UDWiki:Administration/Move Requests/Archive/2011 04
This page is for the requesting of page moves by normal users. The average user's ability to move pages has been rescinded due to frequent abuse by vandals; as such, users will need to submit requests (similar in nature to those on Speedy Deletions and Protections) for pages to be moved by a sysop.
Guidelines for requesting a Page Move
Copy the template below (Or just type it), replace the text in red with the relevant details, and paste the template under the Move Request Queue heading. A day after a sysop has taken action on the request, move requests should be moved to the Archive.
===[[PAGENAME]]===
*[[MOVE TO HERE]]
*~~~~
|
Move Request Queue
The Dead's Resurgence
It's started yay, time to sort out what to do with it. Move to subpage of the dead? If not, I think it's time to go to A/D since the page has completely failed to have gotten off the ground since it was made. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 03:29, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Considering there are already pages for The Dead and The Dead 2.0, could we please have this either renamed into The Dead 3.0 or have The Dead 2.0 unprotected so we can have it there. The page portrays our group as we wish it portrayed, exactly as the page The Dead does. I don't see the problem with that, but I am not fully schooled in WIKI LAW. عبد الريحم بن حسين بن عبد الرحمن العراقي المصري 04:02, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- I should also add that Katthew asked on the talk page "can we edit it however we want?", and Karek's reply implied that to be the case. عبد الريحم بن حسين بن عبد الرحمن العراقي المصري 04:10, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Which reminds me, I should talk to Vantar. It almost looks like you guys were vandalising an event page when it really ended up being a group page.--Karekmaps 2.0?! 04:11, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Thanks for the quick reply - yeah, this is pretty much the case. It's titled like it would be an event page but it ended up being what we intend our group page to be. Ideally, could you unprotect The Dead 2.0 and replace it with The Dead's Resurgence? As it stands, The Dead 2.0 is out of date and pretty much unnecessary content now that the group has been revived. عبد الريحم بن حسين بن عبد الرحمن العراقي المصري 04:14, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Yeah but, technically that could be said about the 1st page too. It's more just a timeline of the group's forms really. Although I don't know much about the 2.0 one, don't think I was really around much for it. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 04:16, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Thanks for the quick reply - yeah, this is pretty much the case. It's titled like it would be an event page but it ended up being what we intend our group page to be. Ideally, could you unprotect The Dead 2.0 and replace it with The Dead's Resurgence? As it stands, The Dead 2.0 is out of date and pretty much unnecessary content now that the group has been revived. عبد الريحم بن حسين بن عبد الرحمن العراقي المصري 04:14, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Which reminds me, I should talk to Vantar. It almost looks like you guys were vandalising an event page when it really ended up being a group page.--Karekmaps 2.0?! 04:11, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- I should also add that Katthew asked on the talk page "can we edit it however we want?", and Karek's reply implied that to be the case. عبد الريحم بن حسين بن عبد الرحمن العراقي المصري 04:10, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- terribly sorry it doesn't have more userboxes and a list of ranks to be a 'legit' group page WIKI LAW wins again – Nubis NWO 04:06, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- It looks pretty good now, subpage of The Dead 2.0 seems best. Thanks for letting us improve it so much. xoxoxoxo --Riseabove 04:08, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Actually, this(mcArabicwords comment) is probably the best solution. Or have the resurgance page set aside as a group page with some Disambiguations added to the other two The Dead pages. Namely the primary page needs a disambig to the other two stating that the third is the current run of the group and that the group in all forms is the same, the various iterations are just marquees of massive upsurge in activity equivalent to group revival. I don't really see why the third page can't be open to their editing as a group in that case, since the primary page is the one linked on Stats.html. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 04:10, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Up until Nubis's edit on the 17th this was a page documenting an emerging event involving a group, not a page made by said group. I don't see why the dead should get control over the page seeing as it wasn't theirs to start with. They are free to make a page of their own they just can't take over an existing event page as their own - Vantar 04:22, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Well, to be fair, if they hadn't done something with it it wouldn't exist at this point. On top of that it was oked and unopposed on said pages talk page. It also seems fairly clear to me, at least, that if the page had gone any longer without updates or edits it would have been subject to deletion or removal by that point.--Karekmaps 2.0?! 04:31, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Man Vantar not to be a tard or anything (okay to be a complete tard) why do you care? Are you a member of the dead? Does the page pertain to your group's sudden surge across Malton? Now it's a Group Page. It's got a little box and everything chill out bro Phuzzy 04:33, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Likely, he feels like using WIKI LAW in an attempt to hassle goons in a rather silly way. Unprotecting The Dead 2.0 would be pretty awesome though!--ебут этом гомосексуальные земля́, ebut ėtom gomoseksual'nye zemlя́
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||Retarded things go here --> 
2 3 4 User:MisterGame 04:36, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Likely, he feels like using WIKI LAW in an attempt to hassle goons in a rather silly way. Unprotecting The Dead 2.0 would be pretty awesome though!--ебут этом гомосексуальные земля́, ebut ėtom gomoseksual'nye zemlя́
- Up until Nubis's edit on the 17th this was a page documenting an emerging event involving a group, not a page made by said group. I don't see why the dead should get control over the page seeing as it wasn't theirs to start with. They are free to make a page of their own they just can't take over an existing event page as their own - Vantar 04:22, 22 April 2011 (BST)
- Actually, this(mcArabicwords comment) is probably the best solution. Or have the resurgance page set aside as a group page with some Disambiguations added to the other two The Dead pages. Namely the primary page needs a disambig to the other two stating that the third is the current run of the group and that the group in all forms is the same, the various iterations are just marquees of massive upsurge in activity equivalent to group revival. I don't really see why the third page can't be open to their editing as a group in that case, since the primary page is the one linked on Stats.html. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 04:10, 22 April 2011 (BST)
Recent Actions
I forgot that sub-pages are only templates when in one's namespace
The Ridleybank Resistance Front/Barhahville Constabulary/Member Template to Template:Barhahville Constabulary Member, plez. --VVV RPMBG 20:32, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- You can transclude any page simply by adding braces and one colon like so {{:The Ridleybank Resistance Front/Barhahville Constabulary/Member Template}}. In this case it produces The Ridleybank Resistance Front/Barhahville Constabulary/Member Template
User:DanceDanceRevolution/sandpit/ghosts
( [[Talk:User:DanceDanceRevolution/sandpit/ghosts]] | Links | Page History | Page Logs | Move Page | Delete Page )
| Requester: | Karekmaps?! 00:01, 11 April 2011 (BST) |
| Reason: | Used in Utility templates, so it obviously should be in a more appropriate, unowned, namespace. |
| Destination: | [[Help:Ghost_Pages]] |
- DOne, will fix links when I return home -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 05:08, 11 April 2011 (BST)
User:DanceDanceRevolution/ghost2
( [[Talk:User:DanceDanceRevolution/ghost2]] | Links | Page History | Page Logs | Move Page | Delete Page )
| Requester: | Karekmaps?! 00:01, 11 April 2011 (BST) |
| Reason: | Used in Categorizing, so it obviously should be in a more appropriate, unowned, namespace. |
| Destination: | [[Template:Ghost]] |
- We'll just let DDR Move this one. ~
02:17, 11 April 2011
- I posted a note on hist talk page when I put these up, hopefully he'll be along shortly. --Karekmaps?! 05:06, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- I moved it to Template:WikiGhost, just to specify more about the content, dunno why just seemed more right to me. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution
- No complaints here, what works works. --Karekmaps?! 07:04, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- I went ahead and fixed the links. I came across User:DanceDanceRevolution/ghost in the process. Any suggestions on where to move that one? ~
~ 08:25, 16 April 2011
- Nowhere
and change the inculsions to this template if they're protected.It's a userpage and sacrosanct of crit 1 and this one already fulfills that purpose. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 12:34, 16 April 2011 (BST)- Got the inclusions, should be a non-issue now pretty much. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 12:37, 16 April 2011 (BST)
- Nowhere
- I went ahead and fixed the links. I came across User:DanceDanceRevolution/ghost in the process. Any suggestions on where to move that one? ~
- No complaints here, what works works. --Karekmaps?! 07:04, 11 April 2011 (BST)
- I moved it to Template:WikiGhost, just to specify more about the content, dunno why just seemed more right to me. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution
- I posted a note on hist talk page when I put these up, hopefully he'll be along shortly. --Karekmaps?! 05:06, 11 April 2011 (BST)
Template:Promotions_Intro
| Requester: | Karekmaps?! 01:53, 10 April 2011 (BST) |
| Reason: | Makes more sense here, cleans up Template namespace. |
| Destination: | A/PM/Intro |
Image:Image-MCDURankPT9.PNG
It's been uploaded to the wrong address). Should be Image:Image-MCDURankPT8.png to keep in with image format and correct number (it's rank 8 image for the MCDU. Note: do not confuse with Image:Image-MCDURankPT9.png with is the rank 9 image and is in the right place. Many thanks. --Neko 02:40, 2 April 2011 (BST)
- We can't automatically move images, sorry. You can only manually do it, then we can delete the old image for you. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 03:17, 2 April 2011 (BST)
Guides:Penguinpyro/Guide_to_Forming_Standard_Generic_Paramilitary_Pro-Survivor_Trenchy_Groups
Would like it as Guides:Guide_to_Forming_Standard_Generic_Paramilitary_Pro-Survivor_Trenchy_Groups, please.--Penguinpyro 11:11, 27 March 2011 (BST)
- Would you maybe prefer Guides:Forming Standard Generic Paramilitary Pro-Survivor Trenchy Groups? as in, without the redundant 'guide to' at the front? -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 11:39, 27 March 2011 (BST)
- Nvm. Done as requested. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 03:17, 2 April 2011 (BST)
