UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Blinking Text Is Annoying: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
BobBoberton (talk | contribs) m (→Voting Section: changing format-breaking sig to default sig) |
(→For) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
#-- Jolly Good--[[User:C Whitty|C Whitty]] 16:51, 14 June 2009 (BST) | #-- Jolly Good--[[User:C Whitty|C Whitty]] 16:51, 14 June 2009 (BST) | ||
#'''Yarp''' -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:51, 14 June 2009 (BST) | #'''Yarp''' -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:51, 14 June 2009 (BST) | ||
#-- Blinking text is dreadful, and should only be used in applicable (and rare) cases. Knowing you idiots (only a few of you...), that will never happen, so I am fully for this. -- | #-- Blinking text is dreadful, and should only be used in applicable (and rare) cases. Knowing you idiots (only a few of you...), that will never happen, so I am fully for this.--{{User:The_shoemaker/Sig}} 20:04, 14 June 2009 (BST) | ||
# - I debated making a blinking yes here, but thought I would [[A/VB|regret it]]. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 18:45, 14 June 2009 (BST) | # - I debated making a blinking yes here, but thought I would [[A/VB|regret it]]. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 18:45, 14 June 2009 (BST) | ||
# - Only because of the "images that mimic blinking" part. Blinking text can be disabled in FF, and I'm guessing the same for other browsers. --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 19:02, 14 June 2009 (BST) | # - Only because of the "images that mimic blinking" part. Blinking text can be disabled in FF, and I'm guessing the same for other browsers. --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 19:02, 14 June 2009 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 19:04, 14 June 2009
Ban blinking text. There is no need for it. I don't like it. Make it go away. From everything just sigs.
For bob:
The signature policy will be changed thusly:
What wouldn't be allowed
- Signatures which have images higher then 14 pixels high.
- Signatures which generally break the wiki in some way either through formatting or other means.
- Signatures which impersonate another user.
- Signatures which link to any of the following special pages: Special:Userlogout or Special:BlockIP.
- Signatures which link to external links that perform malicious actions (closing the browser for example).
- Signatures which contain images larger then 50kb.
- Signatures which contain blinking text or images that mimic blinking text.
Voting Section
| Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
| The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
For
- Well thought out and coherent.--xoxo 10:05, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:06, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- I--Bonghit420 10:18, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- We needed this for a long time. Linkthewindow Talk 10:31, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- Indeed --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:34, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- Amen!--Dr Mycroft Chris 11:39, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- --Cyberbob 11:57, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- - User:Whitehouse 15:01, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 16:44, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- -- Jolly Good--C Whitty 16:51, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- Yarp -- Cheese 17:51, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- -- Blinking text is dreadful, and should only be used in applicable (and rare) cases. Knowing you idiots (only a few of you...), that will never happen, so I am fully for this.--The Shoemaker Talk Red Faction
20:04, 14 June 2009 (BST) - - I debated making a blinking yes here, but thought I would regret it. --Haliman - Talk 18:45, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- - Only because of the "images that mimic blinking" part. Blinking text can be disabled in FF, and I'm guessing the same for other browsers. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 19:02, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- - All the way.--SirArgo Talk 19:21, 14 June 2009 (BST)
