UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2006/May

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Protections Archive

2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019



Template:Navigation

Edit war should be protected until the issue is resolved.--The General W! Mod 17:58, 26 May 2006 (BST)

Protected. --Brizth mod T W! 18:02, 26 May 2006 (BST)

Wikigate

These pages should be reverted to whatever they looked like until May 10th 14h GMT, and then protected. Firther discussion on this cases are to be made in their talk pages. And only arbitrators (and moderators) not involved in any of these cases are allowed to comment about these cases. --hagnat mod 21:44, 10 May 2006 (BST)

The Amazing vs ASS case has been resolved, but due to the arbitrator posting late it ruling was later then 14h gmt I don't feel it should be in here, but moved to the solved cases.--Vista W! 22:22, 10 May 2006 (BST) BTW why is it needed to protect them? can't we simply revert them? any further edits will be extremely noticable.--Vista W! 22:27, 10 May 2006 (BST)
From bitter experience we should know that these cases will turn into an edit war. It's safest to protect them now.--The General W! Mod 22:36, 10 May 2006 (BST)

Protected except for the Amazing vs Ass case.

UDWiki:Moderation/Policy Discussion/Amazing

Voting has ended. In it's current form it is just breeding more controversy.--The General W! Mod 20:39, 10 May 2006 (BST)

protected--Vista W! 22:30, 10 May 2006 (BST)

Old Suggestions Pages

There are plenty more where that came from, I'm sure of it. –Xoid STFU! 14:48, 3 May 2006 (BST)

Have all the relevant suggestions been moved to peer reviewed?--Vista W! 15:18, 3 May 2006 (BST)
er… considering they aren't already protected I'd take a punt and say "probably not". I'm far from certain on that, thought. –Xoid STFU! 16:39, 3 May 2006 (BST)
protecting them would make moving them very hard... and seeing they've been unprotected for so long, waiting a bit longer won't matter. --Vista W! 18:05, 3 May 2006 (BST)

I am slowely protecting old pages but I am trying to make sure that they are tallied before I protect them and it takes time for me to tally them. If someone could get them tallied then i'll protect them immediately.--The General W! Mod 21:27, 4 May 2006 (BST)

I may have some free time this weekend.--Vista W! 21:50, 4 May 2006 (BST)
Weekend? HA! My shining moment is here at last! - Velkrin 18:59, 18 May 2006 (BST) Edit: Or not, I can't edit the pages. 19:00, 18 May 2006 (BST) Edit 2: Alright, I can't edit the 6th, but I can edit the other ones. Doing tallies. Redoing some tallies because some people voted after the deadline. So full of hate. 19:30, 18 May 2006 (BST) Edit 3 - Right, realized that I didn't compare the end dates to the other month's I tallied (re: March, part of February & April). Sanity gone. Done up to the 11th of Jan. Vista: Watch out for votes from Mr NoName, he likes to vote late. Velkrin 19:46, 18 May 2006 (BST)
The 6th has been protected because I moved the suggestions on it.--The General W! Mod 19:55, 18 May 2006 (BST)

Moderation/Policy Discussion/Amazing

Voting has ended. In it's current form it is just breeding more controversy.--The General W! Mod 20:39, 10 May 2006 (BST)

protected. --Vista W! 21:23, 10 May 2006 (BST)

Personal tools
advertisements