Suggestion:20080219 Fire effects

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Nospam.gif Spam!
This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 0 keep, 2 kill, and 9 spam votes.



Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20080219 Fire effects

Piker rifl 06:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion type
Add to molotov and flamethower/Item

Suggestion scope
Side effects of using weapons that involve fire

Suggestion description
After reading one of the suggestion pages it looked like Molotov cocktails and flamethrowers might be added, so if they did it might be a good idea for this Using one of those weapons inside a building should have a risk (a low risk for balancing) like around 5% of catching the building on fire it wouldn't burn down immediately and there would be a chance that the fire would burn it self out like a 25% chance and you could add a new item to the game like a fire extinguisher to help put out fires so people cant run around burning buildings down and it wouldn't burn the building down it would just turn it into ruins


Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes


Kill Votes

  1. Kill - as spam voters--CorndogheroT-S-Z 16:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Kill - As spammers. Not just no, but hell no.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  18:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Incomplete suggestion (and possibly a dupe), but take it to Talk:Suggestions if you're set on developing this. --PdeqTalk* 07:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Do not link suggestions that aren't in the game - Please read the Dos and Do Nots. Linking to suggestions that haven't been implemented = big no no + mountain of spam votes. -- Cheese 10:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Incomplete – As Pdeq said, take it to Talk:Suggestions. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 10:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Incomplete; irrelevant; Spam- As above.-Studoku 11:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Spam & Dupe, if it ever comes to that, of the Peer Reviewed Suggestions: Random Building Fire & Fire!. Plus, what they all said. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 12:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Spam - Suggestions shouldn't be based off of other suggestions.--Karekmaps?! 13:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. No linking suggestions. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Do not link suggestions that aren't in the game as Cheeseman --~~~~ [talk] 16:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  9. Spam - I have this business idea to sell a ricer mod to a car that was never made... --Pgunn 18:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)