UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2007/November
|
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suggestion:20071126_More_Skills
People are continuing to vote on this post removal. Ive already rolled back twice. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 10:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Done, although you can do it yourself if you see a problem on a suggestion page that is closed to voting -- boxy • talk • 10:54 27 November 2007 (BST)
Template:SugVoteBox
Pleas undo Nali's Edit so the page again conforms with the rest of the rules.--Karekmaps?! 00:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- It conforms with the rules now, because I reverted the rule change that was never approved by either suggestion policy vote, nor community discussion -- boxy • talk • 01:00 18 November 2007 (BST)
I dont know from where did you guys raed that you cant vote whitout justifying your own vote. Saying you are against or pro a suggestion and/or policy is enough for a vote. You are not asked to explain why you voted for (name your presidential choice here), so why should we ask for people to explain why they vote in here ? Anyway, page reverted to conform prior rules. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Haggie, I'd advise against changing the SugVoteBox. There's currently a discussion/2 going on regarding if we want justification optional or mandatory. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Crap. The change was made already anyway. Let's wait for this discussions to be over to decide whether to keep it as it is, or change it to being obligatory to justify your vote --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Back to comply with the rules on the suggestions page. It's under voting now -- boxy • talk • 10:03 19 November 2007 (BST)
How about adding
*[[External Links|more...]]
to the end of "External Links" part? --~~~~ [talk] 19:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- – Nubis 20:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you please add this to the external links section?
Thekooks stumbled across this, and created a page for it, but I feel it would be better suited in the external links section. --User:Axe27/Sig 17:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Nalikill
- User:Nalikill
- User talk:Nalikill
- User:Nalikill/Complaining
- User:Nalikill/Sig
- User:Nalikill/Sandbox
- User:Nalikill/nav
- User:Nalikill/header
- User:Nalikill/Archive
Serving Scheduled Protectings against Nalikill user page and sub-pages. The user can ask for these pages to be unprotected once he serves his ban period. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 20:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Template:SugVoteBox
Because it shouldn't be editable by normal users. While you're at it, you might as well make it consistent with Template:SugVoteRules or vice versa. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 19:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Done -- boxy • talk • 00:43 18 November 2007 (BST)
Suggestions
Not used any more, but newbies keep adding their suggestions there time after time --~~~~ [talk] 21:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps making it a redirect would be useful? --Toejam 22:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Protected --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 19:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Suicidal Angel's Archive of Not-So-Greatiness
So people who don't need to be, and people who I suspect are breaking rules will stay the hell off it. Obviously the giant notice at the top of the page won't stop people from editing it. And I need a new one anyway.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Protected. --Z. slay3r • Talk 00:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
User:DangerReport/Stanbury Village
Edit war in progress. Despite being asked twice, neither side have gone to the discussion page to work out a concensus, and have instead repeatedly changed the status for the susburb. Ive replaced it as it was prior to the conflict and request it be locked in order to force them to that table and end this senseless bickering, or for a period of a week, whichever happens sooner. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 13:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- It looks like it died down quite quickly, so it won't be protected unless it starts up again. --Z. slay3r • Talk 21:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
The newest "First time playing" template should be merged into navigation; as it is now - it's wasting space and streching page.
Please, remove it's table from Main page; for easiness i already remade how navigation template should look, here - just copypaste. I've also shuffled the Radio link in Game Information closer to phones link, as asked somewhere --~~~~ [talk] 09:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Actually personally I don't consider it an improvement as it messes the clean look of the other boxes. As it's the most trafficked page I'd say it can't hurt to discuss it on the main page' talk page first before we mess around with it.-- Vista +1 14:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
User:Karek/sig
Might as well, I have no plans for ever changing it in the future.--Karekmaps?! 18:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
News
Because you must now use the past tense to talk about either of those years; nothing else will happen in those years. No use but vandalism in allowing them to be edited. Nalikill TALK E! W! M! USAI 05:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Protected – Nubis 18:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Template:Indent
Utility template for the purpose of helping new users, contains an edit link because it makes a header which can lead to accidental editing of the template page, as has already happened at least once.--Karekmaps?! 20:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Protected. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 22:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Lockettside_Valkyries
More members than just Izumi. Since she hasnt been around for a while, and I have receieved assurances she wont edit the page herself, theres no need to keep it protected. --The Grimch U! E! WAT! 04:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
