Suggestion:20081008 Door and Barricade Buttons Switch Places: Difference between revisions
m (→Voting Section) |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
#'''Keep''' - As others, doesn't hurt. - [[User:Tylerisfat|tylerisfat]] 21:08, 8 October 2008 (BST) | #'''Keep''' - As others, doesn't hurt. - [[User:Tylerisfat|tylerisfat]] 21:08, 8 October 2008 (BST) | ||
# One shouldn't be required to use outside scripts to do things that can be easily done in game.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 02:31, 9 October 2008 (BST) | # One shouldn't be required to use outside scripts to do things that can be easily done in game.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 02:31, 9 October 2008 (BST) | ||
# ''keep''' - down with bouncing buttons. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 07:17, 10 October 2008 (BST) | # '''keep''' - down with bouncing buttons. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 07:17, 10 October 2008 (BST) | ||
'''Kill Votes''' | '''Kill Votes''' |
Revision as of 06:17, 10 October 2008
20081008 Door and Barricade Buttons Switch Places
Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 09:48, 8 October 2008 (BST)
Suggestion type
Interface improvement
Suggestion scope
Survivors
Suggestion description
I'm proposing that the buttons "Close the doors" and "Barricade the building" switch places. Why? If the doors are open when you start barricading, the barricade-button moves left because the door-button vanishes. Several times I've ended up accidentally searching the building because the button moves. If the locations were switched, the barricade-button would stay in the same place. Just a tiny change to make things a more comfortable.
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user. |
The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Keep Votes
- Keep - I don't find this a problem, but I see no reason to not change it either. --Blake Firedancer T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T. 10:25, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Keep - Author. --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 11:03, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Keep - Meh, hurts no one Linkthewindow 11:48, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Keep - Same as above. --Haliman - Talk 12:39, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Keep – While a minor change, and can be achieved easily with Greasemonkey, principles of design favour decreasing options in favour of making good choices. I see no reason not to do this – as alluded to by others, those who read the buttons every time will be no worse off, and those who click repetitively will benefit. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 16:48, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Keep - Makes sense. -- Cheese 18:08, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- KeepMeh, hurts no one. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:15, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Keep - I see no problem with this --Lt.G Deathnut | TheStayPuftMan 20:51, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Keep - As others, doesn't hurt. - tylerisfat 21:08, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- One shouldn't be required to use outside scripts to do things that can be easily done in game.--Pesatyel 02:31, 9 October 2008 (BST)
- keep - down with bouncing buttons. --WanYao 07:17, 10 October 2008 (BST)
Kill Votes
- Kill - You've had three years to get used to the interface, write a greasemonkey script if you're too idle to move your mouse. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:47, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Like I said on Talk:Suggestions, I very much plan to do that unless Kevan breaks speed records in implementing this. It's just that buttons-not-moving is a better choice in interfaces. It should be the people who want it to move (if such people actually exist) that have to use a script or extension (which I can also write if this does get implemented). Why force the worse choice on the newbies and those who don't like it? --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 15:11, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Why should those of us who like the current system, and are coherent enough to read the button before they press it having to change? For three years the system has been like this, and now you've decided you want to change it? No. You change, or you write the script. The game interface should not have to change for your own personal convenience. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:16, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- Like I said on Talk:Suggestions, I very much plan to do that unless Kevan breaks speed records in implementing this. It's just that buttons-not-moving is a better choice in interfaces. It should be the people who want it to move (if such people actually exist) that have to use a script or extension (which I can also write if this does get implemented). Why force the worse choice on the newbies and those who don't like it? --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 15:11, 8 October 2008 (BST)
- kill Useless suggestion is useless, I have never encountered this problem. anyways, you should close the doors before starting to cade up.Padfu-Zomfu 15:59, 8 October 2008 (BST)
Spam/Dupe Votes
#Spamm con Mayonesa - Wow.... Useless suggestion is extremely useless... No signature. Linkthewindow Talk 04:17, 10 October 2008 (BST)
Voting Rules | ||
Advice to Suggesters
Advice to Voters
| ||
Rules for Discussions
Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20081008 Door and Barricade Buttons Switch Places). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted. | ||
Valid Votes
| ||
Invalid Votes
| ||
Comments
| ||
All Caps
Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters. | ||
VOTING EXAMPLES
Keep Votes
Kill Votes
Spam/Dupe Votes
|