User talk:Krazy Monkey
Do not put anything above this headerNEW STUFF RIGHT AT THE BOTTOM! January 09WankerCould you start using {{banneduser}} rather than {{wanker}} in the future, please? It's technically a scheduled deletion (under the page titles containing swearing aimed at other users clause), but we don't really want to go there, as it will mean having to change all the pages that include the old template. Originally, it was only meant to be used on one guys alt pages, I think... but, y'know, I guess it was easy to remember, and stuff ;) -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:06 1 January 2009 (BST)
Move TemplateI seem to be having some issues with your new template. I fixed what I screwed up (finally). So don't panic if you see reverts and edits and duct tape and what not in the history.--– Nubis NWO 00:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC) The A/VB ThingAngel in a townbox!
Please stop with the header lines, they don't help. If you need it to be noticeable that it's separate put them in a townbox or something.--Karekmaps?! 02:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC) Improper Placement of Group PagesI've noticed that you moved the Axes High page to a header labeled Department of Emergency Management/Axes High. While I can appreciate the need for more organizational measures on behalf of the administration, I would appreciate if it were left as it was. We've occupied that page for over three years now, and frankly, It quite hurts our recruitment and general image to be categorized in such a way so as to compromise our singularity as a group in the eyes of the public. Yes, we are members of the DEM, but we're also members of the New Malton Colossus, the AOG, and whatever our little clique of central Malton groups choose to call ourselves. Being put under the header of a group of which we are a part makes little sense to me... as much as listing our page as "New Malton Colossus/Axes High", etc. Hardcore Rockabilly, Retired FAE Axes High AH RR RRF I think we need to seriously look at move requests for groups that are still active and verify it with them in the future. You did know that AH existed before DEM right? We can't let people just post whatever move they want and then do it. It's like vandalism by proxy if it isn't caught. --– Nubis NWO 21:21, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
MisunderstandingHi Krazy Monkey. I'm here to resolve a bit of a problem my friend Kerkel has created. The fact is i'm TheZKiller (can't remember my pass, I would apreciatte if you could send it here as a message, and then delete this user, sorry), we both used to play UD some months ago, he quitted some days ago, and today, he fell by chance on this page and decided to start searching his mates to see what was up. He saw my death at The Philosopher's Knight Kill List, and contacted me to ask me about that. I told him that I'had never been killed by a PK (Philosopher's Knight, curious acronym), and logged in. By the time I saw the kill, and told him, he had already corrected the Kill List, thinking that correcting wrong info wasn't vandalism. Yet, he was so persisten because the PK who killed me did it acussing me of being a "THZ scum", thing that I'm not, i have no relationship with that group, so again, wrong info, he corrected. And the warnings? He told me he hadn't seen them because he expected them to be, if appeared, in the top, and no at the bottom of his messages list. He saw new messages, but looked for them at the top, and seeing only the automatic greet and welcome...well, continued deleting my injust kill until banned. I'm not gonna ask you to remove the ban, he couldn't communicate with the admins and desisted (yet, if you could remove it for a while and talk to him abaout this, and find a solution, well, that'd be great), I just wanted to know, if the kill doesn't have a screen evidence, and was done with wrong info, you could talk with the author and discuss my pressence at their Kill List. Ok, that's all. Thanks for you attention ;) PS: I'm at the same house than kerkel, so you will probably see the same IP... TheZKiller 04:39, 4 January 2009 (UTC) RevertThe command bios please, Daeryon has fucked up the layout and ruined the alphabetical orderness of it >:O http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Randoms/CommandBios&action=history Mrs FlibbleTalk 09:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Some problems :(
Thanks :) --Janus talk 14:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Problems in the pastCheeseman, I've come here to formally apologize for my actions while at the randoms previously. To be honest, I was planning on going PKer anyway, and I decided I'd make an ass out myself until I was banned, for a personal laugh. I disrupted some things on the forums, and was totally oblivious to it. I should have just done the polite thing and quit "quietly," if you will. i would have contacted you sooner about this matter, but I had almost completely forgotten about the randoms, and was reminded from that post on my talk page. I hope you can accept my apology. ps. I was not trying to talk shit on team zombie hardcore's page, they were grieving pro-survivor allies of my current group and I decided I would talk to them about it. They still continue to grief the Malton College of Medicine's campus, and something will be done soon. In fact, they just launched an unsuccessful attack less than half an hour ago. Thank you for your time. --Leroy jankens 02:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
kerkel casesince you are somehow involved in this, care to take into consideration my request to unban kerkel ? --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 12:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
By the way, I would like to know, I used to post here with my TheZKiller old account, but I lost the pass and couldn´ get it back...is there a way of e-mailing it to me, or to recorver my account? If i´m comin' back, I would like to do it with my real account, and to do it starting with the right foot this time... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kerkel (talk • contribs) at somepoint on the 9th of January. A/DSorry about that. I thought I put it under the line, not you. I didn't know it belonged there. --Haliman - Talk 21:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC) A/VB (Colonel Krauser)Hi Cheese. I saw that you ruled not vandalism on Colonel Krauser's case because the vandalism was provoked. Sorry if I'm wrong, but I thought groups could say whatever they wanted on their subpages. Shouldn't that be ruled vandalism then, since it was clearly edits to a group page that said user was not a part of? Also, I am not affiliated with either of the Umbrella groups, I just want to clarify this. Thanks. --Pestolence(talk) 23:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank-youI just wanted to drop by and tell you I noticed the fixes you did on my main Wiki Group page. Thank-you very much! It's appreciated. I suck at Wiki and it shows. I was pretty surprised and pleased when someone responded to my casual request at the bottom of the page for assistance. --Psychotic Pantomime 03:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Take a Look at this stuffDo you think you can do something about all this flaming by both groups in the arby case? I fear it won't be able to stop anything and they still will doing this after it ends.--SirArgo Talk 23:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Random Spammy ShitHey, Crazy Monkey, are you sure this is the place for you? Sometimes you wanna go where everybody knows your name, and they're always glad you came. --Norm 02:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Err..I think and i could be wrong, that writing repeatedly on someone's talk page against their wishes is vandalism. It's obviously not misconduct, but yeah, just thought you should know. Oh and don't tell anyone but i think iscariot's rules are enforced based on his view point and not yours, shhh! ;) --xoxo 23:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Quick questionWhy do you care if he calls himself wiki martyr on cat:arbies ? --xoxo 00:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
i am too lazy to edit above the below section but not lazy enough to change this section header once it gets moved to the right locationyou do realize that after saying 'thank you for your input' you should just ignore whatever the prick has to say ? Its like giving attention to the kiddo with the megaphone --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 01:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
FoD talk pageCheers for that. I've always been curious - How do you guys find random pages like that? I'm assuming you have a list of recently edited, correct?
insta-archivea user once complained that some cases of misconduct, arbitration and promotion are ruled and archived so fast that you barely note they existed. Please, next time you rule on a promotion request, give it some time in the page before moving it to the archive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hagnat (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. February 09Historical votingSince when did unsigned votes count? (Not that it matters) If they do count can I have the unsigned For vote that was struck returned? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
A/DYuo should haev at least waited until the end of the day to delete that image. Yuo were a few hours early. :) --Suicidal Angel - Help needed? 23:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
UraniumBOMBS--/~Rakuen~\Talk Do not put anything below this headerNew posts go directly above this bit hi-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
questionHi, I just have a quick question. twice now, I've noticed you post while you where (in your own words) "drunk". do you think this is a good idea? it really doesnt seem smart to me for someone with sysop powers to edit the wiki under these conditions. what do you think?--'BPTmz 07:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
laters dudeI'm off. Thanks for the demotion! --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 22:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC) SuggestionI noticed that you changed the page 10mfh/roster to 10 minutes from hell/roster as it is a subpage of our group page, 10 minutes from hell. This is fine, however - you did not correct the link to the roster page when you changed the name resulting in a dead link on our main page and a subpage that was not linked to. While I understand (and presume) that this error was unintentional, could you please be more careful in the future? (Note:I've corrected the link, so it is no longer an issue.)--Lois Millard 13:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Honest's Promotion BidTime's up. He has quite a number of vouches, however quite a few people are unsure, and a few strongly against. I personally think he would be an asset, however community being unsure, and his own lack confidence in his suitability mean that he would probably be better off not being promoted at this time. Even if it's just to give some time to think about what he has to offer, and whether he actually wants the job before reapplying -- boxy talk • teh rulz 22:46 13 February 2009 (BST)
|
