From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

On Strike

Er- its back on the stats page currently at 102 members. What going on? If people are back to striking shouldn't the page be unprotected? --MarieThe Grove on Tour 16:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I'll unprotect the talk page, so if anyone knows what's going on, they can post there. I'm leaving this in the queue in case it's gonna need an unprotection. --Daranz.t.mod.W(M)^∞. 17:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
It seems that some at the RRF are going on strike again, but it's kinda ambiguos because while they're "On strike", they have their alts at the Mall Tour '07 and at the Zombie Special Olimpics... --Matthew Fahrenheit YRCT+1 17:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
It is the Feral Undead Matt. They're the ones who are going on strike.--Gage 17:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, I didn't know there was so many. How come that I never hear of them at Yagoton... --Matthew Fahrenheit YRCT+1 17:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
I think they have some help, but yes, the FU started it.--Gage 17:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

This page will not be unprotected, as it is a historical group. If they want the stats page to point to a different page, they should have put something different in their group section of their profile.--Gage 17:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

So it's kinda like the CoLs, but not? --Daranz.t.mod.W(M)^∞. 17:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
If they get a sizeable strike going, and end up making a page they might get a disambiguation page. They will not take over the On Strike page as it is today though.--Gage 17:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
They got what they wanted now haven't they? Even more zombie bonuses. Really we survivors should go on strike- its too easy for zombies. --MarieThe Grove on Tour 18:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Marie, could you please STFU for a second ? If things were nice and easy for the zombies, how would you explain that they are only 30% of the entire population of malton ? Sheesh. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Consider it done Hagnat seeing as you asked so nicely ;) Just saying Caiger, ransack, revives etc- its eaiser for zombies. The communications and simpility of zombie life could make it boring. Easy isn't better. 30% seem to do a good job destorying things though... --MarieThe Grove on Tour 16:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Assault_on_Stupid_Survivors/Recruitment and Assault_on_Stupid_Survivors/Archive

Since Assault_on_Stupid_Survivors is now protected as a historical group, we should either protect these pages, merge them into the main page, add them into a Assault_on_Stupid_Survivors category, or delete them and remove the links from the Assault_on_Stupid_Survivors page. --Dr. Frank Sloth Akule News - All The News That's Fit To Print. 23:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I'd be up for protecting them, but I really don't want them to be 'findable' in the main namespace. That'd force me to move them to a talk page (despite being inappropriate for placement in that namespace). Kevan really needs to activate subpages on the main namespace, something fierce. For now? I recommend just protecting them. –Xoid MTFU! 10:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Protected. --Max Grivas JG / M.F.T. 17:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


i need this page protected during the arbitration case i have with Xoid on this matter. ow, and i need it protected WITH the caigar mall status available ;) --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 14:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Requesting protection without the status, for obvious reasons. –Xoid MTFU! 14:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
it would be nice if neihter gage or cyberbob did this protection, since that would be a conflict of interest. :P --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 15:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
No it wouldn't. :P --Hubrid Nox Mod WTF U! B! 15:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it would. You would like to see the page whitout that status, as anyone can see from the history on that page. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 15:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Whether or not I'd like to see it there is irrelevant. The Arby's case was started with the symbol not on the page; therefore, it must remain that way until the case is ruled upon. --Hubrid Nox Mod WTF U! B! 15:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Granted - Without the symbol. The page must remain as it was when the Arby's case was presented. --Hubrid Nox Mod WTF U! B! 15:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Conflict of interest, anyone ? --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 15:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Nope. Not at all. --Hubrid Nox Mod WTF U! B! 15:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Meh. Both applications denied, but I'll leave the page the way Hagnat wants it. --Hubrid Nox Mod WTF U! B! 15:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)