Suggestion:20090419 Bloody Clothes Layering: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ===Suggestion=== {{suggestionNew |suggest_time=~~~~ |suggest_type=Flavor improvement |suggest_scope=All players |suggest_description=Outer layers of clothing should be either "torn" or "bl...)
 
No edit summary
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Suggestion===
{{Rejected|Interface}}
 
{{Suggestion Navigation}}
===Bloody Clothes Layering===
{{suggestionNew
{{suggestionNew
|suggest_time=[[User:Slicer|Slicer]] 03:34, 19 April 2009 (BST)
|suggest_time=[[User:Slicer|Slicer]] 03:34, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Line 8: Line 11:
Similarly, an outer layer of clothes must be at a greater damage level ("ripped", "torn", "tattered", etc) than the layers below it.
Similarly, an outer layer of clothes must be at a greater damage level ("ripped", "torn", "tattered", etc) than the layers below it.
|discussion=|}}
|discussion=|}}
====Discussion (Bloody Clothes Layering)====
====Voting Section====
----
{{SugVoteBox}}
 
 
'''Keep Votes'''
#'''Author Keep''' This feels more like a bugfix/logic thing than an actual suggestion. [[User:Slicer|Slicer]] 03:36, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Keep''' - makes sense to me. -[[User:CaptainVideo|CaptainVideo]] 12:31, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Keep''' - The harmans need an update that is a useful as this. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:58, 21 April 2009 (BST)
 
'''Kill Votes'''
#'''Kill''' - Totally unnecessary, but it doesn't warrant a spam vote. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 08:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - Pointless. --[[User:Pvt human|Pvt human]] 11:30, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - Your inner layer could have been bloodied before the outer layer got put on... oh, and this is a totally un-necessary level of realism <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:15 19 April 2009 (BST)</small>
#'''Kill''' - Sounds too complicated for the clothing system because each clothing in individual and they all have their chances of being damaged.--[[User:Kez0|Kez0]] 13:59, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - Unnecessary. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 14:06, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - While it makes sense, and is realistic, it adds absolutely no value to the game whatsoever.  Not even flavor. --[[User:Fujiko Mine|Fujiko Mine]] 15:59, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - Nice idea, but too much complication for something that has too little effect on the game. Does NOT warrant a SPAM vote though.--[[User:Zombie Lord|Zombie Lord]] 18:19, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - What's the point... it's really kind of useless and will just confuse people. Also I agree with people above, should not warrant a spam vote. --[[User:ScaredPlayer|ScaredPlayer]] 22:51, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#As Haliman in Spam, but with a lot less spam. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} ({{User:Axe Hack/Stat}}) 23:42, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#As Axe Hack, but as Bob Boberton rather than Haliman. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 07:56, 20 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - Yay, both pointless AND stupid! --[[User:Johnny Bass|Johnny Bass]] 16:45, 21 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - Can't see how this warrants a fix. --[[User:Winton|Winton]] 05:31, 22 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - An pointless change which only a small percentage of people would actually notce.--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 20:09, 22 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - It's a good basic concept, there are just too many flaws. How is a zombie not able to damage two layers at once when he mauls you? Why would your blood get on your raincoat before it gets on a lower layer? And most importantly, what does this actually add to the game? --[[User:LaosOman|LaosOman]] 14:13, 23 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - If it ain't broke don't fix it. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 18:51, 24 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - Very low priority, if not totaly unnessecary. -- [[User:WarlockVI|WarlockVI]] 13:18, 28 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - This is simply a vanity update, you can easily change in and out of clothes. Although i too belive this doesn't earn a spam, your clothes getting bloody is no real reason to warrant a fix. --[[User:Obamacain|Obamacain]] 22:46, 30 April 2009 (BST)
 
 
'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''
#'''Spam''' - Unneeded change. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 04:22, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Spam''' - You can wear raincoats etc. open, and as Haliman. --{{User:BobBoberton/sig}} 06:48, 19 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Spam''' - Useless --[[User:OrangeGaf|<span style="color: #FF9900">OrangeGaf</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:OrangeGaf|<span style="color: DarkRed">Talk!</span>]]</sup> 22:44, 20 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Spam'''' - Has nobody considered that if you were bitten and bleeding it would, in fact, be the ''INNER'' layer that gets the most blood on it? --[[User:YoEleven|YoEleven]] 10:54, 23 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Oops, did I leave my fly open?" --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 23:24, 25 April 2009 (BST)
#'''Spam''' - As that one guy with eleven in his name. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 02:28, 26 April 2009 (BST)

Latest revision as of 14:33, 25 November 2012

Stop hand.png Closed
This suggestion has finished voting and has been moved to Peer Rejected.


Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current Suggestions • Suggestions up for Voting • Clothes Suggestions
Cycling Suggestions • Peer Reviewed • Undecided • Peer Rejected • Humorous
Suggestion Advice • Topics to Avoid and Why • Help, Developing and Editing


Bloody Clothes Layering

Timestamp: Slicer 03:34, 19 April 2009 (BST)
Type: Flavor improvement
Scope: All players
Description: Outer layers of clothing should be either "torn" or "blood-soaked" before the layer below it can get blood on it. For clothing made of plastic/vinyl (raincoats), the raincoat must be at least "torn" before blood can get through it.

Similarly, an outer layer of clothes must be at a greater damage level ("ripped", "torn", "tattered", etc) than the layers below it.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes

  1. Author Keep This feels more like a bugfix/logic thing than an actual suggestion. Slicer 03:36, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  2. Keep - makes sense to me. -CaptainVideo 12:31, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  3. Keep - The harmans need an update that is a useful as this. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 09:58, 21 April 2009 (BST)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - Totally unnecessary, but it doesn't warrant a spam vote. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:04, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  2. Kill - Pointless. --Pvt human 11:30, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  3. Kill - Your inner layer could have been bloodied before the outer layer got put on... oh, and this is a totally un-necessary level of realism -- boxy talk • teh rulz 12:15 19 April 2009 (BST)
  4. Kill - Sounds too complicated for the clothing system because each clothing in individual and they all have their chances of being damaged.--Kez0 13:59, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  5. Kill - Unnecessary. --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 14:06, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  6. Kill - While it makes sense, and is realistic, it adds absolutely no value to the game whatsoever. Not even flavor. --Fujiko Mine 15:59, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  7. Kill - Nice idea, but too much complication for something that has too little effect on the game. Does NOT warrant a SPAM vote though.--Zombie Lord 18:19, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  8. Kill - What's the point... it's really kind of useless and will just confuse people. Also I agree with people above, should not warrant a spam vote. --ScaredPlayer 22:51, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  9. As Haliman in Spam, but with a lot less spam. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs (status:‎Mudkip!) 23:42, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  10. As Axe Hack, but as Bob Boberton rather than Haliman. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 07:56, 20 April 2009 (BST)
  11. Kill - Yay, both pointless AND stupid! --Johnny Bass 16:45, 21 April 2009 (BST)
  12. Kill - Can't see how this warrants a fix. --Winton 05:31, 22 April 2009 (BST)
  13. Kill - An pointless change which only a small percentage of people would actually notce.--Michalesonbadge.pngTCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 20:09, 22 April 2009 (BST)
  14. Kill - It's a good basic concept, there are just too many flaws. How is a zombie not able to damage two layers at once when he mauls you? Why would your blood get on your raincoat before it gets on a lower layer? And most importantly, what does this actually add to the game? --LaosOman 14:13, 23 April 2009 (BST)
  15. Kill - If it ain't broke don't fix it. -- Cheese 18:51, 24 April 2009 (BST)
  16. Kill - Very low priority, if not totaly unnessecary. -- WarlockVI 13:18, 28 April 2009 (BST)
  17. Kill - This is simply a vanity update, you can easily change in and out of clothes. Although i too belive this doesn't earn a spam, your clothes getting bloody is no real reason to warrant a fix. --Obamacain 22:46, 30 April 2009 (BST)


Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Unneeded change. --Haliman - Talk 04:22, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  2. Spam - You can wear raincoats etc. open, and as Haliman. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 06:48, 19 April 2009 (BST)
  3. Spam - Useless --OrangeGaf Talk! 22:44, 20 April 2009 (BST)
  4. Spam' - Has nobody considered that if you were bitten and bleeding it would, in fact, be the INNER layer that gets the most blood on it? --YoEleven 10:54, 23 April 2009 (BST)
  5. Oops, did I leave my fly open?" --WanYao 23:24, 25 April 2009 (BST)
  6. Spam - As that one guy with eleven in his name. --Pestolence(talk) 02:28, 26 April 2009 (BST)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=Suggestion:20090419_Bloody_Clothes_Layering&oldid=2043780"