Supply Crates
- July 7, 2008
- Found a/the supply crate in Pennville [[1]] just after being zombified by a known PKer named Almighty Guru. Proof - [2] his profile - [3]
Keeping with my new zombie persona - I smashed it! Sorry!! it felt bad.... yet at the same time, really good... in a strange, delinquent way. --Jordan russell 13:03, 7 July 2008 (BST)
Ratio of zombies to survivors
So,anyone thinking zombies have a huge advantage now over survivors (check gamestats if you don't know what I am talking about)and it's time for survivors to get a leg up again? - Tre4 23:21, 12 March 2008
- i don't think its so much to do with that game change as it was the mass immigration of the group the Dead, brining well over 1000 zombies into the game is bound to make the stats a little wacky. but the thing is ive seen big groups like this come and go in the past and when this one leaves like all the others before it will be the rest of us left just the way we were. to add a new survivor buff would just make zombies have a grievance once they go and the numbers return to normal.--Bullgod 05:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Not just the Dead, but also Second Big Bash. Read what Sweirs said about it here --~~~~ [talk] 07:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Standing Survivors : 10965 (39%)
- Standing Zombies : 16824 (61%)
- Not exactly looking even really, is it. Since being practically unable to re-barricade if a building is breached, survivors are FUBARd. If Kevan doesn't do something to even it out soon, there's going to be no point in playing for anyone. -- Crystal C-Kids
- Stop whining and try to barricade more than twice. From my research, the chance of zombies preventing barricading is somewhere around 50%. That means the cost of re-barricading is about double of normal and that's pretty far from "practically unable to re-barricade". --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 13:01, 15 April 2008 (BST)
recruitment?
Souldn't recruitment ads be thrown away from here? --~~~~T''' 18:05, 21 August 2007 (BST)
- I absolutely agree. There's already a page for that sort of thing. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 20:20, 21 August 2007 (BST)
Creedy
Why is Creedy the only things that is a current event? No one cares about Creedy any more. --Sonny Corleone RRF CoL DORIS CRF pr0n 01:42, 6 August 2007 (BST)
- Apparently, some member(s) of the Medics of Malton care about Creedy. I'm kind of unsure why though...oh well. A cause is a good thing to have. --Pedentic 21:09, 8 August 2007 (BST)
- It's been ruined. ----Secruss|Yak|Brahnz!|CGR|PKA||EMLN|Templates|RRF|RFTM|Crap|WHOZ||MU|GN|C2008||20:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
stuff
I didn't notice -_- (and signs it like a good UDWikipedian) - Jedaz 14:23, 4 April 2006 (BST)
- Didn't notice what? --SirensT RR 14:42, 4 April 2006 (BST)
What's this page supposed to be, exactly? --Punchkin 05:22, 6 May 2006 (BST)
- When I made my first edit, I figured it would be a page for major projects going on in the wiki or the game, but there's already a place for things in the game. Now it seems to be a place for whatever hoo-hah someone feels like tossing in. --SirensT RR 05:31, 6 May 2006 (BST)
Current Events Restrictions
I feel the Wiki current events page should be limited to wiki business alone. I we're going to include Urban Dead events, I don't believe events that are limited to a single location, or particularly short lived, should be allowed on the "Current Events" page. If we are to allow such things, than every yahoo with an account is going to be saying, "Our stronghold is under attack! HELP!!!!111". Anyone else agree/disagree/have something to add? --SirensT RR 19:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Yeah good idea, and besides yelling the forts being taken over! will just let more zeds know there's a fort they can capture... -YU 337
Random thought, but you're probably ALWAYS going to have some chucklebutt coming in and saying, 'But dis iz currants to meez!', so how about a separate "in-game" current events page? I don't know about what would qualify making that list, but it can be hashed out if/once such a page is established. Any thoughts? --Slightly Lions 12:05, 21 September 2007 (BST)
- Sorry but i fail to understand what problem you find with this page. It is actually hardly maintained as it is now, not to talk about counter-actions for its overspamming --~~~~ [talk] 16:50, 21 September 2007 (BST)
- I never said I "had a problem with it," your words not mine, just trying to offer some useful suggestions. If we can give players a place to submit what could be considered current events, we might get more activity on the wiki with people interested in maintaining pages about what's going on. Also, there'd be no excuse for trying to put in-game stuff on the non-game current events page/section, or vice versa. All a sysop would have to do is point right to the correct spot and/or move it themself. 0 Arguments. If this is still not wanted, fine--forget I mentioned it. --Slightly Lions 12:04, 23 September 2007 (BST)
- This page is for in-game stuff... --~~~~ [talk] 14:08, 23 September 2007 (BST)
- *Cough, cough* Uhh...*Clears throat* Yeah, of course it is. I knew that. I knew it the whole time... This conversation never happened! --Slightly Lions 17:15, 23 September 2007 (BST)
new layout
this page needs desperately a new layout and some content to be added to it (content based on our un-documented history of events). Anyone up for the task ? --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 20:48, 28 June 2007 (BST)
Does anyone ever update this place anymore? Just wondering... --Pedentic 20:47, 28 June 2007 (BST)
- i put it on the sidebar so people might use it. Now that we have the historical events category, i think it might be used a little more. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 20:53, 28 June 2007 (BST)
The new layout presented. -- /// goebiTalkHelp/LFS/SR/NT/MWP /// 16:11, 1 July 2007 (BST)
- Great job. Thank you. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 18:04, 1 July 2007 (BST)
- Gaaah! Why can't we keep the articles for content! --Daranz.t.
mod janitor.W(M)^∞. 22:21, 2 July 2007 (BST}
advertising future events
It might develop in an edit war, so should be talked through here. In my opinion it is reasonable and correct to advertise future events (in particular 5th of November) here. However rules section says about first day of occurrence. Should this be changed? --~~~~ [talk] 18:15, 9 October 2007 (BST)
Zombie Crisis
We've got zombies all over Malton! They took me and acouple of my men out and now I' am heading to Spicer Hills.
We must find a way to take control of the zombie population, does anyone know of a way to do so?
-- Soldier 20:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- suck it up breather, im not going to show any pity till its down to 20%, and even then not much. for now we zombies rule Malton.--Bullgod 20:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Surely you should show no pity whatsoever? I certainly won't.--Drawde Talk To Me! DORIS Яed Яum Defend Ridleybonk! I know Nothing! 23:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- by "pity" i mean "try not to hunt into extinction". would get boring with nothing to hunt.--Bullgod 07:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- True dat.--Drawde Talk To Me! DORIS Яed Яum Defend Ridleybonk! I know Nothing! 16:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Caiger Mall
HEY! What about Caiger Mall getting taken back by the DHPD that's important right? --Ltpotter 21:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
|