User talk:Gold Blade/archive

Suggestions

You have badly fucked up the suggestions page. Please don't edit it again until you know what you're doing here. Play around in the sandbox -- no one will care if you ruin that. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 02:53, 10 July 2006 (BST)

Warning

Please do not vandalise this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, you may be banned from editing the wiki. Cyberbob  Talk  03:01, 10 July 2006 (BST)

User page

Please do not place articles about yourself or your characters in the main namespace. If you wish to write about yourself or your characters, the correct place to do it is in your User space (ie User:Gold Blade/archive). The pages you have created have since been moved to their correct places. This is in regards to User:Goldblade (moved to User:Gold Blade/User:Goldblade). You will need to update your signature to link to your actual user page, not the fake one you created. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 03:04, 10 July 2006 (BST)

Since you have copied User:Gold_Blade/User:Goldblade to your user page, could you nominate the unneeded page for speedy deletion? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 07:27, 10 July 2006 (BST)

Welcome to our Wiki

You have a warning for vandalism. After that you can have one more, and if you persist you will be banned for 24hs, then 48hs, after that a week, then a month, then and a year. Try to not commit any more mistakes. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^Talk 03:32, 10 July 2006 (BST)

Hey, no problem! And, unless the same talk page you are writing on has some special rules on it, you did it right: added a comment at the bottom of the page. Actually, the advice I gave you inspired me to make an "advice" template, so I changed the text of my help on this page for more... "helpfulness". Enjoy, and feel free to use my Talk page anytime! --Matthew Fahrenheit ^{YRC | T | W!} 00:01, 17 July 2006 (BST)

Policy changes and commenting about votes

OMG, try to not bring arguing on your way! There's actually a rule that validates the "Spam" vote on policy votes on the suggestion's page: Suggestions/Voting_Guidelines. Also, note that my conflict with A Bothan Spy has been carried to UDWiki:Moderation/Arbitration. There's a lot going on that you may not understand, that I didn't understand neither until some time ago: there's plenty of time to learn.

What you can understand is this: On the Spam vote Value's page there's a voting being carried on, for a change on the way that Spam votes are tallied (personally, I voted yes because I think the Spam vote is being abused against newbies, and used for trolling and insult, but there's people that likes the actual policy and the Spam vote current value). You can vote for it if you want. But I advice you, don't comment on another persons votes becauses you still lack the experience and the knowledge of the rules. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^{YRC | T | W!} 01:44, 17 July 2006 (BST)

The suggestion on my user page.

It's a joke. I send people there if they try to argue for realism in the game.--Labine50 ^MHG|^MalTel 02:25, 25 July 2006 (BST)

NavBox

Take a look at the template at User:Darth Sensitive/Nav. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 17:44, 1 August 2006 (BST)

Stats

I've got no idea how old you are/how much schooling you've had, so I'm I'm going to try and refer you to Wikipedia for some learning, or you can just read the following (hopefully) simple example. Basically, the binomial distribution explains the probability of a chain of events occurring. To try and illustrate this in simple terms and examples, I'll use a coin-toss thought experiment.

Consider three coin tosses, possibilities are:

• No heads, possible arrangements t/t/t
• One head, possible arrangements h/t/t, t/h/t, t/t/h
• Two heads, possible arrangements h/h/t, h/t/h, t/h/h
• Three heads, possible arrangements h/h/h

Now we can see that 1/8 times you will get no heads, 3/8 times you will get one head, 3/8 times you will get two heads, and 1/8 times you will get three heads. That gives you 12.5%, 37.5%, 37.5%, and 12.5% for each, right?

Now consider three coin tosses with a biased coin, courtesy of the physics store, which somehow has a 25% chance of landing heads. The possibilities are:

• No heads, possible arrangements t/t/t
• One head, possible arrangements h/t/t, t/h/t, t/t/h
• Two heads, possible arrangements h/h/t, h/t/h, t/h/h
• Three heads, possible arrangements h/h/h

Again, we see that 1/8 times you get no heads, 3/8 times you get one, 3/8 you get two, and 1/8 you get three. So it's just as likely to flip two heads with three flips of our biased coin as it is with the normal one? You can see that something's being left out, right?

Probability is additive, but not in the way you were applying it, i.e. 3% chance times 10 attempts does not mean you have a 30% chance of finding it. The percentages for the first coin tosses are accurate, because every outcome is equally likely, thanks to the 50/50 split. When we change that with the biased coin, the numbers change as well. What's really happening is that we take the sum of the probabilities of each individual outcome. Looking at the coins again, the outcome of any one specific possibility with the fair coin is 12.5%, since 50% * 50% * 50% = 12.5%, so summing these we get:

• No heads, possible arrangements t/t/t =12.5%
• One head, possible arrangements h/t/t, t/h/t, t/t/h = 12.5 + 12.5 + 12.5 = 37.5%
• Two heads, possible arrangements h/h/t, h/t/h, t/h/h = 12.5 + 12.5 + 12.5 = 37.5%
• Three heads, possible arrangements h/h/h =12.5%

These numbers match up with the previous assumption. The other coin is not even so we know it's going to be less likely to get three heads than it is to get three tails. Looking at the odds of getting t/t/t, we see that it is now 75% * 75% * 75% = 42.1875%. Looking at the rest we see:

• No heads, possible arrangements t/t/t (75% * 75% * 75%) = 42.1875
• One head, possible arrangements h/t/t (25% * 75% * 75%), t/h/t (75% * 25% * 75%), t/t/h (75% * 75% * 25%) = 14.0625 + 14.0625 + 14.0625 = 42.1875 %
• Two heads, possible arrangements h/h/t (25% * 25% * 75%), h/t/h (25% * 75% * 25%), t/h/h (75% * 25% * 25%) = 4.6875% + 4.6875% + 4.6875% = 14.0625%
• Three heads, possible arrangements h/h/h (25% * 25% * 25%) = 1.5625%

Adding these up, we see that both coins give 100% that the coin will land with one of the possibilities, which means we aren't dealing with imaginary coins or extra dimensions. Either that, or we're dealing with just enough extra dimensions to cancel out the imaginary coins.

Anyways, it's easy to see how flipping three heads is a lot less likely with our biased coin than with the other one.

Hopefully this didn't bore you, and hopefully you've followed through and understood. Assuming you now trust me that much with math, let me just say that, using the formula you can find on the Wikipedia page, when searching with a 3% success rate, you've got about a 74% chance of finding exactly no clips, 23% of finding exactly one clip, 3% of finding exactly two clips, and everything after that is less than 1%.
If you want any help running numbers, just let me know, and I'll get to it when I can, but this much stuff has taken me about a day, given the amount of time I have to spend on wiki stuff. Also, if any of this is confusing, just let me know and I'll endeavor to explain.
--Burgan 19:03, 1 August 2006 (BST)

"It's 3%, then added to a 3% of the remaining 97% (i.e 2.91%), giving a 5.91%, continuing with a 3% of the remaining 94.09%, (2.8227) giving a total of 8.7327." What? So you say that after two searches, you have a 3% * 100% + 3% * 97% = 5.91% chance of finding something? An easy way to sanity-check your math is to try doing it backwards, or in this case, applied to the other side. We need to look at 'finding' and 'not finding' as two separate, possible outcomes, not 'success' and 'failure'. Looking at the other possible outcome, or chance of failure, and if I read your method correctly, that means you get a 97% * 100% + 97% * 3% = 99.91% chance to not find anything after two searches? That means that there is a greater chance to find nothing after two searches than there is to find nothing after one search. Better still, that gives us, after two searches, a 99.91% chance to find nothing, and a 5.91% chance to find something? All possible outcomes sum to 100%, i.e. there is exactly 100% chance that one of your possibilities, but now we've got 105.82% chance that you will either find nothing or find something?
I think you've gone and taken something from random samples without replacement, something from random samples with replacement (which this scenario is), and something from something else, giving us a Frankenstein-formula. No offense, but I've take university level stats, and your latest formula is wrong.
--Burgan 15:07, 3 August 2006 (BST)
P.S. If there's any one (or more) specific site that you think confirms your idea, link it (them) to me and I'll try and explain them to our situation.
P.P.S. Check this out, it's from the seventh google search item I found when searching 'statistics', since you trust google more than me. I haven't looked at the site in depth to verify it, but a quick check over that page seems to make sense.

MP5

Just and advice: submit next revision 2 hours from now: If you do it now it won't get many votes... And remember not to make the % success rate to find a clip very rare because it nerfs the utility of the weapon a lot. Maybe you wuold like to make the weapon itself rarer and the clips easier to find. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^{YRC | T | W!} 20:37, 3 August 2006 (BST)

Your link doesn't link to anything, but if I take of the "," out of it, I must say that it's a reality: We don't spamminate suggestions anymore, we do that with users. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^{YRC | T | W!} 20:46, 3 August 2006 (BST)

Second Warning

Please do not strike votes that are not invalid on the suggestions page of this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges will be revoked. This is your last warning. –Bob Hammero ^{Mod•B'crat•T•A} 21:30, 3 August 2006 (BST)

Good Going

if you are going to make vandal alts, be smart about it. --Gage 01:38, 4 August 2006 (BST)

What the HELL are you talking about? --Gold Blade 02:30, 4 August 2006 (BST)

Let's keep the conversation here, in one place. See what has been going on with M/VB? Don't tell me you know nothing of that.--Gage 02:32, 4 August 2006 (BST)

Weird...

That image you uploaded seems to be acting... very weird. (Sorry, not sure how to explain it.) Could you try uploading it to Image:Spaminated.jpg? Hopefully that will fix the problem. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 03:07, 4 August 2006 (BST)

What do you mean by user image? Are talking about an avatar? If so, then no. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 03:24, 4 August 2006 (BST)

Suggestions Page

You don't remove the suggestion entirely. Remove the template, and everything in it, and say "Withdrawn by author." your sig under the heading. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 05:38, 4 August 2006 (BST)

You again!

I have met a Gold Blade in 3 other websites. Are you the same one? --Neraka Knight 16:31, 4 August 2006 (BST)

Trading

I noticed recently that you put a suggestion up about trading. Kev has said something about this in his freqently asked questions section here[[1]] sections where he mentions a problem with zerging where low level character search out item and then give them to a main character. Despite what Sonny said, he did not seem totally against the option, just weary of potential problems.

I understand this problem, but I too would like to see somesort of item within the game. I've had an idea and I thought I'd run it past you to see what you think.

It's actually more of an item gifting mod really. It would envolve a new Zombie hunter skill, and so only available to characters above 10th level. Lets call it 'Enlightenment' for the moment. At a cost of 1Ap it allows you to give an item in your inventory to someone else - and that's it really. The giver gets nothing in return, except gratitude. That's why its called enlightenment. It can be assumed that other survivors are too concerned about there own survival to give away something for nothing. A poor in-game reason perhaps, but it does allow use to reduce the risk of zerging.

As a final note, you can't give people items that are currently useless, such as newspapers or wirecutters. Any thoughts on this idea? The Mad Axeman 17:38, 5 August 2006 (BST)

Author Removed

Your opinion on my alterations? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 18:11, 9 August 2006 (BST)

An example of it in action:

	Author Removed
	This suggestion was removed by the original author because {{{2}}}.

I personally like the idea. More than one author has forgotten/doesn't know how to remove a suggestion. This is a fun way of making note of the missing suggestion, and what happened to it. I don't see it being used that frequently, or else the hilarious image's effect will be lost. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 18:42, 9 August 2006 (BST)

Wiki Formats

Dude, check out http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Suggestions&diff=352565&oldid=352563 and look at your vote. I fixed it, but you should watch that your vote is only #'''vote''' -blahblahblah and not #*'''vote''' -blahblahbluh.

P.S. actually, be more careful in general. You placed your vote over my re. Watch where you swing that thing, eh? --Burgan 21:04, 9 August 2006 (BST)

Templates!

	Spam
	This user recognizes MrAushvitz's valiant attempt to fill Peer Rejected Suggestions with his own retarded suggestions.

	Spam
	MrAushvitz needs to stop before he fills up Peer Rejected Suggestions.

I like yours too.--Gage 22:33, 9 August 2006 (BST)

Explody Stuff

You can't have been serious. I mean... come ON! Really? David Malfisto 03:27, 15 August 2006 (BST)

Yeah, you couldn't have been serious. --Gage • ASS 03:34, 15 August 2006 (BST)

Banned

Agreed. "6 ft by 6 ft by 12 ft dynamite stick explodes". If that is serious, then I'm King Tut. You have been banned from editing this wiki for for 24 hours. for vandalism , in this case placing a humorous suggestion on the suggestions page.. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 04:45, 15 August 2006 (BST)

MP5 locale

I personally think any SMGs should be unique to the armouries, maybe PDs. I doubt many gun stores in malls have MP5s ripe for the pillaging. I'd like to see them make forts more interesting, is all. --Burgan 21:22, 16 August 2006 (BST)

Gold Blade, I have a interesting idea where to find the MP5. NT buildings. Think of it, NecroTech is a huge corporation, they would probably have a large professional security force. This would mean even slightly illegal weapons in their NecroTech Armories. Just an opinion.--Canuhearmenow 14:27, 17 August 2006 (BST)

Watch it...

If I think you're abusing the Re comment, you'll get VB reported.
On a side note, it's pretty damn rich of you to have that anti-MrAushvitz template on your page when you're guilty of the exact same crime. Cyberbob  Talk  22:15, 16 August 2006 (BST)

Author Withdrawn Template

Would you mind if the Lord God tried his divine hand at cosmetically improving your template? -- (The Lord God) † ^Pray 02:50, 20 August 2006 (BST)

i Have a question

Are you AMazing? I just wondered because of Zombie Gone on his userpage -- Tito 05:18, 22 August 2006 (BST)

I think he is just another poor lost soul needing guidence.--Canuhearmenow 16:03, 22 August 2006 (BST)

Im just a wierd person. A very wierd person. --Gold Blade ^Hunt! 16:04, 22 August 2006 (BST)

We know. Just don't hurt yourself.--Canuhearmenow 16:06, 22 August 2006 (BST)

Rest skill

Hmm, put it on the Suggestion discussion page and make it only when you have 0 AP you recharge your AP one AP every 15 minutes but only to 25AP.--Canuhearmenow 16:13, 22 August 2006 (BST)

Sugg

My vote was trolling, I apologise.--Thari ^{S T F U} 16:46, 22 August 2006 (BST)

Well, in fact, yes. I'll change my vote.--Thari ^{S T F U} 16:55, 22 August 2006 (BST)

Weird Vote

Heh. I like to be unconvential every now and then. Also because I'm bored. The error?

Average damage per clip w/2 training = 16.5

Average damage per clip w/1 training = 19.5

–Xoid ^S•T•FU! 17:37, 22 August 2006 (BST) Fixed it --Gold Blade ^Hunt! 17:39, 22 August 2006 (BST)

My Awesome Idea

Hi, can you please check out my idea.[2] It would be quite cool and nice if this was made.--Canuhearmenow 20:57, 22 August 2006 (BST)

Hey Gold Blade, I would like your opinion. Remember that Mentor thing I was making? Well, I would like to know what you think the name should be (I like Project Mentor!) And what the paragraphs on the main page should be. Your opinion will be appreciated!--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 23:53, 25 August 2006 (BST)

Ok, thanks for the templates your making, like Project Mentor! (Has a ring to it?) But don't make them yet... I need more opinions on names.-Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 23:56, 25 August 2006 (BST)

Ok, You can make the Templates now, only problem is I never made a full length project page before...--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 16:07, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Hey, a way to make the template a lot better could be adding an image, if you don't know how to make a image from scratch thats ok, you can ask someone, my idea for an image is a "M!" Like Project Welcome's image only upside down (The W, of course, not the !) That would make the template a lot better, thanks for helping!--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 16:34, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Check out my changes to the Template Template:Mentor! Tell me what you think, its supposed to be friendly looking. If you have any idea's on how to make it friendlier or cooler tell me...--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 20:46, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Suggestion

My idea is make the Crowbar do some sort of Prying Function, that is what its designed to do. Right?--Canuhearmenow 21:08, 22 August 2006 (BST)

Starting up a bandwagon

Ya, thats how.--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 21:52, 22 August 2006 (BST)

Fuck off

Leave MrAushvitz alone. Cyberbob  Talk  04:07, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Why? He hasn't willingly stopped tormenting the suggestions page since he got here. --Gold Blade ^Hunt! 04:28, 26 August 2006 (BST)

At least he didn't make any suggestions on August 25. --Axe Hack 04:30, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Isnt when he was banned? --Gold Blade ^Hunt! 04:31, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Just leave him alone, would you? Cyberbob  Talk  04:33, 26 August 2006 (BST)

admit he deserves it and i will. --Gold Blade ^Hunt! 04:34, 26 August 2006 (BST)

August 25 is today in NY right now...it'll be tomorrow in 25 minutes. --Axe Hack 04:35, 26 August 2006 (BST)

He made a sug today though --Gold Blade ^Hunt! 04:36, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Did he? I didn't see it....... --Axe Hack 04:37, 26 August 2006 (BST)

It was the mind of the horde one. --Gold Blade ^Hunt! 04:39, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Ahh...that one....I thought that was yesterdays....I remembered voting spam for it last night.......heh......timezone musta gotten me confused.......... --Axe Hack 04:41, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Stupid aushvitz. --Gold Blade ^Hunt! 04:42, 26 August 2006 (BST)

Hey check out MrAushvitz's sheizer list. You made it to #1. --Axe Hack 16:16, 29 August 2006 (BST)

Hmmmm....maybe I shouldn't have told you about that....you'll probably be bragging about it non stop like what Gage did..... --Axe Hack 23:06, 29 August 2006 (BST)

Quit forgeting to sign your comment! You did it 3 times already for all I know... --Axe Hack 23:14, 29 August 2006 (BST)

LOL

isn't it cute?----∴Gage 00:47, 30 August 2006 (BST)

Your not #1 Anymore

Just informing you that Bob Hammero took your place of #1 on MrAushvitz's Shiezer List. --Axe Hack 03:18, 30 August 2006 (BST)

Arby's

M/A--∴Gage 04:15, 30 August 2006 (BST)

Apologies accepted

- though I wasn't the one who posted the suggestion :) I checked and it was Daishii who posted Bash. --Nob666 10:19, 1 September 2006 (BST)

Ha Ha

You gotta check out some of the "stupidest news from around the world" on my user page. They're frickin' hilarious! Well...some might not be that funny.....--Axe Hack 01:50, 2 September 2006 (BST)

LOL! That humorous suggestion just might work! --Axe Hack 02:14, 2 September 2006 (BST)

LOL! Life sucks! --Axe Hack 02:28, 2 September 2006 (BST)

Scroll Wars?

That game was created by Amazing of all people, At least go to Nexus Wars.--∴Gage 19:42, 2 September 2006 (BST)

C'mon Gold Blade, you can deserve better then an Amazing game.--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 19:57, 2 September 2006 (BST)

Indeed. You are turning to the dark side. If you stay in Amascroll Wars you will return here as one of 3pwv's many identities. You have been fighting him. Don't be one of them.--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 21:27, 2 September 2006 (BST)

What's the point.......I doubt he's ever gonna come back to Urban Dead..............Gold Blade! Don't quit now! Please stay! --Axe Hack 23:25, 2 September 2006 (BST)

Why should i?--Gold Blade ^Hunt! 23:45, 2 September 2006 (BST)

Just don't go to scroll wars, that game blows.--∴Gage 03:31, 3 September 2006 (BST)

YAY! You came back! And don't play Scroll Wars. Nexus Wars is so much better. --Axe Hack 23:30, 3 September 2006 (BST)

Nexus War, not Wars. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:12, 4 September 2006 (BST)

Whatever. --Axe Hack 17:25, 4 September 2006 (BST)

Woah

You seem to have gone a little crazy with your "Error" thing. --Axe Hack 17:25, 4 September 2006 (BST)

Custom Sig

I would like to see what a custom sig of mine would look like. I want it along the lines of Mia K's cursive type sig.--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 19:37, 4 September 2006 (BST)

Animated or not? --Gold Blade ^Hunt! 19:49, 4 September 2006 (BST)

Non-animated please.--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 19:55, 4 September 2006 (BST)

You know what...forget about the mirror writing one. I'll take the sniped out one instead. Animated works fine too. If you can get it something like http://www.quickbuddyicons.com/icon/875.gif I'll be rather thankful about it. --Axe Hack 00:37, 5 September 2006 (BST)

Done. --Axe Hack 23:11, 6 September 2006 (BST)

Author Removed Template

Please don't use it anymore, especially when you could save space by using just text.--∴Gage 02:20, 7 September 2006 (BST)

Banned

You have been banned from editing this wiki for 48 hours for continued vandalism. Cyberbob  Talk  06:12, 7 September 2006 (BST)

Promotion Bid

I don't know if you know, but I'm running for sysop status, and I'm getting very little feedback. Because of that, may I ask you to check the bid and, if you wish, cast a vote? Even if it's a negative one, it will help a lot. If you want a shortcut, there's a link to the bid on my signature. Thanks in advance Gold Blade! --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 22:49, 7 September 2006 (BST)

Long Mod Discussion

Want to know one reason why i feel like quiting? --Gold Blade 17:37, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Mostly everyone who knows you wants to know why. Please tell. --Axe Hack 17:38, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Maybe because... The game seems like its Stagnant?--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 17:39, 9 September 2006 (BST)

No, its because in the first minute i was here, i got a warning before my first edit. Isn't something wrong with that? --Gold Blade 17:43, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Happened with me too. That's why I created Project Mentor, so stuff like that doesn't happen.--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 17:45, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Just tell me, how do you get a warning for doing nothing? For joining the wiki? --Gold Blade 17:46, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Well, did you put your page in the mainspace? People are pretty annoyed by that...--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 17:49, 9 September 2006 (BST)

I said, before my first edit. --Gold Blade 17:51, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Why thats impossible, where did they post the warning?--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 17:51, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Well, even the person who gave it to me (Cyberbob) doesn't even know why. Also, the mods are hypocrites. No reason of why i got it was on M/VB, then later, they tell me that there has to be a reason on M/VB. See what I'm getting at? --Gold Blade 17:54, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Crap on M/VB gets flushed regularly. Search the history. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 17:55, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Tool. Recheck your dates. That warning was given on the 10th of July. Your first edit was on the 7th. Cyberbob  Talk  17:57, 9 September 2006 (BST)

I did. Nor is it on M/VD. --Gold Blade 17:58, 9 September 2006 (BST)

OK then, there should be a reason why. Please tell me. --Gold Blade 17:58, 9 September 2006 (BST)

You expect me to remember the details of something that happened 2 months ago? Get real. Cyberbob  Talk  17:59, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Explain the fact that it never went on M/VB and then later I get flamed about the same thing. --Gold Blade 18:01, 9 September

I don't need to explain anything, as here it is. Cyberbob  Talk  18:01, 9 September 2006 (BST) 2006 (BST)

Ok, I found it. It says "For fucking up the suggestions page and removing two votes."(Or something to that effect) Dated July 10th, 2006.--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 18:02, 9 September 2006 (BST)

O RLY? I just posted that! Cyberbob  Talk  18:04, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Sorry, I likely clicked edit at the same time, I didn't see it when typing...--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 18:06, 9 September 2006 (BST)

So i get a warning because of edit conflicts? --Gold Blade 18:07, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Can it. If you wanted to argue over it, you should've done it then. There isn't a chance in hell of it being reversed now, so don't bother. Cyberbob  Talk  18:09, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Thank you, as you have proved my point. Almost all the mods are power-hungry, corrupt, uptight wiki bastards. --Gold Blade 18:12, 9 September 2006 (BST)

You didn't fight it, didn't even ask about it, you just sat there being resentful for months? Idiot. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 18:16, 9 September 2006 (BST)

And you've proved my point. You're an idiot who didn't come forward with the reasoning behind his vandalism until TWO MONTHS LATER. And when you do finally decide to share, we're all supposed to fall over ourselves obeying your wishes! Am I the only one who sees this as a little unreasonable? Cyberbob  Talk  18:17, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Once again, mods working in circles. I could keep this up all day. --Gold Blade 18:21, 9 September 2006 (BST)

OK, now you're changing the subject. Look. If you wanted to argue against the warning, why didn't you do it then? Rather than waiting TWO MONTHS? Cyberbob  Talk  18:26, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Because i had no reason to then. Now i've realized that all that 'Mods trying to control the wiki' isn't a joke. You are just trying to permaban every user off of the wiki. I have plenty of evidence of this. --Gold Blade 18:28, 9 September 2006 (BST)

You had no reason to argue against being warned. Yup. I like your logic. Cyberbob  Talk  18:30, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Probably because he was too much of a noob to know what was going on then.--∴Gage 18:31, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Didn't stop all the other noobs from being able to. Cyberbob  Talk  18:33, 9 September 2006 (BST)

What gage said, plus I assumed that you were just trying to tell me that i did something wrong. But the the thing is, Project Welcome is a joke and Project UnWelcome is real. You just want as few people on here as possible. --Gold Blade 18:33, 9 September 2006 (BST)

If that was true, why aren't I permabanning you right now, to prevent the souper douper sekret from being told? Cyberbob  Talk  18:35, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Easy, you need a reason, no matter how retarded and small it is. Otherwise, everyone would know and have Kevan reset the wiki. --Gold Blade 18:36, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Another person majoring in persecution complex 101? Unsurprising that you toddle off to Amazing, God, Tito's game then. Cyberbob  Talk  18:46, 9 September 2006 (BST)

No, I didnt go to learn from Amazing, I went there because I knew that he knew the injustice of the mods here. Look at what he allows over there! You arent a vandal because you made a mistake. You are a vandal for trying to destroy the wiki. How is that not beter than having a wiki that is only kept in line by fear? Hmm? Instead of letting them enjoy the wiki so they decide not to ahnnilate it? If you can give me a good reason of how that is better, then I am an illiteate chicken that lacks a computer. --Gold Blade 18:54, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Let me reiterate, since you obviously didn't get it the first and second times. If. You'd. Spoken. Up. You. Wouldn't. Have. Been. Warned. We had no way of knowing whether yor edits were in bad faith or whether they were just a mistake. Don't give me that bullshit, Gold Blade. We're not psychic. Cyberbob  Talk  18:57, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Oh, and everything you say will probably damn your case further. I know how to turn every word a person says against them. --Gold Blade 18:39, 9 September 2006 (BST)

How does that explain that I gave a perfectly good explanation of why I did something that was considered vandalisim was ignored? Really. Let me reiterate: I. Did. Speak. Up. And. I. Was. Ignored. --Gold Blade 19:02, 9 September 2006 (BST)

What case? What are you going to do, start up a Misconbitration case against every single mod? Cyberbob  Talk  18:45, 9 September 2006 (BST)

You think every case is legal shit? Ha HA! You moron, this is your case. Besides, i have a good list of all the problems I have with the mods. --Gold Blade 18:48, 9 September 2006 (BST)

You've broken the rules repeatedly, and you're bleating about getting punished TWO MONTHS after the fact? Cyberbob  Talk  18:51, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Rules that mods are often exempt from? And this isnt just about my first warning, this is about a sucession of wrongly given warnings that are from things that are so dumb that you cant follow one rule without breaking another. I have given a perfectly good reason why one of my warnings should be withdrawn, but it was not. And ive found that mods have had twice the amount of retracted warnings than the average user with a warning, you hypocritic retard. --Gold Blade 18:59, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Whups! You got yourself banned. See you in a week, 'lil buddy! Cyberbob  Talk  19:15, 9 September 2006 (BST)

The conspiracy is true! TEH MDOS ARE POISONING THE WATRE!!11!--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 19:17, 9 September 2006 (BST)

The Witch Burners are turning on one another. --Kiki Lottaboobs 21:10, 9 September 2006 (BST)

Despite telling the entire community, very few believe me. Now the mods just say it outright: They really could care no less about the average user. They will use minor things as vandalisim, then decree that the "vandal", so called, really couldn't be any use for having a history of vandalism. Well? What have I been saying? And now, in spite of all that denial, they have snapped and blunder on to reveal: THE TRUTH! They do not want real users here. Who, save the mods, has the power to ensure the mods are doing the right thing, when they work together, silencing any who find flaw with them, Why is it, that things that a regular user would get a warning for, is "not bad faith" if a moderator makes the same edit? There is no way to prove that is is bad faith, but they obviously don't want a regular user here, so it's bad faith and they get a warning. Who will take off the blindfold, and open their eyes, and who will stand with those who would destroy them? Choose your side, because the revoloution is coming. --ĢΘζđ ЫǺđє 18:43, 16 September 2006 (BST)

W FOR WIKIBANK! Rheingold 04:37, 18 September 2006 (BST)

Reminded

Wow....I can't believe you actually made a template about me reminding you to sign......I didn't really think you would do that.... --Axe Hack 01:22, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Thats GB for ya! --Gold Blade 01:26, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Hehe....who knows....maybe I might make a template stating I reminded you to sign # many times...or if you want to do that go ahead. --Axe Hack 01:31, 10 September 2006 (BST)

My Signature Pic

I love love love love love it, but can it be in "Portable" Size? The Mods will get pretty pissed if I signed with it one the suggestions page...--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 01:25, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Bob is already pissed cause it's not black and white(See my talk page...). --Axe Hack 01:26, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Too bad. I can make it grayscale though. --Gold Blade 01:28, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Just use [[Image:Canuhearmenow.gif|80px]] to create

So, how do I add this so when I sign it shows up?--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 01:31, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Ask Mia K, meanwhile, ill go put this is grayscale so they dont get pissed at it. --Gold Blade 01:37, 10 September 2006 (BST)

I really wouldn't have a problem with it being in black, but it is a little large (which artifically increases line height, making everything look stupid). Trim the height by 2 pixels, perhaps? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:33, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Cut it by 10 pixels, how's it look now? And why do i keep getting edit conflicts with myself? --Gold Blade 06:36, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Still a touch too tall, but it's semi-bearable. Also: because mistress MediaWiki hates you? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:42, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Reduced another ten. And i am getting edit conflicts every single time i hit save. She doesnt just hate me, she is trying to tear me apart with her jaws of conflicting. --Gold Blade 06:44, 10 September 2006 (BST)

I had a short time where MediaWiki didn't give me an edit conflict at all. You're lucky; I had to check the diff comparision on every single edit I made to ensure that nothing got mangled. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 07:04, 10 September 2006 (BST)

I'd love to see another Sig for me.--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 19:43, 10 September 2006 (BST)

If possible, try mirror writing. --Axe Hack 19:46, 10 September 2006 (BST)

LOL

Check this out. --Axe Hack 03:32, 10 September 2006 (BST)

I am laughing on the inside. Wiki master 06:17, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Um, excuse me for rudeness, but do i know you at all? --Gold Blade 06:19, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Probably. Wiki master\'s using a proxy. Cyberbob  Talk  06:25, 10 September 2006 (BST)

What difference does that make? --Gold Blade 06:26, 10 September 2006 (BST)

What user is the most imfamous for the most extreme amount of proxy abuse in the history of the UD wiki? Moot 06:29, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Stallone. Before you claim otherwise, 3 page, Stallone is on the wiki, and is easily the master of proxy abuse. You come a close second. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:31, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Oh no, the proxy is mauling my page now! --Gold Blade 06:32, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Never heard of him. Or is he one of those adbotters? Might you have a link? Moot 06:34, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Battle of Walrond Square. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 06:39, 10 September 2006 (BST)

So much proxy and zerging! MY EYES! THEY BURN! THEYRE GETTING ROASTED OUT OF MY EYE SOCKETS! --Gold Blade 06:42, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Hypothetical Question

Lets say I made a sockpuppet, and named him 3pageweekee vandal. Would he be autobanned? --Gold Blade 06:50, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Not automatically as such, but pretty much the moment he edited. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 07:03, 10 September 2006 (BST)

What wouldnt be something that would get someone with that name banned?

	Gold in the Basket
	This user resolved the situation by putting the gold in the basket.

	Gold in the Basket
	This user resolved the situation by putting the gold in the basket.

--Gold Blade 07:05, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Anything other than some variation of what our current serial vandals use, or something gratitiously offensive, like "Lets lynch some niggers" or such, which would qualify for vandalism simply in and of itself. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 07:23, 10 September 2006 (BST)

Second question: Lets say the I suddenly and without reason said I'm 3page? --Gold Blade 00:44, 12 September 2006 (BST)

Then we would, hypothetically, go to you fucking house and kill you.--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 00:46, 12 September 2006 (BST)

You would, hypothetically, be far too late. My com puter montior would, hypothetically, eat my feet, arms, and legs off, and let me bleed to death. --Gold Blade 00:50, 12 September 2006 (BST)

Re:Good question

I mean we need more "Flavorful" Weapon types, like a Riot Shotgun and a Hunting Shotgun are found in different places (PD's and Mall Gun Stores, respectively), yet have the same accuracy, ammo, and damage. So just the name is different.--Canuhearmenow ^Hunt! 02:16, 12 September 2006 (BST)