UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning

Archives

Talk Archives

e Vandal Banning Archive

2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

General Discussion Archives

• Archive1
• Archive2
• Archive3
• Archive4
• Archive5
• Archive6
• Archive7

General Discussion

Vanished Comments

If anyone can get the right comments back please do. I don't have time to search them up but the histories are now merged. They're hidden in the revisions right now because of the re-merging of the A/VB pages. You'll only need to find the most recent revision of the A/VB talk comments. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 02:17, 16 May 2011 (BST)

I'm really not sure what happened to them. I believe it may have had something to do with when you moved A/VB to UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive1. It looks like discussion archives were created with the exact naming structure (see above) and probably when you moved the page you checked "move associated talk page" but when prompted you (wisely) told the wiki not to delete the existing discussion page. That's my best guess. Anyway, I can't find the comments and I don't really know what I'm looking for. They may be gone forever unless you can figure out how to dig them up yourself. ~ _{07:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)}

I know where they are and how to get them it's just a time to do it issue. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 09:18, 9 July 2011 (BST)

Bots Discussion

Return of old, already banned, bots

Over the past couple of days, bots who were previous banned have been spamming again. Has the recent update of the wiki somehow unbanned them? -- boxy 10:35, 27 December 2014 (BST)

Hmm

It's been a few years, but we're getting a wave of bots again. Thoughts? Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 01:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Hopefully it's just a random burst, not a consistent thing? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 04:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

More spammers stuck inside? I gather fraud attempts are way up at the moment. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 08:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Has it been going on for a while? Like beyond this week? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 10:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

No, not yet. I just realized I've gotten complacent because we've had so few. If it continues for more than a week or so we can ponder other options. Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 17:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Hopefully it's just a flareup for now... DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 23:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, like acne. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Yeah.... acne.... DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 00:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Anyone want to review this? They're still here, and popping them isn't helping. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Do you think the captcha needs to be updated? If so I can try to get in touch with Kev. Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 14:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Considering we all have better things to do than continuously ban spambots, probably worth asking! stelar ^{Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge} 20:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

I guess whoever has his ear, go for it. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Johnny Rotten

how in the world are we (the users/future sysops) supposed to know what's acceptable/unacceptable if permabans are on a case by case basis? censorship is subjective. Comedienne Sarah Silverman told this joke: "I was raped by a doctor, which is so bittersweet for a Jewish girl." ...so i ask would it be okay for a woman/"female" character to say: "Johnny Rotten tore my designer jeans off & raped me...then blew my brains out & taunted me afterwards"? ...would it be okay for a victim of (text) rape to talk about in-game text-rape on the wiki? if so, then the text-rapist should be able to talk about in-game text-rape on the victim's talk page ...but if there's zero-tolerance for text-rape, there should be zero-tolerance for out of character (racial, homophobic, etc) slurs and hateful insults ...but if your character is prejudice or a racist, you should have every right to "act" hateful towards other characters on the wiki. if a male cop wants to role-play as a rapist by (text) raping/groping/fondling female characters inside police departments & list all the character names he has (text) raped on his wiki page, he should be able to do so ...but if his victims don't want him to display text-rape on their talk pages, he should comply & keep it moving. role-playing is the keyword here because now it's against the wiki rules to role-play in a vulgar manner ...and yes i am aware that there was vandalism involved but had he put the text-rape on talk pages, he probably would've still be permabanned which is unjust. violent is okay as long as it's not (text) rape. i'm not done but my wife is ready to go. Happy Thanksgiving to all who celebrate. →Son of Sin← 22:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

ask yo' wife. you moron--User:Sexualharrison23:40, 24 November 2011 (bst)

we don't rule on discussion this was a case of him using the wiki as yet another venue of excessive personal harassment in a manner not allowed in urbandead. It is also the third or fourth such documented incident from this user over various game and metagame systems. We follow rules here, the communities, kevan's, and in the most extreme cases the server's(when nnot doing so could be seen as facilitating the action). Understand that and the why's are pretty clear. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 02:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)