are you just trying to be ornery? This couldn't possibly be causing you or your group any trouble.--Gage 01:32, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Because the group that the category obviously refers to does not want to use it. I had removed the category from the 3 pages, making it a crit. 4 speedy delete (see above votes). Vantar has reverted my edits - which was I must say against the groups will. Is there a rule/guideline forcing us to categorize our 3 pages? If not, please delete the category as we will not use it. If there is such a rule, please give me a link. G F J 18:42, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - Since it now has articles, it should be kept. --T 21:01, 1 April 2007 (BST)
- Delete - If they don't want their sub-pages categoriesed, then I they don't have to be (I know it wrecks your plans of totally eradicating un-categorised pages, Vantar, but what can ya do?) -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 02:34, 2 April 2007 (BST)
- Keep - What's the harm? -- Atticus Rex mfu pif Δ 00:53, 8 April 2007 (BST)
Kept --T 17:39, 9 April 2007 (BST)
Mall Information Center (group)
this isnt a group, its just a page where apex was adding whoever made a report in mic... i hardly believe he ever asked the users listed in this page if he could list them as membes of this group. Anyway, apex was permbanned, and i think this "group" will no longer be used, so i ask for its deletion. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Not really needed. -- 19:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Specialist290 ♠♥♣♦ 19:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - G F J 21:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Soccerfan667 12:15, 26 March 2007 (BST)
- Delete - Vista 15:10, 26 March 2007 (BST)