UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2011 06: Difference between revisions
Red Hawk One (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m (august) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Shortcut|[[A/SD]]}} | {{Shortcut|[[A/SD]]}} | ||
{{M/SD Intro}} | {{M/SD Intro}} | ||
{{UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 08}} | |||
{{UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 07}} | {{UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 07}} | ||
==Archives== | ==Archives== | ||
{{Speedydeletearchivenav}} | {{Speedydeletearchivenav}} | ||
Revision as of 00:31, 1 August 2010
Speedy Deletion Queue
There are currently no pages in the queue.
Served Speedy Deletions
Crit 11
Created it think I was doing him a favour, didn't realise the redlink was just a misspelling. >< NUKE PLZ ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 10:13, 29 August 2010 (BST)
- Consequences will never be the same.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 11:43, 29 August 2010 (BST)
Talk:Auto Repair
Crit 1. -- 
RoosterDragon 
22:09, 27 August 2010 (BST)
- done.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 22:14, 27 August 2010 (BST)
CobbSalad
Since replicated at the correct page: User:Cobb Salad. Crit 1. -- RoosterDragon 21:00, 27 August 2010 (BST)
- Done. Ah, all this administrative work. Just makes you want to join the sysop team, doesn't it?--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 21:14, 27 August 2010 (BST)
Bad Redirects
Crit 3. -- RoosterDragon 17:34, 27 August 2010 (BST)
- Done.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 17:47, 27 August 2010 (BST)
User:Carrie lone
I deleted this page as part of a move request by Misanthropy.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 17:34, 26 August 2010 (BST)
Journal:Dr Parrott
Crit 7 this sucka please. Chief Seagull squawkFree running! 14:46, 25 August 2010 (BST)
User:VI
My user page, obviously. Thanks. CITIZEN VI 04:19, 25 August 2010 (BST)
Image:Vapor-8-bit.png
unused dupe of the used Image:Vapor-8-bit.jpg. --
12:16, 24 August 2010 (BST)
- done.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 17:52, 24 August 2010 (BST)
Image:Zodiac-sketch.jpg
unused dupe of the otherwise used Image:Zodiac killer.jpg, give or take a bit of cropping. --
12:16, 24 August 2010 (BST)
- Pow, pow, pow!--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 17:52, 24 August 2010 (BST)
Talk:Combat 18/archive1
Crit 1, wiped by the group, created without their approval -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:02 24 August 2010 (BST)
- Served. -- 11:44, 24 August 2010 (BST)
Image:AH Unown Sig.JPG
Crit 7. I've uploaded a different version for background color transparency since JPEGs don't support transparency. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 17:45, 23 August 2010 (BST)
- Handled by Yonn, I believe. —Aichon— 01:08, 24 August 2010 (BST)
- Yes sir, it was. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:09, 24 August 2010 (BST)
More Trouble
I can't seem to load new images over the old ones anymore. They're the same file extensions and everything. Regardless, 1, 2, 3. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 21:36, 22 August 2010 (BST)
 |
EATEN |
Done. Not sure what the problem is, though. 
21:38, 22 August 2010 (BST)
Image:Infinity.png
I was having trouble uploading over this file for some reason... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 03:50, 20 August 2010 (BST)
- Possibly a file extension problem? Either way, done -- 03:54, 20 August 2010 (BST)
Remains of EVIL drama
The following are a few speedy delete candidates that I spotted while deleting EVIL's pages. I definitely didn't spot all of the relevant stuff, but I did get these ones. Don't forget the talk pages for these.
- Template:EVILAwards - Unused template, crit 10
- EVIL/recruit - Unused redirect, crit 3
- EVIL/KOS_List - Unused redirect, crit 3
- Talk:EVIL! - Unused redirect, crit 3
- Every single template in Category:Extremely Vengeful and Irksome Laymen is unused/crit 10, except the following ones (i.e. do NOT delete these ones, but delete the rest):
Also, as a side note, someone (DDR?) who deals with categories more might want to look at that category and figure out what to do with it, in terms of whether it should still be a group category or if the templates and images in that category should even remain in it, given that the group they're for no longer has a wiki presence. If they do go away, then the category is going to go crit 4 eventually. —Aichon— 08:18, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- Honestly, I'm beyond knowing what to do. Most of those templates that should be kept link to dead pages and offer nothing in terms of context history or purpose but since they will be kept, I see no reason why the category should be removed. It all depends: if we think someday that the group may return in some form, we might as well keep the category and leave all those used templates in it. If we are without a doubt in belief that it's gone for good, we might as well recategorise (even then, we probably don't need to keep templates categorised no matter what- they are findable enough by POD's contribs anyway if need be) and just delete the category. What are people's thoughts? -- 11:53, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- Done the above requests by Aichon. Personally, I don't think the group will resurface. They had 10 members, including Poodle, and he undoubtedly will have told those members (the regularly active ones), that the group is over. He'll probably come back, but he'll start a new group when he does.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 11:59, 15 August 2010 (BST)
Extremely Vengeful and Irksome Laymen
Go for it. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:12, 15 August 2010 (BST)
Poodle I don't want this to happen, I'll even fix the links or go to arbies, there are ways we can go about reaching an agreement, ignore what I said about going to arbies being bad for you, it was just my first reaction because I was reluctant to commit. --
04:16, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- You know what,.... every time I make a page, a puppy dies,... so delete them all... I don't want any blood on my hands... Excentricity has always been a part of the joke for my group, and everyone seems ready and willing to get on my case about it... so get started.... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:23, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- No, fuck you. I'm not fulfilling this request, misconduct me if you want, but there are better ways to go about this. If a disambiguation page for my new group is going to make you delete yours then I'll try and do something else, give me 24 hours and I'll talk to my mates to try and think of a new group name that isn't in use by anyone on the wiki. Then everyone wins. -- 04:25, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- No. Nobody fucking wins that way, because it shows that you're simply willing to let a temper tantrum force you to bend over backwards. You would be a terrible parent. Either this is hammered out in one of the multiple ways that has been attempted, or the one who is being actually reasonable wins. Guess who the fuck that is. 04:27, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- Misconduct it is... in the mean time... I'm not backing down. This will be the last thing I ever see too.... I'm done with this shit. I make a group,... and it get's taken away from me. I make another group, and everything I do is a conflict. I'm done with this godforsaken game. Thanks a lot,... I'm glad you all can literally suck the life right out of somethings ass... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:29, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- OH MY FUCKING GOD DUDE IT IS AN OLD REDIRECT THAT ISN'T EVEN YOUR FUCKING GROUP PAGE. Even GFJ didn't get this wound about about the DEM page, and you now have the dubious honour of making GOD DAMN UMBRELLA seem like a fucking civil affair. Just go outside and smell a fucking flower and relax before you make an even bigger fool of yourself by bringing a completely unwarranted A/M case, because you'll regret it if you do. 04:32, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- Why,... what are you going to do to me? Ban me... whoopee shit. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:35, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- You won't be banned, but I think my stance on this issue labels me unqualified to fulfil- or at least confirm- this request due to my biases, so not fulfilling this an allowing other sysops to comment is infact the right thing to do. I don't care anymore, this shit has worn me down and it's needless, and I doubt most of my group even enjoy being called lemons anyway, just gimme a day, and I won't need to bug you about this shit anywmore -- 04:40, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- No.... I'm done. I'll stick around long enough to see my group deleted.... then I'm done with this game. It's had all the fun sucked right out of it for me. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:42, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- I don't fucking care. Deleting your group isn't the right way to go about this, even if you do leave. You don't even need the wiki to run your group anyway, run it without the wiki, or whatever. Or just leave and keep the group's page on the wiki. -- 05:04, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- No,... It's my work. I have the right to have it removed when I leave... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 05:31, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- 100% sure? I'll eat it right up right now, w/ milkshake, if you are. 05:32, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- I'm pissed off that you're doing this over all other options being handed to you. Fuck that. -- 05:33, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- 100% sure? I'll eat it right up right now, w/ milkshake, if you are.
- No,... It's my work. I have the right to have it removed when I leave... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 05:31, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- I don't fucking care. Deleting your group isn't the right way to go about this, even if you do leave. You don't even need the wiki to run your group anyway, run it without the wiki, or whatever. Or just leave and keep the group's page on the wiki. -- 05:04, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- No.... I'm done. I'll stick around long enough to see my group deleted.... then I'm done with this game. It's had all the fun sucked right out of it for me. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:42, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- You won't be banned, but I think my stance on this issue labels me unqualified to fulfil- or at least confirm- this request due to my biases, so not fulfilling this an allowing other sysops to comment is infact the right thing to do. I don't care anymore, this shit has worn me down and it's needless, and I doubt most of my group even enjoy being called lemons anyway, just gimme a day, and I won't need to bug you about this shit anywmore -- 04:40, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- Why,... what are you going to do to me? Ban me... whoopee shit. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:35, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- OH MY FUCKING GOD DUDE IT IS AN OLD REDIRECT THAT ISN'T EVEN YOUR FUCKING GROUP PAGE. Even GFJ didn't get this wound about about the DEM page, and you now have the dubious honour of making GOD DAMN UMBRELLA seem like a fucking civil affair. Just go outside and smell a fucking flower and relax before you make an even bigger fool of yourself by bringing a completely unwarranted A/M case, because you'll regret it if you do.
- Misconduct it is... in the mean time... I'm not backing down. This will be the last thing I ever see too.... I'm done with this shit. I make a group,... and it get's taken away from me. I make another group, and everything I do is a conflict. I'm done with this godforsaken game. Thanks a lot,... I'm glad you all can literally suck the life right out of somethings ass... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:29, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- No. Nobody fucking wins that way, because it shows that you're simply willing to let a temper tantrum force you to bend over backwards. You would be a terrible parent. Either this is hammered out in one of the multiple ways that has been attempted, or the one who is being actually reasonable wins. Guess who the fuck that is.
- No, fuck you. I'm not fulfilling this request, misconduct me if you want, but there are better ways to go about this. If a disambiguation page for my new group is going to make you delete yours then I'll try and do something else, give me 24 hours and I'll talk to my mates to try and think of a new group name that isn't in use by anyone on the wiki. Then everyone wins. -- 04:25, 15 August 2010 (BST)
| Misanthropy said: |
| 100% sure? |
- Done. All couple hundred of them. I also handled the Extremly Irksome and Vengeful Laymen (not the lack of an "e" in the first word) namespace, which had about another 50-100 pages, since it was clearly the result of a typo. I'll be posting up a few items for speedy deletion in a minute that are a result of this. Also, on a personal note, Rage in a Cage ring any bells? Or how about the members of your group? Way to ruin plans for dozens of people, just because you threw a tantrum when you didn't get your way. Classy. —Aichon— 07:54, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- As an additional aside, I oppose undeletion of these as well should it ever come up that someone wants them all undeleted. If someone is looking for specific information, fine, but if someone wants to set up the group on the wiki again, those pages are gone as far as I'm concerned, especially considering they were in not one, but two incorrect namespaces. —Aichon— 07:57, 15 August 2010 (BST)
Honestly, deleting your group for something as trivial as a redirect (I hasn't forget U) is just stupid. It's also the first time I saw DDR on his knees, just trying to achieve a different solution through meaningful dialog and you still turn him down. Well, I really looked forward to Rage in a Cage. Ugh. --
Thadeous Oakley 10:52, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- Is there any base for restoring Rage in a Case as a community event? --
Thadeous Oakley 10:58, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- I'll be re-doing it as a Malton Manhunt event with more or less the same rules and vibe. I don't think something that good should die so sadly, we can even dedicate the idea to Poodle etc. Hopefully the same teams, maybe more, participate. -- 11:21, 15 August 2010 (BST)
How does all this shit happen while I'm asleep?--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 11:41, 15 August 2010 (BST)
Talk:Ständige Vertretung/archive1
Criterion 1, this page holds absolutely no content (see the version history). It is not linked to on any page. G F J 15:13, 14 August 2010 (BST)
- I'm gonna cycle this one since it's just a misunderstanding. The 'article' space there is being used as the archive, so there's no need to delete the talk - it's just a sort of reversed case of how talk archives tend to be made. User talk:Misanthropy/2010 Q3 for instance, is an archive of mine, and technically that's the wrong way to do it, as what that does is create the talk page for User:Misanthropy/2010 Q3, rather than a sub-page of User talk:Misanthropy. So this archive is doing it in an article page, not a talk page. tl;dr, no point really deleting it. 19:13, 14 August 2010 (BST)
- This may or may not help, but I've made it a redirect to the regular talk page to avoid confusion or stuff like this in the future. -- 04:36, 15 August 2010 (BST)
Template:2 and Template:3
A failed experiment. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:07, 14 August 2010 (BST)
Non-conspiracy disambig
The Umbrella Conspiracy - crit 1. It's just an inferior dupe to Umbrella, created so that one side can ram their POV down the other's throat -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:19 12 August 2010 (BST)
- Deleted. If you want a POV rant, put it on your group page. If you want a disambig, it has to be neutral.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 14:25, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- herr oviously both of you ignored A/MR then -- 14:38, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- :P Didn't see it.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 15:39, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- herr oviously both of you ignored A/MR then -- 14:38, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Umbrella (alternate)
Same as below, unlinked. --
03:23, 12 August 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
03:28, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Umbrella (Alternate)
Man, fuck off with that redirect shit. As if anyone is going to search for that. Delete as it is unwanted.--Thadeous Oakley 17:15, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- Oh, and I'm talking about a redirect. Don't delete the group page. --Thadeous Oakley 17:16, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- Unwanted? Who's going to search for it? I beg to differ. --Wesker 17:47, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- You might as well link directly, instead of using a redirect. Besides, I decide if want Umbrella redirected through such a link, the answer is no. --Thadeous Oakley 17:51, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- Why wouldn't you? Would you rather it be something like Umbrella (new) or Umbrella (false)? The CoL didn't have a problem with it, so who are you to? If you want to make it more NPOV, be my guest. --Wesker 17:55, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- You might as well link directly, instead of using a redirect. Besides, I decide if want Umbrella redirected through such a link, the answer is no. --
- Unwanted? Who's going to search for it? I beg to differ. --Wesker 17:47, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- Oh Jesus fuck. I give this thing a week before I delete it as an unused redirect. If you want it kept, link it. 17:57, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- It's already linked on two pages. --Wesker 18:11, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- I'll be honest. This whole thing reeks of bad faith. Anyways, group redirects generally belong to the group they redirect to, unless two or more groups claim the redirect (in which case the redirect becomes a disambiguation page for both groups). I can't say we have any de jure precedents, but the de facto practice is that have redirects belong to the group they're redirecting to. If Wesker wants to change the redirect to one of his pages, such as The Umbrella Conspiracy, then that's fine; otherwise, I'd say Thad has a right to decide his group's redirects. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 00:09, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- Wtf is going on? Is everyone taking stupid pills lately? Why do I keep hearing about groups owning redirects? Groups can have a right to redirects if it actually relates to them. As far as I fucking care this umbrella garbage is stupid, even stupider than the original umbrella garbage. This redirect should be deleted, the "real" umbrella redirect should be kept (cause it's to their own group so who cares), and that idiotic disambiguation page should be moved into "real" umbrella's groupspace before I update it reminding all viewers that both groups are shitty knockoffs of a video game. Seriously. The more I see you cunts frothing over the right to use a name you all just fucking stole and bastardise, the more I am tempted to make an article on the REAL umbrella corporation with historical accounts and have it take over the Umbrella disambig simply because it's the NPOV version, so every fucking one of you shits lose out. FUCK -- 02:18, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- I'll be honest. This whole thing reeks of bad faith. Anyways, group redirects generally belong to the group they redirect to, unless two or more groups claim the redirect (in which case the redirect becomes a disambiguation page for both groups). I can't say we have any de jure precedents, but the de facto practice is that have redirects belong to the group they're redirecting to. If Wesker wants to change the redirect to one of his pages, such as The Umbrella Conspiracy, then that's fine; otherwise, I'd say Thad has a right to decide his group's redirects. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 00:09, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- It's already linked on two pages. --Wesker 18:11, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- Similarly, this is a crit 3, and was only made for trolling/drama purposes, so it's gone. I'm happy to leave the Umbrella (Original) because (no, they don't own it) if they genuinely want it as a group redirect, they should have the chance to give it some time before it gets removed as unused. As for this one, it's stupid and is only made to shit off the original umbrella. As for that fucking disambiguation page, if it isn't moved into their group space by someone's request in 3 hours I'm updating the whole thing so it's NPOV, and I highly doubt it'll be something they'll be proud to see. -- 02:24, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- What, like I did this morning? ¬_¬ 02:25, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- Actually, yes, except this will be a proper account of all this umbrella faggotry from NPOV -- 03:14, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- Not that I should get involved... but I was on around the time that was made. I should probably point out that there were a couple dozen more redirects that were made around the same time. Were any of those brought up? If not, perhaps they'd fit deletion criteria,... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 03:17, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- They weren't made. They were redirects that went to Umbrella Corp. that they changed to go to their own. I sorted through the ones that shouldn't have been changed, and moved them back towards Umbrella Corp, it's it's a null issue atm. -- 03:26, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- Actually, yes, except this will be a proper account of all this umbrella faggotry from NPOV -- 03:14, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- What, like I did this morning? ¬_¬
And wesker, you're a fucking idiot. Everything you've said under this header has made 0 sense. --
03:16, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- I'll just pretend I didn't hear that. No sense arguing with the children. --Wesker 13:24, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Template:2
Pet project gone wrong. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 00:45, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- =(--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 00:46, 12 August 2010 (BST)
- Thanks... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 00:54, 12 August 2010 (BST)
FURIG
Page it redirects to was deleted below. Linkthewindow Talk 23:51, 11 August 2010 (BST)
- done.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 00:46, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Bot Made Image
--VVV RPMBG 08:02, 11 August 2010 (BST)
Return this bitch to the source dammit!!
Because it's beginning to piss me off. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 23:32, 9 August 2010 (BST)
Template:Edgecombe Groups Groups
Crit 1. Urgh. 06:08, 9 August 2010 (BST)
- As a side note, why do these things keep popping up? 06:09, 9 August 2010 (BST)
- No idea. Deleted. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 06:12, 9 August 2010 (BST)
- Yeah, wtf? So retarded :/ -- 09:20, 9 August 2010 (BST)
Crit 3s
- Guides: Fast Zombie Builds 10/26/05
- Guides: How to defend a mall
- Guides: Zoe Gorefest's Guide for The Career PKer
- Guides: Real-Time Fighting
- Guides: Short simple guide to staying alive
Again, these are pages that have a space in their name, that will collapse into a black hole when a guides namespace is created. Their disappearance won't exactly be a big deal, but it's probably best we get these sorted now. Linkthewindow Talk 01:25, 7 August 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
01:31, 7 August 2010 (BST)This
Redirects to userspace. Crit 9. --VVV RPMBG 00:01, 6 August 2010 (BST)
- Technically a missed deletion from a move, but Deleted nonetheless. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 00:06, 6 August 2010 (BST)
Cleanse it with fire
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Profile
--Dawkins 
[T][P!][W!][♞] is currently: having his arm torn off by a zombie. 19:05, 5 August 2010 (BST)
And this:
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Talk --Dawkins [T][P!][W!][♞] is currently: having his arm torn off by a zombie. 19:07, 5 August 2010 (BST)
crit 1 images
Image:323366 combat-logo-150.jpg is an unused dupe of the used Image:Combat18.jpg, the same applies to the titz logo, which is an unused dupe of used Image:Titz.png. --
12:17, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- Done. As well as being false advertising (dammit!), that Titz image would probably be better off as a jpg, 'tis huge -- boxy talk • teh rulz 14:44 5 August 2010 (BST)
Temp
User talk:Boxy/Archive/Temp - crit 7 -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:07 5 August 2010 (BST)
User Deletions
I would like This and This deleted. I no longer Have use for them.-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 18:09, 4 August 2010 (BST)
- Done.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 18:42, 4 August 2010 (BST)
National Socialist Union/recruit
Crit 10, per this message. Also, to help clear the orphanage... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 13:25, 4 August 2010 (BST)
- This doesn't fit crit 10 in the conventional sense because it isn't a template, and there are loads of unused recruitment pages out there. Simply, this shouldn't be deleted. -- 13:54, 4 August 2010 (BST)
- I'll message him and ask him if he wants it deleted.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 17:22, 4 August 2010 (BST)
- Boxy already did it. Check Cornhoolio's talk.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 17:23, 4 August 2010 (BST)
User:DangerReport/Surtees Cinema (Pennville)
Incorrectly named dupe of: User:DangerReport/Surtees Cinema. I manually moved the report made.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 23:49, 3 August 2010 (BST)
- Done. -- 00:21, 4 August 2010 (BST)
Furig
I'm the author of this. I'd like to have it deleted. --Captain Rickety 02:20, 3 August 2010 (BST)
- Just to help out the next person, did you want your group page deleted, along with the redirect, or just the redirect? -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 02:25, 3 August 2010 (BST)
- Someone did it. I saw them do it but it was a few hours ago, I forgot who it is and I CBF checking. -- 13:17, 3 August 2010 (BST)
- I did, but he may want his page deleted, so I left it in the queue.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 14:30, 3 August 2010 (BST)
- Main deleted after talk page confirmation. 02:35, 5 August 2010 (BST)
- Main deleted after talk page confirmation.
- I did, but he may want his page deleted, so I left it in the queue.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 14:30, 3 August 2010 (BST)
- Someone did it. I saw them do it but it was a few hours ago, I forgot who it is and I CBF checking. -- 13:17, 3 August 2010 (BST)
Crit 7
This and this do not exist, and never will. Don't forget the talk pages. As an optional bonus, use your edit-delete-restore powers to remove the links to them from the history of this page and my nav box. --VVV RPMBG 04:38, 2 August 2010 (BST)
- I did the nav bar edits, but I don't wish to tamper with SD archives in that manner, at leased without the egging on by another op. -- 04:53, 2 August 2010 (BST)
- DDR forgot the talk pages. :P --User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 08:18, 2 August 2010 (BST)
Two
This, and this please. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:29, 1 August 2010 (BST)
Served Speedy Deletions
Template:Socmember
Oh yeah, this too. Crit 10. —Aichon— 14:50, 30 July 2010 (BST)
- done -- 15:24, 30 July 2010 (BST)
Image:Shirley gordon diary.jpg
The above is an unused crit 1 of the smaller Image:Shirley gordon diary small.jpg. --
11:29, 30 July 2010 (BST)
- Nuked.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 13:55, 30 July 2010 (BST)
Soldiers of Crossman/Members
Our group is no longer using it. —Aichon— 08:55, 30 July 2010 (BST)
- Pow, pow, pow!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:16, 30 July 2010 (BST)
Colette_Hart/CH/CoL
I created it accidentally while working on my userspace, without using the "User:" prefix. I moved the content already to a proper page, so please delete it. --Colette Hart 18:00, 28 July 2010 (BST)
- Done.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:36, 28 July 2010 (BST)
C9
Krabbzz.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:16, 27 July 2010 (BST)
Redirects
The pages found here are all unused redirects. They can be deleted... just the redirect pages that are subpages of the EVIL prefix,... not the pages they redirect to.... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 06:23, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- Long story short, they were deleted by Misanthropy and Aichon -- boxy talk • teh rulz 09:06 27 July 2010 (BST)
Knights Templar/Recruitment
It is a duplicate of this ,... and the latter of the two is the one that's used. Knights Templar/Recruitment only linked to via their discussion page. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:14, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- Keep - Historically, they have used both, as is evident from the comment on the page where the link is used. Also, it's in their group's space and isn't a duplicate, so I see no reason for us to speedy delete it without their say-so. —Aichon— 04:24, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- Even though it could be considered a crit 10, and is partially falls under the category of crit 1? I mean no no offense when I say this, really, but the key word there would be "Historically". Not to mention, I've spoken to them, and brought up the usage of the poem on that page on the admin pages once prior, looking to have it removed from their front page as well. I'd prefer it to be removed here as well, but I guess I'll have to accept it where it is.... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:40, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- I'll grant that the pages serve similar purposes, but they were, at one time, being used concurrently yet for different purposes, so arguing that they're duplicates seems pointless to me, and it's certainly not a low content page. As for the template crit, maybe, but I'd really prefer to have their go ahead before deleting it since it's not in the Template namespace. If they give their say-so, I fully support speedy deleting it, otherwise it should really go to vote. —Aichon— 04:55, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- 99 times in a 100, subpages are generally allowed to be borderline useless - I'm looking at you, Poodle. ¬_¬ 05:52, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- I can't for the life of me find the deletions page, or arbitration page where I specifically asked them not to use that poem,.... and were it was decided I had the right to take it down.... Regardless, I'm going to move this to the cycled section,... because, as I've said above,... the group already thinks I hate them, and pick on them.... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 06:23, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- Best that you did, because let's put it this way- If this was deleted as a crit 1 and we'd allowed you to meddle with crit 1's that belong under group subspaces, you're entire KOS shit would be gone within the day. -- 11:29, 30 July 2010 (BST)
- I can't for the life of me find the deletions page, or arbitration page where I specifically asked them not to use that poem,.... and were it was decided I had the right to take it down.... Regardless, I'm going to move this to the cycled section,... because, as I've said above,... the group already thinks I hate them, and pick on them.... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 06:23, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- 99 times in a 100, subpages are generally allowed to be borderline useless - I'm looking at you, Poodle. ¬_¬
- I'll grant that the pages serve similar purposes, but they were, at one time, being used concurrently yet for different purposes, so arguing that they're duplicates seems pointless to me, and it's certainly not a low content page. As for the template crit, maybe, but I'd really prefer to have their go ahead before deleting it since it's not in the Template namespace. If they give their say-so, I fully support speedy deleting it, otherwise it should really go to vote. —Aichon— 04:55, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- Even though it could be considered a crit 10, and is partially falls under the category of crit 1? I mean no no offense when I say this, really, but the key word there would be "Historically". Not to mention, I've spoken to them, and brought up the usage of the poem on that page on the admin pages once prior, looking to have it removed from their front page as well. I'd prefer it to be removed here as well, but I guess I'll have to accept it where it is.... -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:40, 26 July 2010 (BST)
Category:Historical Groups/FailedArchive
Crit 4. —Aichon— 05:48, 26 July 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
Just a note, pages like this shouldn't be created. That isn't the talk page for a Category:Historical Groups/FailedArchive, it's the /FailedArchive subpage of Category talk:Historial Groups. It's a subpage of a category, used as a talk page. There aren't any actual pages that could go in a subcategory like this one (however I have considered draughting a policy that treats the archiving of historical bids in a manner similar to A/PM). 05:59, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- How about a policy that forbids Poodle to submit anything for deletion (or create a page/category) without asking someone. Ffs. -- 14:06, 26 July 2010 (BST)
Last of these for a while (hopefully)
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Shady
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Characters
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Talk2 Just the redirect, please :P
--Dawkins [T][P!][W!][♞] is currently: having his arm torn off by a zombie. 21:58, 24 July 2010 (BST)
- pow, pow, pow!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:02, 24 July 2010 (BST)
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Name
Sorry, missed this one last time. --Dawkins [T][P!][W!][♞] is currently: having his arm torn off by a zombie. 21:36, 24 July 2010 (BST)
- Deleted.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:41, 24 July 2010 (BST)
Crit. 8, if you please. --Dawkins [T][P!][W!][♞] is currently: having his arm torn off by a zombie. 21:20, 24 July 2010 (BST)
- Done.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:23, 24 July 2010 (BST)
User:Se-Looters and User talk:Se-Looters
Crit. 11. Appears to have been some some confusion. Although I've probably gotten this all wrong. 
Technical Pacifist 17:23, 24 July 2010 (BST)
- User:Se-Looters is actually a user and they have the right to have anything on their page, namely a redirect to the proper group. It wasn't of their choice since it seemed to have been moved and the redirect kept but I think this is a good move. Yes, the user is existent despite no edits coming up, I suspect it was from the last history purge in 07, it's just my opinion but I think the redirect is probably best kept. -- 18:19, 24 July 2010 (BST)
- I knew I had done something wrong. Thought it was a non-existing user.. Dammit. Technical Pacifist 18:27, 24 July 2010 (BST)
- No, that's fine, you just check by looking at the "toolbox" at the left of the userpage, if it has "user contributions" it means it's a user, I understand where you're coming from and it's an easy mistake to make, I just backtracked to understand the circumstances in which it became the mess that it is. -- 14:11, 26 July 2010 (BST)
- I knew I had done something wrong. Thought it was a non-existing user.. Dammit. Technical Pacifist 18:27, 24 July 2010 (BST)
User:DangerReport/St Mark's Church (Chudleyton)
Dupe of: User:DangerReport/St. Mark's Church (Chudleyton) --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:02, 23 July 2010 (BST)
User talk:DanceDanceRevolution/wii
Crit 8. You can find your blood links elsewhere Axe. --
13:31, 23 July 2010 (BST)
- ...I was actually being serious about that comment too. >< --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 13:43, 23 July 2010 (BST)
- I don't doubt you were. But IDC!! -- 13:59, 23 July 2010 (BST)
- Deleted.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 14:57, 23 July 2010 (BST)
- I don't doubt you were. But IDC!! -- 13:59, 23 July 2010 (BST)
Category:Administration
Poodle of Doom made the above category in feb, when there is already one here. Crit 1 and 4. --
12:49, 23 July 2010 (BST)
- deleted.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 14:57, 23 July 2010 (BST)
User talk:Adamwalsh and User talk:Waexu
We treat ad-bots as non-users and there's already a scheduled deletion for adbot userpages but rather than delete these on sight in the "spirit" of the rule (an action of which I was misconducted for many moons ago :() I'd just like to submit them here to get some clarification on whether they should go. They're funny, yes, but non-pages, pretty much. --
11:24, 23 July 2010 (BST)
- No, my accidental plus one!!! >< --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 12:55, 23 July 2010 (BST)
- Deleted.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 14:57, 23 July 2010 (BST)
Image:Troopsofdoom.jpg
Crit 1.-- Adward 16:05, 21 July 2010 (BST)
- Care to show where the duplicate is? I have no doubt in my mind that image is probably on the wiki 7 times over, but I'd just like to be sure. -- 11:19, 23 July 2010 (BST)
- Nevermind, made the effort of finding it myself, done. -- 11:20, 23 July 2010 (BST)
Random Subpages
User:Alexander_Dawkins/inub
User:Alexander_Dawkins/culture
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Sandbox
All under criterion seven. Thanks --Dawkins [T][P!] 17:16, 21 July 2010 (BST)
- Deleted. Also, you might want to change your sig link in preferences so it reads {{SUBST:Nosubst|:nameofyoursigpage}}. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 06:38, 22 July 2010 (BST)
Image:Ccribbon40_ironman.png
New version uploaded, this one no longer in use. --Hawke2019 07:18, 20 July 2010 (BST)
- Done. And for future reference, unused images are automatically deleted anyway. Posting them here creates extra paperwork. —Aichon— 07:27, 20 July 2010 (BST)
crit 7 bonghit
User:Bonghit420/NEVCE #7 author request --Raddox MurTangle 22:09, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- Done, -- 02:17, 20 July 2010 (BST)
Image:JulietteReausfirstweddingring.jpg
He doesn't need me anymore. He replaced me with another image. --TheBardofAwesome 17:48, 19 July 2010 (BST)
None
Crit 1? -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 21:44, 18 July 2010 (BST)
It's a reference to the default none field so it has some relevance, also it's linked to a lot of userpages because in character templates a lot of user seem to actually link the "none" to this page. I'm not saying it isn't eligible for SD but I'd prefer to see it go through deletions if no other sysop disagrees and deletes. --
01:28, 19 July 2010 (BST)
Kept - as with Journal:No Journal, it's a placeholder to avoid newbies creating red links. Although, they could be consolidated, so that No Journal (and any others about) either redirected to None or Example page (depending on context) -- boxy talk • teh rulz 02:53 19 July 2010 (BST)
Maybe you should start actually looking into and researching your SD requests from now on Poodle. --
12:19, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- Quick question, if it has a "Group Page", why doesn't the group "None" show up on the stats pages? -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 16:17, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- There needs to be a smilie to convey the way I pinch the bridge of my nose when I'm frustrated. The stats page tallies up the entries into the "Group" field on in-game profiles, displaying groups with 10 or more active members (I'm not 100% on how it works since I counted ten tagged RDDs the other day but it explicitly states ten or more). The page None is a dummy page for use with various templates on the wiki, and none of the wiki pages will affect any game pages (with the one sole exception being that the stats page will auto-link to the wiki pages of listed groups if there are pages for them). Two things that do not mix, basically. 16:38, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- None is the default tag for a character's group. When users come onto the wiki sometimes they specify this is their status in their affiliation with groups. All it takes is for one guy to see the link is red for them to make the page saying "group" or "this is my group for character 236" or something annoying like that. I'm going off track, the answer to your questions is, again, as simple as the method of finding out- simple deliberation: If None WAS on the stats page, it'd look pretty fucking stupid to see that of the actual groups, the top one was one that unintentionally had 7500+ members and didn't indicate any sort of organisation either. If this is another one of your attempts to try and demonstrate a point with smart-arse and pointless questions, the REAL answer lies somewhat in the one I gave- the page is there as a group because it's a placeholder for the term "none" which is a reference towards the default group affiliation which around 7500+ players of Urban Dead may one day be compelled to follow up if they find a link to it. It just so happens that it's written in good humour and half of that humour is the fact it's a short page about a "group" or at least "common affiliation" that has a short history and a short description. If you're wondering why it's classified as a group, it's mostly because that's literally the best thing we can liken it so, it could loosely be part of Glossary but the whole joke of the page is that it describes itself as a group so it'd be silly not to categorise it as such.
- I'm really tired so I ramble, forgive me. Another point is that if you really are trying to make a point of it trying to be classified as a group even though it isn't one in the classical sense, well category:Groups isn't the official indicator for what groups exist/ed in game, it's just a list of groups on the wiki. In that category, there are several nonexistant groups, wiki-centric groups and humorous groups. This is one of those. -- 17:21, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- There needs to be a smilie to convey the way I pinch the bridge of my nose when I'm frustrated. The stats page tallies up the entries into the "Group" field on in-game profiles, displaying groups with 10 or more active members (I'm not 100% on how it works since I counted ten tagged RDDs the other day but it explicitly states ten or more). The page None is a dummy page for use with various templates on the wiki, and none of the wiki pages will affect any game pages (with the one sole exception being that the stats page will auto-link to the wiki pages of listed groups if there are pages for them). Two things that do not mix, basically.
Various Crit 1's
Banana TacticsBravo company- Journal:Dorsalus
- New Radio Free Malton
- Saviors
- Vegan Zombie Barricade Adjustment Squad
-- Linkthewindow Talk 06:23, 18 July 2010 (BST)
- On second thoughts, Bravo Company isn't really a crit 1. Might take it to deletions. Linkthewindow Talk 06:26, 18 July 2010 (BST)
- We had banana tactics listed recently, a majority of people wanted it kept. 13:54, 18 July 2010 (BST)
- Alright. Consider it struck. Linkthewindow Talk 14:06, 18 July 2010 (BST)
- We had banana tactics listed recently, a majority of people wanted it kept.
I did the others, seemingly useless and abandoned. would loved to have done gaynana tactics. --
01:33, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- It was a tie last time, hardly a majority, Misanthorpy :P. Linkthewindow Talk 12:36, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- Well, technically not a majority at all. even less so considering Wan didn't specifically vote keep on it, Yon just assumed he did ;D -- 13:19, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- Fuck it. Linkthewindow Talk 14:29, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- More like fuck YEAH!! -- 14:49, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- Fuck it. Linkthewindow Talk 14:29, 19 July 2010 (BST)
- Well, technically not a majority at all. even less so considering Wan didn't specifically vote keep on it, Yon just assumed he did ;D -- 13:19, 19 July 2010 (BST)
Deletion
Delete me please. He doesn't need me anymore. He replaced me with another link. --TheBardofAwesome 03:40, 17 July 2010 (BST)
- Deleted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Red Hawk One (talk • contribs) 06:48, 17 July 2010.
Various crit 3's
Various pages that are now unused redirects as a result of the reorganization of the guides name space:
- A Survivor's Guide (really a crit 1, as Red Hawk wiped it for some reason)
- Bounty Hunter's Guide
- Anti siege strategy and Guides:Anti siege strategy (there are a couple of talk page comments linking to the former - I'm not going to edit out those, and they are all pre-2007 anyway.)
- Claw for Grasp, Bite for Threes
- DamagePerAction and DPA have been unused for a while. Damage Per Action is likely a search term, and is probably worth keeping.
- Getting Started as a Feral Zombie
Linkthewindow Talk 02:11, 16 July 2010 (BST)
- I call on the sysop team to channel Trogdor and burninate all of the above! --Maverick Talk - OBR
404 10:21, 16 July 2010 (BST)
- Destroyed the unlinked obvious one. Will look through what links here for the others first. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 11:07, 16 July 2010 (BST)
Keep on DPA, a likely search term, for example if referenced in game etc. --
11:28, 16 July 2010 (BST)
- In fact, I don't even know why DPA was moved to guides to begin with, I think it is better as a glossary item. Either way, I've done all of them sept DPA so far. -- 11:35, 16 July 2010 (BST)
- Fair enough. Linkthewindow Talk 11:36, 16 July 2010 (BST)
Crit 2(Possibly 1?)
like 15 views What is this useful for?-- Jerrel tlk (82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!). 03:54, 14 July 2010 (BST)
- The page is currently 50 minutes old and created by a new member. Its use appears to be as a guide for new zombie players, and as such, should be allowed a bit more time than less-than-an-hour to make it. Also it's not even remotely a crit two, and if you're wanting to apply crit one to it then perhaps A/SD is a crit one of A/D. I'm voting keep on this bad boy. 04:01, 14 July 2010 (BST)
- Shouldn't be a need, it isn't crit 1 and it definitely isn't crit 2. I would suggest moving it to the guides namespace though. -- 10:21, 14 July 2010 (BST)
- To A/MR! Linkthewindow Talk 15:46, 15 July 2010 (BST)
- Shouldn't be a need, it isn't crit 1 and it definitely isn't crit 2. I would suggest moving it to the guides namespace though. -- 10:21, 14 July 2010 (BST)
Crit 2
True, but irrelevant.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 00:38, 12 July 2010 (BST)
- It's now a group page. 00:45, 12 July 2010 (BST)
- One character doesn't make a group. And unless our "Holland Vs Spain" groupie makes it proper group page, this is looking like a pretty clear c.2. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 03:08, 12 July 2010 (BST)
- :( 03:13, 12 July 2010 (BST)
- So, ummm... Are you voting keep, or can we go ahead and delete this? ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 04:08, 12 July 2010 (BST)
- :(
- One character doesn't make a group. And unless our "Holland Vs Spain" groupie makes it proper group page, this is looking like a pretty clear c.2. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 03:08, 12 July 2010 (BST)
I took care of this, amnesia is a good precedent as is this, making one-man groups to allow vulgar wiki pages has even been vandalism in the past. I wouldn't go this far this time but ya, definitely deletable. --
08:11, 12 July 2010 (BST)
- I didn't even get to read any comments. Oh come on, you could at least waited for me! --Thadeous Oakley 10:58, 12 July 2010 (BST)
Suggestion:20081007 Suggestion Dupe change
Same as below. --
11:10, 10 July 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
19:21, 10 July 2010 (BST)Suggestion:20080804 Trenchcoat Solution
An oldie, but still a non-page. Crit 1 of the actual template. --
11:09, 10 July 2010 (BST)
|
EATEN |
19:21, 10 July 2010 (BST)Special:Unusedimages
Numbers 1-15. All unused. All older than a week. -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 20:01, 5 July 2010 (BST)
- The guidelines call for two weeks. Regardless, the ones that fit are deleted. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 20:03, 5 July 2010 (BST)
Good Article Nominees
Crit 4,... will this be uses at all? -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 04:50, 2 July 2010 (BST)
- Keep. Yes, yes it will. -- 05:30, 2 July 2010 (BST)
- This category, like Category:Recently Closed Suggestions, is a utility category that is automatically applied to any pages up for GA nomination. It won't be used often, but it is used. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 06:19, 2 July 2010 (BST)
Archives
|
Speedy Deletions Archive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
