UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2010/August

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019



Combat 18

I'm here to propose that since Cornholioo has been breaching his ban (at least) once by making a fake account solely to maintain his group page, I propose we protect this page and its talk as pages that have been recently attacked by vandalism, as long as Cornholioo remains banned. This way there will be no incentive for him to breach his ban any longer, and the drama surrounding these suspicious accounts can cease. Thoughts? -- 13:39, 24 August 2010 (BST)
Sounds like a plan. I'd actually be for wiping them off the face of the wiki but free speech and all that, I suppose. -- Cheese 13:45, 24 August 2010 (BST)
Three sysops is enough for me. Protected main page and talk. Anything else?--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 17:56, 24 August 2010 (BST)
That should be fine I think. -- LEMON #1 11:54, 25 August 2010 (BST)
Nice signature, btw.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 11:56, 25 August 2010 (BST)

Redirects

This, and this. They exist, because typing the symbol is impossable... - Poodle of Doom 03:57, 20 August 2010 (BST)

It's actually not but whatever. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 03:58, 20 August 2010 (BST)
Really, because I've always copied and pasted.... - Poodle of Doom 03:59, 20 August 2010 (BST)

Dealt with by DDR... - Poodle of Doom 04:01, 20 August 2010 (BST)

I would have been able to say it myself if you hadn't edit conflicted me twice, gahhhhhh. Just a friendly suggestion to not overuse this redirect over the direct link to the group in the future, after what happened last time. -- 04:04, 20 August 2010 (BST)
BTW, [1] -- 04:05, 20 August 2010 (BST)
Why, you going to change your group name to Infinity? - Poodle of Doom 04:16, 20 August 2010 (BST)
I might, if you keep posting these needless A/PT requests. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 04:17, 20 August 2010 (BST)
Seriously. I'm of a mind to start denying them on the grounds that there isn't good reason for protection, given that there is no history of vandalism ever happening to them, nor is there a need to protect them from vandalism any more than any other group pages. Aichon 05:27, 20 August 2010 (BST)
And why not? I just went through the motions because we've done it in the past, but if you unprotect these on that basis I'll support your decision, since it's completely right. -- 05:37, 20 August 2010 (BST)
Isn't worth the effort to unprotect them for me, but going forward I won't be supporting any more protections on this basis. The precedent we've had in place is incorrect, as you point out, and it's time we start doing it properly again. Aichon 06:04, 20 August 2010 (BST)
Lol! Nah. When you edit conflicted me, I was going to post a joke saying that I would, but I won't obviously, I love being a lemon. But it could happen, is all I'm saying -- 04:22, 20 August 2010 (BST)

EVIL

And with all this umbrella stuff going on, what a great time to want this lodged.

Whether this is fulfilled or not I'd like to ask to have this unprotected so I can work on having it as a disambig page for both Extremely Vengeful and Irksome Laymen and Every Villain Is Lemons please, the latter of which has finally become confirmed by me and my friends as a group that will be going for a fair term.

For the record and also for consideration I'll probably add Evil Avatar, probably Legion of Evil and also, under wiki groups, Project Evil. -- 15:32, 13 August 2010 (BST)
Done. Good luck with the incoming links. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 15:37, 13 August 2010 (BST)
You may want to do the talk page as well - it's still protected and acting as a redirect. --Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 15:46, 13 August 2010 (BST)
Twill be a pain, but with having this luxury comes a price I'm willing to pay -- 15:49, 13 August 2010 (BST)

LOO Rangers

This thing is pissing me off. Protect it before I start an arby or have an aneurysm. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 02:02, 13 August 2010 (BST)

Done. We'll give it awhile to cool down, then take it off. Aichon 02:10, 13 August 2010 (BST)
Meant to unprotect it days ago, but simply forgot. Anyway, unprotected once again, though it has since been moved into his userspace. Aichon 09:06, 21 August 2010 (BST)

umbrella

Hi, I'd like my New Group to be added to Umbrella. Thanks! --Haliman - Talk 04:26, 12 August 2010 (BST)

Dun -- 05:41, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Rephrased a bit. Aichon 05:48, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Your Umbrella overlords are pleased. --Haliman - Talk 05:54, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Thanks. You did a much better job than I could manage. -- 06:02, 12 August 2010 (BST)

Got another one here...

Another one,... - Poodle of Doom 02:43, 12 August 2010 (BST)

'tected -- boxy talkteh rulz 02:50 12 August 2010 (BST)

Another Talk Page

Thanks! - Poodle of Doom 01:27, 12 August 2010 (BST)

DDR got it -- boxy talkteh rulz 02:37 12 August 2010 (BST)

Template:1

This won't need to be changed at all.... - Poodle of Doom 00:56, 12 August 2010 (BST)

Protected by DDR. Could have just used {{C}} -- boxy talkteh rulz 02:36 12 August 2010 (BST)

My pages

Mainly my talk page. I don't know if I'm going to be around for a while,... - Poodle of Doom 03:11, 10 August 2010 (BST)

Is it all of them or just your talk page? Because there's a big difference. Aichon 03:17, 10 August 2010 (BST)
Okay, so just the talk space? As in, all of your talk pages? Also, see this. Same idea applies here. Inactivity first, and then we'll honor the request. Aichon 03:36, 10 August 2010 (BST)
That's not the norm though, Aichon. I can't very well ask for protection if I'm inactive, first of all. Second of all,... when I asked for my guide to be protected, it was protected before I left... not after. - Poodle of Doom 03:41, 10 August 2010 (BST)
The norm is usually not to protect non-banned users' talk pages anyway, though, which is how I would be inclined to act here as well. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 03:45, 10 August 2010 (BST)
Ban me again then.... perma ban this time please... - Poodle of Doom 04:04, 10 August 2010 (BST)
Wait,... scratch that. I've got something else. What if I could give you a good reason to protect his page.... - Poodle of Doom 04:06, 10 August 2010 (BST)
Does this reason also explain the inherent oddity in asking for a permaban and page protection? They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 04:09, 10 August 2010 (BST)
Just to point it out, you had already asked for protection. That was sufficient. All you had to do at that point was say, "Okay, bye", then stop posting, and one of us would have honored the request. As I said, "inactivity first, and then we'll honor the request". I was referring to this request, not some magical one you would have to make while inactive. It's really very simple and could have been done already... Aichon 05:46, 10 August 2010 (BST)
I was at uni watching this and it's strange that my post didn't go through, but it went along the lines of: I'm severely disinclined to see this request honoured. IMO your history of self-banning is akin to tolder sulks and your strange view of protections on certain pages is equally as odd, if I may say. Typically, we only protect the talk pages of users if they are going idle and they've had a long history of abuse and/or harassment. If you are going to have yourself perma'd again, I would honour the rules alongside it including protecting your pages, but while you're here I think you should be contactable. Also, the fact you seem willing to self ban again vexes me so. -- 06:35, 10 August 2010 (BST)
But, you withdrew this, so now I feel silly for rewriting this in present tense. -- 06:36, 10 August 2010 (BST)

Yet another talk page...

Thanks! - Poodle of Doom 22:26, 9 August 2010 (BST)

done.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 22:27, 9 August 2010 (BST)

Another Talk Page

Thanks! - Poodle of Doom 19:18, 8 August 2010 (BST)

done.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2 22:27, 9 August 2010 (BST)

Another Archive...

Is ready to go,... - Poodle of Doom 17:19, 8 August 2010 (BST)

Protected ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 18:36, 8 August 2010 (BST)

Group Image, and Talk Page

This Image, and its talk page. - Poodle of Doom 17:24, 8 August 2010 (BST)

Protected ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 18:36, 8 August 2010 (BST)

Another Talk Page

Here it is.... - Poodle of Doom 13:32, 5 August 2010 (BST)

Done --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 13:36, 5 August 2010 (BST)

Template:Vndl

Any chance we could re-add a link to the relevant section on the VB talk page? Linkthewindow  Talk  11:38, 5 August 2010 (BST)

Done -- boxy talkteh rulz 12:16 5 August 2010 (BST)
Lol, I sure would like to throw some cases down a field like a discus, wouldn't I boxy ;D -- 13:46, 5 August 2010 (BST)
Put the vndl 20 metres out, and if half the sysops hit with the discus, it's vandalism :p -- boxy talkteh rulz 14:49 5 August 2010 (BST)

Old Malton Manhunt Events

I highly doubt these old Manhunt events will be edited any further. Perhaps a protection to ensure safety from vandalism? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:24, 5 August 2010 (BST)

But... these are my pages ;_; I was gonna add some changes to them including a useful template with timeline and shit but no worry, I'll just edit them anyway : D -- 03:06, 5 August 2010 (BST)
Technically, only 2 of the 5 concluded Manhunt events are yours. The other three are mine, in case you didn't notice the name "Axe Hack" in them. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:29, 5 August 2010 (BST)
I will arbie you for the right of ownership motherfuckaaaa -- 14:37, 5 August 2010 (BST)

Guess

Guess what this is? - Poodle of Doom 22:59, 4 August 2010 (BST)

Hard to say. Could be admin page spam, since it lacks a reason for a protection. Aichon 00:26, 5 August 2010 (BST)
I'll cite precedent. That being the reason, and what I'll argue later,... because you never bothered to bring it up before. - Poodle of Doom 01:27, 5 August 2010 (BST)
Aww, you're getting all serious about it. Anyway, done. Aichon 01:46, 5 August 2010 (BST)

Another Talk Page

I hope you don't mind! - Poodle of Doom 04:55, 4 August 2010 (BST)

Done. Aichon 05:30, 4 August 2010 (BST)

Sig

User:Fanglord2/sig

Please trade out current code for code below as I'm updating my signature.

[[Image:Umbrella-Turn.gif]][[Umbrella Corporation|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color:">'''President''']] [[Image:Umbrella-Turn.gif]] [[User:fanglord2|<span style= "color:maroon; background-color:">'''Fanglord''']][[Image:Umbrella-Turn.gif]]</span>

--Chairman Fanglord, 22:26, 3 August 2010 (BST)

That code is actually in violation of sig policy, I'm afraid, as the images are too large. I had a look at the correct size for them, which would require a width of 13px to be contained within the 14px height limit, and it seemed very very shrunk. I'll change it if you want me to but I don't think you'll like it when it's resized down. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 22:36, 3 August 2010 (BST)
Hmmm... Well then I'll keep it simple.

[[Umbrella Corporation|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color:">'''President''']] [[User:fanglord2|<span style= "color:maroon; background-color:">'''Fanglord''']]</span>

--Chairman Fanglord, 23:01, 3 August 2010 (BST)

Done. Made a minor edit by closing the span tags inside the link brackets just to avoid any possible hiccups when it's used. You have code for a background colour in there without a colour specified, do you want a colour added or not? They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 23:07, 3 August 2010 (BST)

Another Talk Page

One More... - Poodle of Doom 20:35, 1 August 2010 (BST)

Done.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:36, 1 August 2010 (BST)

Four More EVIL Items

One, Two, 3, 4.... - Poodle of Doom 18:30, 1 August 2010 (BST)

done.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:45, 1 August 2010 (BST)

Our Latest Endeavor

Look, it's not a talk page.... - Poodle of Doom 04:27, 1 August 2010 (BST)

Done. Aichon 04:57, 1 August 2010 (BST)

But this is

... - Poodle of Doom 04:27, 1 August 2010 (BST)

Done. Aichon 04:57, 1 August 2010 (BST)
Personal tools
advertisements