User talk:Suicidalangel

Main ‡ Converse me ‡ Sand Castles ‡ Need Assylum? ‡ POW Æ The two and only rules: I'm the only one allowed to use blinking text, and the rules are subject to my smallest whims. If you're not smart enough to figure out this is my talk page, then leave. Now. If you do stay to chat, don't be an ass. bleep bleep bleepxoxo 05:25, 19 October 2009 (BST) DAWG FACE I still love you! Let's be best friends forever. -Lord Hawthorne 20:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Historical Specify which way you're voting on Category_talk:Historical_Groups#Flowers_of_Disease. Silly. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:55, 23 October 2009 (BST) It's pretty obvious. When you count it all up, the sheep vote will go to which ever side has more to firmly cement that sides chances of winning.-- SA 11:34, 23 October 2009 (BST) Of course it's obvious, but, fine. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 14:18, 23 October 2009 (BST) AHHH! Isn't this cute. The gangs all here! You guys are sysops of this wiki? I should pull our candidacy for this vote right now. Or go vote "yes" for myself 4 or 5 times kind of like you voted "NO" 4 or 5 times. . I don't really care if people want to vote "NO". Great. But what's the reason to then go and throw in a yes, a couple more no's and make an idiot of yourself? You don't like the way the vote is going so you do that? You have no business being a sysop SA. How old are you anyway kid? Hey, For Democracy, right? --Hibernaculum 03:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Are you a fucking imbecile? They will be deleted as they should be. What sort of fucking retard thinks that multi votes actually get counted? Fuck me, you're a moron. He couldn't give less of a shit about the group or the vote, he's just fucking around, and only a dickweed like you could be stupid enough to take it seriously. Holy shit, how offensive, can't believe you managed to bring me into this. Look at the timestamps for this entire conversation, it was for a TOTALLY SEPARATE incident. Not the one that's happened now. Moron. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC) LOL! I love internet tough guys like you. TZH does the same thing. Only they are just playing the game from that angle. But you. You actually have a grudge against someone you've never met over a browser based game. Really dude? If I could buy you a drink to settle you down, I would. You'd think I just came over there and robbed your house or something. You ever notice how you come off sounding like a little kid whose had his toys taken away? Myself, I actually try to speak to you as if you were older than a petulant 13 year old who's been grounded in his parent's basement. But I guess I'd have more luck teaching monkey's to play chess than having a coherent discussion with you. Grow up loser. --Hibernaculum 17:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Actually, reading this, you're the one who sounds like a dick, but never mind.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Can we all quit being dicks to each other on my talk page? It just creates needless work for me to have to check and see the shit. :/ -- SA 20:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC) De-Escalation Escalation removal You're due an escalation being stricken from your A/VD record! Congratulations! Because you've made 250 edits in the past 1 months, you can now have up to 1 escalations removed from your criminal record! Make sure to notify a Sysop, and they should get straight to work fixing your data! --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC) Thanks and all, but that is a pretty useless template IMO. :P -- SA 21:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC) Warning Please do not do dumb vandal things on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. Cyberbob  Talk  03:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC) User space Are you trying to cause drama? Or did you just miss the template? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC) VB Not a problem. I figured getting rid of the hostility would be best, what with how it had transcended in to a "nou" argument gloriously. :P --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC) Yeah, we did kind of run out of useful things to bitch at each other for at that point didn't we?-- SA 23:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC) Ah well. An argument every now and again isn't too bad. --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC) Warning Please do not troll or pester users who have had their pages protected for such reasons. You are a sysop for a reason, and misusing your powers again may result in further warnings or demotion. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 01:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC) LOL I tried to do the same thing but you beat me. My message was "when you learn to format, sign and NOT break voting, etc etc". --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC) \o/ -- SA 02:09, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Did you just add me on steam? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC) YEAH SO?!?-- SA 14:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC) a/sd, faggot xD —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DanceDanceRevolution (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. I accidently tried to delete that with LW's account. T_T-- SA 02:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC) lol tyty --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC) DRUGS I HEARD YOU WERE A FAN OF THEM I AM TOO HOW'D YOU KNOW AND WHY IS MY SIG SO UGLY ON YOUR PAGE >:I OH AND STOP SHAKING! STOP IT! STOOOOOOOOOOOP --Bob Boberton TF / DW 02:14, 5 November 2009 (BST) BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR SIG SUCK BIG OLE COCKS> LOTS AND LOTS OF COCKS!-- SA 02:16, 5 November 2009 (UTC) STOP SHAKING!!!!!!! --Bob Boberton TF / DW 02:17, 5 November 2009 (BST) I watched thirteen seconds before I shut it off. That was pathetic.-- SA 02:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC) STOP SHAKING ok i'll stop then hey wanna prod izzy and see if he turns into a magical ruleslawyer --Bob Boberton TF / DW 02:20, 5 November 2009 (BST) i hear tell he grants wishes --Bob Boberton TF / DW 02:21, 5 November 2009 (BST) Not really, no. I have two warnings now so I have to be good for awhile. that, and I'm lazy, and I'm trying not to antagonize the regulars around here. 'Cause you know, I have to deal with a lot of them on admin pages occasionally?-- SA 02:22, 5 November 2009 (UTC) fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffun. Or lack thereof, rather. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 02:23, 5 November 2009 (BST) You Here. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 02:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Renegade Rabbits I've been keeping an eye on the whole "Bunnies Schism" thing. And I just noticed that you remove the Renegade Rabbits page. Did they tell you to delete it? Or did you realize it was just a failed media stunt and took the initiative to do it yourself? -- Kittithaj 22:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC) We did it ourselves. The original author, Jason, removed all the content from the page. In the wiki admin language, that's a crit 1 and deletable on sight. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 22:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC) I followed what it said on the relevant admin page. :( -- SA 15:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Category:Groups Do you understand how the subcategories work? I'm looking at Category:Groups, and the subcategories there are all screwed up. A couple of groups show up in the subcategories, like the Dead Bunnies, and yet some genuine subcategories like Category:Noise_Abatement_Societies. Reading the help was no help. I've tried shuffling around the category tags for Category:Noise_Abatement_Societies to no avail. Removing the Category:Zombie Groups tag and then replacing seems to work properly, as the group is removed and then added again to the zombie group subcategory. However removing and replacing the Category:Groups tag doesn't have any affect. Thanks in advance for any advice you may have, and sorry if you don't know about all this stuff. It looks like you're online so I thought I'd give you a shot.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 21:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC) I've never fucked around with the categories because it was all cluster-fucked up. Sorry mate. Thanks for trying to tackle it though! Maybe ask someone else?-- SA 22:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Me! I'll be out all day though so I won't be able to help out till later. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:23, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Yes, pick DDR. He needs more shit to occupy his time with.-- SA 00:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC) WHY DONT YOU TAKE A PICTURE????? xoxo 08:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC) TAKE A PICTURE OF WHAT DAMN IT?!?-- SA 15:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC) Do you mean that the sub categories don't all show up on the first page of Category:Groups? I think it's because there is such a huge number of pages actually in the group already. Once there is more than one page full of groups, some of the sub categories get pushed onto later pages -- boxy talk • teh rulz 09:18 14 November 2009 (BST) Thank you everyone for your response. I'm not referring to the 1st page of Category:Groups. It actually doesn't show up on the 2nd page either, where it should fall alphabetically. There appears to be a real problem with either the way the subcategories are being sorted or the way various groups were initially sorted. I'll wait to hear from dear old DDR. Note, if this is something tedious but doable by a regular user I'd be happy to tackle it.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 19:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC) Strike time I am hearby requesting a striking of a ban from my vandal record as i have reached the requirements as per policy. I will be placing this request on an assortment of your peers talk pages so as to insure that this time, my striking isn't mysteriously postponed so as to further tarnish my record despite no wrong doing on my part. xoxo 08:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC) Man, that policy needs to change. Edits to talk pages and your personal pages really shouldn't fucking count.-- #99 DCC 20:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC) We can work on changing it after I get my warning stricken. :D -- SA 00:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC) I thought you should know: I just lost the game. Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 01:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC) I do hope you mean another game then the *chan game, because that one is so very old and so very annoying now. :/ -- SA 02:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC) I once lost the game, abseiling halfway down a building. That was annoying. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Re: Happiness I'm never happy. Now get off my lawn! Grumble, grumble, earache my eye, mumble. Cheers for the quick move, though! 01:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC) Turn that frown upside down you cock sucker. >:( -- SA 01:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC) Can't. Too much cock in mouth. 01:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC) oh you two xoxo 09:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC) I really wish I was a ninja... No problemo, m'dear. --RahrahCome join the #party!17:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC) I wish I was a ninja, too. Why do you miss me? It's not like I do anything around here. ;) --ZsL 23:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC) The Ghetto Cow stuff was quite fun, but I think I have come to terms *sob* with the retirement of the group. I will vote NO on stuff if I want to, so don't tell me what to do! You are misusing your sysop status to violently oppress me, so I will take you to VB, Arby's, and Misconduct! --ZsL 02:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC) *Sniff Sniff*-- SA 05:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC) follow my rules on my talk page! dickhead! :P ----Sexualharrison 17:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC) you aren't funy that was like so old and even when grim did it, it wasn't funny. stop now. i will continue to QQ and use poor language skill until u desist. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC) in fact, looking back on the original QQ that hag made, I seemed like a pretty serious guy back then. 1. I remind myself of Izzy =D --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 23:56, 19 November 2009 (UTC) You're not pretty enough. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC) ... Creep! --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC) Ugh Have some sense man, that template fucks up every time it's used remotely near the top. The other version is practically the same. At least Dux's malformed excuse for a sig only did that occasionally, (and probably failed in anything other than FF) --  RoosterDragon  20:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC) It wasn't just IE that messed it up. FF too.-- SA 20:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC) Either it gets fixed, or I'm going to deletions with it. It was funny for a while, now it's just getting annoying. You can't read the discussion, you can't hit the edit section button to find the code. It fucks conversations over -- boxy talk • teh rulz 22:23 20 November 2009 (BST) Angel is teh bestest sysops evar and I wuv him and never want him to leave the wiki agains!-- SA 23:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC) I was thinking about it, and frankly I think it should go under the Assylum space, along with all the other stuff from it. Like moving the Assylum page from my user space into a sub section of it (IE Assylum (2007)), the Hyperbig under it, any of the templates and images I can still find, you know. You're right it is annoying now, pretty much the only reason I have to use it. But I still think that the uses until now should be preserved (Although we can modify the comments to link to the edit page button perhaps?), and from now on consider it's use an act of vandalism. What do you think?-- SA 23:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC) How about substing it where it doesn't wreck things, and deleting the template. Leaving it around is just asking for drama down the track when someone uses it -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:59 20 November 2009 (BST) That works too. But I do think we need to consider using something like it (Not the big font mind you, just the pagebreaking attribute of it) vandalism from now on.-- SA 00:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC) If you think it's vandalism, why the hell do you keep using it? -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:48 21 November 2009 (BST) To confuse you. Gotta keep you on your toes old man. :smug: ;)-- SA 01:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Why are people so unkind? -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:19 21 November 2009 (BST) The bigness is fine, it's just the overlapping that irks me. I don't see the need for deletion/moving/vandalism/magical edit button or all this other nonsense. If it clears its bounds then I don't have anything against it. --  RoosterDragon  14:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC) I know you think the bigness is fine. The constant 20 point font usage tells me that. ;) -- SA 18:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Just fix it up again, Rooster, and if it gets reverted, you'll just have to go to arbitration about it -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:48 24 November 2009 (BST) And because Iscariot is into censoring opposing views on his talk page... I'll repost my reply to you here -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:57 21 November 2009 (BST) Just as well, because, god knows, remembering code like <big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big>{{{1}}}</big></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></big> would be hell -- boxy talk • teh rulz 00:46 21 November 2009 (BST) I'm not censoring you, I'm just exercising my divine right to take precedence on my user pages. Don't edit conflict me and it won't happen. Also, I'll remember, SA will remember, but future generations might not. We preserve history for our children, and their lolcats! -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:00, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Right... how do I avoid edit conflicting you in the future? Your page is set up to encourage it -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:03 21 November 2009 (BST) My page is set up to encourage prettiness, but there you go accusing me of things again. If you have a way to make those ugly blue edit links into a nice white colour you can have them back, not until. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC) If you want prettiness, you should put up with the edit conflicts it encourages. And it wasn't an accusation at all, it was a statement of fact. Your use of NOEDITSECTION encourages edit conflicts, fact -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:19 21 November 2009 (BST) Fact, you putting sarcastic comments directed at another user on a page that exists for people to talk to me alone is what caused the edit conflict. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:30, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Fact, I just solved it. Iz, go looks. The rest of you, get me a ticket to Palestine, I have much work to do. 01:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Template:Editsection might be able to help you out… of course, what we really need is Extension:CSS, but considering we can't even get Parser Functions, good luck on that one. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 10:09, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Yeah, Editsection does seem promising, but as you pointed out, we don't have the necessary stuff. Since we don't have it, I tried ripping the code directly from that template a few hours ago and seeing how far I could get without all of the CSS, but I didn't get very far before I just stopped trying. I managed to get the colors to change fairly easily, but the link had to be edited by hand since we're missing a magic word, and the positioning wasn't correct, though I didn't really fool around with it much. Long story short, it was pretty much worthless. —Aichon— 10:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC) I hear Mystic Meg takes classes now. 01:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC) There seems to be a minor problem, policy wise, with your sig, Misanthropy... can you find what it is? :) -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:19 21 November 2009 (BST) God damn your sekrit edits! I saw an actual problem and fixed it, now you have me with the pen and paper trying to work out ratios! I shake my fist at you. 01:23, 21 November 2009 (UTC) start a new topic! when using my talk page... jerk ----Sexualharrison 15:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC) Yonnua You're getting angry because I don't read comments? You are yet to read why I'm actually against him making op. Seriously, let's have a civil discussion now, instead of that flame war we had going on on the other page.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC) I did read it. You're just wrong.-- SA 19:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC) Morons Still claiming that lexicon article? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 21:47, 23 November 2009 (UTC) Headings. Titles. Fascinating things. I bet nobody uses these any more. That's probably a good thing. Also I'm sure this is old news but I care not. Here, have a rat! Lachryma has given Suicidalangel a rat for allegedly becoming a sysop, Lord knows how --Lachryma☭ 07:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks, but I do have an email which is faster for me to check, and I was also 'crat for awhile. Then I left, and people almost had me stay crat even though Iw as gone! D: -- SA 07:16, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Obviously this community is not good enough for me if they are doing such things. Email it is.--Lachryma☭ 07:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC) No, we're horrible. We also got Grim lynched. :B -- SA 07:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC) I never even knew him, just heard about him. Also you better be writing some epic of an email. My impatience has never changed.--Lachryma☭ 07:46, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Hey, it's not like he didn't have it coming - {{Grim Doom}}, {{WitchKing}}, {{GraveDance}}. --ZsL 09:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Shush you. You obviously don't know how *snicker* important *snicker* grim was to me.-- SA 10:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Huh, I almost forgot about the political and almost surgical use of templates. Didn't some guy named Akule do something similar in that whole copyright argument?--Lachryma☭ 20:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC) I think so, but that copyright stuff is way in the past - like around the time of Socrate's death. Get with the times, miss I'll-show-up-whenever-and-bring-up-old-stuff-no-one-knows-about-anymore. Now the bureaucrats are promoting anyone that applies for the position. What is this Engel? Grim used to give you Snickers bars? I never got any Snickers candy... --ZsL 03:56, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Yeah... Anyone... To be called that after succeeding Cheese and AHLG, now I'm insulted. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 04:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Har har har. --ZsL 04:35, 27 November 2009 (UTC)