UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 06

Shortcut:
A/PT

This page is for the request of page protection within the Urban Dead wiki. Due to philosophical concerns, the ability to protect pages is restricted to system operators. As such, regular users will need to request a protection from the system operators. For consistency and accountability, system operators also adhere to the guidelines listed here.

Guidelines for Protection Requests

All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

• A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
• A reason for protection. This should be short and to the point.
• A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

Any protection request that does not contain these three pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

Once the protection request has been entered, the request shall remain on this page, where it will be reviewed by a member of the Sysop team, and action taken accordingly. Once action has been taken, the system operator will add a comment including a signed datestamp detailing his course of action, and the request will be moved into the Recent Actions queue, where it will remain for one week. After that week is up, it may be moved to the archive (see navigation box below). If the Protection has been granted, the system operator should place the tag {{protect}} on the page(s) that have been protected.

In the event of a system operator requesting a Protection, all the previous points will apply, excepting that a system operator other than the requestor shall review and take action on the request.

Pages in the Protection Queue may already be scheduled protections. For a list of scheduled protections, see here.

e Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Protection Queue

Suggestion:20101203 New Zombie Tip

Scheduled. —Aichon— 08:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Requested Edits

Place pages requiring editing here.

Recent Actions

Battle of Krinks

Unprotected as 6 months has passed. See UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Iscariot_vs_Cornholioo --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 10:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Lol. I bet you put it in your reminder 6 months ago. Loser :D -- LEMON #1 11:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Hey Aichon, not me. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 12:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Rosslessness_vs_Poodle_of_Doom

This case has been withdrawn and should now be protected. Oh, and Ross, next time when you move it (the case) under "Recently Concluded Cases" you should archive it like I just did and just place a link instead of copy/pasting the entire case. --(Thad)eous Oakley ^Talk 10:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

I didn't copy and paste the case you fool. I cut and pasted the header. Much easier. Plus when I archived the case I would have done this. I didn't archive the case as it had only just ended and wanted to see if anyone else involved wanted to comment so I neither archived or protected it. Any more back seat modding you want to do? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

(I missed reading this part up until now)/ Why do you take so much offense at this, when I merely pointed out some silly mistake, and you immediately lash out at me? --(Thad)eous Oakley ^Talk 15:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh snap! And done. -- LEMON #1 10:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, it is standard procedure to do so and not just on A/A. Looking at the history it also isn't the first time he improperly archived a case. Not that it's that much of a big deal, but eh. --(Thad)eous Oakley ^Talk 11:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and "All Protection Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

• A link to the page in question. Preferably bolded for visibility. "

Its standard procedure. You should probably do it. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Let me set a few things straight right now. 1: It's only mandatory on A/A not A/PM. Once A/PM is cycled, leaving it at the bottom for feedback is fine, been done for years besides the odd insta-archive that's done lately. 2. Yes, Ross, that means you generally insta archive on A/A so I agree with Thad's initial statement at the top. 3. Thad initially did add a link to the page, but no header. In the interests of just keeping the archive clean I changed the internal link brackets into lvlthree header code because since the request had already been filed there wasn't a need for the link to be there (in reality I just didn't really think of putting the header AROUND the link code :|) so that wasn't his fault, more mine. -- LEMON #1 14:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

My god, you're fallible. Thats even better. Besides, I'm going to keep doing it my way, because in my mind, its better. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 14:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Your joking right? --(Thad)eous Oakley ^Talk 14:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Whatever floats your boat. not worth arguing over though personally I think Mistergame wasn't wrong in his initial statement. -- LEMON #1 15:19, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

I was only pointing out that you misarchived some stuff, sorry if I came off a bit dickish. It's just that after you reverted my earlier edit, and moved it under the "concluded case" header I was like "Well if he does that, he might as well archive it correctly". --(Thad)eous Oakley ^Talk 14:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

I simply want poodle et al to have a quick read through. Personally If I archive and protect a case I brought, that seems a bit dickish. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 15:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Axe Hack/Sandbox

Needs unprotecting. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 21:30, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

DONE --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:33, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Dezonus

Obvious protection need is obvious. -- Spiderzed▋ 12:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Done --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Just moving some things...

• User:Axe Hack/Archive3
• User:Axe Hack/Archive 4
• User:Axe Hack/Archive 5

I'm moving stuff in 4 to 3 to keep with the yearly fashion so 2008 won't be split in two, while 5 will be moved back by one because I like my archives to be sorted and numbered right. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 21:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

unprotected by Ross, make sure come back once you're finished. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 23:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

While we're here, do you want number 3 moved so that there's a space in the title, like the others?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 23:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

It doesn't quite matter if there's spaces or not. 2 doesn't have spaces. And while we're here, reprotect 3 and 4, but leave 5 until I archive for December 2010. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

done. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 23:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Scheduled Stuff

• UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 11
• UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Archive/November-2010
• UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 11
• UDWiki:Administration/Move Requests/Archive/Nov 2010

Someone get to 'em, please. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 08:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 11 too. —Aichon— 09:14, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

As well as UDWiki:Administration/Bureaucrat Promotions/April 2010. Linkthewindow  Talk  10:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Done Thanks former and future sops. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 11:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Bureaucrat Promotions/October 2010

Needs {{CratPromoArchive}} at the top. Linkthewindow  Talk  10:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Added --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 11:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Protections Scheduling Queue

Protection Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like deletion scheduling requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Valid votes are:

• Yea - Approval of Schedule Request
• Nay - Disapproval of Schedule Request

Note: The archive for Scheduled Protections can be found here.