UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2008/August
|
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lockettside Valkyries
I request this page be protected permenantly. Izumi Orimoto has decided to, eleven months after the fact, to restart her alt rampage. While protecting this page wont stop her, it will at the least slow her down and frustrate her. --The Grimch U! E! 00:34, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- The point is not to frustrate, insult or provoke vandals. I don't believe a permanent lock is necessary, however I will lock it for a time and see if it does any good. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 02:02, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- AHLG, she wants to edit this wiki. She wants us to leave her alone. The only way we can stop having to perpetually block alts of hers would be to disable, permenantly mind you given her persistance, the pages she is after. The only other possibility is IRL assassination, and thats a touch extreme. Look at her Vandal data to get an idea of just how persistent she is. --The Grimch U! E! 04:10, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- Actually you might not even need to do a major lock, partial ones are supposed to stop accounts less than so many days old from editing the page.--Karekmaps?! 05:17, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- You mean unregistered users? They can't edit the wiki anyways. And Grim, Izumi isn't the only member of the group. All she needs to do is get another member of her group to edit the group page. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:00, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- No, I mean that it blocks unregistered and less than a week old. --Karekmaps?! 02:07, 28 August 2008 (BST)
- It does that? Should I give it a try? -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 02:54, 28 August 2008 (BST)
- The fact that she is still doing this almost a year after it started would definately get a no from me, regardless of whos doing it. It just means she'll create accounts and leave them idle for a week before posting with them, and us banning them. It will have no effect on thwarting her goals. --The Grimch U! E! 23:52, 31 August 2008 (BST)
- We're not going to permanently shut down a group page because one of it's members refuses to abide a ban so I don't really see what that has to do with anything.--Karekmaps?! 14:35, 1 September 2008 (BST)
- Grim was right, of course. She recently edited that page under the thinly veiled sock-puppet called "Wind Angel". This puppet was created nearly immediately after her latest puppet got blocked. By her own admission her group is essentially defunct. I think I'll put the group page up for deletions. It's been a long time since anyone other than her sock-puppets have edited that page. --Stephen Colbert DFA 21:50, 18 September 2008 (BST)
- We're not going to permanently shut down a group page because one of it's members refuses to abide a ban so I don't really see what that has to do with anything.--Karekmaps?! 14:35, 1 September 2008 (BST)
- The fact that she is still doing this almost a year after it started would definately get a no from me, regardless of whos doing it. It just means she'll create accounts and leave them idle for a week before posting with them, and us banning them. It will have no effect on thwarting her goals. --The Grimch U! E! 23:52, 31 August 2008 (BST)
- It does that? Should I give it a try? -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 02:54, 28 August 2008 (BST)
- No, I mean that it blocks unregistered and less than a week old. --Karekmaps?! 02:07, 28 August 2008 (BST)
- You mean unregistered users? They can't edit the wiki anyways. And Grim, Izumi isn't the only member of the group. All she needs to do is get another member of her group to edit the group page. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:00, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- Actually you might not even need to do a major lock, partial ones are supposed to stop accounts less than so many days old from editing the page.--Karekmaps?! 05:17, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- AHLG, she wants to edit this wiki. She wants us to leave her alone. The only way we can stop having to perpetually block alts of hers would be to disable, permenantly mind you given her persistance, the pages she is after. The only other possibility is IRL assassination, and thats a touch extreme. Look at her Vandal data to get an idea of just how persistent she is. --The Grimch U! E! 04:10, 27 August 2008 (BST)
Williamsville Horde of Organized Zombies
And the Reanimations. I don't want to just leave it for dead and watch as it gets deleted, but I do figure that it's time to euthanize them. My brother and I put too much consideration and time into them just to let them be deleted. Yeah, we never reached above 4 members. I'm not requesting the pics to be protected. Thank you for your time. --Secruss|Yak|Brahnz!|CGR|PKA|
|EMLN|Templates|RRF|RFTM|Crap|WHOZ|
|MU|GN|C2008|
|00:07, 3 September 2008 (BST)
User:Pedentic/Sig
I haven't changed it for quite some time, nor do I intend to change it. Thanks! --Pedentic 03:58, 1 September 2008 (BST)
Like my signature page below, I would like this page protected to stop any possible vandals from messing with it.--SirArgo Talk 22:44, 8 August 2008 (BST)
Ackland Mall
Judging from the history which is currently occuring this minute, I'm gonna say an edit war will begin soon... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 19:02, 4 August 2008 (BST)
- Oh yea...an edit war has definitly started. Protection now. Please? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 19:10, 4 August 2008 (BST)
- Never mind. Cheese got it just as I posted that last message. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 19:10, 4 August 2008 (BST)
- I was wondering if this page can be unprotected, we have had recent events that should be recorded on the wiki including a large attack with RFF members this morning.--Karec 22:23, 12 August 2008 (BST)
UDWiki_talk:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2008_07
Move this there. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 10:27, 7 August 2008 (BST)
User:SirArgo/Signature
I'm finished creating my sig and I'd prefer if no one was able to screw up the links or text.--SirArgo Talk 03:13, 5 August 2008 (BST)
Suggestion:00000000 Sample
Edit the signatures to point to Example page, in order to avoid confusion such as here. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 23:34, 4 August 2008 (BST)
