UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 08
August 2010
Axe Hack
OW! OMG I'M NOW BLINDER! BAN HIM! his talk page hurts my eyes.. i thought they banned that type of shit!!----sexualharrison
¯\(
)/¯ 21:27, 25 August 2010 (BST)
Arminius
I knew there was something suspicious about his contribs when I welcomed him... >< --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:26, 24 August 2010 (BST)
- Basiclly, Here's what I propose. You give him one shot. One. More. Shot. You unban Corny, And you tell him, face to face. Listen, if there is ONE more Jew spoken on this wiki, then your banned forever. This could just be some...You know what, i'm tired of trying anymore...BAN THE MOFO!-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 00:26, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- thats a pretty stupid idea as always jerrel. i'm not against hate speech as long as it's funny. good Jewish jokes crack me up!----sexualharrison
¯\(
)/¯ 00:32, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- You obviouslly sexualharssed(lol) the last part, whereas I said BAN THE MOFO. Gawd....-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 00:55, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- No one votes for you for sysops why? --
02:12, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- no you're just not funny Jerrel. and from reading more of you're posts. you are starting to make cornhole seem like a fething genius. and please tell me you're black. because white people saying MOFO just sounds retarded. I hate stupid people almost as much as i hate nazi's. But at least you can reason with nazi's sometimes.----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 03:32, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- Motherfuck, Can stay on fucking topic? We're talking about fucking bunghole, and you start fucking ranting on me? Dude, if you have a problem, don't do it here, do it on my talk page you fucking troll. Now, back to Corn, does anyone think he's going to come back?-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 23:14, 26 August 2010 (BST)
- He'll try for sure. But looking at how bad his recent disguises were, I doubt he could go undercover for long. Not many real newbs who start their wiki career by founding new nazi groups and calling users "zionists" on VB. -- Spiderzed▋ 23:19, 26 August 2010 (BST)
- He'll learn, and end up shoveing this wiki up our asses.-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 23:24, 26 August 2010 (BST)
- Listen jerrel i can hate you and think you're stupid anywhere i want. you were so helping the conversation along also. which is the reason i said something.. I hope I'm still amusing you.----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 23:28, 26 August 2010 (BST)
- He'll try for sure. But looking at how bad his recent disguises were, I doubt he could go undercover for long. Not many real newbs who start their wiki career by founding new nazi groups and calling users "zionists" on VB. -- Spiderzed▋ 23:19, 26 August 2010 (BST)
- Motherfuck, Can stay on fucking topic? We're talking about fucking bunghole, and you start fucking ranting on me? Dude, if you have a problem, don't do it here, do it on my talk page you fucking troll. Now, back to Corn, does anyone think he's going to come back?-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 23:14, 26 August 2010 (BST)
- no you're just not funny Jerrel. and from reading more of you're posts. you are starting to make cornhole seem like a fething genius. and please tell me you're black. because white people saying MOFO just sounds retarded. I hate stupid people almost as much as i hate nazi's. But at least you can reason with nazi's sometimes.----sexualharrison
- No one votes for you for sysops why? --
- You obviouslly sexualharssed(lol) the last part, whereas I said BAN THE MOFO. Gawd....-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 00:55, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- thats a pretty stupid idea as always jerrel. i'm not against hate speech as long as it's funny. good Jewish jokes crack me up!----sexualharrison
Cornholioo (3)
- Another bunghole alt? Arminius was the Roman name of an ancient Germanic warlord, and all that fresh new account did was to chime in on a VB case Streicher brought up. -- Spiderzed▋ 18:13, 24 August 2010 (BST)
Sexualharrison
- Actually, he can copy (or archive) anything he wants, but this should be in his own userspace, not Combat 18's. Just move the page. (edit conflict)--
Thadeous Oakley 11:01, 24 August 2010 (BST)
- Dunno who you replying too here. -- 11:42, 24 August 2010 (BST)
Is there no option for moving the page to his userspace? --
Thadeous Oakley 11:06, 24 August 2010 (BST)
His posts get removed and he reposts them by making an archive, then posts again and links to the archive. Obviously good faith indeed. This is just a soft way to repost a post that has been removed before, which is vandalism. Didn't expect any of the sysops to admit this, seen their Zionist background. --Arminius 19:09, 24 August 2010 (BST)
- aww corny. you're soo cute. calling all the sysops jews! funny! and not just my posts, but everybody's. enjoying the movies?----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 22:15, 24 August 2010 (BST)
User:Mike Aussie
If he can edit the Pathetic Bill group page and edit Ridleybank's page properly then why can't he edit this page properly? Look at his contributions almost all of them done correctly and the few little grammar things he did were all done properly where he went to the specific area why suddenly is this edit a newb error? --
19:49, 18 August 2010 (BST)
- In at least the ridleybank case (I haven't seen the PB edits) he was only editting one sentence at a time. This time, he attempted to create a whole new section. The one Cheese links to in particular is something he's copied from his previous edit summary sheet.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 19:55, 18 August 2010 (BST)
- also, in case it wasn't clear, I'm not ruling newb error yet, I'm waiting to see others' thoughts on the newb error theory. That's just the way I'm leaning at the moment.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 19:58, 18 August 2010 (BST)
- I saw you didn't give a ruling I figured I would point it out that he has been editing for some time, and yes it is his first time attempting to open up a whole new section, at the same time hes been doing a lot of edits properly. -- 20:00, 18 August 2010 (BST)
- I'll scan his contribs.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 20:03, 18 August 2010 (BST)
- I saw you didn't give a ruling I figured I would point it out that he has been editing for some time, and yes it is his first time attempting to open up a whole new section, at the same time hes been doing a lot of edits properly. --
User:Cornholioo (2)
Perma?
- Yes Unless anyone can find a constructive npov edit he's made. And then still yes.--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 23:08, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- No - Personally, I'm against the perma-ban for anybody but accounts which just vandalise. Since his offences are more public nuisance than vandalism of pages, I'll go with no this time, but if he offends again, I'll be inclined to change my mind.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 23:31, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- Ross hits the mark. Pretty much every edit he made was controversial, nothing was constructive or helpful to either the wiki or the community. His contributions are on the same level as that of a spambot, if not much worse. That's pretty much an account that just "vandalizes" --Thadeous Oakley 21:46, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- Still, I don't feel comfortable banning him on nuisance offences (e.g. swearing, racism). If his presence was destroying the fabric of the wiki, then sure, but his present offences can be shrugged off. Hardly wiki-breaking. As I say, if this persists again, I'll be more than happy to toss him aside.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 21:50, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- Meh, personally I prefer judging what someone does rather than what he does not, but I get where your coming from. --Thadeous Oakley 22:31, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- Meh, personally I prefer judging what someone does rather than what he does not, but I get where your coming from. --
- Still, I don't feel comfortable banning him on nuisance offences (e.g. swearing, racism). If his presence was destroying the fabric of the wiki, then sure, but his present offences can be shrugged off. Hardly wiki-breaking. As I say, if this persists again, I'll be more than happy to toss him aside.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 21:50, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- Ross hits the mark. Pretty much every edit he made was controversial, nothing was constructive or helpful to either the wiki or the community. His contributions are on the same level as that of a spambot, if not much worse. That's pretty much an account that just "vandalizes" --
- No - A month at a time is good enough for now. Next time I'll say yes. -- 01:43, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- You seem to automatically (and understandably) assume that there will indeed be a next time. Which begs the question why not prevent that "next time" and all the pointless drama that comes with it by stopping this nonsense right here. I wouldn't bring this up if you actually believed he is going to reform next time, but we both know that isn't going to happen. --Thadeous Oakley 21:46, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- He doesn't break the wiki, he's only as much a vandal as we make him, he comes here with a purpose on this wiki and that is to have a group, not to vandalise. It just so happens he has a hard time avoiding that with us pressuring him. If he can come back and successfully ignore us and get on with his task, why not let him back. I'm not perma'ing him just cause he's an annoying prat who happens to be a nazi. What difference does it make, one month or another month. Stop bugging me about my decision. -- 01:33, 7 August 2010 (BST)
- You seem to automatically (and understandably) assume that there will indeed be a next time. Which begs the question why not prevent that "next time" and all the pointless drama that comes with it by stopping this nonsense right here. I wouldn't bring this up if you actually believed he is going to reform next time, but we both know that isn't going to happen. --
Erm...
"I hate to bring this up (honestly, I do), but the vote hasn't come down in favour of a perma. =/ The policy says we need a two thirds majority in a week long vote. We have 57% after less than 24 hours. Wee bit fast off the mark there, Aichon. -- Cheese 19:57, 6 August 2010 (BST)"
- Honestlly I think he just needed the one month ban. He's so funny to listen to. And shouldn't you guys respect the policy anyways? So does he need to be unbaned?-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 21:06, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- Also, I used the talk page so there's no misunderstandings this time.-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 21:08, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- NVM. I looked at the recent changes pages and it looks like you got it covered.-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 21:11, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- Also, I used the talk page so there's no misunderstandings this time.-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 21:08, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- WD Cheeese, unfortunately I forgot the rules of the Perma vote, good work remebering :/. -- 01:23, 7 August 2010 (BST)
User:Cornholioo
I'm not going to worry about responding to the whole of your idiotic rant but one thing did amuse me, this quote:
| Cornholioo said: |
| And I think we can all agree that "Wiki is still a Jewish network, and is used by Jews a lot." is not racism. |
Actually, it's factually incorrect, as well as implying a racist position. It's called dog whistle politics, that is, it allows you to imply something racist without outright saying something racist (thus maintaining plausible deniability.) Saying that the "Wiki is a Jewish network," is racist for exactly this reason. There's tons of examples of this from politics (much of it to do with race, which you'll dismiss off-hand.) One example which comes to mind is the term welfare queen.
Moving on, the wiki is hardly a Jewish network. I don't know of a single Jew in any position in the administration (that said, I'm not exactly looking,) or hardly any Jews in the wider Urban Dead or wiki community (a few come to mind, but again, it doesn't matter.) Again, provide some evidence that this place is a Jewish network, and you're not just using anti-Semitic code words (although I doubt you will, as you've got none.) Linkthewindow Talk 12:00, 5 August 2010 (BST)
Indeed, we all need to have admin pages spammed with your thoughts on the links between genetics and IQ. That's entirely relevant. You forgot to mention asians as well. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:13, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- What's wrong with Asians? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:26, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- I'm preeeety sure Ross is being sarcastic. See it within the context of Corn's babbling. --Thadeous Oakley 14:41, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- Ya, I know. I was joking, was all. =P --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:42, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- Nothings wrong with anyone really. But if you read any of the papers that corn refers to about different races scoring differently on IQ (which is bollocks as its based on environment, opportunity, nutrition and education.) they all cite that Asians, especially the Chinese, on average have a higher average score than all other races. Even the Germanics. Now that my friend, is Science. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:45, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- I can prove that untrue as I myself am Chinese, but due to my laziness, I tend to keep my grades in the mid 70's, low 80's range. Now in New York, that is considered average. Not above, not below. Just plain average. >< --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:49, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- I think your punctuation just proved it better than any numbers could. 14:53, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- Ah, who needs the speel cheeck? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:55, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- I think your punctuation just proved it better than any numbers could.
- I can prove that untrue as I myself am Chinese, but due to my laziness, I tend to keep my grades in the mid 70's, low 80's range. Now in New York, that is considered average. Not above, not below. Just plain average. >< --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:49, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- Nothings wrong with anyone really. But if you read any of the papers that corn refers to about different races scoring differently on IQ (which is bollocks as its based on environment, opportunity, nutrition and education.) they all cite that Asians, especially the Chinese, on average have a higher average score than all other races. Even the Germanics. Now that my friend, is Science. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 14:45, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- Ya, I know. I was joking, was all. =P --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:42, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- I'm preeeety sure Ross is being sarcastic. See it within the context of Corn's babbling. --
Apparently Cornholioo didn't take Biology, or Anthropology for that matter. Idiotic.-- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:39, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- Someone mute this Corn Guy.-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 16:43, 5 August 2010 (BST)
"Thanks for admitting that you're a Jew. Jews often deny being a Jew. This is also a Tactic of Judas." Aha! That's it! I got it now! David here is actually not a mediocre wannabe, but actually part of an extensive Jewish conspiracy himself, designed to rally support for the Zionist cause all over the internet! It's pretty damn obvious - Just look at all the times he have claimed to be "Aryan", whatever that is. Such is the Tactic of Judas. Oidar 21:20, 5 August 2010 (BST)
 |
I'm dancin' on ur grav! |
| This user is dancin' on the grave of Cornholioo. |
-- Spiderzed▋ 14:03, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- High-fives myself* Finally. Oidar 19:07, 6 August 2010 (BST)
User:DanceDanceRevolution
Well done, Bungholio. Weren't you already escalated for uglyfying Admin pages with racist garbage once? Better learn quickly. -- Spiderzed▋ 21:26, 4 August 2010 (BST)
- It's okay, we better calm down. He's going to get hard. 21:30, 4 August 2010 (BST)
Yeah. You people are right. I don't know why I really reported him. Wiki is still a Jewish network, and is used by Jews a lot. Same stuff as with that 'The Colonel' guy back then. Then it was 'not vandalism' because he made 'a little schoolboy error'. Now it's 'not vandalism' because it's 'maintenance of the wiki'. It's exactly the same. Jews often hold eachothers a hand above the head; my life's task is unmasking them. WPWW, CORNH卐LIOO REMEMBER WHAT THE FIGHT IS FOR 14/88!!! 17:28, 04 August 2010
- Same old Cornholioo. Always looking for Jewish conspiracies where there are none. —Aichon— 21:34, 4 August 2010 (BST)
- Wait, isn't it the Nazis who hold their hands above their heads.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 23:09, 4 August 2010 (BST)
- now that i really think about it. maybe you shouldn't ban him. mis is right.. keep for the fail and extra lulz.----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 20:21, 23 August 2010 (BST)
- Nope. I made it perfectly clear last time that if he reoffended, I'd vote against him. He knew that, and still chose to take our punishment lightly. Now he can leave forever.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 20:23, 23 August 2010 (BST)
- aww now who are we going to play with?----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 20:30, 23 August 2010 (BST)
- We're running out of retards. First sonny, now bunghole. :( 20:32, 23 August 2010 (BST)
- I'm sure there'll be somebody just as annoying waiting around the corner.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 20:34, 23 August 2010 (BST)
- We're running out of retards. First sonny, now bunghole. :(
- aww now who are we going to play with?----sexualharrison
- Nope. I made it perfectly clear last time that if he reoffended, I'd vote against him. He knew that, and still chose to take our punishment lightly. Now he can leave forever.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 20:23, 23 August 2010 (BST)
- now that i really think about it. maybe you shouldn't ban him. mis is right.. keep for the fail and extra lulz.----sexualharrison
